:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:語意關聯與類別語意關係對兒童中文語意發展影響的縱貫式研究
書刊名:中華心理學刊
作者:翁巧涵陳修元 引用關係周泰立 引用關係
作者(外文):Wong, Ciao-hanChen, Shiou-yuanChou, Tai-li
出版日期:2014
卷期:56:1
頁次:頁65-81
主題關鍵詞:語意發展語意關聯類別語意關係Semantic developmentSemantic associationCategorical relatedness
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:25
  • 點閱點閱:81
過去中文語意發展的研究,皆採用橫斷式取向觀察年齡變化的差異,而且沒有將語意關聯與語意關係對於語意處理的影響清楚區分。語意關聯係指字對是以自由聯想建立的關聯性字對;語意關係則是指字對為同類別語意概念。本研究採縱貫式取向,正交地操弄語意關聯(高、低)與類別語意關係(高、低)兩個變項,進一步檢驗11歲兒童語意知識的發展,探討這兩個變項對語意處理的貢獻。實驗以語意判斷作業進行,24位兒童判斷依序出現的兩個中文字是否有意義關係,間隔兩年再次進行相同作業。本研究有兩項主要發現:(一)時間變項主要效果顯著,兒童第二次(兩年後)的判斷正確率優於第一次參與;(二)語意關聯與類別語意關係的交互作用顯著,高低類別語意關係的差異,在高語意關聯時達顯著,低語意關聯時則否;高低語意關聯的差異,在高類別語意關係達顯著,低類別語意關係時則否。推論:(一)隨著年齡成長與兩年的教育學習經驗,兒童對於語意表徵的掌握能力更加精緻化,能以抽象思考能力整合不同層級的類別語意關係;(二)語意關聯與類別語意關係的交互促進效果,在語意關聯與類別語意關係都有增強,穩定的語意促進效果是建立在字彙同時具有高語意關聯及高類別語意關係的組織方式上。
Previous developmental studies with regard to semantic processing used cross-sectional approaches to examine developmental changes and did not make distinctions between semantic association and categorical relatedness. Semantic association was defined as character pairs produced by free association tasks; categorical relatedness was referred to character pairs within the same semantic category. The present study used a longitudinal approach to further investigate the roles of semantic association and categorical relatedness in the developmental changes of semantic processing. We orthogonally manipulated semantic association (strong, weak) and categorical relatedness (high, low) to examine developmental changes of 11-year-old children in a two-year interval. Children were asked to decide whether two visually-presented Chinese characters were semantically related and tested again two years later. There were two main results. First, the main effect of time was significant. Children performed better on accuracy of the second measure as compared with the first measure. Second, we found an interaction between semantic association and categorical relatedness on accuracy. The difference between the high and low categorical relatedness was significant for the strong semantic association, not for the weak semantic association. The difference between the strong and weak semantic association was significant for the high categorical relatedness, not for the low categorical relatedness. There are two implications in the present study. First, as age increased, accumulated learning experiences may enhance children to build more elaborate semantic representations. They may use more abstract manners to integrate different categorical relationships. Second, the interaction of semantic association and categorical relatedness suggests that semantic knowledge may be organized by both semantic association and categorical relatedness. The stable semantic enhancement is based on characters with strong semantic association and high categorical relatedness.
期刊論文
1.Smiley, S. S.、Brown, A. L.(1979)。Conceptual preference for thematic or taxonomic relations: A nonmonotonic age trend from preschool to old age。Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,28(2),249-257。  new window
2.McRae, Ken、Boisvert, Stephen(1998)。Automatic semantic similarity priming。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,24(3),558-572。  new window
3.Shelton, Jennifer R.、Martin, Randi C.(1992)。How semantic is automatic semantic priming?。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,18(6),1191-1210。  new window
4.洪國鈞、李姝慧、陳修元、周泰立(20100900)。語意部件與關聯強度對成人與國小五年級孩童漢字語意處理效應的差異。中華心理學刊,52(3),327-344。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Booth, James R.、Lu, Dong、Burman, Douglas D.、Chou, Tai-Li、Jin, Zhen、Peng, Danling、Zhang, Lei、Ding, Guo-Sheng、Deng, Yuan、Liu, Li(2006)。Specialization of phonological and semantic processing in Chinese word reading。Brain Research,1071(1),197-207。  new window
6.Chee, M. W.、Weekes, B.、Lee, K. M.、Soon, C. S.、Schreiber, A.、Hoon, J. J.(2000)。Overlap and dissociation of semantic processing of Chinese characters, English words, and pictures: evidence from fMRI。Neuroimage,12(4),392-403。  new window
7.Chou, T. L.、Booth, J. R.、Bitan, T.、Burman, D. D.、Bigio, J. D.、Cone, N. E.、Cao, F.(2006)。Developmental and skill effects on the neural correlates of semantic processing to visually presented words。Human Brain Mapping,27(11),915-924。  new window
8.Chou, Tai-Li、Booth, James R.、Burman, Douglas D.、Bitan, Tali、Bigio, Jordan D.、Lu, Dong、Cone, Nadia E.(2006)。Developmental changes in the neural correlates of semantic processing。NeuroImage,29(4),1141-1149。  new window
9.Chou, T. L.、Chen, C. W.、Wu, M. Y.、Booth, J. R.(2009)。The role of inferior frontal gyrus and inferior parietal lobule in semantic processing of Chinese characters。Experimental Brain Research,198(4),465-475。  new window
10.Liu, L.、Vira, A.、Friedman, E.、Minas, J.、Bolger, D.、Bitan, T.、Booth, J.(2010)。Children with reading disability show brain differences in effective connectivity for visual, but not auditory word comprehension。PloS One,5,e13492。  new window
11.Blumenfeld, H. K.、Booth, J. R.、Burman, D. D.(2006)。Differential prefrontal-temporal neural correlates of semantic processing in children。Brain and Language,99,226-235。  new window
12.Booth, J. R.、Burman, D. D.、Meyer, J. R.、Lei, Z.、Choy, J.、Gitelman, D. R.(2003)。Modality-specific and independent developmental differences in the neural substrate for lexical processing。Journal of Neurolinguistics,16,383-405。  new window
13.Borghi, A. M.、Caramelli, N.(2003)。Situation bounded conceptual organization in children: Form action to spatial relations。Cognitive Development,18,49-60。  new window
14.Burgess, C.(1998)。From simple associations to the building blocks of language: Modeling meaning in memory with the HAL model。Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers,30,188-198。  new window
15.Cao, F.、Peng, D. L.、Liu, L.、Jin, Z.、Fan, N.、Deng, Y.(2009)。Developmental differences of neurocognitive networks for phonological and semantics processing in Chinese word reading。Human Brain Mapping,30,797-809。  new window
16.Caramelli, N.、Setti, A.、Maurizzi, D. D.(2004)。Concrete and abstract concepts in school age children。Psychology of Language and Communication,8,19-34。  new window
17.Chenery, H. J.、Ingram, J. C. L.、Murdoch, B. E.(1990)。Automatic and volitional semantic processing in aphasia。Brain and Language,38,215-232。  new window
18.Cree, G. S.、McRae, K.、McNorgan, C.(1999)。An attractor model of lexical conceptual processing: Simulating semantic priming。Cognitive Science,23,371-414。  new window
19.Cronin, V. S.(2002)。The syntagmatic-paradigmatic shift and reading development。Journal of Child Language,29,189-204。  new window
20.Estes, Z.、Jones, L. L.(2009)。Integrative priming occurs rapidly and uncontrollably during lexical processing。Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,138,112-130。  new window
21.Hashimoto, N.、McGregor, K. K.、Graham, A.(2007)。Conceptual organization at 6 and 8 years of age: Evidence from the semantic priming of object decisions。Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research,50,161-176。  new window
22.Hodgson, J. M.(1991)。Informational constraints on pre-lexical priming。Language and Cognitive Processes,6,169-205。  new window
23.Kalénine, S.、Peyrin, C.、Pichat, C.、Segebarth, C.、Bonthoux, F.、Baciu, M.(2009)。The sensory-motor specificity of taxonomic and thematic conceptual relations: A behavioral and fMRI study。NeuroImage,44,1152-1162。  new window
24.Lee, S. H.、Booth, J. R.、Chen, S. Y.、Chou, T. L.(2011)。Developmental changes in the inferior frontal cortex for selecting semantic representations。Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience,1(3),338-350。  new window
25.Lee, Y. S.、Chiang, W. C.、Hung, H. C.(2008)。Lexical association and false memory for words in two cultures。Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,37(1),49-58。  new window
26.Lin, E. L.、Murphy, G. L.(2001)。Thematic relations in adults' concepts。Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,130,3-28。  new window
27.Lucariello, J.、Kyratzis, A.、Nelson, K.(1992)。Taxonomic knowledge: What kind and when。Child Development,63,978-998。  new window
28.Lund, K.、Burgess, C.(1996)。Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence。Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, and Computers,28,203-208。  new window
29.Maki, W. S.、Buchanan, E.(2008)。Latent structure in measures of associative, semantic, and thematic knowledge。Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,15,598-603。  new window
30.Markman, E. M.、Hutchinson, J. E.(1984)。Children's sensitivity to constraints on word meaning: Taxonomic versus thematic relation。Cognitive Psychology,16,1-27。  new window
31.McKoon, G.、Ratcliff, R.(1992)。Spreading activation versus compound cue accounts of priming: Mediated priming revisited。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,18(6),1155-1172。  new window
32.Moss, H. E.、Tyler, L. K.(1995)。Investigating semantic memory impairments: The contribution of semantic priming。Memory,3,359-395。  new window
33.Nation, K.、Adams, J. W.、Bowyerr-Crane, C. A.、Snowling, M. J.(1999)。Working memory deficits in poor comprehenders reflect underlying language impairments。Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,73,139-158。  new window
34.Rönnlund, M.、Nyberg, L.、Bäckman, L.、Nilsson, L. G.(2005)。Stability, growth, and decline in adult life span development of declarative memory: Cross-sectional and longitudinal data from a population-based study。Psychology and Aging,20(1),3-18。  new window
35.Sachs, O.、Weis, S.、Krings, T.、Huber, W.、Kircher, T.(2008)。Categorical and thematic knowledge representation in the brain: Neural correlates of taxonomic and thematic conceptual relations。Neuropsychologia,46,409-418。  new window
36.Sachs, O.、Weis, S.、Zellagui, N.、Huber, W.、Zvyagintsev, M.、Mathiak, K.(2008)。Automatic processing of semantic relations in fMRI: Neural activation during semantic priming of taxonomic and thematic categories。Brain Research,1218,194-205。  new window
37.Sass, K.、Sachs, O.、Krach, S.、Kircher, T.(2009)。Taxonomic and thematic categories: Neural correlates of categorization in an auditory-to-visual priming task using fMRI。Brain Research,1270,78-87。  new window
38.Sliwinski, M.、Buschke, H.(1999)。Cross-sectional and longitudinal relationships among age, cognition, and processing speed。Psychology and Aging,14,18-33。  new window
39.Szaflarski, J. P.、Schmithorst, V. J.、Altaye, M.、Byars, A. W.、Ret, J.、Plante, E.(2006)。A longitudinal functional magnetic resonance imaging study of language development in children 5 to 11 years old。Annals of Neurology,59,796-807。  new window
40.翁巧涵、陳修元、周泰立、李姝慧(20110900)。國小三年級兒童識字能力與語意關係對中文語意處理的影響。中華心理學刊,53(3),293-307。new window  延伸查詢new window
41.Hutchison, Keith A.(2003)。Is semantic priming due to association strength or feature overlap? A microanalytic review。Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,10(4),785-813。  new window
42.Lucas, Margery(2000)。Semantic priming without association: a meta-analytic review。Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,7(4),618-630。  new window
43.McClelland, J. L.、Rogers, T. T.(2003)。The parallel distributed processing approach to semantic cognition。Nature Reviews Neuroscience,4(4),310-322。  new window
44.Moss, H. E.、Marslen-Wilson, W. D.、Ostrin, R. R.、Tyler, L. K.(1995)。Accessing different types of lexical semantic information: Evidence form priming。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition,21,863-883。  new window
45.Nation, K.、Snowling, M. J.(1999)。Developmental differences in sensitivity to semantic relations among good and poor comprehenders: Evidence from semantic priming。Cognition,70(1),B1-B13。  new window
46.Nelson, K.(1974)。Concept, word, and sentence: Interrelations in acquisition and development。Psychological Review,81,267-285。  new window
47.Nelson, K.(1973)。Structure and strategy in learning to talk。Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development,38(1/2)=149,1-135。  new window
48.Nelson, K.(1977)。The syntagmatic-paradigmatic shift revisited: A review of research and theory。Psychological Bulletin,84,93-116。  new window
49.Shaywitz, B. A.、Shaywitz, S. E.、Pugh, K. R.、Mencl, W. E.、Fulbright, R. K.、Skudlarski, P.(2002)。Disruption of posterior brain systems for reading in children with developmental dyslexia。Biological Psychiatry,52(2),101-110。  new window
50.Tomasello, M.(2002)。Things are what they do: Katherine Nelson's functional approach to language and cognition。Journal of Cognition and Development,3,5-19。  new window
51.Zhang, Q.、Guo, C. Y.、Ding, J. H.、Wang, Z. Y.(2006)。Concreteness effects in the processing of Chinese words。Brain and Language,96(1),59-68。  new window
52.洪儷瑜(19971000)。「漢字視知覺測驗」編製初步報告。師大學報. 教育類,42,59-73。new window  延伸查詢new window
53.陳明蕾、王學誠、柯華葳(20091200)。中文語意空間建置及心理效度驗證:以潛在語意分析技術為基礎。中華心理學刊,51(4),415-435。new window  延伸查詢new window
54.Shu, Hua、Anderson, Richard C.(1997)。Role of Radical Awareness in the Character and Word Acquisition of Chinese Children。Reading Research Quarterly,32(1),78-89。  new window
55.Booth, J. R.、Burman, D. D.、Meyer, J. R.、Gitelman, D. R.、Parrish, T. B.、Mesulam, M. M.(2002)。Modality independence of word comprehension。Human Brain Mapping,16(4),251-261。  new window
56.Collins, A. M.、Quillian, M. R.(1969)。Retrieval time form semantic memory。Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,8,240-247。  new window
57.范利霙、周泰立(20120300)。Hierarchical Model Comparisons on Effective Connectivity in Semantic Judgments of Chinese Characters。中華心理學刊,54(1),31-46。new window  new window
58.Meyer, D. E.、Schvaneveldt, R. W.(1971)。Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations。Journal of Experimental Psychology,90(2),227-234。  new window
59.Collins, A. M.、Loftus, E. F.(1975)。A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing。Psychological Review,82(6),407-428。  new window
60.李姝慧、陳修元、周泰立(20091200)。國小五年級孩童與成人的識字能力對中文字語意處理之效應的差異。中華心理衛生學刊,22(4),345-382。new window  延伸查詢new window
61.Chou, T. L.、Booth, J. R.、Chen, C. W.、Fan, L. Y.、Chen, S. Y.(2009)。Testing for a cultural influence on reading for meaning in the developing brain: The neural basis of semantic processing in Chinese children。Frontiers in Human Neuroscience,3,(27)1-(27)9。  new window
62.McGregor, K. K.、Newman, R. M.、Friedman, R. M.、Reilly, R. M.(2002)。Semantic representation and naming in young children。Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research,45,332-346。  new window
會議論文
1.黃沛榮(1996)。漢字部件研究。第七屆中國文字學全國學術研討會。台北:萬卷樓。343-359。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.吳瑞屯、劉英茂(1987)。中文字詞語音、語意屬性的研究 (計畫編號:NSC 75-0301-H002-024)。臺北:行政院國家科學委員會。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.胡志偉、高千惠、羅明(2005)。六百個中文字的自由聯想常模。臺灣心理學會。  延伸查詢new window
2.Howard, D.、Patterson, K. E.(1992)。The pyramids and palm trees test: A test of semantic access from words and pictures。Bury St Edmunds, UK:Thames Valley Test。  new window
3.Inhelder, B.、Piaget, J.(1964)。The early growth of logic in the child: Classification and seriation。London, UK:Routledge。  new window
4.McNamara, T. P.(2005)。Semantic priming: Perspectives from memory and word cognition。New York:Psychology。  new window
5.Nelson, K.(1985)。Making sense: The acquisition of shared meaning。Academic Press。  new window
6.Piaget, J.、Inhelder, B.(1959)。La genèse des structures logiques élémentaires: Classifications et sériations。Neuchâtel, CH:Delachaux and Niestle。  new window
7.Murphy, Gregory L.(2002)。The Big Book of Concepts。MIT Press。  new window
8.Palermo, D.、Jenkins, J. J.(1964)。Word Association Norms, Grade School through College。Minneapolis, MN:University of Minnesota Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Estes, Z.、Golonka, S.、Jones, L. L.(2011)。Thematic thinking: The apprehension and consequences of thematic relations。The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory。Academic Press。  new window
2.Markman, E. M.、Callanan, M. A.(1983)。An analysis of hierarchical classification。Advances in the psychology of human intelligence。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
3.Salthouse, T. A.(2000)。Methodological assumptions in cognitive aging research。The handbook of aging and cognition。Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
4.Schaie, K. W.(1994)。Developmental designs revisit Ed。Life-span developmental psychology: Methodological contributions。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
5.Schaie, K. W.(1996)。Intellectual development in adulthood。Handbook of the psychology of aging。Academic Press。  new window
6.Siegler, R. S.、Shipley, C.(1995)。Variation, selection, and cognitive change。Developing cognitive competence: New approaches to process modeling。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
7.Waxman, S. R.(1991)。Convergences between semantic and conceptual organization in the preschool years。Perspectives on language and thought: Interrelations in development。Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press。  new window
8.Burgess, C.、Lund, K.(2000)。The dynamics of meaning in memory。Cognitive dynamics: Conceptual and representational change in humans and machines。Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE