臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：問題解決模式應用在高職汽車實習之研究
書刊名：教育與心理研究
作者：湯誌龍／黃銘福
作者(外文)：Tang, Jyh-lung／Huang, Ming-fu
出版日期：2006
卷期：29:3
頁次：頁461-488
主題關鍵詞：問題解決能力；問題解決模式；教學活動設計；Problem-solving ability；Problem-solving model；Teaching activity design
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:14
  • 點閱點閱:45
本研究旨在探討問題解決模式對高職汽車科學生汽車實習課程學習之成效。建構高職汽車科學生專業問題解決能力之課程設計及術科考評量表為主要目的，採用文獻分析、專家會議、統計考驗之方式，發展「高職汽車實習課程問題解決能力之課程設計」、「學生問題解決能力自我檢核表」、「專業學科前測試題」及「高職汽車實習課程術科考評能力評量表」等四種主要研究工具。採用不等組前後測準實驗設計，針對公私立兩所高職學生112名進行十週共四個單元實驗教學，其結果經描述性統計考驗、文件分析及雙因子共變數分析考驗發現，在術科檢修的問題解決能力之成就表現方面，實施問題解決教學模式之實驗組學生優於控制組學生。且實施問題解決教學之實驗組學生在事後學習意見調查分析，顯示出高度滿意。
The purpose of this study was to investigate the learning effectiveness of “Automechanics Practicum Course” with problem-solving teaching strategy in Vocational High School. This study, based on problem-solving ability theory, tried to develop a practical problem-solving ability course and criteria of practical training overhaul ability for the vocational high school students in the field of Automobile Department. Literature review, penal discussion, and statistics verifying were used as the main methods of developing “the problem-solving ability course of Automechanics Department”, “self-assessment of problem-solving ability”, “previous test of professional subject” and “assessment of practicum course problem-solving ability”. With the Nonequivalent Pretest-posttest Design, statistics methods by t-test and ANCOVA, this study revealed that implementing “practicum course problem-solving ability with teaching strategy” on vocational high school students has a positive effect and influence on problem-solving ability, and the experimental group students have more satisfied in learning than control group did.
期刊論文
1.洪文東(20030300)。國小「酸鹼」與「氧化還原」教學模組設計及學童科學創造力之實作評量。屏東師院學報，18(下)，495-531。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.張振松、黃萬居(20030900)。自然科創造性問題解決教學對國小學童創造力及問題解決能力之研究。屏師科學教育，18，47-58。  延伸查詢new window
3.馮丹白、吳明振、吳銘達(19970400)。高工技學素養教育實施現況與展望。技術及職業教育，38，10-13。  延伸查詢new window
4.Isaksen, S. G.、Lauer, K. J.、Ekvall, G.、Britz, A.(2001)。Perceptions of the best and worst climates for creativity: Preliminary validation evidence for the situational outlook questionnaire。Creativity Research Journal，13(2)，171-184。  new window
5.洪文東(20031200)。創造性問題解決化學單元教學活動設計與評估。科學教育學刊，11(4)，407-430。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.洪榮昭、曾愛晶(19990800)。培養創造性問題解決能力之教學策略探討。臺灣教育，584，47-56。  延伸查詢new window
7.曾繁鈞(2002)。社會科創造性問題解決教學對國小兒童創造性、問題解決力及社會科學業成就之影響。國民教育研究，6，184-185。  延伸查詢new window
8.蔡錫濤、廖培瑜(2002)。透過網路教學模式培養國中生問題解決能力之研究。生活科技教育，35(6)，2-8。  延伸查詢new window
9.Büyükdamgac, G.(2003)。Process of Organizational Problem Definition: How to Evaluate and How to Improve。Omega: The International Journal of Management Science，31，327-338。  new window
10.Cropley, D. H.(1998)。Towards Formulating a Semiotic Theory of Measurement Information - Part 1 Fundamental Concepts and Measurement Theory。Measurement，24，237-248。  new window
11.Isaksen, S. G.(1995)。On the Conceptual Foundations of Creative Problem Solving: A Response to Magyari-beck。Creativity and Innovation Management，4，52-63。  new window
12.Isaksen, S. G.、Lauer, K. J.、Wilson, G. V.(2003)。An Examination of the Relationship Between Personality Type and Cognitive Style。Creativity Research Journal，15(4)，343-354。  new window
13.Li, Y.、Silver, E. A.(2000)。Can Younger Students Succeed Where Older Students Fail? An Examination of Third Graders' Solutions of Adivision-with-remainder (DWR) Problem。The Journal of Mathematical Behavior，19，233-246。  new window
14.Lobb, D. K.、Inman, D. R.、Butler, R. G.(2004)。Problem-based Learning in Reproductive Physiology。Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health，49(5)，449-453。  new window
15.Passolunghi, M. C.、Pazzaglia, F.(2004)。Individual Differences in Memory Updating in Relation to Arithmetic Problem Solving。Learning and Individual Differences，14(4)，219-230。  new window
16.Pichat, M.、Ricco, G.(2001)。Mathematical Problem Solving in Sidactic Institutions as a Complex System the Case of Elementary Calculus。The Journal of Mathematical Behavior，20，43-53。  new window
17.Reiter-Palmon, R.、Illies, J. J.(2004)。Leadership and Creativity: Understanding Leadership from a Creative Problem-solving Perspective。The Leadership Quarterly，15，55-77。  new window
18.Ronald, D. S.(1998)。Non-statistical Skills That Can Help Statisticians Be More Effective。Total Quality Management，9(8)，711-722。  new window
19.Suzman, K. B.、Morris, R. D.、Morris, M. K.、Milan, M. A.(1997)。Cognitive-behavioral Remediation of Problem Solving Deficits in Children with Acquired Brain Injury。J-Behave, Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry，28(3)，203-212。  new window
20.Teije, Annette Ten、van Harmelen, Frank(1996)。Using Reflection Techniques for Flexible Problem Solving (with Examples From Diagnosis)。Future Generation Computer Systems，12(2-3)，217-234。  new window
21.Treffinger, D. J.(1995)。Creative Problem Solving: Overview and Educational Implications。Educational Psychology Review，7(3)，301-312。  new window
學位論文
1.楊得明(2003)。問題解決教學策略應用於非同步遠距教學系統之研究--以高職電機電子群「微處理機實習」為例(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.張仁家(1999)。問題解決教學策略對高工學生低壓工業配線學習成效影響之研究(博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學，彰化。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.呂素雯(2002)。自然科創造性問題解決教學對國小六年級學童問題解決能力、態度及學習成就之影響研究(碩士論文)。國立台北師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
4.王招文(2004)。問題解決教學策略對國中學生學習生活科技課程成效之研究－以「能源與運輸」領域為例，0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.林進材(2002)。教師教學思考--理論、研究與應用。高雄：復文。  延伸查詢new window
2.Krulik, S. K.、Rudnick, J. A.(1989)。Problem Solving: A Handbook for Senior High School Teachers。Problem Solving: A Handbook for Senior High School Teachers。New York, NY：Allyn ＆ Bacon。  new window
3.Dewey, J.(1933)。How we think: Restatement of the reflective thinking to the educative process。D. C. Health。  new window
4.Sternberg, Robert J.(2003)。Cognitive Psychology。Belmont, CA：Thomson Wadsworth。  new window
5.Sternberg, R. J.(1997)。Thinking styles。New York。  new window
6.教育部(2000)。技職教育白皮書。臺北市：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
7.Hergenhahn, B. R.、王文科(1989)。學習心理學。臺北市：五南出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.黃國彥(1992)。從學習心理談教學策略－認知學習的理論。從學習心理談教學策略－認知學習的理論。屏東縣屏東市。  延伸查詢new window
9.Anderson, J. R.(1947)。Cognitive Psychology and its Implications。Cognitive Psychology and its Implications。New York, NY。  new window
10.Dominowski, R. L.、Dallob, P.(1995)。Insight and Problem Solving。The Nature of Insight。London, UK。  new window
11.Evans, J. St. B. T.(1989)。Problem Solving Reasoning and Decision Making。Research Directions in Cognitive Science: European Perspectives。Hove, UK。  new window
12.Isaksen, S. G.(1998)。A Review of Brainstorming Research: Six Critical Issues for Inquiry。A Review of Brainstorming Research: Six Critical Issues for Inquiry。Buffalo, NY。  new window
13.Isaksen, S. G.。CPS: Linking Creativity and Problem Solving。Problem Solving and Cognitive Processes。London, UK。  new window
14.Richard, M. C.(1980)。Problem Solving and Educational Policy。Problem Solving and Education: Issues in Teaching and Research。Hillsdale, NJ。  new window
15.Swartz, R. J.、Perkins, D. N.(1990)。Teaching Thinking: Issues and Approaches。Teaching Thinking: Issues and Approaches。Pacific Grove, CA。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：725（臺灣：724，外國：1） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2000451 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67798621
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上