臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：用方法說故事：探析電腦輔助文本分析工具在框架研究之應用
書刊名：傳播研究與實踐
作者：盧安邦／鄭宇君 引用關係
作者(外文)：Lu, An-pang／Cheng, Yu-chung
出版日期：2017
卷期：7:2
頁次：頁145-178
主題關鍵詞：社群運算；詞頻分析；詞語共現；情緒分析；框架；議題設定；Social computing；Word-frequency analysis；Co-occurrence analysis；Sentiment analysis；Framing；Agenda setting
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(9) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:9
  • 共同引用共同引用:78
  • 點閱點閱:68
人文社會領域「向運算轉」後，「讓資料說話」成為一股新的風潮，然而資料如何能說故事？本文以電腦輔助處理大量社群媒體文本資料為例，說明在資料蒐集、處理及分析過程中，須經各種文本分析工具的內在邏輯及研究者介入，資料的意義方得浮現。本文使用詞頻分析、詞語共現、情緒分析工具及質性框架分析法等文本分析工具，對同一組社群媒體文本資料集進行研究，結果發現個別分析工具確實為研究者帶來不同洞見，卻也各自存在侷限。 因而，本文認為電腦輔助的文本分析方法在資料篩選、分析、詮釋的過程中，皆需研究者介入進行調整，結合多重方法的研究設計則可協助研究者從文本資料中找出意義框架，說出一則好故事。
As the slogan “let the data speak for itself” gains currency, it becomes important to reconsider the role of the researcher. This study tries to explore the intertwined relationships among data, tools and researchers. In this study, we review the literature on agenda-setting research and framing research, with a particular focus on research methods and analysis tools. To investigate the use of different analysis tools to study media/public issues, this article introduces three analysis tools, word-frequency analysis, co-occurrence analysis, and sentiment analysis, in addition to the qualitative frame analysis method. We find that different analysis tools tell different stories and researcher choices are always important across different research periods. We think that if researchers consider the results obtained using different tools, they will be able to devise a more comprehensive research structure. Therefore, in this article we suggest that researchers apply multiple tools to their data during the pilot study phase.
期刊論文
1.Zhou, Yuqiong、Moy, Patricia(2007)。Parsing framing processes: The interplay between online public opinion and media coverage。Journal of Communication，57(1)，79-98。  new window
2.Song, Y.(2007)。Internet news media and issue development: A case study on the roles of independent online news services as agenda-builders for anti-US protests in South Korea。New Media & Society，9(1)，71-92。  new window
3.陳韻如(20111000)。保護誰的生命？秘魯「婦女運動」公共議題的新聞框架。新聞學研究，109，121-166。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Burgess, Jean、Bruns, Axel(2012)。(Not) the Twitter election: The dynamics of the #ausvotes conversation in relation to the Australian media ecology。Journalism Practice，6(3)，384-402。  new window
5.Small, T. A.(2011)。What the hashtag? A content analysis of Canadian politics on Twitter。Information, Communication & Society，14(6)，872-895。  new window
6.Mahrt, M.、Scharkow, M.(2013)。The value of Big Data in digital media research。Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media，57(1)，20-33。  new window
7.李紅豔、劉碧瑤(20140700)。地方媒體對群體性事件的解讀--以「上海普陀事件」與「廣州增城事件」的報導為例。新聞學研究，120，79-119。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Ku, L.-W.、Chen, H.-H.(2007)。Mining opinions from the Web: Beyond relevance retrieval。Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology，58(12)，1838-1850。  new window
9.鄭宇君(20140100)。向運算轉：新媒體研究與資訊技術結合的契機與挑戰。傳播研究與實踐，4(1)，67-83。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.McCombs, Maxwell E.(2005)。A Look at Agenda-setting: Past, Present, and Future。Journalism Studies，6(4)，543-557。  new window
11.Hassid, Jonathan(2012)。Safety valve or pressure cooker? Blogs in Chinese political life。Journal of Communication，62(2)，212-230。  new window
12.Entman, R. M.、Rojecki, A.(1993)。Freezing out the public: Elite and media framing of the U.S. anti- nuclear movement。Political Communication，10，155-173。  new window
13.Boyd, Danah M.、Crawford, Kate(2012)。Critical Questions For Big Data: Provocations for a Cultural, Technological, and Scholarly Phenomenon。Information, Communication and Society，15(5)，662-679。  new window
14.Lewis, Seth C.、Zamith, Rodrigo、Hermida, Alfred(2013)。Content Analysis in an Era of Big Data: A Hybrid Approach to Computational and Manual Methods。Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media，57(1)，34-52。  new window
15.Yuan, Elaine J.、Feng, Miao、Danowski, James A.(2013)。"Privacy" in semantic networks on Chinese social media: The case of Sina Weibo。Journal of Communication，63(6)，1011-1031。  new window
16.Iser, Wolfgang(1972)。The Reading process: A Phenomenological Approach。New Literary History，3(2)，279-299。  new window
17.Huang, C.-R.、Hsieh, S.-K.、Hong, J.-F.、Chen, Y.-Z.、Su, I. L.、Chen, Y.-X.、Huang, S.-W.(2010)。Chinese Wordnet: design, implementation, and application of an infrastructure for cross-lingual knowledge processing。Journal of Chinese Information Processing，24(2)，14-23。  new window
18.陳百齡、鄭宇君(20141000)。從流通到聚合：重大災難期間浮現的資訊頻道。新聞學研究，121，89-125。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Adedoyin-Olowe, M.、Gaber, M. M.、Stahl, F.(2014)。A survey of data mining techniques for social network analysis。Journal of Data Mining & Digital Humanities。  new window
20.Anstead, Nick、O'Loughlin, Ben(2015)。Social media analysis and public opinion: The 2010 UK general election。Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication，20(2)，204-220。  new window
21.Himelboim, I.、Sweetser, K. D.、Tinkham, S.、Cameron, K.、Danelo, M.、West, K.(2014)。Valence-based homophily on Twitter: Network Analysis of Emotions and Political Talk in the 2012 Presidential Election。New Media Society，18(7)，1382-1400。  new window
22.Graves, I.、McDonald, N.、Goggins, S.(2014)。Sifting signal from noise: A new perspective on the meaning of tweets about the "big game"。New Media Society，18(2)，293-312。  new window
23.Groshek, J.、Al-Rawi, A.(2013)。Public sentiment and critical framing in social media content during the 2012 U.S. presidential campaign。Social Science Computer Review，31(5)，563-576。  new window
24.Tiessen, M.、McKelvey, F.、Simcoe, L.(2015)。A consensual hallucination no more? The Internet as simulation machine。European Journal of Cultural Studies，18，577-594。  new window
25.謝君蔚、徐美苓(20111200)。媒體再現科技發展與風險的框架與演變：以基因改造食品新聞為例。中華傳播學刊，20，143-179。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.Entman, Robert M.(1993)。Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm。Journal of Communication，43(4)，51-58。  new window
27.陳憶寧(20020700)。公共議題之遊戲框架初探--以核四議題為例。新聞學研究，72，85-117。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.Church, Kenneth Ward、Hanks, Patrick(1990)。Word Association Norms, Mutual Information, and Lexicography。Computational Linguistics，16(1)，22-29。  new window
29.McCombs, Maxwell E.、Shaw, Donald L.(1972)。The Agenda-setting Function of Mass Media。The Public Opinion Quarterly，36(2)，176-187。  new window
30.Neuman, W. Russell、Guggenheim, Lauren、Jang, S. Mo、Bae, Soo Young(2014)。The Dynamics of Public Attention: Agenda-Setting Theory Meets Big Data。Journal of Communication，64(2)，193-214。  new window
會議論文
1.Wan, X.(2009)。Co-training for cross-lingual sentiment classification。The Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP。Association for Computational Linguistics。235-243。  new window
2.Turney, P. D.(2002)。Thumbs up or thumbs down? Semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews。The 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics，P. Isabelle (Chair) (會議日期: 2002/07/06-2002/07/12)。Association for Computational Linguistics。417-424。  new window
圖書
1.Mayer-Schönberger, Viktor、Cukier, Kenneth、林俊宏(2013)。大數據。遠見天下文化。  延伸查詢new window
2.Stubbs, Michael(2001)。Words and phrases: Corpus studies of lexical semantics。Blackwell Publishers。  new window
3.Delanty, G.(1997)。Social science: Beyond constructivism and realism。Buckingham：Open University Press。  new window
4.Sniderman, Paul M.、Brody, Richard A.、Tetlock, Philip E.(1991)。Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.王石番(1990)。傳播內容分析法：理論與實證。臺北：幼獅文化。  延伸查詢new window
6.Fellbaum, C.(1998)。WordNet。Blackwell Publishing Ltd。  new window
7.洪漢鼎(1995)。語言學的轉向--當代分析哲學的發展。臺北：遠流。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Liu, B.(2012)。Sentiment analysis and opinion mining。  new window
9.Geertz, Clifford(1973)。The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays。Basic Books。  new window
其他
1.崔愫欣(20110920)。臺灣反核運動的歷史與策略（從1980至2011），http://www.coolloud.org.tw/node/64150。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Manovich, L.(2012)。Trending: The Promises and the Challenges of Big Social Data。Debates in the Digital Humanities。Minneapolis, MN：University of Minnesota Press。  new window
2.Nisbet, M. C.(2009)。Knowledge into action: Framing the debates over climate change and poverty。Doing news framing analysis: Empirical, theoretical, and normative perspectives。New York, NY：Routledge。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：526（臺灣：509，外國：17） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1641614 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67452728
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上