:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:e民主時期的政治信任研究:對於臺灣2016年選舉結果的觀察與評價
書刊名:中國行政評論
作者:汪子錫
作者(外文):Wang, Tzu-his
出版日期:2016
卷期:22:3
頁次:頁38-56
主題關鍵詞:e民主2016年選舉政治信任E-democracy2016 presidential electionPolitical trust
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:25
  • 點閱點閱:38
2016年1月16日台灣舉行總統、國會大選,選舉結果民進黨蔡英文當選中華民國第一位女性總統,同時完成第三次藍綠政黨輪替。另在立法委員選舉中,民進黨贏得113席次的68席,成為國會最大黨。加上之前2014年九合一選舉民進黨贏得過半縣市長席次,在2016選戰之後,民進黨已經實質取得總統、國會、縣市長完全執政地位,長期執政的國民黨出現了僅次於1949年以來的最大潰敗。本研究以「政治信任」為取徑,觀察並評價2016年選舉結果。從表面來看,國民黨敗選肇因於「長期忽略公共行政管理產出政治信任」所造成的結果,然而在e化民主(e-Democracy)時代,社會結構出現重大變化,民眾有能力使用社群媒體揭露、傳播更多與「政治信任」相關的議題,才是改變投票行為的關鍵原因。2016年大選過後,台灣勢必進入一個更清晰可觀察「e民主公民社會」;「政治信任」也將成為e民主時期公共行政管理極為重要的目標。
In the presidential and legislative elections held on January 16, 2016, Tsai Ing-wen, from the Democratic Progressive party (DPP), was elected as the first female president of the Republic of China, while Taiwan's politics experienced its third turnover of ruling parties. As for the legislative election, the DPP won 68 seats out of total 113 seats and became the majority in the legislature. With the 13 seat that was previously won in the nine-in-one local election in 2014, DPP has become an absolute majority on both legislative and local level. This study analyzes and evaluates the 2016 election results based on "political trust." On the face of it, KMT's defeat resulted from its long-term neglect of political trust. To dig deeper, the public now has the ability to reveal and spread more information related to political trust though social media in this e-democracy era, which is the major reason for the changes in voter behavior. Under the traditional media structure, there is a "visible hand" holding the power and monopolizing the media. However, in an e-democratic civil society, there is more than one hand but thousands of them. The 2016 election shows that the public value is no longer created or shaped only by government authority. Taiwan's transition to a more "e-democratic civil society" is sure to happen, and political trust will also become a critical goal for public administration.
期刊論文
1.Huber, C.(2010)。Professional Learning 2.0。Educational Leadership,67(8),41-46。  new window
2.汪子錫(20140600)。E化民主的政策行銷挑戰分析:以反服貿學生運動新媒體運用為例。中國行政評論,20(2),73-106。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Miller, Arthur H.、Goldenberg, Edie、Erbring, Lutz(1979)。Type- Set Politics: Impact of Newspapers on Public Confidence。American Political Science Review,73(1),67-84。  new window
4.Easton, David(1975)。A Re-Assessment of the Concept of Political Support。British Journal of Political Science,5(4),435-457。  new window
5.張苙雲(20000600)。制度信任及行為的信任意涵。臺灣社會學刊,23,179-222。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Dirks, Kurt T.、Ferrin, Donald L.(2001)。The role of trust in organizational settings。Organization Science,12(4),450-467。  new window
會議論文
1.汪子錫(2015)。e民主時期的公共溝通與網路社群正義探析:以2014年台北市長選舉為例。第十一屆兩岸四地公共管理學術研討會,(會議日期: 2015/05/14-2015/05/16)。澳門大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Dominick, J. R.(2011)。Dynamics of Mass Communication: Media in the Digital Age。New York:McGraw- Hill Higher Education。  new window
2.Tilly, Charles(2007)。Democracy。Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Budd, Leslie、Harris, Lisa(2009)。E-governance: Managing or Governing?。Routledge。  new window
4.Giddens, Anthony(1991)。The consequences of modernity。Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press。  new window
5.Campbell, Angus、Converse, Philip E.、Miller, Warren E.、Stokes, Donald E.(1960)。The American Voter。John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
6.Covey, S. M R.、Merrill, R. R.(2008)。The Speed of Trust: The One Thing That Changes Everything。New York:Free Press。  new window
7.Dahl, Robert A.(1971)。Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition。New Haven, CT:Yale University Press。  new window
8.Hetherington, Marc J.(2005)。Why Trust Matters: Declining Political Trust and the Demise of American Liberalism。Princeton University Press。  new window
9.Robbins, Stephen P.(2001)。Organizational behavior。Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
10.Fukuyama, Francis(1995)。Trust: the Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity。The Free Press。  new window
單篇論文
1.謝明瑞(20150226)。大數據分析:以柯P現象為例,財團法人國家政策研究基金會。,http://www.npf.org.tw/post/2/14788, 2016/03/15。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.陳慧萍(2014)。馬英九執政六週年總體檢民調「久趴」九趴總統難翻身。  延伸查詢new window
2.(2016)。第14任總統副總統暨第9屆立法委員選舉輔選工作檢討報告,http://www.kmt.org.tw/2016/02/149.html, 2016/03/15。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE