:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:嚴粲《詩緝》以文學說《詩》及其在經學史上的意義
書刊名:逢甲人文社會學報
作者:黃忠慎 引用關係
作者(外文):Huang, Chung-Sheng
出版日期:2007
卷期:14
頁次:頁25-54
主題關鍵詞:嚴粲詩緝六義涵泳情性嚴羽Yan CanShijiSix yiNurturing of emotion and natureYan Yu
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:78
  • 點閱點閱:108
宋代《詩經》學存在著非常激烈的尊〈序〉與廢〈序〉之爭,所謂新舊兩派之判別,最主要的關鍵就在〈詩序〉的取捨上,嚴粲對「首序」(〈詩序〉首句)的絕對遵從,使得研究者對於《詩緝》的認識通常僅止於「舊派說《詩》者」這樣的刻板印象。其實,嚴粲重視客觀實據的解經態度與方法,已讓他具有清代樸學家架勢,治經也蘊藏著許多宋學家的理學觀點,並善用宋儒慣常的的解經方式—以理學解《詩》,而他在面對某些詩篇時,又能從文學的角度來詮解,這就與一般「舊派說《詩》」之著作有了顯著的不同,所以《詩緝》乃是「舊中帶新」的著作。筆者之前已經探討了嚴粲以經學與理學說《詩》的兩條進路,並且解釋了其在經學史上的意義,本文進一步觀察、評論嚴粲的以文學說《詩》,由此而確認《詩緝》使用經學、理學、文學三條進路解《詩》的配重情況,也使得嚴粲《詩緝》的質性與地位可以被吾人有更具體的認知。
There was a very radical dispute over the honoring and the abandonment of the Preface. The difference between the so-called the new school and the old school rests upon the crucial point of adopting or abandoning of the Preface. And the fact that Yan Can follows straightly the "First Preface"—the first sentence of the Preface-- provides a stereotype understanding of the Shiji that classified Shiji as belonging to the old school. In fact, the attitude and method in interpreting Classics as found in Yan Can's emphasis of objective evidence has revealed an academic style pretty much like that of those scholars of the school of evidence in the Qing Dynasty. However, on the other hand, Yan's interpretation of the Confucian Classics has been immersed with Neo-Confucian perspectives. Yan is good at making use of Song Confucian popular way of interpreting Classic by employing Neo-Confucianism in their interpretations. In interpreting some pieces in the Shijing, Yan Can interprets them from the perspective of literature. All these mark a drastic difference from those works of the old school. Therefore, Shiji is a work that reflects a mixture of both the old and new approaches. The author of this paper has studied these two approaches of Yan Can in interpreting Shijing and explained the significances of them in the history of the study of the Classics. These approaches are the approach of the study of the Confucian classics and that of the Neo-Confucianism. This paper has moved one step further by looking at and commenting on Yan's third approach, employing literature in interpreting Shijing, and, from the basis of theses research findings, this paper asserts that Shiji makes use of all these three approaches in the interpretation of Shijing and the proportion among them. These will enable us to have a concrete understanding of the nature and status of Yan Can's Shiji.
期刊論文
1.黃忠慎(20060600)。嚴粲《詩緝》的解經態度與方法及其在經學史上的意義。興大中文學報,19,55-96。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.陳慶元(1995)。劉克莊和閩籍江湖派詩人。福州師專學報(社會科學版),15(2),28-29。  延伸查詢new window
3.衣若芬(20030900)。「江山如畫」與「畫裏江山」--宋元題「瀟湘」山水畫詩之比較。中國文哲研究集刊,23,33-70。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.陳伯海(1984)。〈嚴羽身世考略〉。《上海師範學院學報社會科學版》,第 3期。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃忠慎(2005)。〈嚴粲《詩緝》的以理學說《詩》及其在經學史上的意義〉。《國文學誌》,第 11 期。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.李莉褒(1998)。嚴粲《詩緝》之研究(碩士論文)。國立中興大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃忠慎(1984)。宋代之詩經學(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.程克雅(1990)。《朱熹、嚴粲二家比興釋詩體系比較及其意義》,中壢。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.杜海軍(2003)。呂祖謙文學研究。北京:學苑出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.屈萬里(198001)。書傭論學集。臺北:臺灣開明書店。  延伸查詢new window
3.錢鍾書(1984)。宋詩選註。臺北:木鐸出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.郭紹虞(1983)。宋詩話考。台北:漢京文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.王國維(1975)。人間詞話。台北:河洛圖書出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.江乾益(2004)。詩經之經義與文學述論。台北:文史哲出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.李清馥(1984)。閩中理學淵源考。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
8.王質(198406)。詩總聞。臺北:新文豐出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
9.何文煥(198202)。歷代詩話。臺北:木鐸出版社:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
10.嚴粲(1983)。詩緝。臺北:廣文書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.王琛、張景祈(1967)。重纂邵武府志。臺北:成文出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.王士禎(1984)。居易錄。台北:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
13.曹庭棟(1984)。宋百家詩存。台北:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
14.朱熹(1979)。詩集傳。臺北:蘭臺書局。  延伸查詢new window
15.萬斯同(1972)。群書疑辨。廣文書局。  延伸查詢new window
16.顏重威、陳加盛(2004)。詩經裡的鳥類。台北:鄉宇文化出版社。  延伸查詢new window
17.鄭玄、賈公彥(1976)。周禮注疏。藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
18.胡樸安(1986)。詩經學。台北:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
19.裴普賢(1977)。詩經研讀指導。臺北:東大圖書有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
20.余培林(1995)。詩經正詁。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
21.李家樹(1990)。詩經的歷史公案。臺北:大安出版社。  延伸查詢new window
22.紀昀、永瑢(1974)。四庫全書總目。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
23.陳振孫(1979)。直齋書錄解題。臺北:廣文書局。  延伸查詢new window
24.黎靖德、王星賢(1987)。新校標點朱子語類。臺北:華世出版社。  延伸查詢new window
25.毛亨、鄭玄、孔穎達(1976)。毛詩正義。藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
26.陳奐(1968)。詩毛氏傳疏。臺北:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
27.朱彝尊、中華書局編輯部(1998)。經義考。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
28.陳子展(199208)。詩經直解。臺北:書林出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
29.黃景進(1986)。嚴羽及其詩論之研究。臺北:文史哲出版社。  延伸查詢new window
30.洪湛侯(2002)。詩經學史。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
31.戴維(2001)。詩經研究史。長沙:湖南教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
32.方玉潤(1981)。詩經原始。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
33.朱熹、陳俊明(2000)。朱子文集。臺北:財團法人德富文教基金會。  延伸查詢new window
34.王引之(1979)。經義述聞。臺北:廣文書局。  延伸查詢new window
35.胡自逢(1993)。五經治要。台北:文史哲出版社。  延伸查詢new window
36.黃忠慎(20020000)。朱子《詩經》學新探。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
37.朱光潛(1982)。《談文學》。台北。  延伸查詢new window
38.朱東潤(1980)。《讀詩四論》。台北。  延伸查詢new window
39.呂祖謙(1984)。《呂氏家塾讀詩記》。《四庫全書》本。台北。  延伸查詢new window
40.姚際恒(1994)。《詩經通論》。《姚際恒著作集》,第 1 冊。台北。  延伸查詢new window
41.胡寅。《斐然集》。《四庫全書》本。  延伸查詢new window
42.馮浩菲(2003)。歷代詩經論說述評。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
43.黃忠慎(2005)。詩經選注。台北:五南圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
44.葉嘉瑩(2002)。《王國維及其文學批評》。台北。  延伸查詢new window
45.鄭振鐸(1978)。《中國文學史》。台北。  延伸查詢new window
46.戴復古(1984)。《石屏詩集》。《四庫全書》本。台北。  延伸查詢new window
47.戴復古(1984)。《石屏續集》。《四庫全書》本。台北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.鄭樵(1963)。通志。九通。台北:新興書局。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE