:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:電腦化「國語聲調聽辨測驗」之編製
書刊名:測驗學刊
作者:張小芬
作者(外文):Chang, Hsiao-Fen
出版日期:2007
卷期:54:1
頁次:頁97-120
主題關鍵詞:國語聲調聽辨測驗電腦ComputerizedDiscrimination testMandarinTones
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:82
  • 點閱點閱:133
本研究主要目的為發展電腦化「國語聲調聽辨測驗」,測驗共38題,分成單字詞聽辨與二字詞聽辨,個別施測時,因作答方式簡單,學生可自行上機進行測驗,測試完畢立即可查看各個聲調聽辨的正確率,欲進行團體施測時,亦有測驗紙本提供作答,施測時間約為10~15分鐘。本測驗對於篩選國語聲調覺識有困難者是很好的工具。研究樣本:耳聰學生為國小一、二年級學生,共計752人;聽障樣本:就讀一般學校之聽障資源班學生,合計18人。信度:研究顯示本測驗具有高度內部一致性,折半信度.80~.82,庫李信度介於.80~.92,再測信度.92 (n=40),測驗時間間隔二週。效標關聯效度:本測驗與國語注音符號大會考之成績的相關r=.70 (p<.01);構念效度考驗,耳聰與聽障兒童之聽辨分數,差異達顯著水準t=4.33 (p<.001),不同聽力損失之二組聽障兒童,其聲調聽辨分數無差異存在 (t=-.736,p>.05),聲調聽辨無年級差異、性別差異、聽辨錯誤率最高的聲調為2聲;最困難的「聲調對比」聽辨為2聲與3聲,符合聲調理論,以上結果顯示本測驗具有良好的效度。
The main purpose of this study was to develop the Computerized Mandarin Tones Dis­crimination Test (CMTDT). The CMTDT contains 38 items and measurement is divided into two subsca1es: 20 one syllable items and 18 two syllable- words' tone discrimination. Test time is 10~15 minutes. The CMTDT is useful in the initial screening of Mandarin tone awareness difficulties. The CMTDT is convenience for both individual and group testing. For the one syllable section, the respondent is asked to choose one tone of a phonetic symbol from a group of 4 items, in the two syllable section, the choice is made from a group of 2 items. The score was computed by the correct percentage from the total scale, and each tone's correct percentage. After the test is completed, the result is automatically analyzed by computer. The study sample Was 752, included normal hearing children from first to second grade of elementary school. The discrimination validity sample was 18 children with mild to profound prelingual hearing impairments (HI) from elementary school resource classrooms. Reliability: The scale obtained high internal consistency correlations, split-halfis .80-82, Kuder-Richardson Formula 20 is .80~.92. A subsample of (n=40) completed the CMTDT after 2 weeks, and the correlation between intake and 2-week CMTDT scores was.92. Validity: The correlation of the CMTDT with a Mandarin Phonetic Symbols Test was significant, and the correlation is .70 (p<.0l). The constructed validities by heterogeneous groups, hearing status, gender, grades, and tones were provided. From normal hearing and hearing impairment children, the result showed significant difference t=4.33 (p<.00l), by hearing status showed no significant difference t=-.736 (p>.05) for tones discrimination. The results confirm the presence of these validities. The result also showed the second tone was the most difficult tone. In contrast tone dis­tinction, the most difficult pair was the second and the third tones.
期刊論文
1.Bradlow, Ann R.、Pisoni, David B.、Akahane-Yamada, Reiko、Tohkura, Yoh'ichi(1997)。Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: IV. Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production。Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,101(4),2299-2310。  new window
2.Shen, Xiao-nan Susan(1989)。Toward a register approach in teaching Mandarin tones。Journal of Chinese Language Teachers Association,24(3),27-47。  new window
3.Gandour, Jack(1983)。Tone perception in Far eastern languages。Journal of Phonetics,11,149-175。  new window
4.Moore, D. B.、Jongman, A.(1997)。Speaker normalization in the perception of Mandarin Chinese Tones。The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,102(3),1864-1877。  new window
5.Whalen, Douglas H.、Xu, Yi(1992)。Information for Mandarin tones in the amplitude contour and in brief segments。Phonetica,49(1),25-47。  new window
6.Fu, Q. J.、Zeng, F. G.、Shannon, R. V.、Soli, S. D.(1998)。Importance of Tonal Envelope Cues in Chinese Speech Recognition。The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,104(1),505-510。  new window
7.張顯達、許碧勳(20001100)。國語輔音聽辨與發音能力之發展研究。中華民國聽力語言學會雜誌,15,1-10。  延伸查詢new window
8.黃秀霜、詹欣蓉(19970600)。閱讀障礙兒童之音韻覺識、字覺識及聲調覺識之分析。特殊教育與復健學報,5,125-138。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.吳明雄(19950400)。國民小學注音符號教學現況。社教資料雜誌,201,4-6。  延伸查詢new window
10.Chen, Qing-Hai(1997)。Toward a sequential approach for tonal error analysis。Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association,32,21-39。  new window
11.胡永崇(20010900)。國小一年級閱讀障礙學生注音符號學習的相關因素及意義化注音符號教學成效之研究。屏東師院學報,15,101-140。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.張蓓莉(19870600)。回歸主流聽覺障礙學生語文能力之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,3,119-133。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Hua, Zhu、Dodd, Barbara(2000)。The phonological acquisition of Putonghua (Modern Standard Chinese)。Journal of Child Language,27(1),3-42。  new window
14.Garding, Eva、Kratochvil, Paul、Svantesson, Jan-Olof、Zhang, Jialu(1986)。Tone 4 and Tone 3 Discrimination in Modern Standard Chinese。Language and Speech,29,281-293。  new window
15.鍾玉梅(1994)。聽障兒童的說話問題。聽語會刊,10,72-79。  延伸查詢new window
16.張小芬、古鴻炎、吳俊欣(2004)。聽障學生國語語詞聲調人耳評分與電腦分析之初探。特殊教育研究學刊,26,221-245。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Wang, Yue、Spence, Michelle M.、Jongman, Allard、Sereno, Joan A.(1999)。Training American Listeners to Perceive Mandarin Tones。The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,106(6),3649-3658。  new window
18.鄭靜宜(2002)。言語障礙者的語音清晰度評估。聽語新潮,3,5-38。  延伸查詢new window
19.Shen, X. S.、Lin, M. C.(1991)。A Perceptual Study of Mandarin Tones2 and 3。Language and Speech,34,145-156。  new window
20.Bluhme, H.、Burr, R.(1971)。An Audio-visual Display of Pitch for Teaching Chinese Tone。Studies in Linguistics,22,51-57。  new window
21.Engen, T.、Engen, E. A.、Clarkson, R. L.、Blackwell, P.(1983)。Discrimination of Intonation by Hearing-impaired Children。Applied Psycholinguistics,4,149-160。  new window
22.Xu, L.、Pfingst, B. E.(2003)。Relative Importance of Temporal Envelope and Fine Structure in Lexical -tone Perception。The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,114(6),3024-3027。  new window
23.Rvachew, S.(1994)。Speech Perception Training Can Facilitate Sound Production Learning。Journal of Speech and Hearing Research,37,347-357。  new window
24.Liu, Y. T.(2004)。The Comparative Fallacy in Tone Perception Studies。Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics,4(1),1-4。  new window
25.Most, T.、Frank, Y.(1994)。The Effects of Age and Hearing Loss on Tasks of Perception and Production of Intonation。The Volta Review,96,137-149。  new window
26.Most, T.、Frank, Y.(1991)。The Relationship between Perception and the Production of Intonation by Hearing-impaired Children。The Volta Review,93,301-310。  new window
27.White, C. M.(1981)。Tonal Perception Errors and Interference from English Intonation。Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association,16,27-56。  new window
28.Lee, Yuh-Shiow、Vakoch, Douglas A.、Wurm, Lee H.(1996)。Tone Perception in Cantonese and Mandarin: A Cross-linguistic Comparison。Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,25(5),527-542。  new window
會議論文
1.Wang, Y、Kuhl P. K.(2003)。Evaluating the "Critical Period" hypothesis: Perceptual learning of Mandarin tones in American adults and American children at 6, 10 and 14 years of age。15th ICPhS。Barcelona。  new window
2.Petrushin, V. A.(2000)。Student Response Evaluation for Spoken Language Learning: A Case Study of Learning Chinese Tones。0。  new window
3.Petrushin, V. A.(2001)。Using Speech Analysis Techniques for Language Learning。0。129-130。  new window
學位論文
1.邱紫容(2000)。國小六年級聽覺障礙學生後設語言覺知能力之研究(碩士論文)。彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳淑麗(1996)。閱讀障礙學童聲韻能力發展之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺東師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃重光(2001)。以自組織特徵映射建立國語聲調電腦評量模式之研究(碩士論文)。臺中師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
4.梅永人(2000)。國語聲調電腦評量模式之研究(碩士論文)。臺中師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
5.張嘉津(2000)。國小低年級學童聲韻調覺識能力與教師教學語言及學童學習背景之相關研究(碩士論文)。臺中師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
6.鐘素鵑(2003)。聲韻覺識教學對國小低年級注音符號學習困難學童之成效分析(碩士論文)。國立台北師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
7.林珮瑜(1996)。聽障兒童語音教學電腦輔助系統--語音處理子系統(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.張淑品(1999)。國中重度聽障學生與耳聰學生國語單元音與聲調的聲學比較分析(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.歐菁妮(2002)。聽障與聽常兒童國語聲調的辨認,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Logan, J. S.、Pruitt, J. S.(1995)。Methodological Issues in Training Listeners to Perceive Non-native Phonemes。Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-language Research。Baltimore, MD。  new window
2.張小芬(2004)。聲調分析軟體在聽障學生國語聲調有效教學的應用。課程領導與有效教學。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE