臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：臺灣諮商輔導倫理研究之回顧與展望
書刊名：中華輔導與諮商學報
作者：洪莉竹 引用關係
作者(外文)：Hung, Li-chu
出版日期：2018
卷期：53
頁次：頁151-189
主題關鍵詞：回顧研究；輔導倫理；諮商倫理；諮商倫理研究；整合研究；Counseling ethics；Counseling ethics research；Integration study；Review study；School counselor
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:77
  • 點閱點閱:77
本研究蒐集1986年到2017年台灣諮商輔導倫理的研究51篇，運用描述性統計分析論文數量、研究方法、研究主題及發展趨勢，並針對各論文的研究結果進行整合分析，進而提出台灣諮商輔導倫理研究未來發展的方向。本研究發現：（1）台灣諮商輔導倫理研究，呈現逐漸增多的趨勢，2011年之後的論文數量佔了整體論文數量的58.8%。（2）研究方法以質性研究最多，量化研究次之，採用混合設計的論文篇數很少；2001年之後質性研究明顯增加。（3）研究主題以「倫理認知與倫理行為」、「倫理困境與因應」和「倫理實務問題處理經驗」三類論文居多，1986-2000年代，研究主題集中在「倫理認知與倫理行為」；2001年之後，探討「倫理困境與因應」和「倫理實務問題處理經驗」之研究佔多數；「倫理教育」的研究數量較少。（4）研究結果分析發現幾個重要現象：（a）倫理議題的判斷信心、信念，在不同研究有不同的結果，倫理認知與行為之間有不一致的現象；（b）實務工作者面對倫理問題時會考量多元脈絡，兼顧多方需求，發展彈性因應的策略；反思倫理守則的適用性與侷限性，更看重專業倫理與諮商輔導專業之核心精神；處理過程需要持續對話與評估。依據研究結果討論，本研究對台灣諮商輔導倫理研究的未來發展，提出6項建議。
There were 51 studies on counselling ethics in Taiwan from 1986 to 2017. Descriptive statistic was used to analyze the number of research papers, research methods, research topics and development trends, and analyze the research results of each paper. The results indicate: (1) The number of counselling ethics researches in Taiwan showedan increasing trend. The number of papers in 2011-2017 accounted for 58.8% of the total number of papers. Master's and Doctoral thesis accounted for 64.7% of the total research volume. The advisor of thesis and the authors of journal focused on specific scholars. The counseling ethics research of Taiwan began with the discussion of the ethical judgment of the school counselors. However, the proportion of papers with the school counselors gradually decreased. (2) Research methods were mostly qualitative research and the numbers of quantitative studies was less than the qualitative studies. Very few studies were mixed designs. There was only one qualitative study in 1997. The number of qualitative studies in 2001-2010 is more than quantitative research. Qualitative research in 2011-2017 accounted for 73.3% of the numbers of papers in the same period. (3) Most of the studies targeted at ＂ethical cognition and ethical behavior＂, followed by the studies of ＂ethical dilemmas and coping＂ and ＂experiences in dealing with ethical issues＂, and then followed by ＂ethical thinking and decision-making＂. The studies of ＂ethical practice ＂ and ＂ethical education＂ were the least. From 1986 to 2000, research topics focused on ＂ethical cognition and ethical behavior＂. After 2001, the studies of ＂ethical dilemmas and coping＂, ＂ experiences in dealing with ethical issues ＂ and ＂ethical thinking and decision-making＂ has increased significantly. The studies of Taiwan's counseling ethics, which accounted for 33.3% of research on specific ethical issues. The remaining research topics were divided into two categories: (a) The overall discussion of the ethical cognition and ethical behavior of practitioners; (b) The ethical issues involved in some practical situation or specific form of service. (4) Analysis of the results of the researches revealed several important phenomena: (a) There were different results about ethical judgments and ethical beliefs. (b) There were inconsistencies between ethical cognition and ethical behavior. (c) Practitioners took into account multiple contexts, took into account the needs of multiple parties, and developed strategies that respond flexibly when they faced with ethical issues. (d) Practitioners reflected on the applicability and limitations of the ethical code, and paid more attention to the core spirit of professional ethics and counseling. They believed that the process of dealing with ethical issues required continuous dialogue and evaluation. Based on research results, six suggestions for the future development of Taiwan’s counseling ethics researches were proposed: (1) The research and publication of Taiwan's counseling ethics requires more researchers to invest. (2) The ethical issues and ethical practical experience faced by school counselors need to continue to pay attention. (3) Both qualitative and quantitative research have their own contributions and limitations. The research method of counseling ethics should be combined with the advantages of qualitative research and quantitative research to balance development. (4) On the research topic, more studies focused and in-depth exploring can be made on specific ethical issues involved in specific practical situations and diverse service forms. (5) The content and connotation of professional ethics education curriculum and support program needs to be expanded, taking into account the professional ethics and individual cultivation. Researchers actively develop diverse professional ethics education courses and ethical support programs, and explore their effectiveness. (6) Researchers collaborate with practitioners to conduct situational research. Researchers depict the ethical practical experience of Taiwanese practitioners in-depth and develop ethical decision and practice models with a cultural perspective.
期刊論文
1.張馥媛、林美芳、王智弘(20120300)。臨床心理師對心理治療知後同意倫理態度與行為之調查研究。中華心理衛生學刊，25(1)，105-134。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.文美華、王智弘、陳慶福(20090300)。網路諮商機構實施電子郵件諮商服務之實務經驗與倫理行為探討。教育心理學報，40(3)，419-438。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.王麗斐、林淑君(20100600)。國內諮商與心理治療質性研究之研究方法與研究題材之初步性整合分析。教育心理學報，41(4)，799-821。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.蔡錚雲(20080200)。倫理諮商中自律原則的哲學省思：專業倫理抑是本業倫理。應用倫理研究通訊，45，39-43。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.林曉玉、洪莉竹(2006)。處理自殺個案的倫理衝突--以一位軍中諮商心理師的經驗為例。醫護科技期刊，8(4)，318-328。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.張勻銘、王智弘、楊淳斐、李佳儒(20121200)。當事人和諮商師發展友誼關係之經驗：當事人觀點。中華心理衛生學刊，25(4)，633-658。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.盧怡任、王智弘(20120600)。諮商心理師倫理判斷與倫理行為之調查研究。教育心理學報，43(4)，783-803。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Smith, D.、Fitzpatrick, M.(1995)。Patient-therapist boundary issues: An integrative review of theory and research。Professional Psychology: Research and Practice，26(5)，499-506。  new window
9.李佳儒、張勻銘、王智弘(20101200)。未成年人團體諮商之倫理困境與因應策略。中華心理衛生學刊，23(4)，613-637。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Feit, S. S.、Lioyd, A. P.(1990)。A profession in search of professionals。Counselor Education and Supervision，29(4)，216-219。  new window
11.王智弘(2013)。朝向含攝文化的諮商研究：開展含攝華人文化的助人專業倫理觀。台灣心理諮商季刊，5(2)，vi-x。  延伸查詢new window
12.李佩怡(20060400)。臨終諮商倫理初探--照護癌末病人個我經驗之反思與建構。哲學與文化，33(4)=383，33-56。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.王韋琇、陳姝蓉、王智弘(20151200)。委外式員工協助方案心理師之專業倫理困境與其因應策略。教育心理學報，47(2)，199-216。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.杜淑芬、王麗斐(2016)。諮商心理師與國小學校輔導行政人員跨專業合作面臨的諮商倫理議題與因應策略--以台北市駐區心理師方案為例。臺灣諮商心理學報，4(1)，63-86。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.洪莉竹(2016)。實務工作者面對倫理挑戰的考量與經驗：臺灣諮商輔導倫理議題研究之探討。臺灣諮商心理學報，4(1)，1-16。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.陳增穎(20160900)。悲傷諮商助人工作者的專業倫理實踐之初探性研究。輔導季刊，52(3)，26-35。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.謝明瑾、王智弘(2016)。國民小學諮商心理師面臨保密議題倫理判斷歷程之敘說研究。臺灣諮商心理學報，4(1)，17-43。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.王智弘(2013)。積極投入含攝文化理論建構：以助人專業倫理雙元模型為例。臺灣心理諮商季刊，5(3)，vi-xi。  延伸查詢new window
19.王智弘、劉淑慧、張勻銘、鄧志平、楊淳斐(20140900)。心理諮商研究倫理守則建置之意見調查研究。教育心理學報，46(1)，51-71。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.盧麗瓊、王智弘、陳增堂、盧怡任(2016)。上海地區高校心理諮詢師倫理判斷與倫理行為調查研究。臺灣諮商心理學報，4(1)，45-62。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Burgard, E. L.(2013)。Ethical concerns about dual relationships in small and rural communities: A review。Journal of European Psychology Students，4，69-77。  new window
22.Cottone, R. R.、Claus, R. E.(2000)。Ethical decision-making models: A review of the literature。Journal of Counseling & Development，78(3)，275-283。  new window
23.Gottlieb, M. C.、Handelsman, M. M.、Knapp, S.(2005)。Training ethical psychologists: An acculturation model。Professional Psychology: Research and Practice，36(1)，59-65。  new window
24.Goodrich, T. J.、Irvine, C. A.、Boccher-Lattimore, D.(2005)。Narrative ethics as collaboration: A four-session curriculum。Families, Systems, & Health，23(3)，348-357。  new window
25.Haberstroh, S.、Barney, L.、Foster, N.、Duffey, T.(2014)。The ethical and legal practice of online counseling and psychotherapy: A review of mental health professions。Journal of Technology in Human Services，32，149-157。  new window
26.Halliday, R.、Franits, L.(2006)。Teaching goodness: Moral development theory and the teaching of ethics。Teaching Philosophy，29(2)，81-92。  new window
27.Klugman, C.、Stump, B.(2006)。The effect of ethics training upon individual choice。Journal of Further & Higher Education，30(2)，181-192。  new window
28.Lambie, G. W.、Hagedorn, W. B.、Ieva, K. P.(2010)。Social-cognitive development, ethical and legal knowledge, and ethical decision making of counselor education students。Counselor Education & Supervision，49(4)，228-246。  new window
29.Rasoal, D.、Skovdahl, K.、Gifford, M.、Kihlgren, A.(2017)。Clinical ethics support for healthcare personnel: An integrative literature review。HEC Forum，29(4)，313-346。  new window
30.Ray, D. C.、Hull, D. M.、Thacker, A. J.、Pace, L. S.、Swan, K. I.、Carlson, S. E.、Sullivan, J. M.(2011)。Research in counseling: A 10-year review to inform practice。Journal of Counseling and Development，89(3)，349-359。  new window
31.Tjeltveit, A. C.(2000)。There is more to ethics than codes of professional ethics: Social ethics, theoretical ethics, and managed care。The Counseling Psychologist，28(2)，242-252。  new window
32.Urofsky, R. I.、Engels, D. W.、Engebretson, K.(2008)。Kitchener's principle ethics: Implications for counseling practice and research。Counselling and Values，53(1)，67-78。  new window
33.Zhao, J.、Ji, J.(2010)。Influence of the ethics education in counseling on the ethical awareness of the trainees applying for psychological counselors。Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology，18(3)，400-402。  new window
34.蘇以青、董力華、黃瑛琪(20091200)。大專院校輔導人員之倫理判斷及對倫理問題的因應。醫護科技期刊，11(4)，248-257。new window  延伸查詢new window
35.李佳儒、張勻銘、王智弘、楊淳斐(20121200)。諮商心理師團體諮商倫理信念與行為之探索。中華輔導與諮商學報，34，53-81。new window  延伸查詢new window
36.洪莉竹(20111100)。中小學學校輔導人員倫理決定經驗研究。輔導與諮商學報. 彰師大，33(2)，87-107。new window  延伸查詢new window
37.洪莉竹(20080300)。中學輔導人員專業倫理困境與因應策略研究。教育心理學報，39(3)，451-472。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.徐智威(2010)。高中職輔導教師諮商倫理之辨識能力和判斷傾向與其諮商自我效能之研究(碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.羅逸婷(2014)。國中輔導教師處理通報事件中透露晤談訊息的兩難與因應方式(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.周雪璉(2011)。企業諮商人員專業倫理衝突經驗探究(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.林曉玉(2007)。軍中諮商心理師面對自殺個案倫理衝突經驗之敘說研究(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.文美華(2007)。網路諮商機構實施電子郵件諮商之實務經驗、困難及因應方式與網路諮商倫理行為之探討(碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.何艾倫(2008)。心理諮商人員專業倫理思考導向與相關影響因素之探究(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.何振宇(1997)。青少年福利服務義務工作人員對專業倫理的認知、困擾、及其因應之研究：以「幼獅育樂營」義務張老師為例(碩士論文)。東海大學，臺中。  延伸查詢new window
8.王智弘(1999)。諮商倫理量表編製、教學方案設計及教學效果比較研究(博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.楊佳穎(2005)。師生諮商雙重關係之經驗探究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
10.楊淳斐(1997)。大專院校輔導教師諮商倫理信念與行為之調查研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
11.蕭宜綾(2003)。問題導向學習取向之諮商倫理網路教學研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
12.楊雅超(2012)。台灣地區大專院校諮商心理師人格特質與諮商專業倫理判斷傾向之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
13.康家華(2009)。中等學校輔導教師對師生諮商雙重關係的經驗探究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
14.林慶仁(1987)。學校輔導教師諮商倫理判斷之調查研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
15.張馥媛(2014)。臨床心理師心理治療中非性雙重關係倫理決策歷程之研究(博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.何志平(2000)。國民小學輔導人員專業倫理行為與倫理判斷傾向之研究(碩士論文)。臺中師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
17.陳志信(1993)。輔導教師專業倫理行為及其倫理判斷傾向之調查研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
18.王義德(2017)。諮商中非性雙重關係之倫理決策經驗探究(碩士論文)。國立暨南國際大學。  延伸查詢new window
19.吳孟容(2016)。雙重關係對高中輔導老師個案諮商之影響研究(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
20.吳亞嬙(2011)。諮商人員在自傷青少年諮商中對保密原則的省思(碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
21.吳嘉展(2014)。人格特質、學校組織氣氛對國小輔導教師專業倫理行為之影響(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
22.林宜霈(2015)。高中職輔導教師面對通報之專業倫理決策歷程研究(碩士論文)。臺北市立大學。  延伸查詢new window
23.陳厚伶(2012)。國小輔導教師面對多重關係的覺察與因應行動之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
24.張品斌(2014)。諮商專業倫理課程中的學習與思考--學習者的經驗(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
25.許齡之(2014)。諮商心理師對個案福祉的思考與行動之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
26.黃清煌(2011)。高中職教師輔導專業倫理信念調查研究(碩士論文)。國立臺南大學。  延伸查詢new window
27.雒恰寧(2014)。人與專業的對話--諮商倫理衝突經驗之質性研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，台北。  延伸查詢new window
28.廖若帆(2015)。精神科病人治療的神經倫理問題：以心理演劇為例(碩士論文)。國立陽明大學。  延伸查詢new window
29.謝明瑾(2011)。國民小學諮商心理師面臨保密議題的倫理衝突之敘說研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
30.謝欣霓(2011)。國中輔導教師透露晤談內容行動對晤談關係的影響與因應研究(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
31.蘇以青(2011)。諮商心理師行使告知後同意之倫理經驗分析(博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.陳文玲(1991)。學校輔導教師諮商倫理信念之調查研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
33.林宇銘(2005)。國軍心理輔導人員專業工作推行與專業倫理決策過程(碩士論文)。輔仁大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Corey, G.、Corey, M. S.、Callanan, P.(2011)。Issues and ethics in the helping professions。Belmont, CA：Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning。  new window
2.Pope, K. S.、Vasquez, M. J. T.(2016)。Ethics in psychotherapy and counseling: A practical guide。Hoboken, NJ：John Wiley & Sons。  new window
3.Kitchener, K. S.、Anderson, S. K.(2014)。Foundations of ethical practice, research, and teaching in psychology and counseling。London：Routledge。  new window
4.Van Hoose, W. H.、Paradise, L. V.(1979)。Ethics in counseling and psychology。Carroll Press。  new window
5.Welfel, E. R.(2010)。Ethics in counseling and psychotherapy: Standards, research, and emerging issues。Belmont, CA：Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning。  new window
圖書論文
1.Handelsman, M. M.(2003)。Problems with ethics training by "Osmosis"。Ethical conflict in Psychology。Washington, DC：American Psychological Association。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1190（臺灣：1179，外國：11） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1586744 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67406393
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上