臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：大學通識休閒管理課程學生學習風格與學習成效之研究
書刊名：輔仁民生學誌
作者：賴廷彰
作者(外文)：Lai, Ting-chang
出版日期：2017
卷期：23:2
頁次：頁1-15
主題關鍵詞：休閒管理課程；學習風格；學習成效；Leisure management course；Learning style；Learning effectiveness
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:32
  • 點閱點閱:2
本研究以A大學通識教育中心相關休閒管理課程修課學生學習風格來加以分析，因同學本身之先備特質本就存在差異，藉由本研究有效區辨出各自擅長學習方式，除能有效增進同學之提升同學之學習動機同步亦可具體呈現較佳之學習成效，具體有效培養建構學生之核心能力。本研究採問卷調查法，以修習某大學通識教育課程學生為研究對象，發放400份問卷，回收238份，回收率為59.5％，回收可用份數218份，回收可用率為55％，以次數分配、百分比及交叉分析…進行資料統計分析。研究結果發現A大學學生的學習風格類型以視覺型最多，其次為分析型，不同學院別、年級別的學生學習風格上也有差異。進一步根據研究結果提出建議，做為相關休閒課程設計與教學實踐之參考。
In this study, we analyze the students' learning style of relevant leisure management courses in General Education Center of University A because there are differences in the characteristics of the students themselves. By distinguishing their respective effective ways of learning in the effective area of this study. The improvement of classmates 'learning motivation can also present better learning outcomes and effectively and effectively build students' core competencies. This paper explored 238 students from the general education classrooms in a university in Taiwan, using a learning style questionnaire to know students' differences in learning, from the perspectives of different gender and colleges. The results showed that most college students in this study were visual learners, and analytic learners. Additionally, data analysis also showed that the learning styles differed among the gender and colleges. Lastly, this research focused on developing some suggestions for the design of leisure courses and teaching.
期刊論文
1.Raudenbush, S. W.(1989)。"Centering" predictors in multilevel analysis: Choices and consequences。Multilevel Modeling Newsletter，1(2)，10-12。  new window
2.高翠霞、蔡崇建(19990700)。學習風格與教學設計。教育資料與研究，29，46-49。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.林生傳(19850600)。國中學生學習式態之相關因素及其與學校教育態度、學業成就的關係。教育學刊，6，320-268。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Grager, S.、Guild, P.(1984)。Learning styles: The crucial differences。Curriculum Review，23(1)，9-12。  new window
5.Grimley, M.、Banner, G.(2008)。Working memory, cognitive style, and behavioral predictors of GCSE exam success。Educational Psychology，28(3)，341-351。  new window
6.Peterson, E. R.、Rayner, S. G.、Armstrong, S. J.(2009)。Researching the psychology of cognitive style and learning style: is there really a future?。Learning and Individual Differences，19(4)，518-523。  new window
7.Lam, C. F.、Wan, W. H.、Roussin, C. J.(2016)。Going the extra mile and feeling energized: An enrichment perspective of organizational citizenship behaviors。Journal of Applied Psychology，101(3)，379-391。  new window
8.李坤清、陳怡婷(20160400)。不同思考方式、教學方法和學習風格對行動學習使用行為之影響。數位學習科技期刊，8(2)，17-47。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.林秀芝、鄭永熏(20160900)。多媒體教學與學生學習風格對教育目標達成度之影響：以國中烘焙教學為例。餐旅暨觀光，13(1)，79-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Dunn, A. J.(1980)。Neurochemistry of Learning and Memory: An Evaluation of Recent Data。Annual Review of Psychology，31，343-390。  new window
11.Emamipour、Esfandabad, H. S.(2010)。A comparative study of learning styles among monolingual (Persian) and bilingual (Turkish-Persian) secondary school students。Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences，5，2419-2422。  new window
12.Fleming, N. D.、Mills, C.(1992)。Not another inventory, rather a catalyst for reflection。To Improve the Academy，11(1)，137-155。  new window
13.Hlawaty, H.(2008)。Lernen and learning styles a comparative analysis of learning styles of German adolescents by age, gender and academic achievement level。European Education，40(4)，23-45。  new window
14.Kinshuk, Liu T. C.、Graf, S.(2009)。Coping with mismatched courses: students' behaviour and performance in courses mismatched to their learning styles。Educational Technology Research & Development，57(6)，739-752。  new window
15.Hofmann, David A.、Gavin, Mark B.(1998)。Centering Decisions in Hierarchical Linear Models: Implications for Research in Organizations。Journal of Management，24(5)，623-641。  new window
會議論文
1.黃素惠、林貝珊(2017)。大學生學習風格類型融入教學之探究--以某所大學通識教育學生為例。2017通識教育學術研討會。新竹：中華大學通識教育中心。  延伸查詢new window
2.Graf, S.、Kinshuk、Liu, T. C.(2008)。Identifying learning styles in learning management systems by using indications from students' behaviour。IEEE international conference on advanced learning technologies。IEEE。  new window
圖書
1.Brown, S.、Knight, P.(1994)。Assessing learners in higher education。London：Kogan Page。  new window
2.Dunn, Rita Stafford、Dunn, Kenneth J.(1992)。Teaching elementary students through their individual learning styles: Practical approaches for grades 3-6。Boston, Massachusetts：Allyn & Bacon。  new window
3.Dunn, R.、Dunn, K.(1994)。Teaching Young Children through Their Individual Learning Styles。Boston：Allyn & Bacon。  new window
4.張春興(1995)。現代心理學。台北：台灣東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.Bryk, Anthony S.、Raudenbush, Stephen W.(1992)。Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods。Sage Publications。  new window
6.Dunn, Rita Stafford、Griggs, Shirley A.(1995)。Multiculturalism And Learning Style: Teaching and Counseling Adolescents。Westport, CT：Praeger。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1198（臺灣：1180，外國：18） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1753550 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67570891
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上