臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：防衛性民主的典範變遷：從民主鞏固理論與臺、西、韓三國規範比較出發
書刊名：國會月刊
作者：江廷振
作者(外文)：Jiang, Ting-jhen
出版日期：2015
卷期：43:8=508
頁次：頁35-66
主題關鍵詞：防衛性民主；戰鬥民主；典範變遷；政黨解散；民主鞏固；第三波民主化；臺灣；西班牙；韓國；Militant democracy；Paradigm shift；Dissolution of political parties；Democratic consolidation；Third wave of democratization；Taiwan；Spain；Korea；South Korea
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:55
  • 點閱點閱:42
有鑑於共產政權垮臺、冷戰終結與第三波民主化的趨勢，使得當代防衛性民主在各國有不同的演進與興起，本文試圖從民主鞏固理論出發，比較防衛性民主與民主鞏固理論間的關連，試圖得出防衛性民主典範變遷的成因，並且從臺灣、西班牙、韓國三國的法制面介紹、分析與比較，進一步對照此種變遷現象，並試圖深省臺灣防衛性民主的不足。研究結論認為，當代防衛性民主的各國運作情形，有轉向保障基本權利的趨勢，並且為了符合各國特殊的民主鞏固需求，而與各國自身的歷史、文化因素與政經環境脈絡有關。為了契合民主鞏固與防衛民主的需求，臺灣政黨解散制度施行以及應用上不符當今臺灣的現狀，應檢討改進。
Due to the rises of the evolving concept of militant democracy, the dissolution of the Soviet Union, and the third wave of democratization in contemporary world, this article compares the theory of militant democracy and the theory of democratic consolidation, and aims to discover the causes and theoretical foundation of the paradigm shift of militant democracy. This article takes the legal mechanism of “new militant democracy” in three countries—Taiwan, Spain and Korea—as examples, and tries to find out whether the present militant legal mechanism works appropriately in Taiwan. This article concludes that the paradigm shift contains three factors: (a) the expansion of militant democracy norms to meet specific domestic consolidation needs of different countries; (b) the trends toward more protection of human rights; and (c) the accommodation with its local context of cultural, historical, political and economic conditions. Therefore, the requirements of dissolution of political parties, as specified in the Constitutional Amendment of the Republic of China (Taiwan), does not perfectly fit for Taiwan, and needs to be improved.
期刊論文
1.Teitel, Ruti(2007)。Militating Democracy: Comparative Constitutional Perspectives。Mich. J. Int'l L.，29，49-70。  new window
2.Fox, Gregory H.、Nolte, Georg(1995)。Intolerant Democracies。Harv. Int'l L. J.，36(1)，1-70。  new window
3.蔡英文(20031200)。極權主義與現代民主。政治科學論叢，19，57-84。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.郭秋慶(20101200)。韓國民主轉型的形成與延伸的問題。臺灣國際研究季刊，6(4)，1-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.劉德海(20040900)。南韓民主化與國家安全。臺灣民主，1(3)，25-47。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Loewenstein, Karl(1937)。Militant Democracy and Fundamental Rights。American Political Science Review，31(3)，417-432。  new window
7.葉俊榮、張文貞(20061100)。路徑相依或制度選擇？--論民主轉型與憲法變遷的模式。問題與研究，45(6)，1-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.曾燕倫(20111000)。防衛性民主的兩種模式--並論我國違憲政黨管制的發展趨勢。國立中正大學法學集刊，35，75-115。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.柳嘉信(20140600)。西班牙的轉型正義--從「選擇遺忘」到「歷史記憶」。臺灣國際研究季刊，10(2)，83-105。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.李酉潭(20120600)。臺灣民主鞏固的挑戰。新世紀智庫論壇，58，7-11。  延伸查詢new window
11.卓忠宏(20040300)。西班牙區域主義發展及其影響。淡江人文社會學刊，18，79-100。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Cho, Kuk(1997)。Tension Between the National Security Law and Constitutionalism in South Korea: Security for What。B.U. Int'l L. J.，15，125-174。  new window
13.Capoccia, Giovanni(2013)。Militant Democracy: The Institutional Bases of Democratic Self Preservation。Annual Review of Law and Social Science，9(1)，207-226。  new window
14.Bligh, Gur(2013)。Defending Democracy: A New Understanding of the Party-Banning Phenomenon。Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law，46(5)，1321-1379。  new window
15.Cram, Ian(2008)。Constitutional Responses to Extremist Political Associations--ETA, Batasuna and Democratic Norms。Legal Studies，28(1)，68-95。  new window
16.Högström, John(20131200)。Classification and Rating of Democracy: A Comparison。Taiwan Journal of Democracy，9(2)，33-54。new window  new window
17.Hsu, Tzong-Li(2010)。Adoption and Further Development of the Concept of Militant Democracy in Taiwan-Presented as an Example of the Ban on Parties and Organizations。East Asian Law Journal，1(1)，15-24。  new window
18.Issacharoff, Samuel(2007)。Fragile Democracies。Harvard Law Review，120(6)，1405-1467。  new window
19.Loewenstein, Karl(1938)。Legislative Control of Political Extremism in European Democracies。Colum. L. Rev.，38，725-774。  new window
20.Loewenstein, Karl(1938)。Legislative Control of Political Extremism in European Democracies。Colum. L. Rev.，38，591-622。  new window
21.Loewenstein, Karl(1937)。Militant Democracy and Fundamental Rights。The American Political Science Review，31(4)，638-658。  new window
22.Landau, David(2013)。Abusive Constitutionalism。U. C. Davis Law Review，47，189-260。  new window
23.Niesen, Peter(2002)。Anti-Extremism, Negative Republicanism, Civic Society: Three Paradigms for Banning Political Parties。German Law Journal，3(7)。  new window
24.Niesen, Peter(2002)。Anti-Extremism, Negative Republicanism, Civic Society: Three Paradigms for Banning Political Parties。German Law Journal，3(7)。  new window
25.Rosenblum, Nancy L.(2007)。Banning Parties: Religious and Ethnic Partisanship in Multicultural Democracies。Law & Ethics of Human Rights，1(1)，17-75。  new window
26.Rydgren, Jens(2003)。Meso-level Reasons for Racism and Xenophobia: Some Converging and Diverging Effects of Radical Right Populism in France and Sweden。European Journal of Social Theory，6(1)，45-68。  new window
27.Sajo, András(2012)。Militant Democracy and Emotional Politics。Constellations，19(4)，562-574。  new window
28.楊以彬(20061200)。南韓民主化過程之簡析--以Huntington民主化理論為分析觀點。人文與社會學報，1(9)，301-331。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Foruria, Eduardo Virgala(20140619)。The Banning of Political Parties in Spain (the Batasuna Case)。World Congress of Constitutional Law 2014。Oslo。  new window
研究報告
1.Bourne, Angela K.(2011)。Democratisation and the Illegalisation of Political Parties in Europe。  new window
學位論文
1.Kirshner, Alexander S.(2011)。A Theory of Militant Democracy(博士論文)。Yale University，Ann Arbor。  new window
2.Bligh, Gur(2010)。Democracy Challenged: Limitations on Extremist Participation in the Electoral Arena(博士論文)。Columbia University。  new window
圖書
1.Huntington, Samuel P.、劉軍寧(2008)。第三波：二十世紀末的民主化浪潮。臺北：五南出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Chou, Mark(2013)。Theorising Democide。Basingstoke：Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
3.Diamond, Larry Jay(1999)。Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation。Baltimore：Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
4.McKeon, Richard Peter(1951)。Democracy in a World of Tensions。Paris：University of Chicago Press。  new window
5.Linz, Juan José、Stepan, Alfred C.(1996)。Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe。The Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
其他
1.(2013)。韓國當局逮捕被指「涉嫌內亂」國會議員，http://www.bbc.co.uk/zhongwen/trad/world/2013/09/130904_korea_mp_arrest。  延伸查詢new window
2.(2014)。韓憲法裁判所強制解散極左親朝政黨，http://www.bbc.co.uk/zhongwen/trad/world/2014/12/141219_skorea_constitutional_court。  延伸查詢new window
3.中央研究院社會學研究所(2015)。臺灣社會變遷調查問卷與報告書，http://www.ios.sinica.edu.tw/sc/cht/scDownload2.php。  延伸查詢new window
4.江宜樺(2007)。民主，http://120.118.195.1/aseip_folder/96excellent/961114民主(完整版).pdf。  延伸查詢new window
5.王奕婷(2014)。難以對話的兩種民主觀？秩序、政府效能vs.自由、人權保障，http://whogovernstw.org/2014/04/21/yitingwang1/。  延伸查詢new window
6.(2006)。Registration Requirement of Political Parties, 18-1(A) Korean Constitutional Court Report 402 2004Hun-Ma246，http://www.ccourt.go.kr/home/english/decisions/mgr_decision_view.jsp?seq=597&code=3&pg=14&sch_code=&sch_sel=&sch_txt=&nScale=15。  new window
7.Estado, Boletin Oficial del(2002)。Ley Orgánica 6/2002, de 27 de junio, de Partidos Politicos，http://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-2002-12756。  new window
8.Constitutional Court of Korea(2015)。Constitutional Court of Korea FAQ，http://www.ccourt.go.kr/home/english/jurisdiction/faq.jsp。  new window
9.Constitute(2014)。Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany 1949，https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/German_Federal_Republic_2012?lang=en。  new window
10.Congreso(1978)。CONSTITUTION，http://www.congreso.es/portal/page/portal/Congreso/Congreso/Hist_Normas/Norm/const_espa_texto_ingles_0.pdf。  new window
11.(2014)。Dissolution of Unified Progressive Party, 2013Hun-Da1，http://english.ccourt.go.kr/cckhome/eng/introduction/news/newsDetail.do?pageIndex=1&bbsSeq=23。  new window
12.Korea Legislation Research Institutes(2013)。National Security Act，http://elaw.klri.re.kr/eng_service/lawView.do?hseq=26692&lang=ENG。  new window
13.Korea Legislation Research Institutes(2013)。Political Parties Act，http://elaw.klri.re.kr/eng_service/lawView.do?hseq=29270&lang=ENG。  new window
14.Party Law in Modern Europe(2002)。Organic Law 6/2002 of 27 June on Political Parties，http://www.partylaw.leidenuniv.nl/party-law/4fd709ff-20d8-4f35-8454-098c84e5412d.pdf。  new window
圖書論文
1.Diamond, Larry、廖益興(1997)。緒論：民主鞏固的追求。鞏固第三波民主。台北：業強出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.田弘茂、劉淑惠(1997)。臺灣民主鞏固的展望。新興民主的機遇與挑戰。臺北：業強出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃長玲(2008)。分裂社會下的體制發展與爭議--臺灣與南韓民主化經驗的比較。蕃薯與泡菜：亞洲雙龍臺韓經驗比較。臺北：財團法人亞太文化學術交流基金會。  延伸查詢new window
4.朱建民、陳沖、張桐銳、林子平、李震山、楊子慧、吳信華、王服清、李建良(2014)。德意志聯邦共和國基本法。德國聯邦憲法法院裁判選輯。司法院。  延伸查詢new window
5.廖斌洲(2010)。民主化與民主鞏固。政治學。臺北縣蘆洲市：晶典文化。  延伸查詢new window
6.袁翊軒(2010)。獨裁政治與極權政治。政治學。臺北縣蘆洲市：晶典文化。  延伸查詢new window
7.Klamt, Martin(2007)。Militant Democracy and the Democratic Dilemma: Different Ways of Protecting Democratic Constitutions。Explorations in Legal Cultures。Den Haag：Elsevier。  new window
8.Prado, Carlos Vidal(2009)。Spain。Militant Democracy Principle in Modern Democracies。Farnham, Surrey：Ashgate Publishing Group。  new window
9.Thiel, Markus(2009)。Comparative Aspects。Militant Democracy Principle in Modern Democracies。Farnham, Surrey：Ashgate Publishing Group。  new window
10.Rosenblum, Nancy L.(2008)。Militant Democracy: Banning Parties。On the Side of the Angels: An Appreciation of Parties and Partisanship。Princeton, NJ：Princeton University Press。  new window
11.Valenzuela, Julio Samuel(1990)。Democratic Consolidation in Post-transitional Settings: Notion, Process, and Facilitating Conditions。Issues in Democratic Consolidation: the New South American Democracies in Comparative Perspective。Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies, University of Notre Dame。  new window
12.Linz, Juan J.、Stephan, Alfred、張佑宗(1997)。邁向鞏固的民主體制。鞏固第三波民主。臺北市：業強。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：781（臺灣：770，外國：11） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1695817 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67507324
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上