臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：規範認知與實然參與的罅隙：臺灣民眾在直接民主治理機制下的分析
書刊名：政治學報
作者：郭銘峰 引用關係／詹富堯／王鼎銘 引用關係
作者(外文)：Kuo, Ming-feng／Chan, Fu-yao／Wang, Ding-ming
出版日期：2013
卷期：56
頁次：頁27-54
主題關鍵詞：直接民主；公民投票；政治效能感；民主治理；Direct democracy；Referendum；Political efficacy；Governance
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:321
  • 點閱點閱:265
臺灣政治民主化歷程中，2004年公投制度之落實，是繼1996年總統開放直選、2000年首度政黨輪替後，跨越民主治理的另一項嶄新里程碑。本文以2004年落實的公投制度為例，探析民眾對直接民主治理機制之規範面評價認知與實然面參與狀況。依據民眾的認知與參與行動，本文歸納出四種不同類型群眾：贊同公投治理之知行合一、贊同公投治理之知行不一、反對公投治理之知行不一、反對公投治理之知行合一等四種，並透過2004年「臺灣社會變遷基本調查」面訪資料的輔助，解析這些不同行為模式的影響機制。實證結果顯示：若單純考量省籍、政黨認同、統獨意識等選舉因素，確實如一般文獻之主張會對民眾參與公投機制具重要影響；惟若進一步考量民眾對政治參與影響的公民意識效能，與其對政治人物回應性的態度，原本由統獨意識所驅動的影響效果，卻被大幅沖淡。此一結果，反映民眾對公投的評價與參與，並不完全囿於藍綠或統獨意識對抗之爭，而是相當程度肯定其具有擴大政治參與、改善政府治理的功能。透過本研究，除凸顯近年來民眾對於政治人物與政策回應性的期待，會直接反映在其參與直接民主機制的行為，也再次說明未來國家的治理模式，應更擴大與強化民眾各種參與公共政策制定的管道。
After the general presidential election in 1996 and the peaceful transfer of political power in 2000, the Referendum Act was passed in 2003 and its first realization in 2004 was regarded as a milestone for Taiwan's democratic development and public governance. This article analyzes Taiwan citizens' cognition of and participation in referendum for the first time in the 2004 election. Specifically, we try to explore whether the citizens' participation is driven by their expectation of the substantive policy issues and political efficacy, or is simply motivated by other non-policy factors such as unification-independence ideology and party identity. Four categories of how respondents' cognition of referendum and their participation in reality converge or diverge are identified. In addition, the underlying mechanism influencing their behaviors are analyzed. By analyzing the 1,781 respondents from Taiwan Social Change Survey (2004), we find that in consistence with the current literature, national ideology and party identity did influence the acting and participation in referendum. However, if we take the normative attitude toward policy-making into account, the influence of national ideology will be diminished dramatically. The result reveals two important policy implications. First, people expect strongly that public opinion should play an important role in policy-making process. This expectation will furthermore affect their willingness of participation in the direct democracy. Second, people are extremely anxious for more channels of participation in policy-making. Effective governance for a modern democracy therefore is to expand and reinforce more diversified channels of participation in policy-making for the public.
期刊論文
1.徐火炎(19941200)。認知動員、選舉動員類型與選民的投票行為：第二屆國民大會代表選舉的分析。社會科學論叢，42，101-147。  延伸查詢new window
2.莊文忠(20100600)。臺灣民眾公民意識的變化：2008年政權二次輪替前後的比較分析。人文及社會科學集刊，22(2)，201-246。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Dalton, Russell J.(1984)。Cognitive Mobilization and Partisan Dealignment in Advanced Industrial Democracies。Journal of Politics，46(1)，264-284。  new window
4.陳隆志(2004)。合法合情合理的三二〇公投。新世紀智庫論壇，25，12-14。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃東益(20040600)。評Michael Gallagher and Pier Vincenzo Uleri eds. «The Referendum Experience in Europe»(歐洲公民投票的經驗)。臺灣民主，1(2)，201-204。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Bengtsson, A.、Mattila, M.(2009)。Direct Democracy and Its Critics: Support for Direct Democracy and 'Stealth' Democracy in Finland。West European Politics，32(5)，1031-1048。  new window
7.Blais, A.、Young, R.、Fleury, C.、Lapp, M.(1995)。Do People Vote on the Basis of Minimax Regret?。Political Science Quarterly，48(4)，827-836。  new window
8.Denver, D.(2002)。Voting in the 1997 Scottish and Welsh Devolution Referendums: Information, Interests and Opinions。European Journal of Political Research，41(6)，827-843。  new window
9.Donovan, Todd、Karp, Jeffrey A.(2006)。Popular Support for Direct Democracy。Party Politics，12(5)，671-688。  new window
10.Hill, Carolyn J.、Lynn, Laurence E. Jr.(2005)。Is Hierarchical Governance in Decline? Evidence from Empirical Research。Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory，15(2)，173-195。  new window
11.Kobach, Kris W.(1993)。Recent Developments in Swiss Direct Democracy。Electoral Studies，12(4)，342-365。  new window
12.Roberts, Nancy(1997)。Public Deliberation: An Alternative Approach to Crafting Policy and Setting Direction。Public Administration Review，57(2)，124-132。  new window
13.Setala, M.(2006)。National Referendums in European Democracies: Recent Development。Representation，42(1)，13-23。  new window
14.Small, K. A.、Hsaio, C.(1985)。Multinomial Logit Specification Tests。International Economic Review，26(3)，619-627。  new window
15.徐永明、蔡佳泓、黃綉庭(20050300)。公民投票--臺灣國家認同的新動力。臺灣民主季刊，2(1)，51-74。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Aldrich, John H.(1993)。Rational Choice and Turnout。American Journal of Political Science，37(1)，246-278。  new window
17.Bowler, Shaun、Donovan, Todd、Karp, Jeffrey A.(2007)。Enraged or Engaged? Preferences for Direct Citizen Participation in Affluent Democracies。Political Research Quarterly，60(3)，351-362。  new window
18.De Vreese, Claes H.、Semetko, Holli A.(2004)。News Matters: Influences on the Vote in the Danish 2000 Euro Referendum Campaign。European Journal of Political Research，43(5)，699-722。  new window
19.林水波(20040300)。臺灣代議政治的信任門檻。臺灣民主，1(1)，119-141。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.徐永明(20040600)。公投民主與代議民主的關係--以臺灣經驗為例。臺灣民主，1(2)，1-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Hausman, Jerry、McFadden, Daniel(1984)。Specification Tests for the Multinomial Logit Model。Econometrica，52(5)，1219-1240。  new window
22.Riker, William H.、Ordeshook, Peter C.(1968)。A Theory of the Calculus of Voting。American Political Science Review，62(1)，25-42。  new window
23.Robinson, William S.(1950)。Ecological Correlations and the Behavior of Individuals。American Sociological Review，15(3)，351-357。  new window
24.Craig, Stephen C.(1979)。Efficacy, Trust, and Political Behavior: An Attempt to Resolve a Lingering Conceptual Dilemma。American Politics Research，7(2)，225-239。  new window
25.陳志瑋(20040600)。三二○公投與臺灣政治發展分析。臺灣民主，1(2)，43-72。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.Leduc, Lawrence(2002)。Opinion Change and Voting Behaviour in Referendums。European Journal of Political Research，41(6)，711-732。  new window
27.王鼎銘(20070300)。成本效益、公民責任與政治參與：2004年公民投票的分析。東吳政治學報，25(1)，1-37。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.林瓊珠、蔡佳泓(20100900)。從成案到投票--2008年討黨產與入聯公投的公投意向與參與行為。臺灣民主，7(3)，45-85。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.黃偉峰(20040900)。從選票區位結構試探影響2004年「和平公投」之相關因素。臺灣民主，1(3)，73-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.許立一(20110600)。從形式參與邁向實質參與的公共治理：哲學與理論的分析。行政暨政策學報，52，39-85。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.Craig, Stephen C.、Maggiotto, Michael A.(1982)。Measuring Political Efficacy。Political Methodology，8(3)，85-109。  new window
32.陳英鈐(20040600)。公民投票法的制度設計。臺灣民主，1(2)，73-93。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.陳敦源(20000400)。人為何投票？--理性選擇觀點的緣起與發展。民意研究季刊，212，31-64。  延伸查詢new window
34.吳俊德、陳永福(20051200)。投票與不投票的抉擇--2004年總統大選與公民投票的探索性研究。臺灣民主季刊，2(4)，67-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
35.陳文俊(20030500)。藍與綠--臺灣選民的政治意識型態初探。選舉研究，10(1)，41-80。new window  延伸查詢new window
36.吳重禮、王宏忠(20030500)。我國選民「分立政府」心理認知與投票穩定度：以2000年總統選舉與2001年立法委員選舉為例。選舉研究，10(1)，81-114。new window  延伸查詢new window
37.吳重禮(20080600)。政黨偏好、制衡認知與分裂投票--2006年北高市長暨議員選舉的實證分析。臺灣民主季刊，5(2)，27-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
38.Dalton, Russell J.、Bürklin, Wilhelm P.、Drummond, Andrew(2001)。Public Opinion and Direct Democracy。Journal of Democracy，12(4)，141-153。  new window
39.王鼎銘、郭銘峰、黃紀(20080900)。選制轉變過程下杜佛傑心理效應之檢視：從日本眾議院選制變革的經驗來觀察。問題與研究，47(3)，1-28。new window  延伸查詢new window
40.徐火炎(20051200)。認知動員、文化動員與臺灣2004年總統大選的選民投票行為--選舉動員類型的初步探討。臺灣民主季刊，2(4)，31-66。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Tsai, C. -H.、Hsu, Y. -M.、Huang, S. -T.(2005)。Polarizing the Political Universe: A Case Study of Taiwan。The Annual Meeting of Chinese Political Science Association of Taipei。  new window
研究報告
1.章英華(2005)。臺灣地區社會變遷基本調查（問卷一：公民權組）。中央研究院社會學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Schmidt, David D.(1989)。Citizen Lawmakers: The Ballot Initiative Revolution。Philadelphia, Pennsylvania：Temple University Press。  new window
2.林水波(1995)。實踐主權在民理念：選舉與公投設計。三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.Butler, David、Ranney, Austin(1978)。Referendums: A Comparative Study of Practice and Theory。Washington, DC：American Enterprise Institute。  new window
4.Dalton, Russell J.(2004)。Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices。Oxford, NY：Oxford University Press。  new window
5.IRI Europe(2005)。Guidebook to Direct Democracy。Amsterdam, The Netherlands：Berlin：Initiative and Referendum Institute Europe。  new window
6.Zimmerman, Joseph Francis(1986)。Participatory democracy: Populism revived。New York：Praeger Publishers。  new window
7.Pohill, Dennis(1996)。Are Coloradans Fit to Make Their Own Laws?。Golden, CL：Independence Institute。  new window
8.Cronin, Thomas E.(1989)。Direct Democracy: The Politics of Initiative, Referendum, and Recall。Cambridge, Massachusetts：Harvard University Press。  new window
9.Gallagher, Michael、Uleri, Pier Vincenzo(1996)。The Referendum Experience in Europe。New York：St. Martin's Press。  new window
10.Budge, Ian(1996)。The New Challenge of Direct Democracy。Oxford：Cambridge：Polity。  new window
11.Magleby, David B.(1984)。Direct Legislation: Voting on Ballot Propositions in the United States。Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
12.Long, J. Scott(1997)。Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables。Sage Publications。  new window
13.Dahl, Robert A.(1971)。Polyarchy: Participation & Opposition。New Haven, CT。  new window
14.Kettl, Donald F.(1993)。Sharing Power: Public Governance and Private Markets。Washington, DC：The Brookings Institution。  new window
15.王業立(20110000)。比較選舉制度。臺北：五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Downs, Anthony J.(1957)。An Economic Theory of Democracy。New York：Harper and Row。  new window
17.Barber, Benjamin R.(1984)。Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age。University of California Press。  new window
18.林水波(2007)。公共政策析論。五南圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
19.林水波、邱靖鈜(2006)。公民投票vs.公民會議。五南圖書。  延伸查詢new window
20.Surowiecki, James(2004)。The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many are Smarter than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shape Business, Economies, Societies, and Nations。New York：Doubleday。  new window
21.Campbell, Angus、Gurin, Gerald、Miller, Warren E.(1954)。The Voter Decides。Westport, Connecticut：Evanston, IL：Greenwood Press：Row, Peterson & Company。  new window
單篇論文
1.孫國祥(2002)。電子治理的機會與挑戰：善治再造？，http://old.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/IA/091/IA-R-091-043.htm， 2012/09/12。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(20040222)。陳水扁：持續改革、公投要贏。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.林佳龍、周永鴻、曾建元(2007)。臺灣人民眼中的公民投票：2004年和平公投的實證分析。民主到底：公投民主在臺灣。臺北：臺灣智庫。  延伸查詢new window
2.Bulter, D.、Ranney, A.(1994)。Theory。Referendums around the World: The Growing Use of Direct Democracy。Washington, DC：AEI Press。  new window
3.Craig, S. C.、Kreppel, A.、Kane, J. G.(2001)。Public Opinion and Support for Direct Democracy: A Grassroots Perspective。Referendum Democracy: Citizens, Elites, and Deliberation in Referendum Campaigns。New York：Palgrave Macmillian。  new window
4.Trechsel, Alexander H.、Kriesi, H.(1996)。Switzerland: The Referendum and Initiative as a Centerpiece of the Political System。The Referendum Experience in Europe。London：Macmillan。  new window
5.Uleri, P. V.(1996)。Italy: Referendum and Initiatives from the Origins to the Crisis of Democratic Regime。The Referendum Experience in Europe。London：Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
6.Morel, Laurence(1996)。France: Toward a Less Controversial Use of the Referendum?。The Referendum Experience in Europe。London：Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：980（臺灣：953，外國：27） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1641614 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67451951
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上