臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：閱讀之摘要歷程探究
書刊名：教育心理學報
作者：連啟舜 引用關係／陳弘輝／曾玉村
作者(外文)：Lien, Chi-shun／Chen, Hung-hui／Tzeng, Yu-htsuen
出版日期：2016
卷期：48:2
頁次：頁133-158
主題關鍵詞：鉅觀結構；摘要歷程；閱讀理解；Macrostructure；Summarization process；Reading comprehension
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:67
  • 點閱點閱:18
本研究以Kintsch 與van Dijk（1978）的理論模式為基礎來探討不同年齡的讀者之摘要歷程。藉由實驗材料的操弄，測量兒童摘要能力以探討兒童閱讀的心理歷程，進而探討摘要能力與中文理解的關係。研究方法選取三年級及六年級受試者各34 名，每人閱讀三篇不同歷程版本之說明文後，進行自由回憶作業、摘要評量及文本理解測驗。研究結果發現：一、摘要整體表現和閱讀理解、自由回憶、文本理解皆呈現中等之相關；而在不同歷程之摘要表現上，刪除歷程和歸納、建構歷程之相關不顯著，刪除所使用到的摘要次能力不同於歸納和建構。二、不同年級讀者在閱讀後的摘要表現、自由回憶及文本理解在發展上有顯著的差異，六年級學童皆優於三年級學童。三、不同發展階段的讀者在摘要「次能力」表現有顯著差異，刪除的能力明顯優於歸納和建構的能力，其中建構能力是發展最不成熟的能力。在作答分析中顯示僅有五分之一的三年級學童和三分之一的六年級學童能正確選出文章的主題句。
According to Kintsch and van Dijk’s (1978) theoretical model, we investigated the summarization processes of children with different ages. By manipulating three versions of texts, this study measured the process of reading comprehension and investigated the relationship between reading ability and summarization for Chinese readers. Participants were 34 third graders and 34 sixth grades. They were asked to read three different versions of texts and then performed three cognitive tasks (free recall, summarization, textbase questions). The results showed that there were moderate correlations among the measures of summarization, free recall and text comprehension, but no correlations among the measures of deletion, generalization and construction processes. Sixth graders outperformed third graders on all cognitive tasks. Readers at different developmental stages exhibited a significant difference in the sub-process of children’s summarization skills. The performance on the deletion-version was better than that on the generalization-version and construction-version. Among them, the performance on construction-version was the worst. Only one-fifth of third graders and one-third of sixth graders could select topic sentences of the text correctly.
期刊論文
1.O'Reilly, T.、McNamara, Danielle S.(2007)。Reversing the reverse cohesion effect: Good texts can be better for strategic, high-knowledge readers。Discourse Processes，43(2)，121-152。  new window
2.Landauer, T. K.、Foltz, P. W.、Laham, D.(1998)。An Introduction to Latent Semantic Analysis。Discourse Processes，25(2/3)，259-284。  new window
3.陳明蕾、王學誠、柯華葳(20091200)。中文語意空間建置及心理效度驗證：以潛在語意分析技術為基礎。中華心理學刊，51(4)，415-435。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Williams, J. P.、Taylor, M. B.、Ganger, S.(1981)。Text variations at the level of the individual sentence and the comprehension of simple expository paragraphs。Journal of Educational Psychology，73(6)，851-865。  new window
5.Hare, V. C.、Rabinowitz, M.、Schieble, K. M.(1989)。Text effects on main idea comprehension。Reading Research Quarterly，24(1)，72-88。  new window
6.張碧容、鄒慧英(20050400)。國小四年級學童閱讀摘要實作表現及自我評量之研究。南大學報. 教育類，39(1)，149-174。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.William, J. P.、Taylor, M. B.、DeCani, J. S.(1984)。Constructing macrostructure for expository text。Journal of Educational Psychology，76(6)，1065-1075。  new window
8.Anderson, Valerie、Hidi, Suzanne(1988)。Teaching students to summarize。Educational Leadership，46(4)，26-28。  new window
9.林世華、黃寶園(19981000)。柯氏性格量表效度概化之統合分析。師大學報. 教育類，43(2)，21-42。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.吳英長(19980400)。國民小學國語故事體課文摘寫大意的教學過程之分析。臺東師院學報，9，149-184。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Kintsch, W.(1994)。Text comprehension, memory and learning。American Psychologist，49(4)，294-303。  new window
12.Magliano, J. P.、Graesser, A. C.(1991)。A there-pronged method for studying inference generation in literary text。Poetics，20，193-232。  new window
13.Savolainen, H.、Ahonen, T.、Aro, M.、Tolvanen, A.、Holopainen, L.(2008)。Reading comprehension, word reading and spelling as predictors of school achievement and choice of secondary education。Learning and Instruction，18(2)，201-210。  new window
14.Tzeng, Y.、Chen, P. L.(2006)。The effects of causal structure on levels of representation for Chinese children。Chinese Journal of Psychology，48(2)，115-138。  new window
15.Williams, J. P.(1984)。Categorization, macrostructure, and finding the main idea。Journal of Educational Psychology，76，874-879。  new window
16.陸怡琮(20110900)。摘要策略教學對提升國小五年級學童摘要能力與閱讀理解的成效。教育科學研究期刊，56(3)，91-118。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Kintsch, Walter(1988)。The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model。Psychological Review，95(2)，163-182。  new window
18.Brown, A. L.、Day, J. D.(1983)。Macrorules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise。Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior，22(1)，1-14。  new window
19.Garner, R.(1982)。Efficient text summarization: Costs and benefits。Journal of Educational Research，75(5)，275-279。  new window
20.Kintsch, W.、Van Dijk, T. A.(1978)。Toward a model of text comprehension and production。Psychological Review，85(5)，363-394。  new window
21.LaBerge, David、Samuels, S. Jay(1974)。Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading。Cognitive Psychology，6(2)，293-323。  new window
會議論文
1.Lien, C.、Lin, S.(2007)。What can we learn from reading comprehension instruction studies? A meta-analysis of Taiwanese reading instruction studies。American Educational Research Association (AERA) 2007 Annual Meeting。Chicago, IL。  new window
研究報告
1.邱上真、洪碧霞(1999)。中文閱讀成分與歷程模式之建立及其在實務上的應用：評量與診斷、課程與教材、學習與教學--國語基本能力檢定診斷與協助系統之發展 (計畫編號：NSC88-2614-H-017-004-F18)。  延伸查詢new window
2.柯華葳、詹益綾、張建妤、游婷雅(2008)。臺灣四年級學生閱讀素養（PIRLS 2006報告） (計畫編號：NSC 96-MOE-S-008-002)。國立中央大學學習與教學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
3.張新仁(2010)。台灣跨年級學生閱讀摘要能力之研究 (計畫編號：NSC 99-2410-H-017-010)。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.楊韻平(1993)。兒童摘取文章大意的能力(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.連啟舜(2002)。國內閱讀理解教學研究成效之統合分析研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.National Research Council、Shavelson, R. J.、Towne, L.、Committee on Scientific Principles for Education Research(2002)。Scientific research in education。Washington, DC：National Academy Press。  new window
2.Leslie, L.、Caldwell, J.(1995)。Qualitative reading inventory。New York：HarperCollins。  new window
3.柯華葳(1999)。閱讀理解困難篩選測驗。臺北：行政院國家科學委員會特殊教育工作小組。  延伸查詢new window
4.Kintsch, W.(1988)。Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition。Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.Van Dijk, T. A.(1980)。Macrostructures: An interdisciplinary study of global structures in discourse, interaction, and cognition。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
6.Perfetti, C. A.(1985)。Reading ability。Oxford University Press。  new window
7.黃秀霜(1996)。中文年級認字量表。台北：心理。  延伸查詢new window
8.Southwest Educational Development Laboratory(2003)。National Staff Development Council standards assessment inventory: Summary report of instrument development process and psychometric properties。Austin, TX：Southwest Educational Development Laboratory。  new window
9.Snow, Catherine E.(2002)。Reading for understanding: Toward a research and development program in reading comprehension。RAND。  new window
10.van Dijk, Teun Adrianus、Kintsch, Walter(1983)。Strategies of discourse comprehension。Academic Press。  new window
11.McKenna, M. C.、Stahl, K. A. D.(2009)。Assessment for reading instruction。New York：Guilford Press。  new window
其他
1.張新仁(2009)。台灣閱讀摘要研究回顧與前瞻。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Kintsch, Walter(2004)。The construction-integration model of text comprehension and its implications for instruction。Theoretical models and processes of reading。Newark, DE：International Reading Association。  new window
2.Magliano, J. P.、Millis, K. K.、Ozum, Y.、McNamara, D. S.(2007)。A multidimensional framework to evaluate reading assessment tools。Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies。Mahwah, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum。  new window
3.Pressley, M.(2000)。What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of?。Handbook of reading research。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
4.Van Den Broek, P.、Kremer, K. E.(2000)。The mind in action: What it means to comprehend during reading。Reading for meaning: Fostering comprehension in the middle grades。New York, NY：Teachers College Press。  new window
5.方金雅、鍾易達、邱上真(1998)。國小學童閱讀摘要能力評定規範之發展。國小教學評量的反省與前瞻。臺南：國立臺南師範學院測驗發展中心。  延伸查詢new window
6.King, A.(2007)。Beyond literal comprehension: A strategy to promote deep understanding of text。Reading comprehension strategies: Theory, interventions, and technologies。Mahwah, NJ：New York, NY：Lawrence Erlbaum。  new window
7.Meyer, B. J. F.(1977)。The structure of prose: Effects on learning and memory and implications for educational practice。Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge。Hillsdale, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum。  new window
8.Sweet, A. P.(2005)。Assessment of reading comprehension: The RAND reading study group vision。Children's reading comprehension and assessment。Mahwah, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：737（臺灣：727，外國：10） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1780212 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67595449
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上