It is much to the credit of the late intellectual historian Edward T. Ch'ien that Jiao Hong, a prominent Confucian scholar of Late Ming, was rediscovered. Unfortunately, the criticism by no less an authority than Professor Yu Yingshih has put the whole rediscovery issue in controversy. This paper attempts to re-confirm Professor Ch'ien's views on Jiao Hong by re-establishing the facts 1) that Ch'ing evidential research has indeed had its root in the scholarships of the Taizhou School of Late Ming,of which Jiao Hong was a leader, and 2) that Jiao Hong has contributed substantially to Neo-Confucian philosophy.