臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：美國閱讀共同核心標準對閱讀教學的啟示
書刊名：教育研究月刊
作者：連啟舜 引用關係
作者(外文)：Lien, Chi-shun
出版日期：2015
卷期：255
頁次：頁36-53
主題關鍵詞：共同核心標準；閱讀教學；閱讀理解；Common core standards；Reading instruction；Reading comprehension
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:54
  • 點閱點閱:110
美國在2010年發布了《各州共同核心標準》，廣為全美各地所採用。本文將簡介美國「各州英語文與歷史／社會、科學與科技共同核心標準」閱讀部分之基本架構及精神，並將依閱讀理論與研究進行評析，分別列出這套共同核心標準的特色，包含「研究證據導向」、「強調深度閱讀與訊息整合」、「重視文本複雜度」、「平衡不同類別之文本」及「採用閱讀理解策略」等。最後，根據閱讀共同核心課程，提出閱讀教學、文本選擇及教師專業發展建議。
The Common Core State Standards were released in 2010 and now adopted by most states in America. This article intended to introduce the framework and key concepts of the Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts: Reading and reviewed these standards from the perspectives of reading theories and research evidences. Several features of these standards were listed, including “research and evidenced approach,” close reading and information integration,” “text complexity,” “balance of different genres,” and “reading comprehension strategies.” The implications of these standards for reading instruction, text selection, and teacher professional development were discussed.
期刊論文
1.Pearson, P. David、Gallagher, Margaret C.(1983)。The instruction of reading comprehension。Contemporary Educational Psychology，8(3)，317-345。  new window
2.簡馨瑩、宋曜廷、張國恩(2009)。變與不變：兩位國小教師學習自詢策略教學之歷程分析。教育心理學報，40(4)，619-640。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Braten, I.、Stømsø, H. I.、Britt, M. A.(2009)。Trust matters: Examining the role of source evaluation in students' construction of meaning within and across multiple texts。Reading Research Quarterly，44(1)，6-28。  new window
4.Clark, A.、Anderson, R. C.、Kuo, L.、Kim, I.、Archodidou, A.、Nguyen-Jahiel, K.(2003)。Collaborative reasoning: Expanding ways for children to talk and think in school。Educational Psychology Review，15，181-198。  new window
5.Hynd, C. R.(1999)。Teaching students to think critically using multiple texts in history。Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy，42，428-436。  new window
6.Kuhn, D.、Udell, W.(2007)。Coordinating own and other perspectives in argument。Thinking and Reasoning，13，90-104。  new window
7.Kuhn, D.、Wang, Y.、Li, H.(2011)。Why argue? Developing understanding of the purposes and values of argumentive discourse。Discourse Processes，48，26-49。  new window
8.McKeown, M. G.、Beck, I. L.、Sinatra, G. M.、Loxterman, J. A.(1992)。The contribution of prior knowledge and coherent text to comprehension。Reading Research Quarterly，27，79-93。  new window
9.McLaughlin, M.、Overturf, B. J.(2012)。The common core: Insights into the K-5 standards。The Reading Teacher，66，153-164。  new window
10.Shanahan, T.(2011)。Common core standards: Are we going to lower the fences or teach kids to climb?。Reading Today，29，20-21。  new window
11.Snow, C. E.、Lawrence, J. F.、White, C.(2009)。Generating knowledge of academic language among urban middle school students。Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness，2，325-344。  new window
12.van den Broek, Paul(2010)。Using texts in science education: Cognitive processes and knowledge representation。Science，328(5977)，453-456。  new window
13.Williams, J. P.、Nubla-Kung, A. M.、Pollini, S.、Stafford, K. B.、Garcia, A.、Snyder, A. E.(2007)。Teaching cause-effect text structure through social studies content to at-risk second graders。Journal of Learning Disabilities，40(2)，111-120。  new window
14.O'Reilly, T.、McNamara, Danielle S.(2007)。Reversing the reverse cohesion effect: Good texts can be better for strategic, high-knowledge readers。Discourse Processes，43(2)，121-152。  new window
15.Wiley, J.、Voss, J. F.(1999)。Constructing arguments from multiple sources: Tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text。Journal of Educational Psychology，91，301-311。  new window
16.McNamara, D. S.、Kintsch, W.(1996)。Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence。Discourse Processes，22(3)，247-288。  new window
17.陳明蕾、王學誠、柯華葳(20091200)。中文語意空間建置及心理效度驗證：以潛在語意分析技術為基礎。中華心理學刊，51(4)，415-435。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.McNamara, D. S.、Kintsch, E.、Songer, N. B.、Kintsch, W.(1996)。Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text。Cognition and Instruction，14(1)，1-43。  new window
19.Graesser, A. C.、Millis, K. K.、Zwaan, R. A.(1997)。Discourse comprehension。Annual Review of Psychology，48(1)，163-189。  new window
20.吳裕聖、曾玉村(20030300)。概念構圖教學策略對小五學生科學文章理解及概念構圖能力之影響。教育研究集刊，49(1)，135-169。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Guthrie, J. T.、Wigfield, A.、Barbosa, P.、Perencevich, K. C.、Taboada, A.、Davis, M. H.、Scafiddi, N. T.、Tonks, S.(2004)。Increasing reading comprehension and engagement through concept-oriented reading instruction。Journal of Educational Psychology，96(3)，403-423。  new window
22.Dole, Janice A.、Duffy, Gerald G.、Roehler, Laura R.、Pearson, P. David(1991)。Moving from the Old to the New: Research on Reading Comprehension Instruction。Review of Educational Research，61(2)，239-264。  new window
23.Kintsch, W.(1994)。Text comprehension, memory and learning。American Psychologist，49(4)，294-303。  new window
24.宋曜廷、陳茹玲、李宜憲、查日龢、曾厚強、林維駿、張道行、張國恩(20130300)。中文文本可讀性探討：指標選取、模型建立與效度驗證。中華心理學刊，55(1)，75-106。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.National Reading Panel(2000)。Report of the national reading panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups。Washington, DC：National Institute of Child Health and Human Development。  new window
學位論文
1.連啟舜(2002)。國內閱讀理解教學研究成效之統合分析研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Coleman, D.、Pimentel, S.(2012)。Revised publishers, criteria for the common core state standards in English language arts and literacy, grades 3-12。Washington, DC：CCSSO & NASBE。  new window
2.Council of Chief State School Officers、National Governors Association(2010)。Common core state standards for English language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects。Washington, DC：Council of Chief State School Officers。  new window
3.Snow, C. E.(2002)。Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension。Santa Monica, CA：RAND Corporation。  new window
4.Chall, J. S.(1983)。Stages of reading development。McGraw-Hill。  new window
5.Toulmin, Stephen Edelston(1958)。The Uses of Argument。Cambridge University Press。  new window
其他
1.National Assessment of Education Progress(2010)。The Nation's Report Card: Grade 12 Reading and Mathematics 2009 National and Pilot State Results，http://www.nationsreportcard.gov/。  new window
2.柯華葳，詹益綾，丘嘉慧(2013)。臺灣四年級學生閱讀素養：PIRLS 2011報告，http://lm.ncu.edu.tw/Teacher%20web/hwawei/Project/PIRLS%202011%E5%AE%8C%E6%95%B4%E5%A0%Bl%E5%91%8A.pdf， 2015/04/09。  new window
圖書論文
1.Graesser, A. C.(2007)。An introduction to strategic reading comprehension。Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies。Mahwah, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
2.Borko, H.、Jacobs, J.、Koellner, K.(2010)。Contemporary approaches to teacher professional development: Processes and content。International encyclopedia of education。Oxford：Elsevier。  new window
3.Duke, N. K.、Pearson, P. D.、Strachan, S. L.、Billman, A. K.(2011)。Essential elements of fostering and teaching reading comprehension。What research has to say about reading instruction。International Reading Association。  new window
4.Pearson, P. D.(2013)。Research foundations fro the common core state standards in English language arts。Reading instruction in the age for common core state standards。Newark, DE：International Reading Association。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：383（臺灣：375，外國：8） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1328876 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67139066
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上