:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:公投民主與代議民主的關係--以臺灣經驗為例
書刊名:臺灣民主季刊
作者:徐永明 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsu, Yung-ming
出版日期:2004
卷期:1:2
頁次:頁1-26
主題關鍵詞:代議民主直接民主公投民主Referendum democracyDirect democracyRepresentative democracy
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(13) 博士論文(3) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:12
  • 共同引用共同引用:78
  • 點閱點閱:131
本文透過台灣在兩千年初政黨輪替後至2004總統大選前夕,公投民主興起脈絡的探討,期能瞭解公投民主與代議民主的關係為何?同時,初步探討台灣公投民主興起的民意動力,以及在現階段台灣的民主發展進程中,公投民主所能扮演以及發揮的功能為何?本文認為台灣的公投民主興起,是在一個代議民主定期選舉機制,配合歷史的偶然 (SARS危機),以及政治菁英的政治競爭下,所促成定期選舉之外,另一個直接民權表達與落實的正式管道。而公投民主的體制化,除了與代議民主形成一種競爭關係之外,同時可以成為彌補與解決代議民主政治僵局所造成的困境。雖然,台灣的公投民主是誕生在主權萎縮的困厄中,源於代議菁英的競爭壓力,卻也創造了可以直接召喚民意的民主管道。
To examine the relationship between referendum democracy and representative democracy, this paper tries to analyze the context out of which the debate on democracy of referendums originated, starting from the 2000 alternation of power up until the 2004 presidential election in Taiwan. Furthermore, this paper also discusses the power of public opinion which led to the debate on direct democracy and the possible role referendums and direct democracy could play in Taiwan. In this paper, it is argued that the debate on referendum democracy was caused by regular elections, contingent crisis (crisis of SARA), and the competition among political elites. Apart from representative democracy, referendum democracy can be another formal way through which civil rights are directly expressed and realized. Furthermore, institutionalized referendum democracy not only competes with representative democracy, but it can also counterweigh the political blocking of representative democracy. Finally, although the debate on democracy through referendums was caused by the competition among political elites under the lurch of sovereignty, it might also Create a democratic way which can directly convene the public opinions.
圖書
1.汪平雲、徐永明(2003)。落實公投、鞏固民主:一個公民社會的觀點。臺北:財團法人臺灣智庫。  延伸查詢new window
2.Butler, David、Ranney, Austin(1978)。Referendums: A Comparative Study of Practice and Theory。Washington, DC:American Enterprise Institute。  new window
3.Schattschneider, Elmer Eric(1960)。The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America。Holt, Rinehart, and Winston。  new window
4.Mendelsohn, Matthew、Parkine, Andrew(2001)。Referendum Democracy: Citizens, Elites and Deliberation in Referendum Campaigns。Basingstoke:New York, NY:Palgrave Publisher。  new window
5.Shumpeter, Jospher(1976)。Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy。London:Allen and Unwin。  new window
6.陳隆志(1999)。公民投票與台灣前途。臺北:前衛出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.Butler, David、Ranney, Austin(1994)。Referendums around the World: The Growing Use of Direct Democracy。Washington, D.C.:AEI Press。  new window
8.Held, David(1987)。Models of Democracy。Polity Press。  new window
9.Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel(1967)。The Concept of Representation。University of California Press。  new window
10.張亞中(20000000)。兩岸統合論。臺北:生智文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.三立,普羅(2003)。台灣總統大選民調報告,台北:普羅市場研究公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.山水(2003)。二〇〇四台灣總統大選系列民調報告,台北:山水民意研究公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.山水(2004)。二〇〇四台灣總統大選系列民調報告,台北:山水民意研究公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.朱雲漢(2003)。亞洲民主動態調查報告書,台北:國立臺灣大學政治學系。  延伸查詢new window
5.蕭新煌(2004)。台灣還能為亞洲民主做什麼?,http://www.president.gov.tw/l_structure/famous/column/8_xxh20040501.html, 2004/04/19。  延伸查詢new window
6.蘇永耀(20030824)。《星期人物》許志雄:推動公投。落實行政民主化,http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2003/new/aug/24/today-p2.htm, 2004/04/19。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.李明峻(19990000)。國際法上的公民投票問題。公民投票與臺灣前途。臺北:前衛。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Budge, Ian(2001)。Political Parties in Direct Democracy。Referendum Democracy。Palgrave Publisher。  new window
3.黃偉峰(19990000)。由國際經驗看公民投票。公民投票與臺灣前途。臺北:前衛。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE