:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣快閃政治--新媒體、政黨與社會運動
書刊名:臺灣民主季刊
作者:林澤民蘇彥斌
作者(外文):Lin, Tse-minSu, Yen-pin
出版日期:2015
卷期:12:2
頁次:頁123-159
主題關鍵詞:新媒體政黨社會運動囚徒困局協調賽局太陽花運動New mediaPolitical partiesSocial movementsPrisoner's dilemmaCoordination gameSunflower Movement
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(8) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:8
  • 共同引用共同引用:55
  • 點閱點閱:82
本文探討新媒體對於社會運動的影響,主張近年來的社會運動已呈現出「快閃政治」(flash-mob politics)的型態。具體而言,快閃政治中的社會運動組織者與參與者,主要以行動電話與網際網路作為動員媒介,可在極短時問內擴大參與者的規模,有助於克服集體行動理論中的「白搭」問題(free-riderproblem),把集體行動從多人「囚徒困局」(Prisoner's Dilemma)變成為多人「協調賽局」(Coordination Game)。本文利用跨國的數據資料以及台灣的數據資料分別進行統計實證分析,同時也對於2014年的太陽花學運進行案例研究。我們發現,當行動電話和網際網路的使用率愈高,對於社會抗議的動員會產生顯著的推動效果。最後,本文認為快閃政治會催生出新的政治力量、使政府與政黨更加重視新媒體在政治動員中的角色,同時也將加速傳統政黨政治的式微,促使政治參與轉變成一種「馬上辦政治」(politicsondemand)。
This article examines the effects of new media on social movements. We propose the concept of "flash-mob politics" to describe and analyze recent social movements. In flash-mob politics, political activists rely on new media that is widely accessible on mobile and internet-based devices to mobilize large-scale participation in a short period of time. The use of new media helps overcome the free-rider problem by transforming the Prisoner's Dilemma into a coordination game, which facilitates collective action. We use a multi-method research design to investigate the effects of cellphone/internet usage on the frequency of collective action: a cross-national analysis, a Taiwan-specific time-series analysis, and a case study. Our event count analysis of cross-national data (2000-2004) shows clear positive effects of cellphone usage, and our event count time-series analysis of quarterly Taiwan data (1996-2008) shows even clearer positive effects of both cellphone and internet usage. Our case study of the recent Sunflower Movement complements our quantitative analyses. We conclude that new media and flash-mob politics lead to the emergence of new political forces, speed up the decline of traditional party politics, and catalyze a new form of political participation that we call "politics on demand."
期刊論文
1.Kuzio, Taras(200609)。Civil Society, Youth and Societal Mobilization in Democratic Revolutions。Communist and Post-Communist Studies,39(3),365-386。  new window
2.Jenkins, J. Craig、Jacobs, David、Agnone, Jon(200309)。Political Opportunities and African-American Protest, 1948-1997。American Journal of Sociology,109(2),277-303。  new window
3.Whiteley, Paul(2010)。Is the Party Over? The Decline of Party Activism and Membership Across the Democratic World。Party Politics,17(1),21-44。  new window
4.Rohlinger, Deana A.、Brown, Jordan(2009)。Democracy, action, and the Internet after 9/11。American Behavioral Scientist,53(1),133-150。  new window
5.Ho, Ming-sho(2005)。Taiwan's State and Social Movements under the DPP Government (2000-2004)。Journal of East Asian Studies,5(3),401-425。  new window
6.Jenkins, J. Craig(1983)。Resource Mobilization Theory and the Study of Social Movements。Annual Review of Sociology,9,527-553。  new window
7.陳順孝(20120100)。網路社會動員的繼往開來:反國光石化運動的社會科技基礎和行動策略演化。傳播研究與實踐,2(1),19-34。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.朱雲漢(2014)。台灣離民主崩壞還有多遠。天下雜誌,544,107。  延伸查詢new window
9.West, Joel、Michael Mace(2010)。Browsing as the Killer App: Explaining the Rapid Success of Apple's Iphone。Telecommunications Policy,34(5/6),270-286。  new window
10.Wattenberg, Martin P.(1982)。From Parties to Candidates: Examining the Role of the Media。Public Opinion Quarterly,46(2),216-227。  new window
11.Veenstra, Aaron S.、Iyera, Narayanan、Hossainb, Mohammad Delwar、Park, Jiwoo(2014)。Time, Place, Technology: Twitter as an Information Source in the Wisconsin Labor Protests。Computers in Human Behavior,31,65-72。  new window
12.Su, Yen-pin(2015)。Anti-Government Protests in Democracies: A Test of Institutional Explanations。Comparative Politics,47(2),149-167。  new window
13.Schwartz, Joel、Spix, Claudia、Touloumi, Giota、Bachárová, Ljuba、Barumamdzadeh, Tomasz、Pönkä, Antti、le Tertre, Alain、Piekarksi, Tomasz、Rossi, Giuseppe、Saez, Marc、de Leon, Antonio Ponce、Schouten, Jan P.(1996)。Methodological Issues in Studies of Air Pollution and Daily Counts of Deaths or Hospital Admissions。Journal of Epidemiology & Community Healthy,50(S1),3-11。  new window
14.Rafael, Vicente L.(2003)。The Cell Phone and the Crowd: Messianic Politics in the Contemporary Philippines。Public Culture,15(3),399-425。  new window
15.Nam, Taehyun(2006)。What You Use Matters: Coding Protest Data。PS: Political Science and Politics,39(2),281-287。  new window
16.Larson, Jeff A.、Soule, Sarah(2009)。Sector-Level Dynamics and Collective Action in the United States, 1965-1915。Mobilization,14(3),293-314。  new window
17.Katsouyanni, Klea、Schwartz, Joel、Spix, Claudia、Zanobetti, Antonella、Touloumi, Giota、Zmirou, Denis、Wojtyniak, Bogdan(1996)。Short Term Effects of Air Pollution on Health: A European Approach Using Epidemiologic Time Series Data: The APHEA。Journal of Epidemiology & Community Healthy Suppl,50(1),12-18。  new window
18.Gibson, Rachel K.、Lusoli, Wainer、Ward, Stephen(2005)。Online Participation in the UK: Testing at Contextualised, Model of Internet Effects。British Journal of Politics & International Relations,7(4),561-583。  new window
19.Gaby, Sarah、Caren, Neal(2012)。Occupy Online: How Cute Old Men and Malcolm X Recruited 400,000 US Users to OWS on Facebook。Social Movement Studies,11(3/4),367-374。  new window
20.DeLuca, Kevin M.、Lawson, Sean、Sun, Ye(2012)。Occupy Wall Street on the Public Screens of Social Media: The Many Framings of the Birth of a Protest Movement。Communication, Culture & Critique,5(4),483-509。  new window
21.D'Anieri, Paul(2006)。Explaining the Success and Failure of Post-Communist Revolutions。Communist and Post-Communist Studies,39(3),331-350。  new window
22.Castaneda, Ernesto(2012)。The Indignados of Spain: A Precedent to Occupy Wall Street。Social Movement Studies,11(3/4),309-319。  new window
23.Cardenal, Ana S.(2013)。Why Mobilize Support Online? The Paradox of Party Behaviour Online。Party Politics,19(1),83-103。  new window
24.Bellinger, Paul T.、Arce, Moises(2011)。Protest and Democracy in Latin America's Market Era。Political Research Quarterly,64(3),688-704。  new window
25.Arce, Moises、Bellinger, Paul T.(2007)。Low Intensity Democracy Revisited: The Effects of Economic Liberalization on Political Activity in Latin America。World Politics,60(1),97-121。  new window
26.Arce, Moisés(2010)。Parties and Social Protest in Latin America's Neoliberal Era。Party Politics,16(5),669-686。  new window
27.Anduiza, Eva、Cristancho, Camilo、Sabucedo, José M.(2014)。Mobilization through Online Social Networks: The Political Protest of the Indignados in Spain。Information, Communication & Society,17(6),750-764。  new window
28.Almeida, Paul(2012)。Subnational Opposition to Globalization。Social Forces,90(4),1051-1072。  new window
29.Tolbert, Caroline J.、McNeal, Ramona S.(2003)。Unraveling the Effects of the Internet on Political Participation?。Political Research Quarterly,56(2),175-185。  new window
30.Ho, Ming-sho(2003)。The Politics of Anti-Nuclear Protest in Taiwan: A Case of Party-Dependent Movement (1980-2000)。Modern Asian Studies,37(3),683-708。  new window
31.Bimber, Bruce(2001)。Information and Political Engagement in America: The Search for Effects of Information Technology at the Individual Level。Political Research Quarterly,54(1),53-67。  new window
32.吳介民(20021200)。解除克勞塞維茲的魔咒:分析當前社會改革運動的困境。臺灣社會學,4,159-198。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.Granovetter, Mark(1978)。Threshold models of collective behavior。American Journal of Sociology,83(6),1420-1443。  new window
34.蕭遠(20110900)。網際網路如何影響社會運動中的動員結構與組織型態?--以臺北野草莓學運為個案研究。臺灣民主季刊,8(3),45-85。new window  延伸查詢new window
35.Bargh, John A.、McKenna, Katelyn Y. A.(2004)。The Internet and social life。Annual Review of Psychology,55(1),573-590。  new window
36.何明修(2013)。公民運動與公民不服從--兩條晚近台灣社會運動的路線。新社會政策雙月刊,30,19-22。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Wu, Chin-en、Chu, Yun-han(2010)。The Dynamics of Social Protests During Taiwan's Democratic Consolidation。Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association,(會議日期: 20100902-20100905)。Washington, DC。  new window
2.Chen, Boyu、Liao, Dachi、Wu, Hsin-che、Hwang, San-yih(2014)。The Logic of Communitive Action: A Case Study of Taiwan's Sunflower Movement。2014 Internet, Politics and Policy (IPP) Conference,Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford (會議日期: 20140925-20140926)。  new window
圖書
1.Norris, Pippa(2008)。Driving Democracy: Do Power Sharing Institutions Work?。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Marshall, Monty G、Jaggers, K.(2010)。Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800-2010。College Park, MD:Center for International Development and Conflict Management, University of Maryland。  new window
3.Wattenberg, Martin P.(1998)。The Decline of American Political Parties, 1952-1996。Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press。  new window
4.Bennett, W. Lance、Segerberg, Alexandra(2013)。The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics。Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.Chong, Dennis(1991)。Collective Action and the Civil Rights Movement。University of Chicago Press。  new window
6.晏山農、羅惠雯、梁秋虹、江昺崙、小英教育基金會想想論壇(2015)。這不是太陽花學運--318運動全記錄。台北:允晨文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Raychaudhuri, Dipankar、Gerla, Mario(2013)。Emerging Wireless Technologies and the Future Mobile Internet。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
8.Howard, Philip N.、Hussain, Muzammil M.(2013)。Democracy's Fourth Wave?: Digital Media and the Arab Spring。Oxford University Press。  new window
9.Banks, Arthur S.、Wilson, Kenneth A.(2012)。Cross-National Time-Series Data Archive。Jerusalem, Israel:Databanks International。  new window
10.Anduiza, Eva、Jensen, Michael James、Jorba, Laia(2012)。Digital Media and Political Engagement Worldwide: A Comparative Study。Cambridge University Press。  new window
11.劉定綱(2014)。318佔領立法院--看見希望世代。台北:奇異果文創事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
12.Schelling, Thomas C.(1978)。Micromotives and Macrobehavior。New York, NY:W. W. Norton & Company。  new window
13.Rheingold, Howard(2002)。Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution。Cambridge, MA:Basic Books。  new window
14.Marwell, Gerald、Oliver, Pamela(1993)。The Critical Mass in Collective Action: A Micro-social Theory。Cambridge University Press。  new window
15.Bimber, B.、Davis, R.(2003)。Campaigning online: The Internet in U.S. elections。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
16.Banfield, Edward C.、Wilson, James Q.(1963)。City Politics。Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press。  new window
17.Howe, J.(2008)。Crowdsourcing: why the power of the crowd is driving the future of business。New York:McGraw-Hill:Crown Business。  new window
18.黃紀、王德育(2012)。質變數與受限依變數的迴歸分析。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
19.Powell, G.(1982)。Contemporary Democracies: Participation, Stability, and Violence。Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press。  new window
20.Olson, Mancur(1965)。The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups。New York:Mcgraw-Hill College。  new window
21.Long, J. Scott(1997)。Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables。Sage Publications。  new window
22.Bimber, Bruce(2003)。Information and American Democracy: Technology in the Evolution of Political Power。Cambridge University Press。  new window
23.Norris, Pippa、Bennett, W. L.、Entman, R. M.(2001)。Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide。Cambridge University Press。  new window
其他
1.陳怡如(2014)。學運雖然落幕新媒體才正要開始,http://www.bnext.com.tw/article/view/id/31781, 2014/04/10。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳婉琪(20140630)。誰來「學運」?太陽花學運靜坐參與者的基本人口圖象,https://twstreetcorner.org/2014/06/30/chenwanchi-2/。  延伸查詢new window
3.Hon, Alexander T. P.(2014)。太陽花學運的新媒體影響力,還是輸給了傳統媒體,http://www.thenewslens.com/post/35105/, 2014/09/29。  延伸查詢new window
4.Wu, Atticus(2014)。太陽花學運--科技創新應用總整理,https://gov.hackpad.com/luhVXDtMmWS, 2014/09/29。  延伸查詢new window
5.中央選舉委員會(2014)。立法委員選舉,http://db.cec.gov.tw/, 2014/09/20。  延伸查詢new window
6.內政部統計處(2014)。內政部統計通報,http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/stat/week/list.htm, 2014/9/20。  延伸查詢new window
7.方翊倩(2014)。服貿若過政院版?陳為廷:再攻總統府,http://www.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/article/new/20140408/375236, 2014/09/29。  延伸查詢new window
8.尤騰輝,黃翊琪(2014)。民調:逾半民眾手機上網看新聞,http://newtalk.tw/news/20I4/07/21/49404.html, 2014/09/29。  延伸查詢new window
9.行政院主計總處(2014)。社會指標統計表,http://www.stat.gov.tw/lp.asp?CtNode=538&CtUnit=375&BaseDSD=7&mp=4, 2014/9/25。  new window
10.行政院主計總處(2014)。總體統計資料庫,http://statdb.dgbas.gov.tw/pxweb/dialog/statfile9L.asp, 2014/09/25。  延伸查詢new window
11.宋小海(2015)。反亞投行,總統府前『快閃』,聲援者眾,行動意外延十小時,http://www.coolloud.org.tw/node/82005, 2015/04/01。  延伸查詢new window
12.李光儀(2015)。藍智庫,唐湘龍掌新媒體組,http://udn.com/news/story/6656/788288, 2015/03/31。  延伸查詢new window
13.吳燕玲(2013)。台灣來鴻:白衫軍的怒吼,http://www.bbc.co.uk/zhongwen/trad/taiwan_letters/2013/07/130725_twletter_white_shirts.shtm, 2014/09/29。  new window
14.何明修(2014)。如何理解太陽花學生運動,http://www.dppnff.tw/groupjdata.php?id=221&data=comment, 2014/09/29。  延伸查詢new window
15.林澤民(2014)。囚徒困局系列四--衝破囚徒困局的公民快閃政治,http://blog.udn.com/nilnimest/12340707, 2014/09/29。  延伸查詢new window
16.林澤民(2014)。囚徒困局系列三--學生與政府的「墨西哥對峙」僵局,http://blog.udn.com/nilnimest/11950762, 2014/09/29。  延伸查詢new window
17.林敬殷(20130804)。從鄉親到鄉民。  延伸查詢new window
18.林倖妃,鄧凱元(2014)。太陽花不潰散,靠什麼樣的組織力和動員力?,http://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5056813&page=1, 2014/09/29。  延伸查詢new window
19.卓冠齊,賴振元(2014)。指尖上的黑潮,學運新面貌,http://pnn.pts.org.tw/main/2014/04/03/, 2014/9/29。  延伸查詢new window
20.魚夫(2014)。太陽花革命裡打敗傳媒的一場戰爭,http://opinion.cw.com.tw/blog/profile/194/article/1168, 2014/09/29。  延伸查詢new window
21.徐志明(2005)。2004年第四季台灣行動上網觀測報告,http://www.fmd.org.tw/market_info.aspx?n_ID=6982, 2015/03/31。  延伸查詢new window
22.胡元輝(2014)。開發群眾資助的民主潛能--318占領國會運動的另一啓示,台灣媒體觀察教育基金會。,http://mediawatch.org.tw/node/4718, 2014/09/29。  延伸查詢new window
23.World Bank(2014)。World Development Indicators,http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators。  new window
24.Socha, Bailey,Eber-Schmid, Barbara(2014)。What is New Media? Defining New Media Isn't Easy,http://www.newmedia.org/what-is-new-media.html, 2014/09/01。  new window
25.U.S. Department of Health & Human Services(2012)。What is Using New Media?,https://www.aids.gov/using-new-media/new-media-basics, 2014/09/05。  new window
26.Mozur, Paul,Wong, Alan(2014)。Hong Kong Protesters Flock to Off-Grid Messaging App,http://sinosphere.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/09/29/hong-kong-protesters-flock-to-off-grid-messaging-app/, 2014/09/29。  new window
27.Nicholson, Judith A.(2005)。Flash! Mobs in the Age of Mobile Connectivity,http://six.fibreculturejournal.org/fcj-030-flash-mobs-in-the-age-of-mobile-connectivity/, 2014/09/29。  new window
28.King, Gary,Lowe, Will(2003)。10 Million International Dyadic Events,https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=hdl:1902.1/FYXLAWZRIA, 2014/09/29。  new window
29.Gilliam, Frank(2011)。Occupy: Flash Mob Politics or Social Movement?,http://frameblog.org/2011/10/09/occupy-flash-mob-politics-or-social-movement/, 2015/03/31。  new window
30.謝佳君(2014)。太陽花學運幕後推手系列報導4讓世界看見--陳瑞光主持正「譯」,http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/local/paper/767925, 2014/9/29。  延伸查詢new window
31.彭筱婷,呂伊萱(2014)。整個世界,都是我們的現場,台灣媒體觀察教育基金會。,http://mediawatch.org.tw/node/4716, 2014/09/29。  延伸查詢new window
32.資策會(2009)。台灣歷年經常上網人口統計,http://www.fmd.org.tw/0105/howmany/usage_1.asp, 2014/09/29。  延伸查詢new window
33.黃國昌(20140416)。太陽花學運的形成背景及其政治意涵,台北:臺灣大學。,http://simlightseeker.org/article/955, 2014/09/29。  延伸查詢new window
34.陳淑貞(2014)。世新調査:智慧型手機普及,帶動網路閱聽,http://www.peoplenews.tw/news/3bae6b39-5eb6-46ed-ba63-1579449c56e3, 2014/09/29。  延伸查詢new window
35.洪貞玲(2014)。太陽花綻放,青年世代的運動與媒體,台灣媒體觀察教育基金會。,http://mediawatch.org.tw/node/4717, 2014/09/29。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Wattenberg, Martin P.(2000)。The Decline of Party Mobilization。Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies。Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press。  new window
2.Monterde, Amau、Postill, John(2014)。Mobile Ensembles: The Uses of Mobile Phones for Social Protest by Spain's Indignados。The Routledge Companion to Mobile Media。New York:Routledge。  new window
3.Dalton, Russell J.、McAllister, Ian、Wattenberg, Martin P.(2000)。The Consequences of Partisan Dealignment。Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
4.張錦華(2015)。從太陽花運動談新媒體、新公民、新民主。我是公民也是媒體--太陽花與新媒體實踐。台北:大塊文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.廖達琪、陳柏宇(2013)。網路:政治邊陲者的動員工具--從iVoter參與者特質反思網路政治參與相關理論。網路民主--臺灣iVoter投票諮詢網站建置紀實。台北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
6.Prytula, Olena(2006)。The Ukrainian Media Rebellion。Revolution in Orange: The Origins of Ukraine's Democratic Breakthrough。Washington, D.C.:Carnegie Endowment for International Peace。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE