:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國家力量的分析
書刊名:淡江人文社會學刊
作者:洪鎌德侯政宏
作者(外文):Hung, Lien-teHou, Cheng-hong
出版日期:2002
卷期:12
頁次:頁97-120
主題關鍵詞:國際政治國際體系國家利益實力權力勢力或影響力CapacityInternational politicalInternational systemPowerInfluenceNational interest
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:62
  • 點閱點閱:17
     國際關係學者認為一國力量的強弱決定它在國際上的地位。實力強的國家可以依照本身的意志行事,他們會運用有形或無形的力量排除他國的干預與影響,並且能夠順利達成自己既定的外交目標。因此,本文定義國家實力的實質內涵為權力與勢力。然而,衡量一個國家實力的標準有哪些呢?大致上可以分成四個要素:地理環境;人口資源;經濟資源;軍事資源。這四個要素的重要性會隨著時代演進而互有高低,但是基本上還是要從整體的角度來衡量一國的力量,否則會偏重某個要素而產生誤判的情形,所以本文將就這四個要素做更進一步的探討,另外也討論國家實力的近貌,藉此瞭解國家在國際社會運作的實際情形,並且找出合理的衡量標準來評斷國家力量的強弱。
     Scholars of international relations believe that the strength of a state's capacity decides its international status. States with significant strength can accomplish tasks based on their will. To successfully accomplish their diplomatic objectives, these nations use both tangible and intangible power to prevent other states' intrusion and influence. Hence, the basic concept of a nation's capacity includes power and influence. However, what is the criterion used in measuring a state's capacity? Basically, there are four factors: geographical environment, population, economics, and arms. The importance of these four factors fluctuate over time. But, basically, we need to measure the capacity of a state in its entirety. Otherwise, misjudgment is likely to occur if we overlook any of these four factors. The following report analyzes the four factors in depth to understand the actual scenario of how a state runs on the international stage and discusses the most recent definition of national capacity. We also locate a reasonable criterion to evaluate the strength of a state's capacity.
期刊論文
1.Brams, S. L.(1969)。The seach for structural order in the international system。International Studies Quarterly,13,254-280。  new window
2.Galtung, J.(1964)。A structural theory of aggression。Journal of Peace Research,1(2),95-115。  new window
3.Kegley, C. W.、Eugene, R. W.(1976)。Structural characteristics of international influence relationships: A replication study。International Studies Quarterly,2,261-299。  new window
4.Halle, L.(1959)。The role of force in foreign policy。Social Science,30,203-208。  new window
5.Singer, J. D.(1963)。Inter nation influence: A formal model。American Political Science Review,57,420-430。  new window
6.Dahl, Robert Alan(1957)。The Concept of Power。Behavioral Science,2(3),201-215。  new window
圖書
1.李其泰、Deutsch, K. W.(1972)。國際關係的解析。臺北:幼獅文化事業公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.朱維瑜(1999)。二〇〇〇世界年鑒。台北:中央通訊社。  延伸查詢new window
3.王逸舟(1998)。國際政治析論。臺北:五南出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.林添貴、Brzezinski, Z.(1998)。大棋盤。臺北:立緒文化。  延伸查詢new window
5.林宗達(2000)。戰區飛彈防禦與台海安全。台北:時英出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.席曙光(1993)。世界權力大轉換。台北:風雲時代出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.洪鎌德(2000)。當代政治經濟學。台北:揚智。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Dougherty, E.、Pfaltzgraff, R. L. Jr.、胡祖慶(1993)。國際關係理論導讀。台北:五南出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.陳漢文(1987)。在國際舞臺上。台北:谷風出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.Claude, I. L. Jr.、張保民(1976)。權力與國際關係。臺北:幼獅文化事業公司。  延伸查詢new window
11.張明澍、關弘昌(1995)。國際政治。台北:五南出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.國家統計局(1999)。中國統計年鑒。北京:中國統計出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.鄭又平、黃烈修、Guzzini, S.(2000)。國際關係與國際政治經濟學。台北:韋伯出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.楊鈞池(1994)。國際政治經濟學。台北:五南出版社。  延伸查詢new window
15.The Club of Rome、黃孝如(1992)。第一次全球革命。臺北:時報文化。  延伸查詢new window
16.龍冠海(1969)。社會學。台北:三民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
17.蔣永芳、王振坤、劉志堅、Binnendijk, H. A.(1999)。美國一九九八年戰略評估。台北:國防部史政編譯局。  延伸查詢new window
18.Halle, L.(1954)。The nature of power。London:Ruppert Hart-Davis。  new window
19.Duchacek, Ivo D.(1971)。Nations and men, an introduction to international politics。New York:Holt, Rinehart and Winston。  new window
20.Dougherty, James E.、Pfaltzgraff, Robert L. Jr.(1971)。Contending theories of international relations。J. B. Lippincott Company。  new window
21.Dahl, R. A.(1963)。Modern political analysis。Englewood Cliffs, N. J.:Prentice Hall, Inc.。  new window
22.Keohane, R. O.、Nye, Joseph S.(1977)。Power and interdependence。Boston:Little Brown and Company。  new window
23.Holsti, K. J.(1977)。International politics, a framework for analysis。Engelwood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall Inc.。  new window
24.Organski, A. F. K.(1967)。World politics。New York:Knopf。  new window
25.Morgenthau, Hans J.(1967)。Politics among nations。Knopf。  new window
26.Lerche, C. O.、Abdul, A. S.(1970)。Concepts of international politics。N. J.:Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
27.Legg, K. R.、James, F. M.(1971)。Politics and the international system: An introduction。New York:Harper & Row Publishers。  new window
28.Lasswell, H. D.、Abraham, K.(1950)。Power and society: A framework for political inquiry。New Haven:Yale University Press。  new window
29.Wolfers, A.(1971)。Discord and collaboration。Baltimore:The Johns Hopkins Press。  new window
30.Weber, M.(1964)。Wirtschaft and gesellschaft Koln。Berlin:Kiepenheuer & Witscherster Halbband。  new window
31.Stoessinger, J. G.(1969)。The might of nations。New York:Random House。  new window
32.林碧炤(1997)。國際政治與外交政策。臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
33.洪丁福(1996)。國際政治的理論與實際。啟英。  延伸查詢new window
34.洪鎌德(1977)。世界政治新論。臺北:牧童。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Kindermann, G. K.(1963)。Hans J. Morgenthau und die theore-ticchen Grundlagen des politischen Realsimus。Grundlegung einer Theorie dcr intemationalen Politik。Gutersloh:C. Bertelsmann Verlag。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE