頓悟性問題解決規則教導與效果評估__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	頓悟性問題解決規則教導與效果評估
書刊名：	教育心理學報
作者：	邱發忠／徐芝君／張雨霖／林耀南／陳學志
作者(外文)：	Chiu, Fa-chung／Hsu, Chih-chun／Chang, Yu-lin／Lin, Yao-nan／Chen, Hsueh-chih
出版日期：	2018
卷期：	50:2
頁次：	頁219-241
主題關鍵詞：	詞彙的多義性；頓悟性問題；擴散性思考；Divergent thinking；Lexical ambiguity；Insight problem
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:1 共同引用:78 點閱:126

頓悟性問題解決訓練是創造教育和創新思考的核心議題之一，過去既有提升頓悟性問題解決方法的研究，多數並非基於頓悟性問題解題規則。而根據過去研究顯示頓悟問題與笑話具有共通性，故本研究藉由分析笑話的結構與規則進行頓悟問題解題規則的教導，並以實徵實驗檢驗之。研究一將101位參與者隨機分派至頓悟性問題解決訓練之實驗組與控制組，實驗組同時予以「詞彙的多義性」、「符合關鍵語句的例外狀況」、「符合關鍵語句的例外規則」等頓悟性問題解決規則之整合訓練後，完成三類頓悟性問題與擴散性思考測驗。結果顯示，實驗組在「詞彙的多義性」與「符合關鍵語句的例外規則」類之頓悟性問題解決上具有提升效果；而且，在整體的頓悟性問題解決表現上亦具有訓練效果。此外，實驗組訓練也顯示可以提升擴散性思考的表現。研究二為瞭解個別解題規則訓練對於不同類別頓悟性問題解題效果之差異，將200位大學生隨機分派至三種不同解題規則：「詞彙的多義性」、「符合關鍵語句的例外狀況」、「符合關鍵語句的例外規則」之實驗組及「控制」組的訓練，接下來完成如同研究一的三類頓悟性問題。結果顯示「詞彙的多義性」訓練對「詞彙的多義性」與整體頓悟性問題解決表現具有提升效果；然而，「符合關鍵語句的例外狀況」與「符合關鍵語句的例外規則」訓練則未呈現提升解題的訓練效果。本研究初步發現基於笑話結構的「詞彙的多義性」規則訓練之效果，據此建議實務方面可運用此規則來教導頓悟性問題解決。

以文找文

Insight problem-solving training is a core topic in creativity education and creative thinking. However, few studies on enhancing such skills have identified the norms of insight problem-solving. According to the literature, a commonality exists between insight problems and jokes. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate insight problem-solving rules and examine their effects on improving problem-solving skills and divergent thinking through analyzing the problem-solving characteristics and structures of jokes. In the first study phase, 101 participants were randomly assigned to either the insight problem-solving training group or the control group. The experimental group received training for ＂homonyms,＂＂exceptions to the rules for punch lines,＂ and ＂alternatives for punch lines,＂ and completed tests on insight problem-solving skills and divergent thinking. The results indicated that the experimental group had significantly better performance in ＂homonyms,＂＂alternatives for punch lines,＂ and overall insight problem-solving than the control group. In the second study phase, differences in the effects of three types of insight problem-solving training were examined. A total of 200 college students were recruited and randomly assigned to four groups: ＂homonyms,＂＂exceptions to the rules for punch lines,＂＂alternatives for punch lines,＂ and ＂no training＂ (i.e., the control group). The results indicated that the ＂homonyms＂ group performed significantly better for ＂homonyms＂ and overall insight problem-solving than the other groups. However, training for ＂exceptions to the rules for punch lines＂ and ＂alternatives for punch lines＂ exhibited no significant effects insight problem-solving and provided preliminary findings for the effects of training of ＂homonyms＂ derived from the structure of jokes. These findings could be applied in practice for future insight problem-solving skill training courses.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Wycoff, Edgar B.、Pryor, Burt(2003)。Cognitive Processing, Creativity, Apprehension, and the Humorous Personality。North American Journal of Psychology，5(1)，31-46。
2.	Isen, A. M.、Johnson, M. M. S.、Mertz, E.、Robinson, G. F.(1985)。The Influence of Positive Affect on the Unusualness of Word Associations。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，48(6)，1413-1426。
3.	陳學志、鄭昭明、卓淑玲(20011200)。笑話中幽默因子的訊息整合歷程研究。中華心理學刊，43(2)，137-153。延伸查詢
4.	蔡秉勳、林緯倫、林烘煜(20130900)。心情對了，創意就來了--情緒對發散性思考與頓悟問題解決的不同影響。教育心理學報，45(1)，19-36+38。延伸查詢
5.	Samson, A. C.、Hempelmann, C. F.、Huber, O.、Zysset, S.(2009)。Neural substrates of incongruity-resolution and nonsense humor。Neuropsychologia，47(4)，1023-1033。
6.	Knoblich, G.、Ohlsson, S.、Raney, G. E.(2001)。An eye movement study of insight problem solving。Memory & Cognition，29(7)，1000-1009。
7.	Knoblich, G.、Ohlsson, S.、Haider, H.、Rhenius, D.(1999)。Constraint relaxation and chunk decomposition in insight problem solving。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition，25(6)，1534-1555。
8.	Dow, G. Y.、Mayer, R. E.(2004)。Teaching students to solve insight problems: Evidence for domain specificity in creativity training。Creativity Research Journal，16(4)，389-402。
9.	Gough, H. G.(1979)。A creative personality scale for the adjective check list。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，37(8)，1398-1405。
10.	邱發忠、陳學志、卓淑玲(20030400)。幽默創造訓練之課程設計暨實徵效果評估。教育心理學報，34(2)，179-198。延伸查詢
11.	Humke, Christiance、Schaeffer, Charles E.(1996)。Sense of Humor and Creativity。Perceptual & More Skills，82(2)，544-546。
12.	Kovac, T.(2000)。Humor and creativity in intrapsychological Bonds。Studia Psychologica，41(4)，360-362。
13.	黃博聖、陳學志、劉政宏(20121200)。「中文詞彙遠距聯想測驗」之編製及其信、效度報告。測驗學刊，59(4)，581-607。延伸查詢
14.	Grant, E. R.、Spivey, M. J.(2003)。Eye movements and problem solving; guiding attention guides thought。Psychological Science，14(5)，462-466。
15.	Jung-Beeman, M.、Bowden, E. M.、Haberman, J.、Frymiare, J. L.、Arambel-Liu, S.、Greenblatt, R.、Kounios, J.(2004)。Neural activity when people solve verbal problems with insight。Public Library of Science Biology，2(4)。
16.	Martin, R. A.、Lefcourt, H. M.(1983)。Sense of humor as a moderator of the relation between stressors and moods。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，45(6)，1313-1324。
17.	Friedman, R. S.、Förster, J.(2005)。The influence of approach and avoidance cues on attentional flexibility。Motivation and Emotion，29，69-81。
18.	Friedman, R. S.、Förster, J.(2000)。The Effects of Approach and Avoidance Motor Actions on the Elements of Creative Insight。Journal of Personality & Social Psychology，79，477-492。
19.	Kershaw, T. C.、Ohlsson, S.(2004)。Multiple causes of difficulty in insight: The case of the nine-dot problem。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition，30(1)，3-13。
20.	MacGregor, J. N.、Ormerod, T. C.、Chronicle, E. P.(2001)。Information-processing and insight: A process model of performance on the nine-dot and related problems。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition，27，176-201。
21.	Gilhooly, K. J.、Murphy, P.(2005)。Differentiating insight from non-insight problems。Thinking & Reasoning，11(3)，279-302。
22.	邱發忠、陳學志、徐芝君、吳相儀、卓淑玲(20080600)。內隱與外顯因素對創造作業表現的影響。中華心理學刊，50(2)，125-145。延伸查詢
23.	徐芝君、陳學志、邱發忠(20120900)。「報紙的不尋常用途」測驗之編製。創造學刊，3(2)，33-56。延伸查詢
24.	Shen, W. B.、Yuan, Y.、Liu, C.、Luo, J.(2016)。In search of the 'Aha!' experience: Elucidating the emotionality of insight problem-solving。British Journal of Psychology，107(2)，281-298。
25.	Duncker, Karl、Lees, Lynne S.(1945)。On Problem-Solving。Psychological Monographs，58(5)，i-113。
26.	Chronicle, E. P.、MacGregor, J. N.、Ormerod, T. C.(2004)。What makes an insight problem? The roles of Heuristics, Goal conception, and solution in knowledge-lean problems。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, memory, and cognition，30(1)，14-27。
27.	Metcalfe, J.、Wiebe, D.(1987)。Intuition in insight and non insight problem solving。Memory and Cognition，15(3)，238-246。
28.	林小慧、林世華、吳心楷(20180300)。科學能力的建構反應評量之發展與信效度分析：以自然科光學為例。教育科學研究期刊，63(1)，173-205。延伸查詢
29.	邱發忠(20100600)。幽默理解的多重語義激發、好笑反應對創造力的影響：以右腦激發為中介變項。中華心理衛生學刊，23(2)，183-217。延伸查詢
30.	Ansburg, P. I.、Dominowski, R. L.(2000)。Promoting insightful problem solving。The Journal of Creative Behavior，34，30-60。
31.	Chiu, F.-C.、Hsu, C.-C.、Lin, Y.-N.、Chen, H.-C.、Liu, C.-H.(2017)。Effects of the interaction between exercising self-control and PhoPhiKat on divergent and convergent thinking。Thinking Skills and Creativity，24，286-298。
32.	Chiu, F.-C.(2014)。The effects of exercising self-control on creativity。Thinking Skills and Creativity，14，20-31。
33.	Chiu, F.-C.(2015)。Improving your creative potential without awareness: Overinclusive thinking training。Thinking skills and Creativity，15，1-12。
34.	Danek, A. H.、Wiley, J.、Öllinger, M.(2016)。Solving classical insight problems without Aha! experience: 9 dot, 8 coin, and matchstick arithmetic problems。The Journal of Problem Solving，9(1)，48-57。
35.	Dong, Y.、Bartol, K. M.、Zhang, Z. X.、Li, C.(2017)。Enhancing employee creativity via individual skill development and team knowledge sharing: Influences of dual-focused transformational leadership。Journal of Organizational Behavior，38(3)，439-458。
36.	Gruber, H. E.(1979)。On the relation between "Aha experiences" and the construction of ideas。History of Science，19，41-59。
37.	Hao, N.、Liu, M.、Ku, Y.、Hu, Y.、Runco, M. A.(2015)。Verbal divergent thinking facilitated by a pleasurable incubation interval。Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts，9(3)，286-295。
38.	Jeon, K. N.、Moon, S. M.、French, B.(2011)。Differential effects of divergent thinking, domain knowledge, and interest on creative performance in art and math。Creativity Research Journal，23(1)，60-71。
39.	Kershaw, T. C.、Flynn, C. K.、Gordon, L. T.(2013)。Multiple paths to transfer and constraint relaxation in insight problem solving。Thinking & Reasoning，19(1)，96-136。
40.	Kozbelt, A.、Nishioka, K.(2010)。Humor comprehension, humor production, and insight: An exploratory study。Humor，23(3)，375-401。
41.	Krug, R.、Finn, M.、Pietrowsky, R.、Fehm, H. L.、Born, J.(1996)。Jealousy, general creativity, and coping with social frustration during the menstrual cycle。Archives of Sexual Behavior，25(2)，181-199。
42.	Öllinger, M.、Jones, G.、Faber, A. H.、Knoblich, G.(2013)。Cognitive mechanisms of insight: the role of heuristics and representational change in solving the eight-coin problem。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition，39(3)，931-939。
43.	Ostafin, B. D.、Kassman, K. T.(2012)。Stepping out of history: Mindfulness improves insight problem solving。Consciousness and Cognition，21(2)，1031-1036。
44.	Patrick, J.、Ahmed, A.(2014)。Facilitating representation change in insight problems through training。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition，40，532-543。
45.	Patrick, J.、Ahmed, A.、Smy, V.、Seeby, H.、Sambrooks, K.(2015)。A cognitive procedure for representation change in verbal insight problems。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition，41(3)，746-759。
46.	Walinga, J.、Cunningham, J. B.、MacGregor, J. N.(2011)。Training insight problem solving through focus on barriers and assumptions。The Journal of Creative Behavior，45(1)，47-58。
47.	Wen, M. C.、Butler, L. T.、Koutstaal, W.(2013)。Improving insight and non-insight problem solving with brief interventions。British Journal of Psychology，104(1)，97-118。
48.	Wicker, F. W.、Weinstein, C. E.、Yelich, C. A.、Brooks, J. D.(1978)。Problem-reformulation training and visualization training with insight problems。Journal of Educational Psychology，70，372-377。
49.	Wu, X.、He, M.、Zhou, Y.、Xiao, J.、Luo, J.(2017)。Decomposing a chunk into its elements and reorganizing them as a new chunk: The two different sub-processes underlying insightful chunk decomposition。Frontiers in Psychology，8，1-8。
50.	Yue, X. D.、Hui, A. N.(2015)。Humor styles, creative personality traits, and creative thinking in a Hong Kong sample。Psychological Reports，117(3)，845-855。
51.	Zhou, J.、Wang, X. M.、Song, L. J.、Wu, J.(2017)。Is it new? personal and contextual influences on perceptions of novelty and creativity。Journal of Applied Psychology，102(2)，180-202。
52.	林緯倫、連韻文、任純慧(20050900)。想得多是想得好的前提嗎？--探討發散性思考能力在創意問題解決的角色。中華心理學刊，47(3)，211-227。延伸查詢
53.	Schooler, J. W.、Ohlsson, S.、Brooks, K.(1993)。Thoughts beyond words: When language overshadows insight。Journal of Experimental Psychology: General，122(2)，166-183。
54.	Friedman, Ronald S.、Förster, Jens(2001)。The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，81(6)，1001-1013。
55.	Friedman, R. S.、Förster, J.(2002)。The Influence of Approach and Avoidance Motor Actions on Creative Cognition。Journal of Experimental Social Psychology，38(1)，41-55。

圖書
1.	吳靜吉、陳甫彥、郭俊賢、林偉文、劉士豪、陳玉樺(1998)。新編創造思考測驗指導及研究手冊。臺北市：教育部訓委會。延伸查詢
2.	Nickerson, R. S.、Perkins, D. N.、Smith, E. E.(1985)。The Teaching of Thinking。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。
3.	Guilford, J. P.(1967)。The nature of human intelligence。McGraw-Hill。
4.	Ohlsson, S.(2011)。Deep Learning: How the Mind Overrides Experience。Cambridge University Press。
5.	Wakefield, J. F.(1992)。Creative thinking: Problem-Solving Skills and the Art Orientation。Norwood, New Jersey。
6.	Köhler, W.、Winter, E.(1925)。The mentality of apes。New York：Vintage Books。
7.	Perkins, D.(2000)。The eureka effect: The art and logic of breakthrough thinking。New York, NY：Norton & Company。
8.	Watson, J. D.(1968)。The double helix: Being a personal account of the discovery of the structure of DNA。New York, NY：Atheneum。

圖書論文
1.	Suls, J. M.(1972)。A two-stage model for the appreciation of jokes and cartoons: An information-processing analysis。The Psychology of Humor: Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Issues。Academic Press。
2.	Weisberg, R. W.(1995)。Prolegomena to theories of insight in problem solving: a taxonomy of problems。The nature of insight。MIT Press。
3.	Chi, M. T. H.、Hausmann, R. G. M.(2003)。Do radical discoveries require ontological shifts?。The international handbook on innovation。New York, NY：Elsevier。
4.	Godkewitsch, M.(1974)。Correlates of humor: Verbal and nonverbal aesthetic reactions as functions of semantic distance within adjective-noun pairs。Studies in the new experimental aesthetics。Washington, DC：Hemisphere。
5.	Ohlsson, S.(1992)。Information processing explanations of insight an related phenomena。Advances in the psychology of thinking。London：Harvester-Wheatsheaf。
6.	Öllinger, M.、Knoblich, G.(2009)。Psychological research on insight problem solving。Recasting reality。Springer。
7.	Ruch, W.、Hehl, F. J.(2007)。A two-mode model of humor appreciation: Its relation to aesthetic appreciation and simplicity-complexity of personality。The sense of humor: Explorations of a personality characteristic。Berlin：Mouton de Gruyter。
8.	Schooler, J. W.、Fallshore, M.、Fiore, S. M.(1995)。Epilogue: Putting insight into perspective。The nature of insight。Cambridge, MA：MIT Press。
9.	Segal, Z. V.、Teasdale, J. D.、Williams, J. M. G.(2004)。Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy: Theoretical rationale and empirical status。Mindfulness and relationship: Expanding the cognitive behavioral relationship。New York：The Guilford Press。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	校務檔案怎麼評？校務經營檔案之信效度分析
2.	探討不同族群新住民子女在兩類創意思考表現之差異：以文化距離作為中介變項
3.	執行自我控制活動與自我控制特質交互作用對聚斂性與擴散性思考的效果
4.	創造階段特定技巧模式的發展與效果研究
5.	學生學習投入、好奇心、教師集體層級變項與科學探究能力的關係：跨層級調節式中介效果之探討
6.	利用Rasch模式評估高中物理素養試卷過程：教師發展素養試題之啟示
7.	中文版遠距聯想測驗在創造力研究之應用：回顧與展望
8.	青少年生氣情緒表達、幽默感與幸福感之相關研究
9.	童話平面廣告中幽默程度與表現方式之感受差異研究
10.	從多層面Rasch模式來檢視不同的評分者等化連結設計對參數估計的影響
11.	青少年封閉式創造力潛能測量：「青少年版中文詞彙遠距聯想測驗」之編製及信、效度研究
12.	科學想像力圖形測驗之驗證
13.	中等學校師資生任教學科專門知識檢測機制之探討
14.	臺灣大專院校餐旅相關學系學生廚藝創造力之探討
15.	臺灣實驗認知心理學發展選論：以臺大心理學系為框架

1.	大學生品味、創意自我效能、廚藝創造力關係之研究
2.	良善與惡意幽默因應對負向情境之情緒轉換效果：功能性磁振造影研究
3.	大學生品味能力、創意自我效能與個人創意關係之研究：創意支持的影響
4.	不同發展階段的創造性潛能與傾向潛在組型及創意自我效能中介效果
5.	遠距聯想在創造力形成歷程之運作機制
6.	國中生教育復原力模式之驗證研究
7.	探討問題導向學習於健康照護專業促進臨床實務能力之成效
8.	國中生之歷史教材幽默改編策略分析暨其對學習成效之影響
9.	我國大學生正向情緒量表建置暨實徵性研究
10.	心情與創意思考關係的多成份模式：調整焦點、向性、激發心情對創意思考的影響暨中介變項之探討
11.	世變、迂迴、荒唐之言——六朝諧隱研究
12.	情感錯誤歸因程序的歷程分離：激發後校正模式
13.	不同創造力運作與認知抑制、工作記憶廣度間關係之探討
14.	創造力認知運作機制之探究

無相關書籍

無相關著作

1.	地方學的深度學習設計轉化
2.	「欲迎還拒」：戰後臺灣日本出版品進口管制體系的建立(1945~1972)

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫