:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國營事業土地資產利用策略之研究--以台電及台糖公司為例
作者:丁福致 引用關係
校院名稱:國立政治大學
系所名稱:地政學系
指導教授:林英彥
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2002
主題關鍵詞:國營事業土地資產利用資源歸屬生命週期策略矩陣state-owned corporationutilization strategies for land assetsattribution of the resourcelife cyclestrategic matrix
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:55
摘要
我國國營事業早期係政府戰後接收多家日本在台之企業,及大陸淪陷後遷台之國營事業為主,而後1970年代基於促進產業之發展,亦相繼成立多家國營企業,然近年來面臨市場開放、盈餘繳庫,以及民營化政策推動之壓力,使得國營事業轉而追求土地資產個別利益之獲取,作為創造盈餘來源,或是吸引投資對象之重要誘因。
然而追求土地資產個別利益,往往未能切實探討國營事業之本質與利用策略,本研究即係以台電與台糖公司為例,就其土地資產利用與國營事業本業之關聯性、土地資產利用策略之差異性,探討目前國營事業土地資源歸屬、土地利用模式與營運競爭力、以及土地資源公平與效率,並進而整合國營事業土地永續利用之策略。
就國營事業資源歸屬與本業之關聯性分析,其土地資源應以全民所有為依歸,而土地資產利用應基於本業之發展。從企業不動產與策略矩陣差異分析,則因生命週期所處之階段而有所不同,成長/成熟期追求與競爭對手差異化之策略,強化土地利用之優勢;衰退期則因本業資金挹注困難,而以降低不動產之運作成本為主。相對於政府以衰退期作為移轉民營之時機,將使接手者缺乏經營本業之誘因下,僅著眼於土地之利益,將更易引發土地資源歸屬之衝突。
而就土地資源公平與效率而言,國營事業應由整體觀點著手,而非侷限於單一事業土地資產利用之框架,如以使用權代替所有權之財產權型態,達成資源歸屬之公平;另以全民資源為基礎,經由市場經濟之效率,彌補市場經濟不足。因此,國營事業土地資源之整合機制,不僅考量整體土地資源之循環使用,更須妥善運用國有民營之觀念,將土地經營之利益,解決民營化所生之缺憾,以建構國營事業土地資源永續利用之整體策略。
關鍵字:國營事業、土地資產利用、資源歸屬、生命週期、策略矩陣
Abstract
Most of the older state-owned corporations (SOCs) in Taiwan found their predecessors in the companies established by the colonial Japanese government and later took over by the Chinese central government at the end of the World War II as well as in the enterprises sponsored by the central government after its withdrawal from Mainland China to Taiwan. By 1970s, several new SOCs were further set up with the mission to promote the island’s industrial development. Privileged by long-term government protection, these SOCs are now confronted with severe challenges from the increasing deregulation in the market and the pressing demand for privatization. They have accordingly resorted to their land assets as an essential source for generating earnings and a major incentive for attracting investments.
However, in their pursuit of the profits promised by their land assets, SOCs in Taiwan in general have failed to take into sufficient consideration of their nature as state-owned corporations and effective utilization strategies. The research, based on the examples of Taipower Company and Taiwan Sugar Company, starts by examining the relation between a SOC’s core business and its utilization strategies for land assets and the differences between the Taipower and Taiwan Sugar utilization strategies. The research then moves on to analyze the attribution of the SOC’s land resources, the utilization models and operational competitiveness, and the fairness and efficiency in the utilization of land resources. Results of the previous studies are then integrated for the research to develop integrated strategies for the sustainable utilization of SOC’s land assets.
In its analysis on the relation of SOC’s core business and the attribution of its assets, the research regards the land resources as owned by the general public and suggests that the land resources should be utilized in a manner that contributes to the development of the SOC’s core business. Analysis based on corporate real estate and strategic matrix further indicate that utilization of land assets varies in accordance with the life cycles of the SOC’s core business. In times of business growth and maturity, utilization of land assets should be optimized to perpetuate differentiation in one’s core business from one’s competitors. On the other hand, in times of decline, the top priority should be the effective reduction in the operation costs of land assets as capital support from the core business grows unreliable. The government’s active promotion of the privatization of SOCs in times of decline tends to cripple the privatized SOC’s interest in its core business and to prompt it to focus on exploiting the profits of its land assets, thereby triggering conflicts in the attribution of state-owned land resources.
How to achieve fairness and efficiency in the utilization of SOCs’ land resources is an issue to be examined with a comprehensive perspective; it should not be forced to fit into the utilization model of a single SOC. Replacing ownership with usership, for example, can be an effective way to ensure the fairness in the attribution of land resources. Developing the land assets of SOCs as public resources can help boost up the efficiency of market economics to compensate its inadequacies. Therefore, an integration mechanism in the utilization of the land assets of SOCs is needed to facilitate the continual use of land resources. Careful and skill application of the “state ownership for private operation” concept is also of crucial importance in using the profits generated by the management of land resources to fix the flaws of privatization and to develop the integrated strategies for the sustainable use of land resources of state-owned corporations in Taiwan.
Key words: state-owned corporation, utilization strategies for land assets, attribution of the resource, life cycle, strategic matrix.
參考書籍
一、中文部分
1、中興工程顧問公司,1999,東京電力公司地下變電所多目標使用暨經營現況參觀研習心得報告。
2、立法院圖書資料室,1996,立法報章資料專輯第五十三、五十四、五十四輯:公營事業民營化(上、中、下輯),立法院。
3、台灣電力公司,1994,電力事業經營現況與展望。
4、台灣電力公司,2000,台電公司多角化經營土地開發模式研究。
5、台糖公司土地開發處,1999,短、中、長程土地開發計劃,台糖公司。
6、台灣勞工陣線,1999,新國有政策-台灣民營化政策總批判,台北:勞動者雜誌社。
7、邱毅,1998,變革-恐龍型企業的再造,台北:中華徵信所企業股份有限公司。
8、林左裕,2000,不動產投資管理,台北:智勝文化。
9、林英彥,1994,不動產估價九版,台北:文笙書局。
10、林森田,1996,土地經濟理論與分析,台北:三民書局。
11、林建山,1999,民營化規劃與執行實務探討,台北:環球經濟社。
12、林建山,2000,讓市場真正市場化-公營事業民營化議題之理論與對策, 公營事業民營化相關問題研討會,行政院經建會。
13、何宗良,1997,民主資本主義制度下公用事業功能角色定位問題之研究,國立中興大學財政研究所碩士論文。
14、何鳳嬌編,1993,台灣土地資料彙編第一輯:光復初期土地之接收與處理(一),國史館。
15、何鳳嬌編,1995,台灣土地資料彙編第一輯:光復初期土地之接收與處理(二),國史館。
16、吳若予,1992,戰後台灣公營事業之政經分析,台北:業強出版社。new window
17、吳思華,1999,策略九說,台北:臉譜文化事業公司。
18、吳芳貞,1998,公營事業民營化之探討-以日鐵、台鐵為例,國立政治大學財政研究所碩士論文。
19、李明軒、邱如美合譯,Porter,M. E.著,2000,競爭優勢,台北:天下遠見出版股份有限公司。
20、李俊瑩,2000,我國公營事業民營化之檢討與法制變革重點建議,台北:國立台灣大學法律學研究所碩士論文。
21、李清松,2000,民營化後剩餘公股管理問題之探討,公營事業民營化相關問題研討會,行政院經建會。
22、侯坤宏編,1988,中華民國農業史料(一):土地改革史料,國史館。
23、周旭華譯,Porter, M.E.著,1999,競爭策略-產業環境及競爭者分析,台北:天下遠見出版股份有限公司。
24、周添城,1999,台灣民營化的經驗,台北:中華徵信所企業股份有限公司。
25、黃允治,1994,公營事業民營化與經營績效關係之研究,台北:國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
26、黃俊傑,1995,戰後台灣的轉型及其展望,台北:正中書局。new window
27、黃清賢,2000,公營事業民營化政策對談-公營事業改革新出路,公營事業民營化相關問題研討會,行政院經建會。
28、黃舒衛,2000,台糖土地釋出之政治經濟分析,台北:國立政治大學地政研究所碩士論文。
29、黃應豪,1995,台灣國際觀光旅館經營策略之研究-策略矩陣分析法之研究,台北:國立政治大學企業管理研究所論文。
30、張金鶚,1997,房地產投資與決策分析-理論與實務二版,台北:華泰書局
31、張清溪等,1986,經濟學-理論與實際,台北:新陸書局,頁319
32、張晉芬,1999,「私有化符合誰的利益?:檢視臺灣公營事業所有權移轉的社會效果」‧公營事業評論,第一卷第三期。new window
33、張晉芬,2000,缺乏社會公平和正義觀點的民營化政策,公營事業民營化相關問題研討會,行政院經建會。
34、經濟部國營會,1995,經濟部所屬事業發展事略。
35、經濟部國營會,1999,台糖公司民營化可行性研究。
36、經濟部國營會,1999,經濟部國營會暨部屬事業業務簡報。
37、馮月忠,1996,國營事業土地處理行為之研究:以台糖公司六萬元一坪勞工住宅為例,新竹:中華工學院建築與都市計劃研究所碩士論文。
38、薛月順編,1993,資源委員會檔案史料彙編:光復初期台灣經濟建設(上)(中),國史館。
39、薛琦、胡仲英,1999,民營化政策的回顧與展望,台灣民營化的經驗,台北:中華徵信所。
40、鄭明安,1996,國有土地使用權制度之研究,台北:國立政治大學地政研究所博士論文。new window
41、瞿宛文,1995,國家與台灣資本主義的發展,-評論(解構黨國資本主義)」,台灣社會研究季刊,第二十期。
42、蘇玉守,1999,公司型態國營事業土地開發與經營之探討,台南:國立成功大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文。
43、蘇拾忠,1988,產業環境因素與企業競爭策略關係之研究-以我國營建業為例,台北:國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
44、魏寶貝,1989,從國有化到私有化-英國之經驗,台北:淡江大學歐洲研究所碩士論文。
45、司徒達賢,1985,策略管理,台北:遠流出版公司
46、司徒達賢,1989,「公營事業民營-動態過程之策略與管理」,因應自由化國際化之競爭策略學術論文研討會,中華民國管科學會主辦。
47、司徒達賢,1997,經營艱困公營事業民營化方式及應有配合措施之研究,經建會。
48、司徒達賢,1999,公營事業民營化-整理與重生之程序,台灣民營化的經驗,台北:中華徵信所出版。
二、英文部分:
1、Alchian,A.A.,1965,”The Basis of Some Recent Advances in the Theory of Management of the Firm.” ,Journal of Industrial Economics,14,30-41.
2、Arthur Anderson, NACORE International and CCIM, 1993, Real Estate in the Corporation: The Bottom Line from Senior Management, Arthur Anderson and Co.
3、Beldona,S.R.,Chaganti,M.H.& A.C.Inkpen., 1997, Industry Variety, Life-cycle Stages, and Performance: A Dyamic Perspective. Competitive Intelligence Review 8:4.
4、Buchanan, J.M.,1986, Liberty, Market and State-Political Economy in the 1980s, N.Y.:New York University Press.
5、Coase, R.H.,1988, The Firm, the Market and the Law, Chicago and London:The University of Chicago.
6、Eucken, W.,1947, Die Grundlagen der Nationalokonomie.2d ed,Godesberg:Helmut Kupper, vormals Georg Bondi.
7、Fernley, T.G.A., 1996, The Pivotal Role of an AMC in The Life Cycle of an Association, Association Management ,48:7.
8、Gibbs, J.P., 1981, Norms, Deviance, and Social Control:Concept Matters, Elsevier North Holland, Inc.
9、Garfield, P.J.and W.F.Lovejoy, 1964, Public Utility Economics, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.:Prentice-Hall.
10、Hayek ,F.A.,1960, The Constitution of Liberty, Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
11、Joroff, M., 1992, Corporate Real Estate 2000, Management Strategies for the Next Decade,Industrial Development, Industrial Development Research Foundation.
12、Keynes, J.M.,1936, The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money, London:Macmillan.
13、Marshall, A.,1890, Principles of Economics, London:Macmillan.
14、Manning, C and S.E. Roulac, 1996, Structuring the Corporate Real Property Function for Greater ‘Bottom Line’ Impact, Journal of Real Journal Research, 12:3,233-96.
15、Manning, C., Mauricio, R. and S.E. Roulac, 1997, Which Corporate Real Estate Management Functions Should be Outsourced?, Journal of Real Estate Research, 14:3,259-74.
16、North, D.C.,1981, Structure and Change in Economic History, N.Y. and London:Norton.
17、Nourse, H.O. and S.E. Roulac, 1993, Linking Real Estate Decision to Corporate Strategy, Journal of Real Estate Research, 8:4,475-94.
18、Ogus, A.I., 1994, Regulation:Legal Form and Economic Theory, N.Y.: Oxford Press Inc,
19、Ostrom, E.,1990,Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20、Porter,M.E.,1980, Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitor, N.Y.:The Free Press.
21、Porter, M.E.,1985, Competitive Advantage:Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, N.Y.:The Free Press.
22、Pigou, A.C.,1920,The Economics of Welfare, London:Macmillan.
23、Robinson,K.C.,1999, An Examination of The Influence of Industry Structure on Eight Alternative Measures of New Venture Performance for High Potential Independent New Ventures, Journal of Business Venturing 14:2.
24、Savas, E.S.,1987, Privatization:The Key to Better Government, Chatham ,N.J.:Chatham House Publishers.
25、Stiglitz,J.E.,1986, Economics of Public Sector, N.Y.:W.W.Norton.
26、Shakey, W.W.,1982, The Theory of Nature Monopoly, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27、Veale, P.R., 1989, Managing Corporate Real Estate Assets: Current Executive Attitudes and Prospects for an Emergent Discipline, Journal of Real Estate Research, 4:3,1-22.
28、Zeckhauser, S. and R. Silverman, 1983, Rediscovering Your Company’s Real Estate, Harvard Business Review, January February,111-17.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE