:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣水資源管理公民會議之評估
書刊名:法政學報
作者:范玫芳 引用關係
作者(外文):Fan, Mei-Fang
出版日期:2006
卷期:20
頁次:頁87-104
主題關鍵詞:水資源管理公民會議公民參與審議民主永續發展Water resource managementConsensus conferencePublic participationDeliberative democracySustainable development
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:37
由於用水需求的不斷增加與潛在的缺水危機,水資源的永續管理成為當前臺灣的重要議題。公民參與決策過程的主張愈來愈受到重視。本文針對在2006年舉行的水資源管理公民會議進行程序面與影響面的評估,同時突顯公民參與決策過程的重要性,以及當前水資源政策與措施的爭議。首先,扼要介紹公民會議如何被視為是公民參與以及決策過程的有效工具,以及此次水資源管理公民會議是如何召開。本文採用數項指標來評估此公民會議,包括接受度與程序指標,以及對政治、政策與公民的影響。最後主張在水資源決策制定過程中應有更多公民會議的召開,並結合其他公民參與機制。
Sustainable water resource management has become a critical issue in Taiwan because of the increasing water demands and the potential crisis of water shortage. There is a growing emphasis on the involvement of the public in decision making in Taiwan. This paper evaluation the procedure and impacts of the consensus conference held on issues of 'water resource management', and highlights the significance of public involvement in decision making and disputes over current practices and policy measures taken for water resource management. This paper introduces the consensus conference method as a useful tool for public participation and decision process, and how the consensus conference on controversial water resources issues was conducted. It employs several criteria and provides the evaluation of the consensus conference, including acceptance and procedure criteria, and the impacts on politics, policy, and people. It concludes by arguing for more consensus conferences and combined participatory mechanisms in water resource decision making.
期刊論文
1.Fiorino, D. J.(1990)。Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms。Science, Technology, & Human Values,15(2),226-243。  new window
2.Gleick, P. H.(1998)。Water in Crisis: Paths to Sustainable Water Use。Ecological Applications,8(3),571-579。  new window
3.Guston, D. H.(1999)。Evaluating the First U.S. Consensus Conference: The Impact of the Citizens' Panel on Telecommunications and the Future of Democracy。Science, Technology, & Human Values,24(4),451-482。  new window
4.Joss, S.(1998)。Danish consensus conferences as a model of participatoiy technology assessment: An impact study of consensus conferences on Danish Parliament and Danish public debate。Science and Public Policy,25(1),2-22。  new window
5.Kallis, G.(2006)。Participatory methods for water resources planning。Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy,24,215-234。  new window
6.Lin, K. M.、Chen, D. S.(2003)。Consensus Conference and Deliberative Democracy: Citizen Participation in Taiwan's National Health Insurance Policies。Taiwanese Sociology,6,61-118。  new window
7.Middendorf, G.、Busch, L.(1997)。Inquiry for the public good: Democratic participation in agricultural research。Agriculture and Human Values,14,45-57。  new window
8.Rowe, G.、Marsh, R.、Frewer, L.(2004)。Evaluation of a Deliberative Conference。Science, Technology, & Human Values,29(1),88-121。  new window
9.Wu, C. L.、Dan, Z. Y.(2004)。Civic Group Forum: Citizen Participatory Method in New Democracy。Taiwan Democracy Quarterly,1(4),35-56。  new window
10.Zurita, L.(1995)。Consensus conference method in environmental issues: relevance and strengths。Land Use Policy,23,18-25。  new window
11.Rowe, Gene、Frewer, Lynn J.(2000)。Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation。Science, Technology & Human Values,25(1),3-29。  new window
會議論文
1.Chen, D. S.(2005)。The Limitations of Deliberative Democracy: Cases of Citizen Conference in Taiwan。International Conference on Deliberative Democracy,(會議日期: 2005/08/29-08/30)。Taipei:Taiwan Think Tank。  new window
2.Lin, K. M.(2005)。The Practice of Deliberative Democracy in Taiwan。International Conference on Deliberative Democracy,(會議日期: 2005/08/29-08/30)。Taipei:Taiwan Think Tank。  new window
圖書
1.Holmes, T.、Scoones, I.(2000)。Participatory environmental policy process: experiences from North and South。Sussex:Institute for Development Studies, University of Sussex。  new window
2.Gutmann, Amy、Thompson, Danis(1996)。Democracy and Disagreement。Belknap Press of Harvard University Press。  new window
3.WCED(1987)。Our Common Future。Oxford University Press。  new window
其他
1.UNCED(1992)。Agenda 21,http://habitat.igc.org/agenda21/index.htm, 。  new window
圖書論文
1.D'Entrèves, M.(2002)。Introduction: democracy as public deliberation。Democracy as Public Deliberation: New Perspectives。Manchester:Manchester University。  new window
2.Leng, T. K.(2005)。Sustainable Development in Canada and Taiwan: Comparative and International Perspectives。Confronting Environmental Change in East & South East Asia。New York:United Nations University。  new window
3.Miller, D.(2002)。Is deliberative democracy unfair to disadvantaged groups?。Democracy as Public Deliberation: New Perspectives。Manchester:Manchester University。  new window
4.Redclift, M.(1995)。The UK and the international environmental agenda: Rio and after。UK Environmental Policy in the 1990s。London:Macmillan。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE