:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:中國對南海領土(海)主權爭議之作為--Alexander Wendt建構主義的觀點
書刊名:人文與社會學報
作者:巫彰玫白兆偉 引用關係
作者(外文):Wu, Chang-meiPai, Jaw-wei
出版日期:2018
卷期:3:7
頁次:頁77-107
主題關鍵詞:建構主義霍布斯文化洛克文化康德文化新現實主義StructuralismHobbesianLockianKantianNeorealism
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:78
  • 點閱點閱:8
中國的改革開放政策使得人民的生活水平大為提高,經濟僅次於美國躍升為全球第二大經濟體,與30年前剛結束文化大革命的面貌,完全不可同日而語。然而在南海區域中,除中國宣稱擁有主權外,尚有台灣、越南、馬來西亞、印尼、菲律賓、汶萊等均宣稱擁有臨海主權,目前大多以維持現狀為主,並未採取軍事行動爭奪。其實以往主權爭議一直存在,但是在這個富藏資源的南海地區,爭奪能源和資源是各方主要的考量。因此,當中國宣稱擁有幾乎全部南海主權,甚至包括接近鄰邦沿岸的水域在內時,菲律賓和越南不但時時指控中國當局的無理與霸道,而在伸張領土主權方面的作為,也愈來愈挑釁中國。雖然在中國方面,曾多次表達願與東協國家(The Association of Southeast Asian Nations,ASEAN)在條件成熟時,探討制定南海區域的行為準則(Conduct Code),但因部分國家試圖拉攏外力介入南海問題,將南海問題多邊化、國際化,導致南海區域危機潛伏,南海談判更難以進行。引起筆者好奇的是中國面對南海領土(海)的主權爭議作為,提倡擱置爭議、共同開發,是否如溫特建構主義模式,國家不會使用暴力解決利益衝突,而是如朋友般相互幫助,以和平方式解決爭議?
However, in the South China Sea region, in addition to China's claim of sovereignty, Taiwan, Vietnam, Malaysia, Indonesia, the Philippines, and Brunei all claim to have coastal sovereignty. Currently, most of them maintain the status quo and do not take any military action to fight for it. In fact, sovereignty disputes have existed in the past. Nevertheless, competition for energy and resources is the major consideration of all parties in this resource-rich South China Sea region. Therefore, when China claims to have almost all the sovereignty of the South China Sea and even includes waters close to the coasts of neighboring countries, the Philippines and Vietnam not only accuse the Chinese authorities of their unjustifiable requests and arbitrary, but they are even more provocative in their efforts to assert territory and sovereignty. China has repeatedly stated that it would like to discuss with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) on the formulation of the Conduct Code in the South China Sea region when conditions are ripe. Nonetheless, due to some countries' attempts to introduce foreign powers to intervene in the South China Sea so as to multilateralize and internationalize the South China Sea issue, it has led to a potential crisis in the South China Sea region, making it more difficult for the South China Sea negotiations to proceed. This author is wondering that if China's sovereignty disputes over the South China Sea's territory (sea), Its promotion to leave the disputes aside and joint development is like Wendt's constructivism model that the state will not use violence to settle down the disputes of interest, but rather solve the dispute by peaceful means just like friends helping each other.
期刊論文
1.宋鎮照(20120900)。南海爭端風雲詭譎:中美區域平衡博弈的傑作。海峽評論,261,16-21。  延伸查詢new window
2.宋鎮照(20110800)。南海風雲再起,充滿詭譎與火藥味--解析中國和越、菲的南海衝突與美國角色。海峽評論,248,24-29。  延伸查詢new window
3.鄭端耀(20010600)。國際關係「社會建構主義理論」評析。美歐季刊,15(2)=142,199-229。  延伸查詢new window
4.孫國祥(20140600)。論東協對南海爭端的共識與立場。問題與研究,53(2),31-66。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.李瓊莉(20110800)。東協對南海問題的立場與回應。海峽評論,248,29-33。  延伸查詢new window
6.宋鎮照(2012)。第二十屆東協高峰會的機會與挑戰:一致或分歧。海峽評論,257,22-26。  延伸查詢new window
7.周宇(20110830)。誰為中國劃出南海九段線?。鳳凰週刊。  延伸查詢new window
8.花俊雄(2013)。習近平主席訪問中亞和東南亞的戰略意義。海峽評論,275。  延伸查詢new window
9.研究小組(20111202)。2013年南海地區形勢評估報告。遠景基金會季刊。  延伸查詢new window
10.孫若怡(2013)。中越關係:站在歷史的新起跑點上。海峽評論,276。  延伸查詢new window
11.趙國材(2015)。中國為何在南海永署礁填海造島?。海峽評論,289。  延伸查詢new window
12.初國華、張昌吉(20100400)。中國崛起之意涵及其區域政治效應。全球政治評論,30,127-156。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.宋燕輝(20030300)。南海地區安全戰略情勢之發展與現況。亞太研究論壇,19,12-21。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.陳鴻瑜(20000700)。The PRC's South China Sea Policy and Strategies of Occupation in the Paracel and Spratly Islands。Issues & Studies,36(4),95-131。new window  new window
會議論文
1.黃異、魏靜芬(1996)。評析現行南海水域之法律地位。臺灣與四鄰學術研討會,1-9。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Hong, Nong(2010)。Law and Politics in the South China Sea: Assessing the Role of UNCLOS in Ocean Dispute Settlement(博士論文)。University of Alberta,Edmonton, Alberta。  new window
圖書
1.傅崑成(1993)。我國南海歷史性水域法律地位之研究。臺北:行政院研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.O'Connell, D. P.、Brian, J.(1992)。Spratly Islands Issue: Strategic Interests and Options。New Port, Rhode Island:Naval War College。  new window
3.Nathan, Andrew J.、Ross, Robert S.(1997)。The Great Wall and the Empty Fortress: China's Search for Security。New York:W. W. Norton & Company。  new window
4.Jennings, Robert、Watts, Arthur(1992)。Oppenheim's International Law。Longman。  new window
5.丘宏達(2006)。現代國際法。三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.Chemillier-Gendreau, Monique(2000)。Sovereignty over the Paracel and Spratly Islands。The Hague:Kluwer Law International。  new window
7.孫國祥(2017)。南海之爭的多元視角。香港城市大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.劉復國、吳士存(2015)。2013年南海地區形勢評估報告。台北:國立政治大學安全研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
9.童振源(20030000)。全球化下的兩岸經濟關係。臺北:生智文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.吳漢鈞(20111009)。印尼納土納群島陷主權爭議?,http://www.zaobao.com/special/china/southchinasea/pages/southchinasea111009.shtml。  延伸查詢new window
2.(19970321)。ASEAN rallies around Vietnam in spat。  new window
3.Koh, Tommy(20110913)。Mapping out rival claims in the South China Sea。  new window
4.(20000315)。China Calls for Ban on Military Exercises in S. China Sea。  new window
5.(19990915)。Chinese Defense Minister Reiterates China's Stand on South China Sea Issue。  new window
6.(19990520)。Chinese Foreign Ministry Says Nansha Islands Sovereignty Indisputable。  new window
7.Tarabay, Jamie(19991129)。China Makes Proposal in South China Sea Dispute。  new window
8.(19990330)。FM Spokesman Reiterates Stance on Nansha Islands。  new window
9.陳建仲(20150527)。南海主權,蔡英文訪美高爆彈?。  延伸查詢new window
10.萬仁奎(20141115)。習告訴歐:我們重視主權。  延伸查詢new window
11.(20130505)。陸:東協為周邊外交優先,http://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E9%99%B8-%E6%9D%B1%E5%8D%94%E7%E5%91%A8%E9%82%8A%E5%A4%96%E4%BA%82%BA%A4%E5%84%AA%E5%85%88-104410948.html。  new window
12.方沛清(20130620)。越陸高層會談南海受重視,http://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E8%B6%8A%E9%99%B8%E9%AB%98%E5%B1%A4%E6%9C%83%E8%AB%87-%E5%8D%97%E6%B5%B7%E5%8F%97%E9%87%8D%E8%A6%96-043713856.html, 。  new window
13.牟辰潞(20110627)。越南是如何在南海問題上出爾反爾的,http://v.huanqiu.com/history/201106/20110627231157.shtml。  延伸查詢new window
14.何立波(20111215)。1946年收復南海諸島與「九段線」的由來,http://dangshi.people.com.cn/BIG5/16611814.html。  延伸查詢new window
15.林先江(20111123)。中國與亞細安國家的協作與爭議,http://big5.fmprc.gov.cn/gate/big5/www.fmprc.gov.cn/chn/pds/ziliao/zt/ywzt/2011nzt/wjbdyldrhy/t881400.htm。  new window
16.(20130702)。王毅強調:南海問題應由直接當事方談判解決,http://big5.ifeng.com/gate/big5/news.ifeng.com/mainland/special/nanhailingtuzhengduan/content-3/detail_2013_07/02/27052402_0.shtml?_from_ralated, 。  new window
17.鉅亭網新聞中心(20130701)。東盟峰會菲又奧步散發聲明指中國威脅南海和平,http://news.cnyes.com/Content/20130701/KH8ZW768UCKD2.shtml。  延伸查詢new window
18.齊之豐,張松林(20140630)。南中國海爭端,http://blog.boxun.com/hero/201406/nanshanxia/16_1.shtml。  延伸查詢new window
19.(20130703)。菲律賓聲稱黃岩島和仁愛礁被「侵佔」王毅嚴正回應,http://big5.ifeng.com/gate/big5/news.ifeng.com/mainland/special/nanhailingtuzhengduan/content-3/detail_2013_07/03/27060186_0.shtml?_from_ralated, 。  延伸查詢new window
20.薛力(20140208)。南海九段線--南海傳統海疆線的由來、現狀與含義,http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_c50390f90101p7tg.html。  延伸查詢new window
21.丁咚(20150104)。中國宜改變在南海的僵硬政策,http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_c50390f90102vaw8.html。  延伸查詢new window
22.中華人民共和國外交部(20100818)。中國在南海問題上的的基本立場以及解決南沙爭端的政策主張,http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_chn/ziliao_611306/tytj_611312/zcwj_611316/t10650.shtml。  延伸查詢new window
23.香港文匯報(2010)。南海各國與中方領土爭議,http://sp.wenweipo.com/1129nh/。  延伸查詢new window
24.謝劍(20140922)。時論--南海U 形線 國本所在,http://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20140922000423-260109。  延伸查詢new window
25.Kuhn, Anthony(19990401)。China Says Philippines Ramping Up Spratlys Rift。  new window
26.(19991125)。China Agree to Negotiate for Spratlys 'Code of conduct'。  new window
圖書論文
1.Storey, Ian(2011)。Brunei and China。China and its Borders: Twenty neighbors in Asia。New York:M.E. Sharpe, Inc.。  new window
2.鄭澤民(2009)。21世紀初越南在南海問題上的對華策略分析。聚焦南海:地緣政治、資源、航道。北京:中國經濟出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳欣之(2003)。國際關係理論:對現實主義的質疑。國際關係總論。臺北:揚智文化公司。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE