臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：男性不在場：臺灣女性參政的性別階序格局
書刊名：臺灣社會研究季刊
作者：姜貞吟 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chiang, Chen-yin
出版日期：2011
卷期：83
頁次：頁179-240
主題關鍵詞：政治參與；女性；性別；立委選舉；性別階序格局；Political participation；Women；Gender；Legislative election；Matrices of gender hierarchy
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:924
  • 點閱點閱:305
女性在政治場域的參與，一直是婦女運動與性別研究者高度關注的議題，並且將參政數量的增加視為政治參與性質轉變的重要關鍵，因此，關心政治與性別的學者，經常對兩性在政治參與的差異、不平等的現象提出解釋。過往研究經常以教育資源、專業技能、現代獨立來解釋現在女性參政提高的因素，但這個現代化的發展進程，卻無法完全解釋為什麼台灣女性參政比例還是無法快速增加的結構因素。本研究係以第二屆到第七屆女性立法委員為分析對象，目的在找出台灣女性參政的社會條件為何。研究發現如下：（1）台灣女性參政持續受到政治家庭與地方勢力的結構因素影響，形成「參選人才庫」的內在封閉網絡，排擠其他女性參政的可能。（2）台灣女性雖具有高教育程度與專業經歷等現代化人力資本的條件，但她們的出場仍然深受在地男性無法在場、男性不願在場、男性不准在場等性別框架所影響。（3）這三種男性不在場背後隱含了參選人才庫中的四個位階的「性別階序格局」，是一種以地方勢力與政治家庭為基礎單位，血緣、地緣跟性別為主要篩選機制所組成的階序格局模式。
Political participation of women is a starting point in the study of social structure of gender for many researchers. They think that increasing rate of political participation of women signifies the improvement of women’s political status. Therefore, they often explain the phenomenon of gender differences and inequalities in political participation. Previous studies often interprets the factors influencing the increase of women’s participation nowadays in politics with educational resources, professional skills, modern independence, however, this modernization process can’t thoroughly explain why the participation rate of Taiwanese women still has yet to increase significantly. This study is based on the analysis of women legislators ranking from the second to seventh terms with the aim to identify the social conditions of Taiwanese women’s participation in politics. The research findings are: (1) Taiwanese women’s participation in politics has continually influenced by political families and the factional structures. This has resulted in “pool of candidates” inner closed network and also led to the exclusion of other women in politics. (2) Although Taiwanese women have a high level of education and professional experience and other modern conditions of human capital, but their political participations are still profoundly limited by the gender frames like men’s failure, reluctance, and forbidden to show up. (3) Behind the previous three situations in which men are absent implies the ranking gap of “matrices of gender hierarchy” existing in the “candidates pool”. This structure is primarily a screening mechanism based on the political families and local factional power structures, which is made up of kinship, geographical factors and gender politics.
期刊論文
1.何金銘(19941100)。勝選因素：北高兩市二屆立委選舉比較研究。選舉研究，1(2)，163-198。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.高永光(20040500)。臺北縣地方派系與黑道互動模式之研究。選舉研究，11(1)，33-72。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.姜貞吟(2005)。兩性參政之現況問題與未來展望。國家政策季刊，4（1)，33-68。  延伸查詢new window
4.Kenworthy, Lane、Malami, Melissa(1999)。Gender inequality in political representation: A worldwide comparative analysis。Social Forces，78(1)，235-269。  new window
5.Norris, Pippa(1991)。Gender Differences in Political Participation in Britain: Traditional Radical and Revisionist Models。Government and Opposition，26，56-74。  new window
6.Richter, Linda K.(1990)。Exploring Theories of Female Leadership in South and Southeast Asia。Pacific Affairs，63(4)，524-540。  new window
7.Mansbridge, Jane(1999)。Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent "Yes"。The Journal of Politics，61(3)，628-657。  new window
8.楊婉瑩(200012)。婦女的政治機會結構析論。國立中山大學社會科學季刊，2(4)，65-95。  延伸查詢new window
9.吳偉立、洪永泰(20051100)。第五屆立委選舉臺聯候選人的得票分布：三種得票離散程度衡量工具的分析。選舉研究，12(2)，189-212。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.唐文慧、王怡君(19991000)。女性參政者之角色扮演與政策議題--以一九九八年立法委員選舉為例。國立政治大學社會學報，29，75-116。  延伸查詢new window
11.趙永茂(20010600)。新政黨政治形勢對臺灣地方派系政治的衝擊--彰化縣與高雄縣個案及一般變動趨勢分析。政治科學論叢，14，153-182。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.徐永明、陳鴻章(20041200)。地方派系與國民黨：衰退還是深化？。臺灣社會學，8，193-228。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.王金壽(20040600)。瓦解中的地方派系：以屏東為例。臺灣社會學，7，177-207。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Waylen, G.(1994)。Women and Democratization: Conceptualizing Gender Relations in Transition Politics。World Politics，46(3)，327-354。  new window
15.Welch, Susan(1977)。Women as Political Animals?: A Test of Some Explanations for Male-Female Participation Differences。American Journal of Political Science，21(4)，711-730。  new window
16.陳明通(19990100)。地方派系、賄選風氣與選舉制度設計。國策專刊，7，12-13。  延伸查詢new window
17.姜貞吟(20091200)。女性作為政治行動者：臺灣女性參政圖像的反思。臺灣社會研究，76，277-316。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Eisenstadt, S. N.、Roniger, Louis(1980)。Patron-Client Relations as a Model of Structuring Social Exchange。Comparative Studies in Society and History，22(1)，42-77。  new window
19.梁雙蓮(19931100)。影響臺灣省女性省議員參政的背景因素分析(一九五一至一九八九)。社會科學論叢，41，1-30。  延伸查詢new window
20.黃長玲(20010500)。從婦女保障名額到性別比例原則--兩性共治的理論與實踐。問題與研究，40(3)，69-82。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.蔡宗珍(19971000)。關於民意代表之婦女保障名額條款的另類思考。婦女與兩性研究通訊，44，5-7。  延伸查詢new window
22.盛杏湲(19981100)。政黨配票與侯選人票源的集散度：一九八三年至一九九五年臺灣地區立法委員選舉的分析。選舉研究，5(2)，73-102。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.洪家殷(19960600)。論我國婦女當選保障名額之規定。東吳法律學報，9(1)，151-189。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.吳宜侃(20050500)。立法委員連任預測模分析--以第四屆立法委員為例。選舉研究，12(1)，173-210。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.林繼文(19981100)。地盤劃分與選舉競爭：對應分析法在多席次選舉研究上之應用。選舉研究，5(2)，103-128。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.楊婉瑩(20071100)。政治參與的性別差異。選舉研究，14(2)，53-94。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.黃德福(19940500)。現代化、選舉競爭與地方派系：一九九二年立法委員選舉的分析。選舉研究，1(1)，75-91。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.Granovetter, Mark S.(1985)。Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness。American Journal of Sociology，91(3)，481-510。  new window
29.Desert, Sophie des(1999)。Tu seras elue, ma fille !。Le Nouvel Observateur，pp.20-26。  new window
30.Anderson, Benedict(1988)。Cacique Democracy and the Philippines: Origins and Dreams。New Life Review 169 (May-June 1988)，3，3-33。  new window
31.Inglehart, Ronald, and Pippa Norris(2001)。Cultural Obstacles to Equal Representation。Journal of Democracy，12，126-141。  new window
32.Crossette, Barbara(2008)。Indira Gandhi’s Legacy: Vying for Mastery in South Asia。World Policy Journal，25(1)，36-44。  new window
33.Rule, Wilma(1987)。Electoral Systems, Contextual Factors and Women’s Opportunity for Election to Parliament in Twenty-three Democracies。Western Political Quarterly September，477-498。  new window
34.Jalalzai, Farida and Allegheny College(2004)。Women Political Leaders : Past and Present。Women & Politics，26(3/4)，85-108。  new window
35.Katzenstein, Mary Fainsod(1978)。Towards Equality : Cause and Consequence of the Political Prominence of Women in India。Asian Survey，18(5)，473-486。  new window
36.Hutchcroft, Paul David(2008)。The Arroyo Imbroglio in the Philippines。Journal of Democracy，19(1)，141-155。  new window
37.Matland , Richard E.(1998)。Women’s Representation in National Legislatures: Developed and Developing Countries。Legislative Studies Quarterly，23，109-125。  new window
38.Oakes, Ann, and Elizabeth Almquist(1993)。Women in National Legislatures: A Cross-National Test of Macrostuctural Gender Theories。Population Research Policy and Review，12，71-81。  new window
39.Paxton, Pamela(1997)。Women in National Legislatures: A Cross-National Analysis。Social Science Research，26，442-464。  new window
40.Paxton, Pamela, Melanie M. Hughes and Jennifer L. Green(2006)。The International Women’s Movement and Women’s Political Representation, 1893-2003。American Sociological Review，71，898-920。  new window
41.Reynolds, Andrew(1999)。Women in the Legislatures and Executives of the World: Knocking at the Highest Glass Ceiling。World Politics，51，547-572。  new window
42.Thompson, Mark R.(2002)。Female Leadership of Democratic Transitions in Asia。Pacific Affairs，75(4)，535-555。  new window
43.Silvestre, Jaylyn(2001)。The Rise of Women Leaders in the Philippines: A Study of Corazon Aquino and Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo。The Berkeley McNair Research Journal，pp.165-178。  new window
會議論文
1.張茂桂、陳俊傑(1986)。現代化、地方派系與地方選舉投票率之關係：自由派理論再檢討。投票行為與選舉文化研討會。台北：中國政治學會。487-519。  延伸查詢new window
2.高永光(2003)。〈地方派系政黨支持變遷之研究：基隆市個案分析〉。  延伸查詢new window
3.高永光(2002)。〈二十一世紀台灣地方派系的發展〉。  延伸查詢new window
4.Sainsbury, Diane(1985)。Women’s Routes to National Legislatures : A Comparison of Eligibility and Nomination in the United States, Britain and Sweden。Barcelona。  new window
學位論文
1.廖峻宏(2003)。地方政治生態與選舉關係之研究--以台中市立法委員為例(碩士論文)。南華大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.許翠谷(2002)。影響我國女性政治參與之因素分析--以第四屆女性立法委員為例(碩士論文)。國立中山大學，高雄。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳芳銘(1996)。地方派系的分化與結盟變遷之研究--以嘉義縣和高雄縣為例(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.涂一卿(1994)。台灣地方派系之社會基礎--以嘉義縣地方派系為例(博士論文)。東海大學，台中。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.黃長玲(2003)。婦女與政治參與。台灣婦女權益報告書. 全集。臺北：婦女權益基金會。  延伸查詢new window
2.Burns, Nancy, Kathy Lehman Schlozman and Sidney Verba(2001)。The Private Roots of Public Action : Gender, Equality and Political Participation。Cambridge：Harvard University Press。  new window
3.Lovenduski, Joni, and Pippa Norris, eds.(1993)。Gender and Party Politics。London：Sage。  new window
4.Mandel, Ruth B.(1981)。In the Running: The New Woman Candidate。New Haven：Ticknor and Fields。  new window
5.Norris, Pippa、Lovenduski, Joni(1995)。Political Recruitment: Gender, Race, and Class in the British Parliament。Cambridge University Press。  new window
6.Bo, Zhiyue(2007)。China's Elite Politics: Political Transition and Power Balancing。World Scientific。  new window
7.中央選舉委員會(1996)。第三屆立法委員選舉實錄。台北：中央選舉委員會。  延伸查詢new window
8.中央選舉委員會(1999)。第四屆立法委員選舉實錄。台北：中央選舉委員會。  延伸查詢new window
9.中央選舉委員會(2002)。第五屆立法委員選舉實錄。台北：中央選舉委員會。  延伸查詢new window
10.中央選舉委員會(1994)。第二屆立法委員選舉實錄。  延伸查詢new window
11.Sapiro, V.(1983)。The Political Integration of Women: Roles, Socialization and Politics。Chicago：University of Illinois Press。  new window
12.Blondel, Jean(1970)。Votes, Parties, and Leaders。London, UK：Penguin。  new window
13.中央選舉委員會(2005)。《第六屆立法委員選舉實錄》。台北：中央選舉委員會。  延伸查詢new window
14.Rokkan, Stein(1970)。Citizens, Elections, and Parties: Approaches to the Comparative Study of the Processes of Development。New York：Universitetsforlaget。  new window
15.Lovenduski, Joni(1986)。Women and European Politics。Amherst：The University of Massachusetts Press。  new window
16.Norris, Pippa(1997)。Passages to Power: Legislative Recruitment in Advanced Democracies。Cambridge University Press。  new window
17.Gertzog, Irwin N.(1984)。Congressional Women: Their Recruitment, Treatment and Behavior。New York：Preager。  new window
18.Rule, Wilma、Zimmerman, Joseph F.(1994)。Electoral Systems in Comparative Perspective: Their Impact on Women and Minorities。New York：Greenwood Press。  new window
19.Sineau, Mariette(2001)。Profession: Femmes Politique。Paris：Presses de Science Po。  new window
20.Gertzog, Irwin N.(1995)。Congressional Women: Their Recruitment, Integration, and Behavior。Westport, Conn：Praeger。  new window
21.Inglehart, Ronald、Norris, Pippa(2003)。Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change around the World。Cambridge University Press。  new window
22.Chou, Bih-Er、Clark, Cal、Clark, Janet(1990)。Women in Taiwan politics: overcoming barriers to women’s participation in a modernizing society。Boulder, CO：London：Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc。  new window
23.財團法人婦女新知基金會(2000)。1999台灣女權報告。台北：財團法人婦女新知基金會。  延伸查詢new window
24.Lijphard, Arend、Aitkin, Don(1994)。Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-seven Democracies, 1945-1990。Oxford University Press。  new window
25.Verba, Sidney、Nie, Norman H.、Kim, Jae-on(1978)。Participation and Political Equality: A Seven-Nation Comparison。Cambridge。  new window
26.梁漱溟(2005)。中國文化要義。上海人民出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.費孝通(2003)。鄉土中國生育制度。北京：北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
28.金耀基(1992)。中國社會與文化：人際關係中人情之分析。香港：牛津大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
29.廖忠俊(1997)。臺灣地方派系的形成發展與質變。臺北：允晨文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.陳明通(1995)。派系政治與臺灣政治變遷。月旦出版社股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
31.王振寰(1996)。誰統治台灣？轉型中的國家機器與權力結構。巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.Kvale, Steinar(1996)。Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing。Sage。  new window
33.中央選舉委員會編印(2008)。《第七屆立法委員選舉暨全國性公民投票案第三案、第四案實錄》。  延伸查詢new window
34.陳岳、吳秀慧(1989)。《柯拉蓉傳》。台北。  延伸查詢new window
35.黃光國(1989)。《中國人的權力關係》。台北。  延伸查詢new window
36.Lee, Rose J.(2000)。Electoral Reform and Women’s Empowerment: Taiwan and South Korea。Democracy and the Status of Women in Esat Asia。USA。  new window
37.周柏青、游巧榮(2001)。《甘地夫人傳》。台北。  延伸查詢new window
38.Bhutto, Benazir(1989)。Daughter of the East。Hamish Hamilton。  new window
39.Darcy, R., Susan Welch, and Janet Clark(1987)。Women: Elections and Representation。New York。  new window
40.Frank, Katherine(2002)。Indira: The Life of Indira Nehru Gandhi。  new window
41.Genovese, Michael A., and Seth Thompson(1993)。Women as Chief Executives : Does Gender Matter ?。Women as National Leaders。London。  new window
42.Jeydel, Alana S.(2004)。Political Women: The Women’s Movement, Political Institutions, the Battle for Women’s Suffrage and the ERA。  new window
43.Saint-Germain, Michelle(1993)。Women in Power in Nicaragua: Myth and Reality。Women as National Leaders。London。  new window
44.Taagepera, Rein(1994)。Beating the Law of Minority Attrition。Electoral Systems in Comparative Perspective: Their Impact on Women and Minorities。Westport。  new window
45.Vianello, Mino and Gwen Moore ed.,(2000)。Gendering Elites: Economic and Political Leadership in 27 Industrialised Societies。  new window
46.Waylen, Georgina(1996)。Analysing Women in the Politics of the Third World。Women and Politics in the Third World。London ; New York。  new window
47.謝敏捷、吳芳銘、劉兆隆(1994)。〈地方派系與金權政治的循環機制〉。「選舉與政治腐化」學術研討會論文。台南。  延伸查詢new window
48.趙永茂(1998)。〈台灣地方派系的轉變：從解嚴到精省〉。「修憲後地方政治與行政發展」學術研討會。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(1998)。姊弟檔：余玲雅余政道，各有奧援，家人分邊助選，形成母女檔和兄弟檔。  延伸查詢new window
2.(2001)。政治鬩牆，翻開余家朱門恩怨史。  延伸查詢new window
3.(2001)。台北縣新聞-選舉觀察。  延伸查詢new window
4.(2001)。《台灣省參議會、臨時省議會暨省議會時期口述歷史訪談計畫：余陳月瑛女士訪談錄》，台中縣霧峰鄉。，http://old.tpa.gov.tw/study/tw_study_02/tw_study_02_y.asp， 20061220。  延伸查詢new window
5.(2007)。歷年育齡婦女一般生育率、年齡別生育率及總生育率，http://www.ris.gov.tw/ch4/static/st20-0.html， 20070526。  延伸查詢new window
6.羅雨恆，嚴培曉(2001)。蕭登標案／何嘉榮、蕭登標皆因官司判決喪失參選資格，http://www.ettodat.com/2001/10/17/91-1209220.htm， 2006/11/26。  延伸查詢new window
7.(1986)。國大代表競選，三種提名策略，足不足額因地制宜，嘉市禮讓情況特別。  延伸查詢new window
8.(1992)。你是石子我是沙，團結起來力量大。  延伸查詢new window
9.(1992)。始終保持沉默，未對弟弟反擊，余玲雅身為余家女兒，無法改變。  延伸查詢new window
10.(1992)。台灣即將出現一張「新地圖」！明年立院結構＝全國政治版圖地方龍頭瞄準立院，派系主導提名生態，派系運作明顯的縣市，非派系屬意者出頭難。  延伸查詢new window
11.(1998)。立法委員／我想當，余家班姊弟都參選，地方懷疑余政道、余玲雅失和。  延伸查詢new window
12.朱雲漢(1994)。〈成也財團黑道，敗也財團黑道〉。  延伸查詢new window
13.楊婉瑩(2008)。矛盾的女性關鍵多數。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.梁雙蓮、顧燕翎(1995)。臺灣婦女的政治參與體制內與體制外的觀察。臺灣婦女處境白皮書：1995年。臺北：時報。  延伸查詢new window
2.Clark, Janet、Clark, Cal(2000)。The Reserved Seats System in Taiwan。Democracy and the Status of Women in East Asia。Boulder, Colorado：Lynne Rienner。  new window
3.朱雲漢(1989)。寡佔經濟與威權政治體制。壟斷與剝削--威權主義的政治經濟分析。臺北：臺灣研究基金會。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：785（臺灣：775，外國：10） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1586744 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67388205
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上