:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國民小學高年級學童科學本質觀之研究
書刊名:臺北市立師範學院學報. 人文藝術類社會科學類科學教育類
作者:黃萬居李悅美
作者(外文):Huang, Wan-chuLee, Yueh-mei
出版日期:2003
卷期:34
頁次:頁173-197
主題關鍵詞:科學本質Elementary studentViews toward the nature of science
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:22
  • 點閱點閱:29
     本研究之目的在於探討高年級學童的科學本質觀8一進一步分析學童之性別、自然科學習成就與其科學本質觀的關係,同時找出影響學童科學本質觀形成的可能因素。研究方法採用問卷調查法,並輔以晤談之資料的方式。研究對象為臺北市某國小六年級的學童。研究工具之發展:先參考相關文獻後改編成適宜國小學童閱讀之文句,部分自編試題發展成「科學本質問卷」和「科學本質晤談綱要」。研究過程先以科學本質問卷對學童施測,再挑選學生進行晤談,然後就問卷及晤談資料進行統計分析。 研究結果發現:學童之科學本質觀與自然科學習成就間有正相關;男女學童的科學本質觀無顯著的差異;學童在科學本質問卷總量表與各分量表的得分,隨自然科學習成就之提昇而增加的趨勢;自然科學習成就高分組的學童,其科學本質觀較低分組的學童更趨現代觀;但和中分組的學童則無顯著差異。學童的科學本質觀整體而言略偏向現代觀,但經深入晤談後發現其科學本質觀並未協調統整,部分仍受傳統邏輯實證的影響。影響學童科學本質觀的可能因素有生活經驗、電視節目、教科書、課外讀物、教師、父母、親人等。 針對本研究的發現,研究者提出對科學教育及未來研究的建議。
     The purposes of this study were as following: (1) to investigate the relationships among students' gender, science achievement, and views toward the nature of science (NOS), (2) to investigate students' views toward the nature of science, (3) to find out the factors in the formation of NOS. The method of this research was both questionnaire survey and interview. The subjects were sixth graders at an elementary school in Taipei. The instruments included "Questionnaire of the Nature of Science (QNOS)" partially revised from some literature and "interview schema". The results of this study were as following: (1) There was positive correlation between students' views toward the nature of science and science achievement. (2) There was no significant difference between the boys and girls toward the NOS. (3) Students' scores on the QNOS and three subscales improved the promotion of science achievement. The NOS of high-scored group in science achievement was more contemporary than those low-scored group held; there was no significant difference between the mid-scored group and high-scored one. (4) In general, students slightly tended to hold contemporary perspective toward the views of NOS. However, after detailed interview, the researcher found that students' views toward NOS had not been integrated yet. They were partially influenced by traditional logical positivism. (5) The factors of affecting the students' views of NOS were: life experiences, TV programs, textbooks, extension readings, teachers, parents, and family members. According to the findings of this study, commendations about science education and researches in the future were purposed.
期刊論文
1.莊明貞(19980400)。國小自然科新課程的性別論述。兩性平等教育季刊,2,30-50。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃萬居(19970900)。談建構主義的自然科教學。教育資料與研究,18,35-37。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.陳淑媛、洪振方(19980600)。融入科學史之教學對學生了解科學本質之影響。科學與教育學報,2,121-150。  延伸查詢new window
4.張惠博、何珮琪、林建隆(20000900)。國中學生對於科學與科學家的認識之研究。教育研究資訊,8(5),136-152+a7-a8。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.楊龍立(19950600)。男女學生科學興趣差異與道德發展之關聯。臺北市立師範學院學報,26,39-54。  延伸查詢new window
6.Gallagher, J. J.(1991)。Prospective and practicing secondary school science teachers' knowledge and beliefs about the philosophy of science。Science Education,75(1),121-133。  new window
7.詹志禹、吳璧純(19920300)。邏輯實證論的迷思。思與言,30(1),101-121。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.顏弘志(20000600)。從科學本質看科學教育。科學教育研究與發展季刊,19,20-25。  延伸查詢new window
9.佘曉清(19950100)。Elementary and Middle School Students' Perception of Science, Scientists, and Their Work。Proceedings of the National Science Council. Part D, Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education,5(1),19-28。  new window
10.張鳳琴(19941200)。孔恩[Kuhn]--哲學觀與我國科學教育的省思。科學教育,175,8-16。  延伸查詢new window
11.Aikenhead, G. S.、Fleming, R. W.、Ryan, A. G.(1987)。High School Graduates' Beliefs about Science-Technology-Society. I. Methods and Issues in Monitoring Student Views。Science Education,71(2),145-161。  new window
12.Fraser, Barry J.(1978)。Development of a Test of Science-Related Attitudes。Science Education,62(4),509-515。  new window
13.Nussbaum, J.(1989)。Classroom conceptual change: Philosophical perspectives。International Journal of Science Education,11,530-540。  new window
14.Cleminson, A.(1990)。Establishing an epistemological base for science teaching in the light of contemporary notions of the nature of science and of how children learn science。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,27(5),429-445。  new window
15.江啟昱(19951200)。國小學生對科學的態度之性別差異。科學教育研究與發展季刊,1,94-102。  延伸查詢new window
16.洪文東(19960300)。科學的本質。屏師科學教育,3,2-10。  延伸查詢new window
17.翁秀玉、段曉林(19980900)。國小自然科教師傳達科學本質之行動究。科學教育,8,36-52。  延伸查詢new window
18.楊龍立(19920600)。科學教育中性別差異的解釋。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所集刊,34,115-141。  延伸查詢new window
19.楊龍立(19960400)。國中學生性別因素、科學能力自我概念、三種對科學的態度之研究。臺北市立師範學院學報,27,159-182。  延伸查詢new window
20.Barman, Charles R.(1996)。How do students really view science and scientists?。Science & Children,34(1),30-33。  new window
21.Bell, R. L.、Lederman, N. G.、Abd-El-Khalick, F.(2000)。Developing and acting upon one's conception of the nature of science: A follow-up study。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,37(6),563-581。  new window
22.楊文金、楊莉川(19980400)。從社會認同理論探討高中生傾向科學的態度與科學本質的理解。物理教育,2(1),45-62。  延伸查詢new window
23.Lederman, N. G.(1992)。Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,29(4),331-359。  new window
24.佘曉清(19980400)。科學教育與性別差異的省思。兩性平等教育季刊,2,51-57。  延伸查詢new window
25.莊嘉坤(19991200)。從認同的觀點分析學童對科學本質的了解與科學生涯的知覺。科學教育學刊,7(4),343-366。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.Roach, L. E.、Wandersee, J. H.(1995)。Putting People Back to Science: Using Historical Vignettes。School Science and Mathematics,95(7),365-370。  new window
會議論文
1.Lederman, N. G.(1996)。The nature of science: Instructional implications for a process more tentative than products。The Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching。St. Louis, MO。  new window
2.Matthews, M. R.(1996)。What should be the goal in teaching about the nature of science?。The annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching。St. Louis. MO。  new window
3.黃俊儒、楊文金(1997)。由科學本質觀的流變來看人與知識間的關係及其對科學教育的意涵。趙金祁教授榮退學術研討會。台北市:國立台灣師範大學科學教育研究所。333-349。  延伸查詢new window
4.鄭湧涇、周美雪、張麗珠(1989)。職前與在職生物教師對科學的本質的了解。臺北:行政院國家科學委員會。257-283。  延伸查詢new window
5.林顯輝(1991)。我國國中地球科學及國小自然科學教科書科學本質含量之分析。臺灣省第二屆教育學術論文發表會,233-255。  延伸查詢new window
6.莊嘉坤(1995)。國小學生對科學的態度之探討。八十四學年度師範院教育學術論文發表會。屏東市:國立屏東師範學院。1-28。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.林陳涌(1995)。高中生對科學本質瞭解之研究 (計畫編號:NSC84-2511-S-003-083)。臺北:行政院國家科學委員會。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.張鳳琴(1994)。高雄地區公立高中學生對科學知識的本質之看法(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃瓊瑱(1996)。我國國小自然科學教科書之分析研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.翁秀玉(1997)。國小自然科教師傳達科學本質之行動研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.林千青(1996)。國小職前教師與在職教師對科學知識本質了解之研究(碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
5.丁嘉琦(1999)。花蓮縣國小教師科學本質觀點之研究(碩士論文)。國立花蓮師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
6.黃孝宗(2000)。高雄縣大寮國小學童科學家意象之研究(碩士論文)。臺東師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
7.鄭淑妃(1999)。國小自然科教師科學本質觀之詮釋性研究(碩士論文)。國立花蓮師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
8.楊淑萍(1999)。高二學生的科學本質觀與氣體定律解題之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.許玫理(1992)。我國國民中學自然科學教師科學哲學觀點之調查研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Driver, R.、Leach, J.、Millar, R.、Scott, P.(1996)。Young people's images of science。Open University Press。  new window
2.甘漢銧、熊召弟、鍾聖校(1991)。小學自然科教學研究。臺北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
3.教育部(2001)。國民中小學九年一貫課程暫行綱要--自然與生活科技學習領域。台北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
4.American Association for the Advancement of Science(1989)。Project 2061: Science for all Americans。Washington, DC:American Association for the Advancement of Science。  new window
5.史鮑爾、黃玉懷(1992)。改變世界的科學家9--愛迪生。台北市:牛頓出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.廖輝英(1987)。科學家的故事。台北市:正大印書館。  延伸查詢new window
7.National Research Council(1996)。National Science Education Standards。Washington, DC:National Academy Press。  new window
8.American Association for the Advancement of Science(1993)。Benchmarks for science literacy。Oxford University Press。  new window
其他
1.林陳涌(1999)。科學本質在科學教育上的研究與實施(國立花蓮師範學院國小科學教育研究所88學年度所內專題演講講稿),http://www.nhltc.edu.tw/~sciewww/doc/doc4.htm。  延伸查詢new window
2.郭重吉(1995)。建構主義與數理教學,http://www.bio.ncue.edu.tw/c&t/issuel-8/vl-2.htm。  new window
3.黃光國(2000)。科學視域與宗教問題,http://www.sinica.edu.tw/as/weekly/86/647/03.txt。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.林顯輝(1998)。國小自然科師資培育實習教師對科學本質之認知與評量研究。國小自然科師資培育實習模式研討手冊。屏東:國立屏東師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE