:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:學前階段合作模式融合教育之探討--以新竹市融合班為例
書刊名:特殊教育與復健學報
作者:李翠玲 引用關係
作者(外文):Lee, Tsuey-ling
出版日期:2006
卷期:15
頁次:頁1-19
主題關鍵詞:融合班合作模式融合教育學前特殊幼兒Inclusive educationCollaborative modelPreschoolTaiwan
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:82
  • 點閱點閱:94
本研究旨在探討學前階段合作模式融合教育實施情形,以文件分析、訪談、觀察學生等方式蒐集資料。研究焦點為新竹地區四所公立幼稚園之學前融合班(合作模式)。研究結果發現:(1)本研究之合作模式融合教育運作方式師生比為2:15~18及特殊生及一般生比例1:1.5~3.25,但仍需外加一位助理人力支援。(2)特教班轉型為融合班有部分是因為招生不足,而主動轉型,部分是因應特殊教育法規定,政策所致,被動轉型,實施以來,教師、行政人員與家長一致認同融合班的成效,尤其對自閉症幼兒的成效最佳,重度與情緒障礙學生則被認為在現行條件下仍不宜安置融合班。(3)招生時召開說明會有助化解融合班家長的疑慮。(4)融合班課程採用主題式,難以兼顧特殊學生的特殊需求以致影響IEP的執行。(5)行政人員與教師均一致認同融合教育對特殊幼兒與一般幼兒有利,但在現行融合班資源不足情況下,仍應有條件融合。(6)融合班仍有定位不明的問題,導致經費運用與教師進修政策的搖擺不定。(7)融合班困難包括學生障礙類別來源不定、人力不足、評鑑和訪視太多、IEP撰寫的困難、資源不足等,這些需從行政與課程方面進行支援與調整。並建議整合幼教課程與特教課程。
This study explores collaborative model of preschool inclusive education in Hsin-chu city, Taiwan. Documents including IEP, evaluation report and instruction materials were analyzed and 7 teachers, 5 administrators in 4 inclusive preschools were interviewed. The children in inclusive classes were observed. The findings indicated that: the ratio between teacher to students was 2:15~18 for collaborative model. The ratios between children with special needs and typically developing showed 1:1.5~3.25. The teachers agreed that both the children with special needs and typically developing are mostly benefited from inclusive education. The difficulties of implementing inclusive education are lack of support and hard to achieve the IEP goals based on current curriculum in classroom. All teachers and administrators show positive perspectives to inclusive education.
期刊論文
1.鄒啟蓉(20040900)。建構接納與支持的班級文化:學前融合班教師促進普通與發展遲緩幼兒互動及人際關係之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,27,19-38。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Rafferty, Y.、Piscitelli, V.、Boettcher, C.(2003)。The impact of inclusion on language development and social competence among preschoolers with disabilities。Exceptional Children,69,467-479。  new window
3.Cavallaro, C. C.、Ballard-Rosa, M.、Lynch, E. W.(1998)。A preliminary study of inclusive special education services for infants, toddlers, and preschool-age children in California。Topics in Early Childhood Special Education,18(3),169-182。  new window
4.Odom, S. L.、McEvoy, M. A.(1990)。Mainstreaming at the preschool level: potential barriers and tasks for the field。Topics in Early Childhood Special Education,10(2),48-61。  new window
5.Beckman, P.、Barnwell, D.、Horn, E.、Hanson, M.、Gutierrez, S.、Lieber, J.(1998)。Communities, families, and inclusion。Early Childhood Research Quarterly,13(1),125-150。  new window
6.王天苗(2001)。運用教學支援建立融合教育的實施模式:以一公立幼稚園的經驗為例。特殊教育研究學刊,21,27-51。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.王天苗(20020900)。發展遲緩幼兒在融合教育環境裡的學習。特殊教育研究學刊,23,1-23。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.劉蔚萍、王銀絲、徐淑珍、卓政翰、紀岑嬌(20030900)。學前融合教育專業團隊巡迴輔導:以高縣旗山區早期療育發展中心輔導模式為例。國立臺北師範學院學報. 教育類,16(2),307-336。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.王天苗(20030900)。學前融合教育實施的問題和對策--以臺北市國小附幼為例。特殊教育研究學刊,25,1-25。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.簡淑蓮(2004)。學前教師對實施融合教育態度及專業知能需求之研究--以台東縣為例(碩士論文)。國立臺東大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.劉嘉樺(2004)。台灣學前融合教育政策與實踐--以台北縣市國小附幼為例(碩士論文)。南華大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.蔡淑玲(1998)。一位自閉症幼兒在融合教育政策實施下的狀況(碩士論文)。國立師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.人間福報電子報(2003)。甘惠忠神父致力特教工作。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳淑美(2000)。融合教育之實施與推廣。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳淑美(2004)。融合教育的理念與實務。  延伸查詢new window
4.李秀珠(2005)。高雄市學前融合教育班教師角色之決與教學支援需求之研究。  延伸查詢new window
5.林少雀(2004)。實施融合教育教師態度、教學困擾與教師需求之研究----以台北縣國中小附設幼稚園為例。  延伸查詢new window
6.林春梅(2004)。幼稚園教師對學前融合教育態度之研究。  延伸查詢new window
7.林貴美(2001)。融合教育與學校再造。  延伸查詢new window
8.張英鵬(2001)。融合幼教單位之幼兒家長及幼教老師對融合式特殊幼兒教育之態度。  延伸查詢new window
9.教育部(1998)。特教教育法施行細則。  延伸查詢new window
10.許碧勳(2001)。幼稚園普通班實施融合教育之探討。  延伸查詢new window
11.鈕文英(2003)。融合教育的理念與作法----課程與教學規劃篇。  延伸查詢new window
12.黃世鈺(1998)。從適性、適需與適用談學前特教師資在職培育模式。  延伸查詢new window
13.鄭炳炫(2004)。推動學校本位觀點之融合教育模式:從發現問題、解決問題到建構模式。  延伸查詢new window
14.鄭雅莉(2001)。台灣幼稚園教師與家長對融合教育的看法。  延伸查詢new window
15.鍾梅菁、吳金花譯(2002)。學前融合教育方案。  延伸查詢new window
16.Bricker, D.(1978)。A rationale for the integration of handicapped and nonhandicapped preschool children。  new window
17.Dorsey, S. Y.(2000)。Teacher’s attitudes toward behaviors of students with learning disabilities placed in regular education programs。  new window
18.Frankel, E. B.(2004)。Supporting inclusive care and education for young children with special needs and their families。  new window
19.Guralnick, M. J.(2001)。Early childhood inclusion: focus on change。  new window
20.Hanson, P., Horn, E., Sandall, S., Beckman, P., Morgan, M., Marquart, J., et al.(2001)。After preschool inclusion: children’s educational pathways over the early school years。  new window
21.Hanson, M. J., Gutierrez, S., Morgan, M., Brennan, E. L., & Zercher, C.(1997)。Language, culture, and disability: Interacting influences on preschool inclusion。  new window
22.Hunt, P., Soto, G., Maier, J., Liboiron, N., & Bae, S.(2004)。Collaborative teaming to support preschoolers with severe disabilities who are placed in genera l education early childhood programs。  new window
23.Lieber, J., Beckman, P. J., Hanson, M. J., Janko, S, Marquart, J. M., Horn, E. et al.(1997)。The impact of changing roles on the relationships between professionals in inclusive programs for young children。  new window
24.Odom, S. L.(2002)。Widening the circle: Including children with disabilities in preschool programs。  new window
25.Odom, S. L., Ha nson, M. J., Lieber, J., Marquart, J., Sandail, S., Wolery, et al.(2001)。The costs of preschool Inclusion。  new window
26.Odom, S. L., Peck, C. A., Hanson, M. J., Beckman, P. J., Kaiser, A. P, Lieber, J., et al.(1996)。Inclusion at the preschool level: an ecological analysis。  new window
27.Poulou, M. & Norwich, B.(2000)。Teachers’ perceptions of students with emotional and behavioural difficulties: severity and prevalence。  new window
28.Siegel, B.(1996)。Is the emperor wearing clothes? Social policy and the empirical support for full inclusion of children with disabiltities in the preschool and early elementary grades。  new window
29.Stainback, S. & Stainback, W.(1996)。Controversial issues confronting special education: divergent perspectives。  new window
圖書論文
1.秦麗花(2000)。從美國融合教育的歷史發展實事研究展望未來融合教育的推展。e世代特殊教育。台北:中華民國特殊教育學會。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE