:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:試論道光朝回民杜文秀京控案
書刊名:政大史粹
作者:李典蓉
作者(外文):Lee, Dian-jung
出版日期:2006
卷期:11
頁次:頁125-178
主題關鍵詞:京控雲南回民杜文秀林則徐Jing KongHui people of YunnanDu wenxiuLin Zexu
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:81
  • 點閱點閱:102
京控是清朝的一種特別訴訟程序。清朝規定訴訟需由下而上,自州縣到省,越級則為越訴。如控訴者越過地方州、縣、府、道、省各級司法機關,至京城部院(都察院、步軍統領衙門、通政使司等衙門)上控,即謂之京控。清朝內地回民與外藩回部身份不同,與漢民一樣編戶籍於州縣,觸犯刑律卻時常被論以重典,屬於官府重要防範對象。杜文秀京控為清朝影響最大的回民京控案件。道光年間,雲南保山縣漢回械鬥,地方官員互相迴護並偏袒漢民,效法一般民人京控成了最後自救的方式。朝廷受理案件後,由雲貴總督林則徐奉旨審斷,其「不問回漢,止分良莠」的公平處置,使回民的委屈暫時得到伸張。但一指之癰實為全身皆病,該案披露了清朝邊區地方州縣吏治的弊病,及隱藏於社會底層的族群歧視與偏見,是研究清朝京控案件的典範之一。本文揚棄所謂「民族壓迫」的史觀,藉助臺北故宮典藏之軍機處檔與文獻梳理案件始末,探討清朝邊區地方的社會、民族與法制問題,希冀能對前人研究有所補益。
Jing Kong was a special litigation procedure in Qing dynasty. According to Qing laws, litigations should be handled by Zhou, Xian and Provincial Governments step by step. Should the petitioner skip any step, this kind of action would have been called Yue Su. On contrast, should the petitioner skip any level of the judicial organs of local Zhou, Xian, Dao, or Provincial governments, and appeal directly to Bu Yuan in Beijing, it would have been named as Jing Kong. Different from Hui people of Wai Fan, Hui people of inner provinces were registered in Zhou Xian, and the government kept an eye on this group of people. When in violation of criminal law, they would be more heavily punished than the Hanese. The Jing Kong case of Du Wenxiu was one of the most important made by Hui people in Qing dynasty. During Daoguang period, several fights took place between Hanese and Hui in Boashan County, Yunnan province, and local officials sided with the Hanese. Due to the injustice of addressing the turmoil by the local officials, the Hui people there had no choice but to seek Jing Kong. When the central government accepted the case, the emperor sent Lin Zexu, Governor of Yunnan-Guizhou to handle it. On the basis of the principle "Distinciton between good and evil, no distinction between Hanese and Hui," Lin Zexu dealt with the case impartially and the grievances of the Hui people were temporally addressed. However, the degenerated local governance, and the ethnic discrimination embedded in the local society were revealed with the going on of this case. On the basis of archives of Jun Ji Chu and other original archives of Taipei National Palace Museum, this article gives up the historiography of ethnic oppression, and discusses the social, ethnic, legal problems of border area in Qing dynasty from a new perspective.
期刊論文
1.杜正勝(19940600)。「編戶齊民論」的剖析。清華學報,24(2),163-191。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.王東平(2000)。《大清律例》回族法律條文研究。回族研究,38,9-13。  延伸查詢new window
3.胡雲生(1998)。論清代法律中的回回問題。回族研究,1998(4),30-35。  延伸查詢new window
4.王日根(2006)。從幾起京控案看林則徐的為政風格。中國社會經濟史研究,2006(2),67-75。  延伸查詢new window
5.張一鳴(1985)。試論在處理雲南”漢回互鬥”事件中的幾個問題。雲南師範大學學報(哲學社會科學版),1985(1),27-33。  延伸查詢new window
6.林荃(1985)。杜文秀京控時間考。福建論壇,1985(6),25-29。  延伸查詢new window
7.李豫、李雪梅(2003)。《趙二姑寶卷》與清代山西叩閽大案。山西檔案,2003(3),38-41。  延伸查詢new window
8.莊興成(1995)。林則徐與滇西回民起義。蒙自師專學報(社會科學版),12(1),34-37。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.王樹槐(1970)。咸同雲南回民事變。台北:中研院近史所。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.那思陸(198206)。清代州縣衝門審判制度。台北:文史哲出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.老舍(1981)。正紅旗下。北京:人民文學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.劉毓珂(196709)。永昌府志。臺北:成文出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃六鴻(1978)。福惠全書。福惠全書。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳登武(20060000)。從人間世到幽冥界 : 唐代的法制、社會與國家。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.祝慶祺、鮑書芸、潘文舫、何維楷(2004)。刑案匯覽三編(4冊)。北京:北京古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.鄭秦(1988)。清代司法審判制度研究。長沙:湖南教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.王文韶、唐炯(1966)。續雲南通志稿。文海出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.孟森(198209)。明清史講義。臺北:里仁書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.薛允升、黃靜嘉(1970)。讀例存疑。臺北:成文出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.徐本、田濤、鄭秦(1999)。大清律例。北京:法律出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.Gladney, Dru C.(1991)。Muslim Chinese: Ethnic Nationalism in the People's Republic。Harvard University Press。  new window
14.趙爾巽、柯劭忞、國史館清史稿校註審查委員會(1986)。清史稿校註。臺北:國史館。  延伸查詢new window
15.那思陸(2004)。中國審判制度史。臺北:正典出版文化有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
16.顧炎武、崑山顧炎武研究會(2002)。天下郡國利病書。上海:上海科學技術文獻出版社。  延伸查詢new window
17.連橫(1976)。臺灣通史。臺灣省文獻委員會。  延伸查詢new window
18.張德澤(2006)。清代國家機關考略。北京:學苑出版社。  延伸查詢new window
19.張中復(20010000)。清代西北回民事變:社會文化適應與民族認同的省思。臺北:聯經。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.白壽彝(1992)。回回民族的新生。回回民族的新生。北京。  延伸查詢new window
21.趙曉華(2001)。晚清訟獄制度的社會考察。晚清訟獄制度的社會考察。北京。  延伸查詢new window
22.高其邁(1984)。明史刑法志注釋。明史刑法志注釋。北京。  延伸查詢new window
23.(1971)。Chinese Legal Working Aid。Chinese Legal Working Aid。Cambridge。  new window
其他
1.(清)黃汝成(1985)。日知錄集釋,上海。  延伸查詢new window
2.(清)慶桂(1985)。清高宗實錄,北京。  延伸查詢new window
3.(1990)。大清會典事例,北京。  延伸查詢new window
4.(清)慧中(2000)。欽定臺規,北京。  延伸查詢new window
5.林文忠公政書。  延伸查詢new window
6.莊吉發(2000)。清代社會經濟變遷與秘密會黨的發展,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
7.回民丁燦廷等京控案由,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
8.雲南回民杜文秀等控案由,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
9.(清)繆荃孫(1988)。續碑傳集,上海。  延伸查詢new window
10.(清)王又槐(2000)。刑錢必覽,北京。  延伸查詢new window
11.(2000)。州縣須知摘要,北京。  延伸查詢new window
12.(1985)。清仁宗睿皇帝實錄,北京。  延伸查詢new window
13.(1985)。清宣宗成皇帝實錄(第一冊),北京。  延伸查詢new window
14.(1990)。清會典事例(光緒朝),北京。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE