:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:運用敘說探究探索家庭暴力施暴者的成長歷程與婚姻經驗
書刊名:亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊
作者:蘇昭月陳筱萍 引用關係周煌智吳慈恩黃志中
作者(外文):Su, Chao-yuehChen, Sheau-pingChou, Frank Huang-chihWu, GraceHuang, Joh-jong
出版日期:2005
卷期:1:1
頁次:頁1-25
主題關鍵詞:成長歷程施暴者敘說探究婚姻經驗Growing processDomestic assailantNarrative inquiryMarital experience
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:109
  • 點閱點閱:153
本研究的主要目的是藉由探索婚姻施暴者的個人生命故事,來瞭解其成長歷程及婚姻經驗。研究對象為某家暴中心及法院轉介之8位家庭暴力施暴者;並以質性研究的敘說探究做為研究方法、採半結構式訪談大綱,經個案書面同意後進行深度訪談,過程並以錄音方式記錄資料,將蒐集的訪談內容資料加以逐字譯,然後採敘說分析取向來建構文本。研究結果發現大部份施暴者建構出的原生家庭裡,父親扮演著威嚴的角色,對個案管教大都採嚴厲的打罵方式,而個案的求學成績表現及人際互動大多不盡理想,甚至有些個案曾經是打架、吸毒、殺人未遂的問題青年;對於挫折及壓力的因應經驗,大都不會採取溝通方式,而是使用壓抑、逃避、喝酒或是吵架等非建設性的方式。在婚姻互動方面,發現施暴者與妻子常為經濟爭吵,溝通模式都以吵架爭執呈現,導致最後演變為暴力相向。而性生活不協調亦是影響婚姻關係的重要因素之一;研究結果亦發現許多施暴者雖然對配偶有負向的評價歸因,但卻不願意接受離婚,反而期待能重修舊好,並且有的個案也願意學習溝通技巧來改善彼此的關係;同時,在婚姻衝突中,經濟問題亦佔有重要的影響力。基於以上的發現,在對施暴者的協助計劃裡可將溝通的技巧與工作的協助列入考慮的面向之一。
The purpose of this study attempted to explore the growing process and marital experiences of domestic assailants by their life stories. Eight subjects were referred from the Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault Prevention Center and the court for this study. After obtaining informed consent, the in-depth interviews were conducted with subjects, and they were encouraged to express their life stories by the semi-structure guide format after obtaining informed consent. In the process of interview, the whole interviewing content would be recorded and analyzed by a narrative analysis method. The findings revealed that most subjects were beaten and scolded by their fathers who were authority characteristics, and they performed poor in the areas of academic achievement and social interaction. Some of them even committed problems with fight, murder and drug addicted. The experience of coping with frustration and stress, most subjects acted in the ways of suppressing, avoiding, alcohol using or quarreling rather than positive communicating. The results also found subjects always quarreled with their wives because of economic reason, and turned out to physical violence. In addition, the unsatisfied sexual life was the important factor to the outcome, However, We found that many domestic assailants had negative evaluation toward their partners, but couldn't accept divorce, and even preferred to reconciliation. Some domestic assailants would like to learn communication skills to improve the relationship with their partners. Another, financial problem is an important factor in the marital conflict. We suggest that communication skill training and help them how to get job should be considered in the treatment strategy and the helping program.
期刊論文
1.陳正元、陳怡君(20010600)。從家庭關係探討老年婦女受虐問題。社區發展季刊,94,158-169。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.McRae, S.(1998)。Familial Abuse: a Multifaceted Problem。Canadian Medical Association Journal,158,867-868。  new window
3.Mckenry, P. C.、Julian, T. W.、Gavazzi, S. M.(1995)。Toward a Biophysical Model of Domestic Violence。Journal of Marriage and the Family,57,307-320。  new window
4.林佩瑾(19981200)。女性主義社會工作的實施與婚姻暴力防治。社區發展季刊,84,86-94。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.周煌智(20021000)。性侵害犯罪加害人裁判前鑑定、家庭暴力相對人審前鑑定與涉案之精神病犯精神鑑定比較。刑事法雜誌,46(5),33-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.周月清(19940400)。臺灣受虐婦女社會支持探討之研究。婦女與兩性學刊,5,69-108。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.陳筱萍、周煌智、吳慈恩、黃志中(20040900)。裁定前鑑定家庭暴力相對人特徵與施暴的心理社會歸因。中華輔導學報,16,149-181。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.林明傑(20000600)。美加婚姻暴力犯之治療方案與技術暨其危險評估之探討。社區發展季刊,90,197-215。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Bennett, L.W.、Tolman, R.M.、Rogalski, C.J.、Srinivasaraghavan, J.(1994)。Domestic abuse by male alcohol and drug addicts。Violence and Victims,9,359-368。  new window
10.Campbell, J.C.(2001)。Abuse during pregnancy: a quintessential threat to maternal and child health—so when do we start to act ?。CMAJ.JAMC,164(11),1578-1579。  new window
11.Kyriacou, D.N.、Anglin, D.、Taliaferro, E.(1999)。Risk factors for injury to women from domestic violence against women。The New England Journal of Medicine,341,1892-1898。  new window
會議論文
1.陳秉華、林佩儀、洪莉竹(2003)。婚暴受害婦女的諮商模式的初步建構。性別、暴力與權力研討會。高雄市:高雄師範大學性別教育研究所。39-59。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳若璋(1988)。婚姻暴力引發因素及被毆打婦女的研究。沒有紀錄。103-112。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃志中(2001)。台灣家庭暴力相對人之鑑定與治療模式。高雄。  延伸查詢new window
4.郭麗安、潘才學(2001)。婚姻暴力的脈絡研究--從家暴違法者的眼光120-156。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳韺(2003)。創造雙贏的婚暴複式療法一初探婚姻治療與個別治療的合倂使用27-37。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.Wilson, S. R.(1996)。East Asian International Students' Stressors and Coping Behaviour。Boston。  new window
學位論文
1.李宜靜(2001)。家庭暴力加害人心理經驗之研究,高雄。  延伸查詢new window
2.林芬菲(1998)。婚姻暴力受虐婦女的正式機構求助歷程探討(碩士論文)。東吳大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳高德(2003)。台灣家庭暴力之男性加害人(碩士論文)。台北醫學大學,台北。  延伸查詢new window
4.鄭秀津(2003)。婚姻暴力加害人之生態系統分析--以嘉義地區受保護管束者為例(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.湯琇雅(1993)。婚姻暴力中婦女受虐狀況與其因應過程之初探(碩士論文)。東吳大學,臺中市。  延伸查詢new window
6.劉宏恩(1996)。心理學取向之法律研究:以住宅搜索、子女監護及婚姻暴力問題為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Gelles, R. J.、Cornell, C. P.(1983)。International Perspective on Family Violence。International Perspective on Family Violence。Toronto, Canada:Lexington Books。  new window
2.Young, M. E.、Long, L. L.(1997)。Counseling and Therapy for Couples。Pacific Glove, CA:Brooks/Cole。  new window
3.Siegel, J. L.、Senna, J.(1997)。Juvenile delinquency: Theory, practice and law。New York, NY:West Publishing Co。  new window
4.Dutton, D. G.(1988)。The domestic assault of women: Psychological and criminal justice perspectives。Boston, Mass.:Allyn and Bacon, Inc.。  new window
5.Lieblich, Amia、Tuval-Mashiach, R.、Zilber, T.(1998)。Narrative Research: Reading, Analysis, and Interpretation。SAGE Publications。  new window
6.Healey, K.、Smith, C.、O’Sullivan, C.(1998)。Battener intervention: Program approaches and criminal justices strategies。Washington D.C.。  new window
其他
1.內政部家庭暴力防治委員會(1998)。家庭暴力防治法。  延伸查詢new window
2.內政部家庭暴力防治委員會(2003)。家庭暴力防治中心服務案件累計表。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE