:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:政黨配票與侯選人票源的集散度:一九八三年至一九九五年臺灣地區立法委員選舉的分析
書刊名:選舉研究
作者:盛杏湲 引用關係
作者(外文):Sheng, Shing-yuan
出版日期:1998
卷期:5:2
頁次:頁73-102
主題關鍵詞:複數選區單記不可讓渡投票制政黨配票立委選舉政黨競爭地方派系票源集散度選區SNTV electoral systemVote-equalizing strategyLegislative electionsParty competitionLocal factionVote-distribution of candidatesConstituency
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(19) 博士論文(3) 專書(2) 專書論文(2)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:16
  • 共同引用共同引用:215
  • 點閱點閱:86
本篇論文的主要目的是從SNTV制度導致的政黨配票與候選人票源的集散度為切入點,來探討我國政黨競爭的本質與政黨政治的發展。本研究以一九八三年至一九九五年的五次立法委員選舉為分析的基礎,研究發現指出:第一,國民黨以責任區為主要配票方式,配合地方派系來區隔候選人票源,因此它的候選人票源較集中,而民進黨與新黨缺乏像國民黨一般綿密的基層組織與地方派系以為支援,因此其候選人得票較分散;第二,從長期來觀察,國民黨候選人的票源即使比其它黨候選人來得較集中,卻有愈來愈分散的趨勢,此一愈趨分散的態勢尤以自一九八九年以降最為明顯;第三,地方派系支持的候選人票源較集中,只是此一票源集中的現象也有下降的現象,這顯示地方派系隨著社會經濟的發展與反對勢力的茁壯,其在選舉中的影響力已有下跌的趨勢。這在在顯示出了當反對黨崛起且漸漸茁壯之後,國民黨以地方的基層組織與地方派系以為支援的責任區配票制度已不像過去一般具有成效。
This paper examines the major parties' vote-equalizing strate-gies and the impacts of these strategies on candidates' vote-distribu-tion under a SNTV electoral system. From this perspective, this study tries to observe party competition and party politics in Taiwan since the 1980s. Based on a study on legislative elections from 1983 to 1995, this paper shows some research findings. First, the KMT uses the local factions and "responsibility zone system" to mobilize and allocate potential votes to her candidates. Therefore, the vote-distribution of the KMT candidates tends to be concentrated on some parts of the electoral district. On the other hand, the DPP and NP cannot be helped by the local organizations so that the vote shares of their candidates tend to be scattered across the district. Secondly, from a longitudinal perspective, the vote shares of the KMT candidates are getting scattered. This tendency has become evident since the end of the 1980s, when the opposition parties were gradually organized and institutionalized. Thirdly, the influence of the local factions has gradually become weak because of the devel-opment of social economy and the emergence of the opposition par-ties. All of these tendencies show that the KMT's campaign system which depends on vote allocation, local factions and grass-root organizations has become shaky.
期刊論文
1.游清鑫(19940500)。選區規劃與選舉競爭。選舉研究,1(1),147-170。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Cox, Gary W.、Rosenbluth, Frances(1994)。Reducing Nomination Errors: Factional Competition and Party Strategy in Japan。Electoral Studies,13,4-16。  new window
3.游清鑫(19960500)。選舉制度、選舉競爭與選舉策略:八十四年北市南區立委選舉策略之個案研究。選舉研究,3(1),137-177。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.方晉安(1995)。李登輝全力捆綁軍眷票。財訊月刊,164,173-178。  延伸查詢new window
5.Cox, Gary W.(1996)。Is the Single Nontransferable Vote Superproportional? Evidence from Japan and Taiwan。American Journal of Political Science,40(3),740-755。  new window
6.Cox, Gary W.(1994)。Strategic Voting Equilibria under the Single Nontransferable Vote。American Political Science Review,88(3),608-621。  new window
7.Cox, Gary W.(1991)。SNTV and d'Hondt are Equivalent。Electoral Studies,10,118-132。  new window
8.Cox, Gary W.、Niou, Emerson M. S.(1994)。Seat Bonuses under the Single Nontransferable Vote System: Evidence from Japan and Taiwan。Comparative Politics,26(2),221-236。  new window
9.Reed, Steven R.(1990)。Structural and Behaviour: Extending Duverger's Law to the Japanese Case。British Journal of Political Science,20,335-356。  new window
10.Nathan, Andraw J.(1993)。The Legislative Yuan Elections in Taiwan : Consequences of the Electoral System。Asian Survey,33,424-438。  new window
11.Hsieh, John fuh-Sheng、Niemi, Richard G.(1999)。Can Duverger's Law Be Extended to SNTV? The Case of Taiwan's Legislative Yuan Elections。Electoral Studies,18(1),101-116。  new window
12.Reed, Steven R.(1994)。Democracy and the Personal Vote: A Cautionary Tale from Japan。Electoral Studies,13(1),17-28。  new window
13.劉義周(19920300)。國民黨責任區輔選活動之參與觀察研究。國立政治大學學報,64,209-233。  延伸查詢new window
14.Cox, Gary W.、Rosenbluth, Frances McCall(1993)。The Electoral Fortunes of Legislative Factions in Japan。American Political Science Review,87(3),577-589。  new window
15.謝相慶(19951200)。單記不可移轉得票法[Single Non-transferable Vote Method]下候選人的當選門檻及政黨的提名策略--以我國第三屆立法委員選舉為例驗證。中山人文社會科學期刊,4(2)=9,305-324。  延伸查詢new window
16.黃德福(19930800)。選舉制度與政黨競爭--臺灣地區解嚴後選舉競爭的觀察。理論與政策,7(4)=28,3-21。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.劉義周(19951100)。臺灣的新政黨體系。問題與研究,34(11),1-10。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.陳陸輝(19941100)。中國國民黨「黃復興黨部」的輔選效果分析。選舉研究,1(2),53-96。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.黃德福(19941100)。政黨競爭與政治民主化:臺灣地區政黨體系的新挑戰。選舉研究,1(2),199-220。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.黃德福(19940500)。現代化、選舉競爭與地方派系:一九九二年立法委員選舉的分析。選舉研究,1(1),75-91。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Cox, Gary W.(1990)。Centripetal and Centrifugal Incentives in Electoral Systems。American Journal of Political Science,34(4),903-935。  new window
22.游清鑫(19951200)。臺灣政黨競爭及體系之變遷。政治學報,25,181-206。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.劉義周(1986)。國民黨責任區輔選制的效果:七十四年台北市議員選舉候選人得票率之分析。投票行為與選舉文化研討會,中國政治學會 。台北:中國政治學會。417-484。  延伸查詢new window
2.Lin, Jih-wen(1995)。Social Cleavage and Political Competition under the Single Nontransferable Vote System。the First Annual Taiwan Studies Conference in North America,(會議日期: 1995/06/02-04)。Yale University。  new window
3.劉義周(1991)。國民黨責任區輔選制效果之研究。政黨政治與民主憲政研討會。臺北:民主基金會。269-298。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.陳明通(1989)。區域性聯合獨佔經濟、地方派系與省議員選舉:一項省議員候選人背景資料的分析。行政院國科會。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Liu, I-Chou(1990)。The Electoral Effect of Social Context Control on Voters : The Case of Taipei, Taiwan(博士論文)。University of Michigan。  new window
2.Sheng, Shing-Yuan(1996)。Electoral Competition and Legislative Participation(博士論文)。University of Michigan。  new window
3.許志鴻(1986)。選區選民影響力對議員角色行為的作用之探討:第四屆臺北市議員之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.包正豪(1997)。第三屆立法委員選舉新黨競選策略之研究:以臺北市、臺北縣與桃園縣為例(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Fiorina, Morris P.(1974)。Representatives, Roll Calls, and Constituencies。Lexington, Massachusetts:Lexinton Books。  new window
2.盛杏湲(1986)。國民黑與黨外中央後援會選舉競爭之研究。台北:桂冠圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.張昆山、黃正雄(1996)。地方派系與台灣政治。台北:聯合報出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.趙永茂(1978)。台灣地方派系與地方建設的關係。高雄:德馨室出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Cain, Bruce、Ferejohn, John、Fiorina, Morris(1987)。The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence。Cambridge:Harvard University Press。  new window
6.Taagepera, Rein、Shugart, Matthew Søberg(1989)。Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems。Yale University Press。  new window
7.黃秀端(1994)。選區服務:立法委員競選連任的基礎。台北:唐山出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.Fenno, Richard F. Jr.(1978)。Home Style: House Members in Their Districts。Glenview, Illinois:Scott, Foresman and Company。  new window
9.王業立(1996)。我國選舉制度的政治影響。臺北:五南圖書出版公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Rae, Douglas W.(1971)。The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws。New Haven, Conn.:Yale University Press。  new window
11.郭正亮(1998)。民進黨轉型之痛。臺北:遠見天下文化出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
12.黃德福(1992)。民主進步黨與台灣地區政治民主化。台北:時英出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.陳明通(1995)。派系政治與臺灣政治變遷。月旦出版社股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
14.Mayhew, David R.(2004)。Congress: The Electoral Connection。Yale University Press。  new window
15.Rosenstone, Steven J.、Hansen, John Mark(1993)。Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America。New York:MacMillan Publishing Company。  new window
圖書論文
1.Lijphart, Arend、Pintor, Rafael Lopez、Sone, Yasunori(1986)。The Limited Vote and the Single Nontransferable Vote: Lessons from the Japanese and Spanish Examples。Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences。New York:Agathon Press, Inc.。  new window
2.Chen, Ming-Tong(1996)。Local Factions and Elections in Taiwan Democratization。Taiwan Electoral Politics and Democratic Transition: Riding the Third Wave。Armonk, New York:M. E. Sharpe。  new window
3.Mezey, Michael(1985)。The Function of Legislatures in the Third World。Handbook of Legislative Research。Cambridge:Harvard University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE