:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:實證主義死了嗎﹖:從知識論觀點探討實證主義之更迭及其對教育研究方法的影響
書刊名:國民教育研究學報
作者:李嘉齡
作者(外文):Li, Chia-ling
出版日期:2001
卷期:7
頁次:頁167-191
主題關鍵詞:知識論實證主義教育研究方法PositivismEpistemologyResearch methods in education
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:1717
  • 點閱點閱:36
     哲學中的「知識論」,探究人是如何獲知的問題,亦即探詢人的信念基礎--支持此一信念的憑據(justification)為何?若以教育研究為例,就是問:怎樣才算是「知道」?學生「知道」了些什麼?要如何瞭解學生對一個問題表示他「知道了」?可見知識論之演進與當代教育研究方法賞有不可分之唇齒關係。 實證主義的發展數經更迭,隱然成為二十世紀當代顯學,不僅對自然科學界、甚至在文化、哲學、政治、教育、心理...等社會科學領域產生巨大的影響。其以「自然主義(naturalistic)」的模式來探討世界,亦即以「經驗-分析」的方法,從事現象的描述、解釋、預測和控制,但20世紀對實證主義典範的質疑與挑戰也未嘗停歇。 本文擬從知識論角度重新回顧實證主義之歷史淵源與基本主張,亦即企圖瞭解其「求知方法」的依據,並對其在教育研究方法的應用上提出分析及討論,以釐清下列各項問題: 1.實證主義之歷史發展及其知識論主張之演變 2.實證主義知識論對教育研究方法之影響 3.對實證主義知識論與教育研究方法之反省
     In the field of philosophy, "epistemology" is meant to explore the ways people acquire knowledge, that is, finding out what are the sources of the faiths of human beings-- justification. Education researches consider it as the questions to judge the true "know", to understand what learners have absorbed in mind, and to know how to testify their understanding. Therefore, epistemology has evolved with education researches of modern times. On 20th century, positivism has gradually taken the leading role in research field. And not only does it bring about great influences in natural sciences, but also in social sciences concerning culture, philosophy, politics, and psychology. Positivism tends to examine the whole world with the naturalistic modes, employing the "empirical-analytical" method to describe, explain, predict, and control every phenomenon. However, positivism bas been encountering the challenges and doubts from the outside world at the same time. This study plans to review both the historic and the theoretical background of positivism in the view of epistemology. Furthermore, it tries to know more about "the ways to get acquired" and discuss the future implications of research in education, in order to clear up the following important questions: 1. The historic background of positivism and its relationship with epistemology. 2. The impacts of epistemology of positivism on research methods in education. 3. The examination and reflection about research methods in education.
期刊論文
1.Tuthill, D.、Ashton, P.(1983)。Improving educational research through the development of educational paradigms。Educational Researcher,12(10),6-14。  new window
2.Smith, J. K.(1983)。Quantitative versus qualitative research: An attempt to clarify the issue。Educational Researcher,12(3),6-13。  new window
3.Lather, P.(1992)。Critical Frames in Educational Research: Feminist and Post-structural Perspectives。Theory into Practice,31,87-99。  new window
4.Phillips, D. C.(1983)。After the wake: Postpositivistic educational thought。Educational Researcher,12(5),4-14。  new window
5.姜得勝(19970100)。教育研究的舊弔詭與新思維。教育資料與研究,14,65-73。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.張家麟(20000600)。論科學哲學中的「求知方法」。中山人文社會科學期刊,8(1)=18,279-304。  延伸查詢new window
7.詹志禹、吳璧純(19920300)。邏輯實證論的迷思。思與言,30(1),101-121。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.鄭博真(1996)。寫作修改教學策略對國小學生寫作修改表現、寫作修改能力、寫作品質和寫作態度之影響研究(碩士論文)。國立台南師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.黃慶明(1996)。知識論講義。臺北:鵝湖。  延伸查詢new window
2.Hunt, Morton、李斯(2000)。心理學的故事--源起與演變。臺北:究竟。  延伸查詢new window
3.孫振青(1990)。知識論。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
4.張春興(2000)。心理學思想的流變。臺北市:臺灣東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.Pollock, J. L.(1986)。Contemporary theories of knowledge。Totowa, N.J.:Rowman & Littlefield。  new window
6.吳俊升(1988)。教育哲學大綱。臺北:臺灣商務出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.Popper, K. R.、程實定(1989)。客觀知識--一個進化論的研究。台北:結構群。  延伸查詢new window
8.Guba, E. G.、Lincoln, Y. S.(1984)。Naturalistic inquiry。Newbury Park, CA:Sage。  new window
9.洪謙(1990)。邏輯經驗主義論文集。台北:遠流出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
10.Popper, Karl R.(1968)。The logic of scientific discovery。台北:虹橋。  new window
11.拉卡托斯、于秀英(1990)。科學研究綱領方法論。台北:結構群。  延伸查詢new window
12.Kuhn, Thomas Samuel、王道還(1994)。科學革命的結構。台北:遠流。  延伸查詢new window
13.拉卡托斯、周寄中(1994)。批判與知識的增長。台北:桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
14.費爾阿本、周昌忠(1996)。反對方法。台北:時報。  延伸查詢new window
15.郭生玉(1983)。心理與教育研究法。臺北:精華書局。  延伸查詢new window
16.趙雅博(1974)。西方當代哲學。台北:正中。  延伸查詢new window
17.洪謙(1996)。維也納學派哲學。台北:唐山。  延伸查詢new window
18.姚介厚(19960916)。當代美國哲學。臺北:遠流出版社。  延伸查詢new window
19.Phillips, D. C.(1987)。Philosophy, science, and social inquiry。New York。  new window
20.朱則剛(1994)。教育工學的發展與派典演化。台北:師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Bryant, Christopher G. A.(1985)。Positivism in Social Theory and Research。London:MacMillan。  new window
22.王文科(1990)。教育研究法。五南圖書出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.沈清松(19860000)。現代哲學論衡。臺北:黎明。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.Noddings, Nel、曾漢塘、林季薇(2000)。教育哲學。臺北:弘智文化。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Hammersley, Martyn(1999)。Deconstructing the qualitative-quantitative divide。Qualitative Research。Sage。  new window
2.Popper, K. R.(1974)。Autobiography。The philosophy of Karl Popper。La Salle:Open Court。  new window
3.Walker, J. C.、Evers, C. W.(1997)。Research in education: Epistemological Issues。Educational research, methodology and measurement: an international handbook。Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.林清山(1987)。實驗研究法在教育上的應用。教育研究方法論。台北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃政傑(1987)。教育研究亟須擺脫量化的支配。教育研究方法論。台北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
6.楊銀興(1993)。教育研究中因果說明問題之探究。教育學方法論。台北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
7.劉仲冬(1999)。質與量社會研究的爭議及社會研究未來的走向與出路。質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。台北:巨流。  延伸查詢new window
8.de Landsheere, G.(1997)。History of educational research。Educational research, methodology and measurement: An international handbook。Cambridge University Press。  new window
9.Kaplan, A.(1997)。Scientific methods in educational research。Educational research, methodology and measurement: an international handbook。Cambridge University Press。  new window
10.楊深坑(1999)。世紀之交教育研究的回顧與前瞻。教育學研究方法論文集。高雄市:麗文。  延伸查詢new window
11.Husen, T.(1997)。Research paradigms in education。Educational research, methodology and measurement: an international handbook。Cambridge University Press。  new window
12.Guba, Egon G.、Lincoln, Yvonna S.(1994)。Competing paradigms in qualitative research。Handbook of qualitative research。Sage Publications。  new window
13.詹志禹(1997)。從科學哲學的發展探討「理性」的意義及其對教育的含義。當代教育哲學論文集。臺北:中央研究院歐美研究所。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE