:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:應用情境學習原則之機車安全教育課程教學實驗研究
書刊名:衛生教育學報
作者:余惠蓮王國川 引用關係
作者(外文):Yu, Huey-lianWang, Kuo-chang
出版日期:2004
卷期:22
頁次:頁63-85
主題關鍵詞:交通安全情境學習機車MotorcycleSituated-learningTraffic safety
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:26
  • 點閱點閱:21
本研究之目的在於探討「應用情境學習原則之機車安全教育課程」,是否可以提高學生注意安全行車的能力、發覺道路潛在危險、處理交通事故及傷患能力,以及學校對此課程的反應及意見。本研究採「準實驗設計」,以臺北市中國海事商業專科學校二專一年級學校為研究對象,立意取樣二班為實驗組(91人),二班為對照組(90人),共181。實驗組接受三單元共三週(每週100分鐘)的教學介入,對照組則無教學介入。本研究以「交通安全行車認知測驗」為主為的評量工具,對兩組進行前測、後測及後後測。分別以單因子共變數分析、雙因子重複量數共變數分析,來了解教學介入後的立即及短期效果。本研究的主要發現有:一、「應用情境學習原則之機車安全教育課程」可以立即增進學生注意安全行車能力、發覺道路潛在危險、處理交通事故及傷患的能力。二、教學介入三週後,學生在注意安全行車能力、發覺道路潛在危險、處理交通事故及傷患的能力仍有持續的效果。另外,實驗組接受學習過程意見調查。其結果為(1)課程設計可引發學習興趣;(2)「做中學」的概念,可加深學習效果。
He purpose of t his study consists in designing a motorcycle safety educational curriculum by application of the principle of situated-learning, in order to assess the effects and to investigate the learning process of the curriculum in the capability of safety driving、risk awareness and accident handling. This study was constructed on quasi-experimental design, which sample 4 classes of freshman students from the China College Marine Technology and Commerce (CCMTC) at Taipei as research subjects. These students were non-randomly assigned to the treatment group(n=90). The treatment group received the intervention curriculum of 3 units for 3 weeks and the control group received nothing. Two groups took the pretest、posttest and post-posttest with the traffic safety cognition questionnaire. One-way analysis of covariance and two-way analysis of repeated covariance were used to test these hypothesis. The finings in this study were as follows: 1、The motorcycle safety educational curriculum enhanced the subjects the capability8 of safety driving、risk awareness and accident handling at traffic safety significantly. 2、Three weeks after accomplishing the curriculum, the subjects in the treatment group still had better in the capability of safety driving、risk awareness and accident handling at traffic safety than the control group. According to the analysis of investigation learning process in the treatment group, these subjects’ reactions and opinions from the curriculum were shown as follows, 1、The subjects had interest in this design of the curriculum. 2、Practice-in learning, it can help to be impressed on subjects’ learning.
期刊論文
1.林佩璇(1994)。合作學習在高級職業學校的應用。技職及職業教育,24,21-23。  延伸查詢new window
2.Choi, J.、Hannafin, M.(1995)。Situated cognition and learning environments: role, structures, and implications for design。Education Technology Researcher and Development,43(2),53-69。  new window
3.Colman, A.(1996)。Driver training。Young Studies,5(2),8-13。  new window
4.Demetre, J. D.、Lee, D. N.、Grieve, R.、Pitcairn, T. K.、Ampofo-Boateng, K.、Thomson, L. A.(1993)。Young children learning on road-crossing simulations。British Journal of Educational Psychology,63,348-358。  new window
5.Hamish, A. D.(1999)。Hazard and risk perception among young novice drives。Journal of Safety Research,30(4),225-236。  new window
6.Jonah, B. A.(1986)。Accident risk and risk-taking behaviour among young drivers。Accident Analysis and Prevention,18(4),225-271。  new window
7.Soderlund, N.、Zwi, A. B(1995)。Traffic-related mortality in industrialized and less developed countries。Bulletin of the World Health Organization,73,175-182。  new window
8.Swaddiwudhipong, W.、Boonmak, C.、Nguntra, P.、Mahasakpan, P.(1998)。Effect of motorcycle rider education on changes in risk behaviours and motorcycle-related injuries in rural Thailand。Tropical Medicine and International Health,3(10),767-770。  new window
9.Young, David S.、Lee, David N.(1987)。Training children in road crossing skills using a roadside simulation。Accident Analysis & Prevention,19(5),327-341。  new window
10.Zeedyk, M. S.、Wallace, L.、Spry, L.(2002)。Stop, look, listen, and think? What young children really do when crossing the road。Accident Analysis & Prevention,34(1),43-50。  new window
11.胡益進(20001200)。大學生交通安全教育介入效果實驗研究--以臺北地區師範院校學生為例。學校衛生,37,25-44。  延伸查詢new window
12.徐新逸、辜華興(19990600)。書本VS.光碟:情境學習環境中媒體對學習之影響。視聽教育雙月刊,40(6)=240,1-17。  延伸查詢new window
13.陳立慧、林茂榮、王榮德(19931200)。機動車交通事故之死亡率、潛在生命年數損失及其貨幣價值。中華民國公共衛生學會雜誌,12(4),368-378。  延伸查詢new window
14.黃禎貞(20021200)。國中生死亡教育介入成效研究。衛生教育學報,18,17-40。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.蔡錫濤、楊美雪(19961200)。情境式學習的教學設計。教學科技與媒體,30,48-53。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.鄭晉昌(19930900)。電腦輔助學習的新教學設計觀--認知學徒制。教育資料與圖書館學,31(1),55-66。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Harley, S.(1993)。Situated learning and classroom instruction。Educational Technology,33(3),46-51。  new window
18.Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt(1993)。Anchored instruction and situated cognition revisited。Educational Technology,33(3),52-70。  new window
19.Brown, John Seely、Collins, Allan、Duguid, Paul(1989)。Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning。Educational Researcher,18(1),32-42。  new window
20.Aiken, L. R.(1980)。Content validity and reliability of single items or questionnaires。Educational and Psychological Measurement,40(4),955-959。  new window
研究報告
1.內政部警政署(2002)。警政統計通報。  延伸查詢new window
2.行政院衛生署(2002)。潛在生命年數損失統計。  延伸查詢new window
3.WHO(1989)。New Approaches to improve road safety。Geneva:World Health Organization。  new window
學位論文
1.王介民(1997)。青年學生對機車事故傷害危險認知與冒險行為之研究(碩士論文)。國防醫學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.朱永裕(2001)。我國大學生道路交通行為表現之調查研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.王國川(2002)。圖解SAS在變異數分析上的應用。臺北:五南圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.臺北市政府(2002)。臺北市機車騎士手冊。臺北:臺北市政府。  延伸查詢new window
3.行政院衛生署(2001)。衛生白皮書。臺北:行政院衛生署。  延伸查詢new window
4.張新立、吳宗修、王國川、蔡明志、葉純志、吳佳蓉、葉祖宏、吳晉光、陳中平、黃歆嵐、陳鴻文(2001)。道路安全講習現況探討及未來講習制度之研究。臺北:交通部運輸研究所。  延伸查詢new window
5.United States Department of Health & Human Services(2000)。Healthy people 2010。Washington, DC:US Department of Health & Human Service。  new window
6.交通部(2002)。交通政策白皮書:運輸。臺北:交通部。  延伸查詢new window
7.李坤崇(2001)。綜合活動學習領域教材教法。心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.Lave, Jean、Wenger, Etienne(1991)。Situated learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation。Cambridge University Press。  new window
其他
1.交通部(2001)。九十年臺灣地區機車使用狀況調查摘要分析,http://www.motc.gov.tw/service/ana9119109-1.doc, 2003/5/7。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部,交通部(2002)。九十學年度九十一年度交通安全教育評鑑報告,臺北:教育部:交通部。  延伸查詢new window
3.Department of Transport U. K.(2003)。Child Road Safety-an Action Plan for Delivering the 2010 Targets,http://www.dft.gov.tw/intradoc-cgi/。  new window
圖書論文
1.張新立(1995)。大專學生騎乘機車使用安全帽推廣策略探討。中華民國交通安全教育學會九週年紀念。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE