參考文獻
一、中文部分
何素華（民86）：如何為身心障礙兒童編選教材。載於國立彰化師範大學特殊教育中心編印：啟智教育教材編選工作手冊，4-16頁。
邱上真（民78）：後設認知研究在輕度障礙者教學上的應用。特殊教育， 30，12-16。
邱上真（民80）：學習策略教學的理論與實際。特殊教育與復健學報，1，1-49。邱上真、葉千綺（民88）：國民小學國語文低成就學童的篩選。學童閱讀困難的鑑定與診斷研討會論文。
周台傑、詹文宏（民84）：後設認知閱讀策略對國小閱讀障礙兒童閱讀理解能力之研究。特殊教育與復健學報，4，109-152。李玉貴（民87）：國小學童線上閱讀故事體文章之推論類別分析研究。台北市立師範學院國民教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。
林宜真（民87）：閱讀障礙學生與普通學生閱讀理解方式之比較研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。
胡志偉、楊乃欣（1992）：閱讀中文的心理歷程：80年代研究的回顧與展望。載於曾志朗主編：中國語文心理學研究：第一年度結案報告。嘉義：國立中正大學認知科學研究中心。
柯華葳（1992）：台灣地區閱讀研究文獻回顧。載於曾志朗主編：中國語文心理學研究：第一年度結案報告。嘉義：國立中正大學認知科學研究中心。
柯華葳（民84）：語文科的閱讀教學。載於李永吟（主編）：學習輔導：學習心理學的應用，307-349頁。台北：心理出版社。
柯華葳、李俊仁（民88）：閱讀困難理論架構及驗証。學童閱讀困難的鑑定與診斷研討會論文。
洪碧霞、邱上真、葉千綺、林素微（民88）：國小學童國語文能力成長組型之探討。學童閱讀困難的鑑定與診斷研討會論文。許天威（民76）：學習障礙者之教育。台北：五南。
許天威、夏瑞璘（民84）：中美兩國有關學習障礙之研究的發展脈絡。載於中華民國特殊教育學會（主編）：教學與研究：中華民國特殊教育學會八十四年年會專輯。
許天威、蕭金土（民88）：綜合性非語文智力測驗實施手冊。台北：心理。
胥彥華（民78）：學習策略對國小六年級學生閱讀效果之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。
黃瓊儀（民85）：相互教學法對國小高年級學童閱讀理解能力、後設認知能力與閱讀態度之影響。國立嘉義師範學院國民教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。
曾世杰（民84）：閱讀低成就與一般學生的閱讀歷程成分分析研究。國科會專題研究報告。
曾陳蜜桃（民79）：國民中小學生的後設認知及其與閱讀理解之相關研究。國立政治大學教育研究所未出版之博士論文。
郭靜姿（民81）：閱讀理解訓練方案對於增進高中學生閱讀策略運用與後設認知能力之成效研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。楊芷芳（民83）：國小不同後設認知能力兒童的閱讀理解能力與閱讀理解策略之研究。國立台中師範學院初等教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。
劉玲吟（民83）：後設認知閱讀策略的教學對國中低閱讀能力學生閱讀效果之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。
藍慧君（民80）：學習障礙兒童與普通兒童閱讀不同結構文章之閱讀理解策略的比較研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。二、英文部分
Aaron, P. G., & Joshi, R. M. (1992). Reading problems: Consultation and remediation. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Aaron, P. G., Joshi, M., & Williams, K. A. (1999). Not all reading disabilities are alike. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32(2), 120-137.
Alvermann, D. E., Smith, L. C., & Readena, J. E. (1985). Prior knowledge activation and strategic knowledge in academic performance. Review of Educational Research, 58, 375-404.
Anderson, J. R. (1995). Cognitive psychology and its implications(4th ed.). New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Anderson, R. C. Reynolds, R. E. Shallert, D. L., & Goetz, E. T. (1977). Frameworks for comprehension discourse. American Educational Research Journal, 14, 367-382.
Baker, L., & Brown, A. (1984). Matacognitive skills and reading. In P. D. Pearson , R. Barr , M. Kamil , & P. Mosenthal (eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 353-394). New York: Longman.
Bereiter, C., & Bird, M. (1985). Use of thinking aloud in identification and teaching of reading comprehension strategies. Cognition and instruction, 2(2), 131-156.
Brady, P. L. (1990). Improving the reading comprehension of middle school students through reciprocal teaching and semantic mapping strategies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon-Eugene.
Bruning, R. H., Schraw, G. J., & Ronning, R. R. (1999). Cognitive psychology and instruction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Carr, T. H., Brown, T. L., Vavrus, L. G., & Evans, M. A. ( 1990). Cognitive skill maps and cognitive skill profiles: Componential analysis of individual differences in children’s reading efficiency. In T. H. Carr & B. A. Levy (eds.), Reading and its development. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Davey, B., & McBride, S. (1986). Effects of question-generation training on reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 256-262.
Dermody, M., Speaker, R. (1995). Effects of reciprocal strategy training in prediction, clearification, question generating, and summarization on fourth graders’ reading comprehension. In K. A. Hinchman, D. J. Leu, & C. K. Kinzer (Eds.), Forty-fourth yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp.190-196).
Deshler, D. D., Ellis, E. S., & Lenz, B. K. (1996). Teaching adolescents with learning disabilities: Strategies and methods(2nd ed.). Denver, CO: Love Publishing Co.
Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., & Pearson, P. D. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 239-264.
Dole, J. A., & Smith, E. L. (1987). When prior knowledge is wrong: Reading and learning science text. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Reading Conference, St. Petersburg, FL.
Ehri, L. C. (1982). Learning to read and spell. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association annual meeting, Washington, D. C.
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Gagne, E. D., Yekovich, C. W., & Yekovich, F. R. ( 1993). The cognitive psychology of school learning (2nd ed.). New York, NY: HarperCollins College Publishers.
Goodman, K. S. (1967). Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. Journal of Reading Specialist, 6, 126-135.
Gough, P. B. (1972). One second of reading. In E. Kavanagh & I. G. Mattingly (eds.), Language by ear and by eye (pp. 331-358). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1987). The psychology of reading and language comprehension. Newton, MA: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-case research design: Methods for clinical and applied setting. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kintsch, W. & Van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 92, 109-129.
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182.
Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 92, 109-129.
Kletzien, S. B. (1992). Proficient and less proficient comprehenders’ strategy use for different top-level structures. Journal of Reading Behavior, 24, 191-215.
LaBerge, D. & Samuels, S. J. (1974).Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive psychology, 6, 283-323.
Lenz, B. K., Ellis, E. S., & Scanlon, D. (1996). Teaching learning strategies to adlescents and adults with learning disabilities. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Lerner, J. (2000). Learning disabilities: Theories, diagnosis, and teaching strategies(8th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Co.
Lysynchuk, L., Pressley, M., & Vye, N. J. (1990). Reciprocal teaching improves standardized reading comprehension performance in poor comprehenders. The Elementary School Journal, 90, 469-484.
Meyers, J., Lytle, S., Palladino, D., Devenpeck, G., & Green, M. (1990). Think-aloud protocol analysis: An investigation of reading comprehension strategies in fourth- and fifth-grade students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 8, 112-127.
Mercer, C. D., & Mercer. A. R. (1998). Teaching students with learning problems(5th ed.). New York, NY: MacMillan Publishing.
Olshavsky, J. E. (1976-1977). Reading as problem solving: An investigation of strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 7(4), 654-674.
Paris, S. G., Lipson, M. Y.,& Wixson, K. K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 293-316.
Palincsar, A. S. (1987). Collaborating for collaborative learning of text comprehension. (ED 285123)
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117-175.
Palincsar, A. S., David, Y., Winn, J., Stevens, D., & Brown, A. L. (1990). Examining the differential effects of teacher-versus student-controlled activity in comprehension instruction. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.
Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Raphael, T. E., & Pearson, P. D. (1985). Increasing student awareness of sources of information for answering questions. American Educational Research Journal, 22, 217-237.
Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1989). The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Resnick, L. B.(1984). Comprehension and learning: Implications for a cognitive theory of instruction. In H. Mandl, N. L. Stein, & T. Trabasso (eds.), Learning and comprehension of text (pp.431-443). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Richek, M., Caldwell, J., Jenning, J., & Lerner, J. (1996). Reading problems: Assessment and teaching strategies. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn Bacon.
Rosenshine, B.(1980). Skill hierarchies in reading comprehension. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension(pp.33-58). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rosenshine, B.(1997). Advances in research on instruction. In J. W. Lloyd , E. J. Kameenui , & D. Chard (eds.), Issues in educating students with disabilities(pp. 197-220). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 64(4), 479-530.
Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 181-221.
Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension(pp.33-58). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Shortland-Jones, B. (1986). The development and testing of an instructional strategy for improving reading comprehension based on schema and metacognitive theories. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon. University Microfiles No. 8622529).
Smith, F. (1971). Understanding reading: A psycholinguistic analysis of reading and learning to read. Orlando, FL: Holt, Rinehart.
Snider, V. E. (1989). Reading comprehension performance of adolescents with reading disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12, 87-96.
Stone, C. A. (1998). The metaphor of scaffolding: Its utility for the field of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 13(4), 344-364.
Taylor, B. M., & Frye, B. J. (1992). Comprehension strategy instruction in the intermediate grades. Reading Research and Instruction, 92, 39-48.
Tawney, J. W., & Gast, D. L. (1984). Single subject research in special education. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company.
Trabasso, T., & Magliano, J. P. (1996). Conscious understanding during comprehension. Discourse Processes, 21, 255-287.
Tryon, W. W. (1982). A simplified time-series analysis for evaluation treatment interventions. Journal of applied behavior analysis, 15, 423-429.
Waxman, H. C., Padron, Y. N., & Knight, S. L. (1991). Risks associated with students’ limited cognitive mastery. In W. C. Wang , M. C. Reynolds , & H. J. Walberg (eds.), Handbook of special education: Research and practice. Vol4, pp.235-254.
Wade, S. E. (1990). Using think alouds to assess comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 43, 442-451.
Whitney, P., & Budd. D. (1996). Think-aloud protococs and the study of comprehension. Discourse Processes, 21, 341-351.
Williams, J. P. (1998). Improving comprehension of disabled reader. Annals of Dyslexia, 48, 213-238.
Wong, B. Y. L. (1985). Self-questioning instructional research: A review. Review of Educational Research, 55(2), 227-268.
Wood, D., & Wood, H. (1996). Vygotsky, tutoring and learning. Oxford Review of Education, 22(1), 5-16.