:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:不同性別與學習潛能之國小學童在學習適應、注意力與記憶力之比較研究
書刊名:臺中師院學報
作者:陳淑絹
作者(外文):Chen, Shu-chuan
出版日期:1999
卷期:13
頁次:頁73-99
主題關鍵詞:國小學童學習適應注意力記憶力
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:50
  • 點閱點閱:37
     本研究旨在從國小學童「學習適應量表」「多向度注意力測驗」與「記憶力測驗」 施測結果,探討不同性別與不同學習潛能學生之學習適應、注意力與記憶力之差異。 本研究的樣本取自臺中市健行國小五年級,隨機叢集抽樣兩班學生共七十名,分別是男 生三十六名,女生三十四名。全部受試以國小系列學業性向測驗之百分等級分為高中低三類 不同學習潛能者,所有資料以獨立樣本二因子變異數分析處理。 主要發現如下: 1.高學習潛能之學生,其學習習慣、學習態度與總適應,優於中、低學習潛能者,但不 因性別的不同而有差異。 2.高學習潛能之學生,其分離性注意力、持續性注意力與總注意力,優於中、低學習潛 能者,但不因性別的不同而有差異。 3.整體而言,不同學習潛能學生之記憶力,不因性別的不同而有差異。惟數字的記憶力, 女生優於男生;文字與圖畫的記憶力,高學習潛能者優於中、低學習潛能者。 4.國小學童在不同學習材料上有不同的記憶方式,可提供國小老師指導記憶策略之參 考。最後,研究者提出本研究結果在教育上及未來進一步研究之建議。
     The purpose of this study was to explore the performance of fifth graders with different sex and different learning potentials on learning adaptability, attention, and memory, which were tested by the Learning Adaptability Rating Scale, the Multi-dimensional Attention Test, and the Memory Test. Thirty-six boys and 34 girls from Taichung Chien-Sin Elementary School were selected as subjects. They were assigned to one of types of high, intermediate, and low learning potentials by the Elementary School Series Scholastic Aptitude Test. Data were analyzed by using two way analysis of variance. Results were as follows. 1. High learning potential students scored significantly higher on learning habit, learning attitude, and total adaptability than intermediate and low potential students. No differences were found between boys and girls. 2. High learning potential students scored significantly higher on separate attention, durable attention, and total attention than intermediate and low potential students. No differences were found between the boys and girls. 3. There was no interaction effect of sex and types of learning potentials on total memory, but girls scored higher than boys on figure memory. Also, high learning potential students scored significantly higher on word memory and picture memory than intermediate and low potential students. 4. Different memory manners of elementary school students were found on various learning materials. The contents of these manners can be provided to teachers to teach memory strategies. According to the findings of this study, educational implications and suggestions for future studies were discussed.
期刊論文
1.甘夢龍(19930300)。國小學生困擾何其多?--國小學生行為困擾及其相關因素之研究。國教之友,44(3)=527,15-26。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳正勝(19870300)。大學聯招新制錄取大一學生聯考經驗及學習適應之研究。輔導學報,10,223-266。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.李咏吟、龍玉琴(19940200)。注意力不集中兒童之輔導。教師天地,68,62-65。  延伸查詢new window
4.林玉華(19950200)。給注意力缺陷兒童的教師之建議。國教輔導,34(3)=305,48-50。  延伸查詢new window
5.林敏慧、王天苗、范德鑫(19950600)。國小輕度智障兒童學習潛能評量之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,12,197-216。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.陳英豪、汪榮才、李坤崇(19930300)。學習心事誰人知?--國中國小學生學習適應及其相關因素之比較研究。國教之友,44(3)=527,5-14。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳英豪、林正文、李坤崇(19890100)。國小學生學習適應量表編製報告。測驗年刊,36,1-11。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.徐享良(19810400)。智能中等兒童與智能不足兒童注意反應速度及注意集中度之研究。教育學院學報,6,207-256。  延伸查詢new window
9.楊幸真(19921000)。注意力與學習之相關探討。教師之友,33(4),28-30。  延伸查詢new window
10.黃萬益(19751200)。國小學生學習適應問題之研究。新竹師專學報,2,256-183。  延伸查詢new window
11.陳慶文、謝季宏(19790600)。國中不升學學生的在校適應問題。輔導月刊,15(7/8),24-29。  延伸查詢new window
12.Clampit, M. K.、Silver, S. J.(1989)。Distribution of relative attention deficits on the WISCR by age, sex, social class, and region。Journal of Learning Disabilities,22(4),258-259。  new window
13.Meisels, S. J.、Liaw, F. R.(1993)。Failure in grade: Do retained students catch up?。Journal of Education Research,87(2),69-77。  new window
14.Varley, C. K.(1984)。Attention deficit disorder (the hyperactivity syndrome): Selected issues。Journal of Development and Behavioral Pediatrics,5(5),254-258。  new window
15.李坤崇(19900500)。我國國小學生學習適應及其相關因素之研究。臺南師院學報,23,133-159。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Snider, V.(1987)。Use of self-monitoring of attention with LD students research and application。Learning Disability Quarterly,10(2),139-151。  new window
17.徐享良(19910600)。智力因素結構之探索--國中學生注意力、記憶力及認知能力之相關分析。特殊教育學報,6,321-372。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.周台傑、林玉華(19960600)。自我教導策略對注意力不足過動兒童之教學效果研究。特殊教育學報,11,239-284。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Lesure, G. E.(1994)。Ethic differences and the effects of racism on college adjustment。The Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association。California。  new window
研究報告
1.譚光鼎(1994)。台灣山胞青少年文化認同、成就概念與學習行為關係之研究。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.宋淑慧(1992)。多向度注意力測驗編製之研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.林進材(1992)。城郊地區國小高年級學生學校適應比較研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.林素妃(1992)。增進學習技巧的團體輔導對學習適應欠佳兒童的影響效果研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳莉莉(1990)。智優學生與普通學生記憶策略之比較研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.賴玉粉(1995)。花蓮縣原住民、非原住民國小學童學習適應與自我觀念之比較研究(碩士論文)。國立花蓮師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
6.Melnick, D. H.(1992)。Adjustment to transitions in early adolescence (Junior high school)(博士論文)。Long Island University。  new window
圖書
1.田培林(1973)。教育學新論。台北:文景出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.李坤崇(1996)。學習適應量表增訂版指導手冊。台北:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.周台傑、邱上真、宋淑慧(1993)。多向度注意力測驗修訂版指導手冊。台北:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.吳清山、李錫金、劉緬懷、莊貞銀、盧美貴(1990)。班級經營。台北:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.柯永河(1987)。臨床神經心理學概論。台北:大洋出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.張春興(1990)。現代心理學。台北:東華出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.張春興(1989)。張氏心理學辭典。台北:東華出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.簡茂發、蘇建文、陳淑美(1986)。國小系列學業性向測驗指導手冊。台北:行為科學社。  延伸查詢new window
9.Best, J. B.(1986)。Cognitive psychology。New York:West Publishing Company。  new window
10.Maltin, M. W.(1983)。Cognition。New York:CBL College Publishing。  new window
11.Gross, T. F.(1985)。Cognitive development。California:Wadworth, Inc.。  new window
12.Sigmon, S. B.(1983)。Social inequality and measurement of cognition in the schools: Focusing on Raven's colored progressive matrices scale。New Jersey。  new window
13.Rebok, G. W.(1987)。Life-span cognitive development。New York:Holt, Rinehart and Winston。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE