臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：科學想像力圖形測驗之驗證
書刊名：教育心理學報
作者：王佳琪 引用關係
作者(外文)：Wang, Chia-chi
出版日期：2020
卷期：51:3
頁次：頁341-367
主題關鍵詞：心像；科學想像力；科學想像力圖形測驗；Rasch部分給分模式；Mental imagery；Rasch partial credit model；Scientific imagination；Scientific imagination test-figural
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:348
  • 點閱點閱:8
本研究旨在以Rasch模式重新驗證科學想像力圖形測驗（Scientific Imagination Test-Figural, SIT-Figural），以提供內容、結構、類推、本質、解釋、以及外在效度面向的效度證據，並探討科學想像力、心像與不同背景變項（例如性別、年級與學院別）之間的關係。研究對象共616位大學生。本測驗共有A、B、C、D四項作業，每項作業均包含科學想像力歷程中的漫想力、聯想力、奇想力等三個向度，用以測量學生之科學想像力。經以Rasch部分給分模式分析，三向度的測驗具有良好的模式資料適配度。大部分的作業在性別、年級與學院別上並無明顯的差異試題功能（differential item functioning, DIF），且漫想力、聯想力、奇想力之信度分別是.85、.84以及.83，科學想像力與心像能力具有中低度相關。在差異分析上，研究指出科學想像力在性別、年級與學院別上有顯著差異，其中，女學生在科學想像力圖形測驗上的能力表現顯著高於男生，大三學生的科學想像力顯著優於大一與大二學生，人文社會學院與數位設計學院學生的表現比工學院與商管學院的學生好。最後，本研究針對「科學想像力圖形測驗」的發展與應用，提出未來研究之建議。
The present study aimed to validate the Scientific Imagination Test-Figural (SIT-Figural; Wang, Ho, & Cheng, 2016) for undergraduates using Rasch measurement. Furthermore, this study not only provided validating evidence concerning content validity, structural validity, generalizability, substantive validity, interpretation, and external validity (Wolfe & Smith, 2007) but also explored the relationship among scientific imagination, mental imagery, and other background variables (e.g., gender, grade, and college). Quantitative data were collected from 616 participants using the questionnaire, which was extracted from the SIT-Figural model. The SIT-Figural was designed to measure students' scientific imagination through four types of tasks: A, B, C, and D. Additionally, these assignments in the scientific imaginative process comprised three dimensions: brainstorming, association, and transformation/elaboration. The Rasch partial credit model was used to assess the model–data fit; differential item functioning (DIF) analysis was conducted to examine the consistency of the ratings by gender and college. The results of DIF demonstrated that some items in the SIT-Figural showed a significant difference. Moreover, the three dimensions in the SIT-Figural indicated a positive model-data fit. The reliabilities of three subtests were 0.85, 0.84, and 0.83. The correlation coefficients between scientific imagination and mental imagery ranged from low to medium. Furthermore, a significant difference was found between scientific imagination and gender, grade, and college. In terms of scientific imagination, female students performed better than male students. Third-year students displayed better scientific imagination than freshmen and sophomores. Students from the College of Humanities and Social Sciences and the College of Digital Design possessed better abilities than those from the College of Engineering and the College of Business. Finally, suggestions for revising and applying the SIT-Figural were proposed for future research.
期刊論文
1.曹筱玥、林小慧(20121200)。想像力量表之編製。教育科學研究期刊，57(4)，1-37。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Chan, D. W.、Cheung, P. C.、Lau, S.、Wu, W. Y.、Kwong, J. M.、Li, W. L.(2001)。Assessing ideational fluency in primary students in Hong Kong。Creativity Research Journal，13(3/4)，359-365。  new window
3.Hargreaves, D. J.(1977)。Sex roles in divergent thinking。British Journal of Educational Psychology，47(1)，25-32。  new window
4.Razumnikova, O. M.(2004)。Gender differences in hemispheric organization during divergent thinking: An EEG investigation in human subjects。Neuroscience Letters，362(3)，193-195。  new window
5.侯雅齡(20090300)。幼兒科學創造力評量方法之發展：嵌入式評量設計。教育科學研究期刊，54(1)，113-142。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.梁朝雲、許育齡、林威聖(20140300)。探究想像力內涵暨評測量表研發。測驗學刊，61(1)，27-50。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.許育齡、梁朝雲(20121200)。探究想像力的意涵與特徵--探索性與驗證性因素分析之發現。教育心理學報，44(2)，349-372。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.王依仁、葉忠達、江怡瑩(20120500)。國小六年級學童的繪畫創作想像力研究。藝術教育研究，23，105-137。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Raju, N. S.、Price, L. R.、Oshima, T. C.、Nering, M. L.(2007)。Standardized conditional SEM: A case for conditional reliability。Applied Psychological Measurement，31(3)，169-180。  new window
10.Hsu, Y.、Liang, C.、Chang, C. C.(2014)。The mediating effects of generative cognition on imagination stimulation。Innovations in Education and Teaching International，51(5)，544-555。  new window
11.Wang, W.-C.(2008)。Assessment of differential item functioning。Journal of Applied Measurement，9(4)，1-22。  new window
12.Liang, C.、Chang, C. C.(2014)。Predicting scientific imagination from the joint influences of intrinsic motivation, self-efficacy, agreeableness, and extraversion。Learning and Individual Differences，31，36-42。  new window
13.Sternberg, R. J.(1994)。Allowing for thinking styles。Educational Leadership，52(3)，36-40。  new window
14.Sternberg, R. J.、Lubart, T. I.(1996)。Investing in creativity。American Psychologist，51(7)，677-688。  new window
15.邱發忠、陳學志、林耀南、涂莉苹(20121200)。想像力構念之初探。教育心理學報，44(2)，389-410。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.洪瑞雲、王精文、拾已寰、李泊諺、王愉敏(20131200)。以概念結合理論為基礎的想像力測驗之編製。測驗學刊，60(4)，681-713。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Ward, Thomas B.(1994)。Structured imagination: The role of category structure in exemplar generation。Cognitive Psychology，27(1)，1-40。  new window
18.許育齡、梁朝雲、林志成(20130600)。教師發揮教學設計想像力的心理與環境因素探究。當代教育研究，21(2)，113-148。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Liang, C.、Chang, C.-C.、Hsu, Y.(2014)。Differential effects of personality traits and environmental predictors on reproductive and creative imagination。Journal of Creative Behavior，48(4)，237-253。  new window
20.Wang, C.-C.、Ho, H.-C.、Wu, J.-J.、Cheng, Y.-Y.(2014)。Development of the scientific imagination model: A concept-mapping perspective。Thinking Skills and Creativity，13，106-119。  new window
21.Wang, C.-C.、Ho, H.-C.、Cheng, Y.-Y.(2015)。Building a learning progression for scientific imagination: A measurement approach。Thinking Skills and Creativity，17，1-14。  new window
22.Ren, Fujun、Li, Xiuj、Zhang, Huiliang、Wang, Lihui(2012)。Progression of Chinese students' creative imagination from elementary through high school。International Journal of Science Education，34(13)，2043-2059。  new window
23.Ho, H.-C.、Wang, C.-C.、Cheng, Y.-Y.(2013)。Analysis of the scientific imagination process。Thinking Skills and Creativity，10，68-78。  new window
24.Farah, M. J.、Hammond, K. M.、Levine, D. N.、Calvanio, R.(1988)。Visual and spatial mental imagery: Dissociable systems of representation。Cognitive Psychology，20，439-462。  new window
25.Ayas, M. B.、Sak, U.(2014)。Objective measure of scientific creativity: Psychometric validity of the Creative Scientific Ability Test。Thinking Skills and Creativity，13，195-205。  new window
26.Blajenkova, O.、Kozhevnikov, M.、Motes, M. A.(2006)。Object-spatial imagery: A new self-report imagery questionnaire。Applied Cognitive Psychology，20，239-263。  new window
27.葉玉珠、彭月茵、林志哲、蔡維欣、鍾素香(20080400)。「情境式科學創造力測驗」之發展暨科學創造力之性別與年級差異分析。測驗學刊，55(1)，33-60。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.Huang, H.-Y.、Wang, W.-C.、Chen, P.-H.、Su, C.-M.(2013)。Higher-order item response models for hierarchical latent traits。Applied Psychological Measurement，37(8)，619-637。  new window
29.Levien, D. N.、Warach, J.、Farah, M. J.(1985)。Two visual systems in mental imagery: dissociation of what and where in imagery disorders due to bilateral posterior cerebral lesions。Neurology，35，1010-1018。  new window
30.王佳琪、何曉琪、鄭英耀、邱文彬(20170900)。科學想像力學習進程之驗證：測量觀點。教育心理學報，49(1)，69-94。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.王佳琪、鄭英耀、何曉琪(20161200)。科學想像力圖形測驗之發展。教育科學研究期刊，61(4)，177-204。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.吳可久、蘇于倫、曹筱玥(20130300)。由激發想像力思維探索設計課程教學方式。建築學報，83，19-35。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.McCormack, Alan(2010)。Message from the NSTA president: Imagine and invent: Create a great future。Journal of College Science Teaching，40(1)，8-9。  new window
34.王佳琪、楊棨棠(20190300)。探討科學想像力融入國小自然科課程單元之成效：以「簡單力學--力與運動」單元為例。教育科學研究期刊，64(1)，213-240。new window  延伸查詢new window
35.伍家德、王沛淳、黃文宏(20160900)。創造性人格與創意行為之關聯研究--以A科技大學為例。管理資訊計算，5(2)，47-57。new window  延伸查詢new window
36.陳坤淼、沈思岑(20110300)。設計想像力之探討--以個案創意設計分析為例。文化創意產業研究學報，1(1)，1-12。new window  延伸查詢new window
37.潘裕豐(2016)。大學藝術學院學生創造力與遠距聯想之關係研究。創造學刊，7(1)，1-18。  延伸查詢new window
38.王佳琪、何曉琪、鄭英耀(20140900)。「科學創造性問題解決測驗」之發展。測驗學刊，61(3)，337-360。new window  延伸查詢new window
39.林緯倫、連韻文、任純慧(20050900)。想得多是想得好的前提嗎？--探討發散性思考能力在創意問題解決的角色。中華心理學刊，47(3)，211-227。new window  延伸查詢new window
40.許育齡、黃文宗、林立中(20120500)。視覺傳達設計學習者發揮想像的內在因素探索與驗證。藝術教育研究，23，41-70。new window  延伸查詢new window
41.陳瓊花(20130300)。創造力的載體：從「創意表現」探討創造力具體化的圖像類型、表現策略及其意涵。資優教育論壇，11，42-71。  延伸查詢new window
42.謝甫佩、洪振方(20060800)。從匯合取向的觀點探討科學創造力的評量。科學教育，291，11-23。  延伸查詢new window
43.韓承靜、洪蘭、蔡介立(20100300)。心像旋轉中之心智表徵特性--探討圖形複雜度與整合性的影響。教育心理學報，41(3)，551-578。new window  延伸查詢new window
44.Finke, R. A.、Slayton, K.(1988)。Explorations of creative visual synthesis in mental synthesis in mental imagery。Memory & Cognition，16，252-257。  new window
45.Gündoğan, A.、Ari, M.、Gönen, M.(2013)。Test of creative imagination: Validity and reliability study。Educational Sciences: Theory & practice，13，15-20。  new window
46.Huang, C. Y.、Kao, Y. S.、Lu, H. H.、Wu, M. J.(2017)。Curriculum Development for Enhancing the Imagination in the Technology Commercialization Process。EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education，13，6249-6283。  new window
47.Mun, J.、Mun, K.、Kim, S. W.(2015)。Exploration of Korean students' scientific imagination using the scientific imagination inventory。International Journal of Science Education，37(13)，2091-2112。  new window
48.Pérez-Fabello, M. J.、Campos, A.(2011)。Dissociative experiences and creativity in fine arts students。Creativity Research Journal，23，38-41。  new window
49.Root-Bernstein, M.、Root-Bernstein, R.(2006)。Imaginary worldplay in childhood and maturity and its ımpact on adult creativity。Creativity Research Journal，18，405-425。  new window
50.Kaufman, J. C.、Baer, J.(2008)。Gender differences in creativity。The Journal of Creative Behavior，42(2)，75-105。  new window
51.Cheng, Y.-Y.、Wang, W.-C.、Ho, Y.-H.(2009)。Multidimensional Rasch analysis of a psychological test with multiple subtests: A statistical solution for the bandwidth-fidelity dilemma。Educational and Psychological Measurement，69(3)，369-388。  new window
52.Dudek, S. Z.、Strobel, M. G.、Runco, M. A.(1993)。Cumulative and proximal influences on the social environment and children's creative potential。Journal of Genetic Psychology，154(4)，487-499。  new window
53.Eckhoff, A.、Urbach, J.(2008)。Understanding imaginative thinking during childhood: Sociocultural conceptions of creativity and imaginative thought。Early Childhood Education Journal，36(2)，179-185。  new window
54.Hu, Weiping、Adey, Philip(2002)。A scientific creativity test for secondary school students。International Journal of Science Education，24(4)，389-403。  new window
55.Karwowski, M.、Soszynski, M.(2008)。How to develop creative imagination?: Assumptions, aims and effectiveness of Role Play Training in Creativity (RPTC)。Thinking Skills and Creativity，3(2)，163-171。  new window
56.Karwowski, M.(2008)。Measuring creativity using the Test of Creative Imagination (TCI). Part 2. On validity of the TCI。New Educational Review，15(2)，216-231。  new window
57.LeBoutillier, N.、Marks, D. F.(2003)。Mental imagery and creativity: A meta-analytic review study。British Journal of Psychology，94(1)，29-44。  new window
58.Linacre, J. M.(1998)。Thurstone thresholds and the Rasch model。Rasch Measurement Transactions，12(2)，634-635。  new window
59.Masters, G. N.(1982)。A Rasch model for partial credit scoring。Psychometrika，47(2)，149-174。  new window
60.Vygotsky, Lev Semenovich(2004)。Imagination and Creativity in Childhood。Journal of Russian and East European Psychology，42(1)，7-97。  new window
61.Wolfe, E. W.、Smith, E. V. Jr.(2007)。Understanding Rasch measurement: Instrument development tools and activities for measure validation using Rasch models: Part II--Validation activities。Journal of Applied Measurement，8(2)，204-234。  new window
62.Adams, Raymond J.、Wilson, Mark R.、Wang, Wen-chung(1997)。The multidimensional random coefficients multinomial logit model。Applied Psychological Measurement，21(1)，1-23。  new window
63.Schumacker, R. E.、Smith, E. V. Jr.(2007)。Reliability: A Rasch perspective。Educational and Psychological Measurement，67(3)，394-409。  new window
學位論文
1.王佳琪(2015)。科學想像力學習進程之驗證(博士論文)。國立中山大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Mcvey, J. A.(2004)。Single-sex schooling and girls' gender-role identity and creativity(博士論文)。Foodham University，New York, USA。  new window
圖書
1.Bond, T. G.、Fox, C. M.(2007)。Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
2.Holland, P. W.、Wainer, H.(1993)。Differential item functioning。Hillsdale, NJ：Lawrence Erlnaum。  new window
3.Amabile, Teresa M.(1996)。Creativity in context。Westview Press Inc.。  new window
4.Mayer, Richard E.、林清山(1990)。教育心理學：認知取向。臺北市：遠流出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Finke, R. A.、Ward, T. B.、Smith, S. M.(1992)。Creative Cognition: Theory, Research, and Applications。Cambridge, MA：MIT Press。  new window
6.Morris, P. E.、Hampson, P. J.(1983)。Imagery and Consciousness。Academic Press。  new window
7.Wu, M. L.、Adams, R. J.、Wilson, M. R.(2007)。ConQuest (Computer software and manual)。Australian Council for Educational Research。  new window
8.鄭昭明(1993)。認知心理學：理論與實踐。桂冠圖書股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Sternberg, Robert J.、李乙明、李淑貞(2005)。創造力I．理論。臺北：五南。  延伸查詢new window
10.Kosslyn, S. M.(1994)。Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate。MIT Press。  new window
11.Kosslyn, S. M.、Koenig, O.(1992)。Wet mind: the new cognitive neuroscience。New York：The Free Press。  new window
12.Miles, Mathew B.、Huberman, A. Michael(1994)。Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods。Sage Publications。  new window
圖書論文
1.Efland, A.(2004)。Art education as imaginative cognition。Handbook of research and policy in art education。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：295（臺灣：290，外國：5） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1586744 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67380433
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上