However, in the South China Sea region, in addition to China's claim of sovereignty, Taiwan, Vietnam, Malaysia, Indonesia, the Philippines, and Brunei all claim to have coastal sovereignty. Currently, most of them maintain the status quo and do not take any military action to fight for it. In fact, sovereignty disputes have existed in the past. Nevertheless, competition for energy and resources is the major consideration of all parties in this resource-rich South China Sea region. Therefore, when China claims to have almost all the sovereignty of the South China Sea and even includes waters close to the coasts of neighboring countries, the Philippines and Vietnam not only accuse the Chinese authorities of their unjustifiable requests and arbitrary, but they are even more provocative in their efforts to assert territory and sovereignty. China has repeatedly stated that it would like to discuss with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) on the formulation of the Conduct Code in the South China Sea region when conditions are ripe. Nonetheless, due to some countries' attempts to introduce foreign powers to intervene in the South China Sea so as to multilateralize and internationalize the South China Sea issue, it has led to a potential crisis in the South China Sea region, making it more difficult for the South China Sea negotiations to proceed. This author is wondering that if China's sovereignty disputes over the South China Sea's territory (sea), Its promotion to leave the disputes aside and joint development is like Wendt's constructivism model that the state will not use violence to settle down the disputes of interest, but rather solve the dispute by peaceful means just like friends helping each other.