臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：客家新女性政治參與的世代差異：以葉菊蘭與徐欣瑩為例
書刊名：客家公共事務學報
作者：姜貞吟 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chiang, Chen-yin
出版日期：2012
卷期：6
頁次：頁49-79
主題關鍵詞：性別；政治參與；客家女性；選舉；Gender；Political participation；Hakka women；Election
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:92
  • 點閱點閱:29
台灣女性近年在政治場域的參與，不論在質與量上，都愈見增加與提高，也陸續出現女性參與政治的相關研究與討論，但是在政治場域的探討領域裡，客家女性的圖像辨識卻不是那麼的清楚與明顯，族群的身分並未成為鮮明的標誌，經常被忽略。相較於對歐美女性在參與政治場域的分析，國際文獻的分析層次經常把亞洲女性的參政視為一個整體，也認為台灣女性的參政多數是政治受難家屬類型，並認為這些女性是不熟悉政治事務的；而對近年新世代的年輕女性參政，卻又賦予年輕、活力、高學歷與專業的現代形象，兩者形成傳統保守被動與現代積極主動的鮮明對比。本研究探討客家女性政治參與，以葉菊蘭與徐欣瑩為例，探討她們首度參與選舉時的不同世代差異，釐清傳統與現代交融及混匯的樣貌。本研究結果發現，兩位客家女性參與選舉的世代差異可分為社會網絡（social net）與網際網絡（internet）之別，葉菊蘭所處世代的社會關係網絡為黨外運動同儕、徐欣瑩則為教育場域的各項人際資本；而前者接觸選民說明參選理念的方式為面對面的說明會、造勢活動，後者除了造勢活動與說明會之外，網際網路成為她長期、仔細地說明政見的工具，作為跟選民直接接觸的管道，顯見網際網路的應用改變了傳統選區選民投入選舉的方式。
Taiwanese women’s participation in political field in recent years has been increasing quantitatively and qualitatively, and the study and discussion pertinent to women and political participation can also be seen consecutively. However, in the study of this political field, Hakka women’s iconic recognition seems not that clear and obvious; ethnic identity has not become a distinctive mark as to be ignored. Compared to the analysis of Western women’s political participation, international archive tends to see Asian women’s political participation as a whole, thinking they are unfamiliar with political affairs, while casting modern image of young, energetic, high academic background and professionalism on those young women of new generation, which makes it a starkly distinctive contrast between tradition, conservativeness, passiveness and modernity, aggressiveness, and activeness. This research aims to explore Hakka women’s political participation, take Chu-Lan Yeh and Hsin-Ying Hsu for example, delving into the difference existing in different generation for their debut participation in elections, to clarity the visage of mix and combination between tradition and modernity. This study result uncovers that the generation difference of these two Hakka women’s participation in election lies in the difference of social net and that of Internet. The social net of the generation Chu-Lan Yeh lives in is opposition party movement peers while Hsin-Ying Hsu’s is all kinds of interpersonal capital in educational field. The way the former gets in touch with electorates explicating her political participation ideology is face-to-face meetings and campaigning promotion activities; yet besides campaigning promotion activities and meetings, Internet turns to be the latter’s tool for explicating electoral concepts detailedly and delicately. In the same token, the application of Internet also changes the way traditional constituency’s electorates involved in elections.
期刊論文
1.姜貞吟(20050400)。兩性參政之現況問題與未來展望。國家政策季刊，4(1)，33-68。  延伸查詢new window
2.姜貞吟(20110800)。男性不在場：臺灣女性參政的性別階序格局。臺灣社會研究季刊，83，179-240。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.唐文慧、王怡君(19991000)。女性參政者之角色扮演與政策議題--以一九九八年立法委員選舉為例。國立政治大學社會學報，29，75-116。  延伸查詢new window
4.姜貞吟(20091200)。女性作為政治行動者：臺灣女性參政圖像的反思。臺灣社會研究，76，277-316。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.陳明通(19990100)。地方派系、賄選風氣與選舉制度設計。國策專刊，7，12-13。  延伸查詢new window
6.楊婉瑩(20001200)。婦女的政治機會結構析論。國立中山大學社會科學季刊，2(4)，65-95。  延伸查詢new window
7.Anderson, K.(1975)。Working women and political participation 1952-1972。American Journal of Political Science，79(3)，439-453。  new window
8.Jalalzai, F.、College, A.(2004)。Women political leaders: Past and present。Women & Politics，26(3/4)，85-108。  new window
9.Katzenstein, M. F.(1978)。Towards equality: Cause and consequence of the political prominence of women in India。Asian Survey，75(5)，473-486。  new window
10.Kincaid, D.(1978)。Over his dead body: A positive perspective on windows in the U. S. congress。Western Political Quarterly，31，96-104。  new window
11.Paxton, P.、Hughes, M. M.、Green, J. L.(2006)。The international women's movement and women's political representation, 1893-2003。American Sociological Review，71，898-920。  new window
12.Richter, L. K.(1990)。Exploring theories of female leadership in south and southeast Asia。Pacific Affairs，63(4)，524-540。  new window
13.Thompson, M. R.(2002)。Female leadership of democratic transitions in Asia。Pacific Affairs，75(4)，535-555。  new window
14.Yuval-Davis, N.(2005)。Intersectionality and feminist politics。European Journal of Women's Studies，73(3)，193-209。  new window
15.Welch, S.(1977)。Women as political animals: A test of some explanations for male-female political participation differences。American Journal of Political Science，21，711-730。  new window
16.黃長玲(20010500)。從婦女保障名額到性別比例原則--兩性共治的理論與實踐。問題與研究，40(3)，69-82。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.蔡宗珍(19971000)。關於民意代表之婦女保障名額條款的另類思考。婦女與兩性研究通訊，44，5-7。  延伸查詢new window
18.盛杏湲(19981100)。政黨配票與侯選人票源的集散度：一九八三年至一九九五年臺灣地區立法委員選舉的分析。選舉研究，5(2)，73-102。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.洪家殷(19960600)。論我國婦女當選保障名額之規定。東吳法律學報，9(1)，151-189。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.楊婉瑩(20071100)。政治參與的性別差異。選舉研究，14(2)，53-94。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Burns, N.(2006)。Gender in the aggregate, gender in the individual, gender and political action。The conference on political women and American democracy。IN：University of Notre Dame。  new window
學位論文
1.江素慧(1996)。女性政治菁英之研究：以民進黨女性公職人員為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.中央選舉委員會(1994)。第二屆立法委員選舉實錄。台北市：中央選舉委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.中央選舉委員會(1996)。第三屆立法委員選舉實錄。台北市：中央選舉委員會。  延伸查詢new window
3.中央選舉委員會(1999)。第四屆立法委員選舉實錄。台北市：中央選舉委員會。  延伸查詢new window
4.中央選舉委員會(2002)。第五屆立法委員選舉實錄。台北市：中央選舉委員會。  延伸查詢new window
5.中央選舉委員會(2005)。第六屆立法委員選舉實錄。台北市：中央選舉委員會。  延伸查詢new window
6.中央選舉委員會(2008)。第七屆立法委員選舉暨全國性公民投票案第三案、第四案實錄。台北：中央選舉委員會。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳明通(1995)。政治派系與台灣政治變遷。台北：月旦。  延伸查詢new window
8.彭渰雯(2000)。1999台灣女權報告。台北：財團法人婦女新知基金會。  延伸查詢new window
9.蕭新煌、黃世明(2001)。台灣客家族群史之政治篇。南投：台灣省文獻委員會。  延伸查詢new window
10.Bames, S. H.、Kaase, M.、Allerbeck, K. R.(1979)。Political action: Mass participation in five western democracies。Beverly Hills, CA：Sage。  new window
11.Chou, Bih-er、Clark, Cal、Clark, Janet(1990)。Women in Taiwan politics: Overcoming barriers to women's participation in a modernizing society。Boulder, CO：Lynne Rienner。  new window
12.Burns, N.、Schlozman, K. L.、Verba, S.(2001)。The private roots of public action: Gender, equality and political participation。Cambridge, MA：Harvard University Press。  new window
13.Beckwith, K.(1986)。American women and political participation: The impacts of work, generation, and feminism。New York：John Wiley & Sons。  new window
14.Conway, M.(1991)。Political participation in the United States。Washington, DC：Congressional Quarterly。  new window
15.Darcy, R.、Welch, S.、Clark, J.(1987)。Women: Elections and representation。New York：Longman。  new window
16.Gertzog, I. N.(1995)。Congressional women: Their recruitment, integration, and behavior。Westport, CT：Praeger。  new window
17.Jennings, Myron K.、Niemi, Richard G.(1974)。The political character of adolescence: The influence of families and schools。Princeton University Press。  new window
18.Lovenduski, J.、Norris, P.(1993)。Gender and party politics。London：Sage。  new window
19.Mandel, R. B.(1981)。In the running: The new woman candidate。New Haven, CT：Ticknor and Fields。  new window
20.Sainsbury, D.(1985)。Women's routes to national legislatures: A comparison of eligibility and nomination in the United States, Britain and Sweden。Barcelona：European Consortium for Political Research。  new window
21.Tolleson-Rinehart, S.(1992)。Gender Consciousness and Politics。New York：Routledge。  new window
22.Jennings, M. Kent、Niemi, Richard G.(1981)。Generations and Politics: A Panel Study of Young Adults and Their Parents。Princeton University Press。  new window
23.Campbell, Angus、Converse, Philip E.、Miller, Warren E.、Stokes, Donald E.(1960)。The American Voter。New York：John Wiley and Sons, Inc.。  new window
24.Kvale, Steinar(1996)。Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing。Sage。  new window
其他
1.(20051126)。三合一選舉系列專題／樁腳篇樁腳藍綠通吃今年選戰特色需求量大實力派更是身價不凡抓賄雷厲風行有人坦承「想動都很難」。  延伸查詢new window
2.(20051115)。《選舉繽紛》徐欣瑩交大校長鄭重推薦。  延伸查詢new window
3.(20051113)。《選戰看板》徐欣瑩頂博士班學歷拚議員。  延伸查詢new window
4.(20080106)。《場邊論戰／竹縣篇》組織戰、打帶跑、努力追選情冷。  延伸查詢new window
5.(19891203)。南區立委／民進黨風雲「綠三角」不同調康系棄守山河林正杰、葉菊蘭訴求成功雙上壘張德銘飽受夾擊慘遭「滑鐵盧」。  延伸查詢new window
6.(19891126)。民生公園橋頭堡最紅自辦政見會總計1283場創歷年高紀錄民生公園場地最搶手取代往日的龍山寺與公圳公園。  延伸查詢new window
7.(20091121)。張碧琴：炒作族群心態可議，http://www.worldjoumal.com/pages/full_news/。  延伸查詢new window
8.(20071117)。徐欣瑩參選投震撼彈無黨籍縣議員轉戰立委竹縣選情複雜化邱鏡淳坦承連任之路受衝擊。  延伸查詢new window
9.(19860821)。國大代表競選三種提名策略足不足額因地制宜嘉市禮讓情況特別。  延伸查詢new window
10.(19890407)。涉嫌叛亂抗傳警方強制拘提鄭南榕拒捕投彈自焚死亡。  延伸查詢new window
11.(20051208)。徐欣瑩現象改寫竹北選戰利用網路作戰專攻大廈新社區。  延伸查詢new window
12.(19890416)。葉菊蘭塑造成吳淑珍第二？。  延伸查詢new window
13.(19890407)。辦公室當成城堡鄭南榕畫地為牢。  延伸查詢new window
14.(20051001)。選舉登記花招百出有人大張旗鼓有人低調辦理也有人故意錯開對手時間。  延伸查詢new window
15.(19861126)。選舉繽紛：攤販賣小吃發筆選舉財助選三聲帶頗具親和力。  延伸查詢new window
16.(19861209)。謠傳運兵船被風吹翻兩雜誌負責人送偵辦。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.梁雙蓮、顧燕翎(1995)。台灣婦女的政治參與：體制內與體制外的觀察。台灣婦女處境白皮書：1995年。台北：時報。  延伸查詢new window
2.Clark, J.、Clark, C.(2000)。The reserved seats system in Taiwan。Democracy and the status of women in east Asia。Boulder, CO：L. Rienner。  new window
3.Lee, R. J.(2000)。Electoral reform and women's empowerment: Taiwan and South Korea。Democracy and the status of women in east Asia。Boulder, CO：L. Rienner。  new window
4.Mannheim, K.(1953)。The problem of generation。Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge。London：Routledge Kegan Paul。  new window
5.Waylen, G.(1996)。Analysing women in the politics of the Third World。Women and politics in the Third World。London：Routledge。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：493（臺灣：466，外國：27） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1753550 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67556773
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上