:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:審議民主在空間議題上的新實驗:以「中港河廊通學步道願景工作坊」為例
書刊名:公共行政學報
作者:杜文苓 引用關係張國偉 引用關係吳嘉純
作者(外文):Tu, Wen-lingChang, Kuo-weiWu, Chia-chun
出版日期:2009
卷期:32
頁次:頁69-104
主題關鍵詞:公民參與審議民主願景工作坊參與式規劃新莊中港大排Citizen participationDeliberative democracyScenario workshopParticipatory planningHsin-Chuang Chung-Kang drainage channel
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:170
  • 點閱點閱:150
當審議民主碰上空間規劃議題時,其操作方式需要有什麼樣的調整?審議民主與參與式規劃兩個不同的專業領域,又會激盪出哪些發展的可能性?本文以「中港河廊通學步道願景工作坊」-一個結合了審議民主專業以及空間規劃專業的實驗性工作坊為例,思考審議民主會議與空間專業領域跨界合作的可能,以及公民審議在空間議題上的執行問題。 透過會議活動的觀察以及與會者會後的深度訪談,我們分析願景工作坊的新設計如何促進公民在空間議題上的溝通審議,其又對現行的審議民主會議以及參與式規劃操作有何啟發。本文分析審議民主與參與式規劃在公民參與設計重點的異同,探求兩個專業領域在碰撞過程中的思考與執行的成果,透過個案分析,進一步思索公民參與空間議題的設計原則與未來方向。
Once deliberative democracy comes to deal with the spatial planning issues, what is the way to adjust its mode of operation? When the advocates of deliberative democracy come across the participatory planning practitioners, what possibilities can be developed? Taking the example of “the Scenario Workshop on the Safe Routes to Schools around Chung-Kang Drainage Channel,” an experimental citizen deliberative meeting, this paper explores the potentials of cooperation of two disciplines between deliberative democracy and participatory planning. Through participative observation and in-depth interviews, we examine some innovative elements designed for this scenario workshop and discuss how they enhance the citizen communication and deliberation on spatial issues. This new experiment also sheds light on the current practices of deliberative democracy and participatory planning. By analyzing the similarities and differences of two disciplines, we further ponder on the design principle for citizen to engage in spatial planning issues.
期刊論文
1.黃東益(20060300)。審議日:治理的烏托邦或務實的民主創新工程?。公共行政學報. 政大,18,137-142。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.黃麗玲(20031200)。一九九0年代臺北市都市規劃中的社區參與--全球過程、地方政治以及鄰里回應。地理學報,34,61-78。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.杜文苓(20070600)。審議民主與社會運動:民間團體籌辦新竹科學園區宜蘭基地公民會議的啟發。公共行政學報,23,67-93。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Weithman, P.(2005)。Deliberative character。The Journal of Political Philosophy,13(3),263-283。  new window
5.郭秋永(19990600)。強勢民主:新時代的政治參與。問題與研究,38(6),63-94。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.林國明、陳東升(20031200)。公民會議與審議民主:全民健保的公民參與經驗。臺灣社會學,6,61-118。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.陳東升(20060300)。審議民主的限制--臺灣公民會議的經驗。臺灣民主季刊,3(1),77-104。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Albrechts, L.(2002)。The planning community reflects on enhancing public involvement: Views from academics and reflective practitioners。Planning Theory and Research,3(3),331-347。  new window
9.Bond, S.,、M. Thompson-Fawcett(2007)。Public participation and new urbanism: A conflicting agenda?。Planning Theory & Practice,8(4),449-472。  new window
10.Brody, S. D.、Godschalk, D. R.、Burby, R. J.(2003)。Mandating citizen participation in plan making: Six strategic planning choices。Journal of the American Planning Association,69(3),245-264。  new window
11.Fishkin, J. S.,、S. A. Rosell(2004)。Choice dialogues and deliberative polls: Two approaches to deliberative democracy。National Civic Review,Winter,55-63。  new window
12.Forester, J.(2006)。Making participation work when interests conflict: Moving from facilitating dialogue and moderating debate to mediating negotiations。Journal of the American Planning Association,72(4),447-456。  new window
13.Hajer, M. A.(2005)。Rebuilding ground zero: The politics of performance。Planning Theory and Practice,6(4),445-464。  new window
14.Wagenet, L. P.,、Pfeffer, M. J.(2007)。Organizing citizen engagement for democratic environmental planning。Society and Natural Resources,20,801-813。  new window
會議論文
1.曾旭正(2001)。社區參與之社會效果分析:1990年代的台灣經驗。馬祖。  延伸查詢new window
2.羅瑞鴦、劉欣蓉(2001)。參與式社區設計:台灣經驗省思。馬祖。  延伸查詢new window
3.McNally, M. J.,、T. Nagahashi(2001)。Challengishimasu! Episodes in the pursuit of democratic design。Taipei。  new window
4.Rehg, W.(2005)。The prospect and challenge for deliberative democracy。Taipei。  new window
研究報告
1.林國明(2007)。行政民主之實踐:全國型議題審議民主公民參與。台北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.黃浩榮(2005)。公共新聞學:審議民主的觀點。台北:巨流圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.Bohman, James(1996)。Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy。MIT Press。  new window
3.Gutmann, Amy、Thompson, Danis(1996)。Democracy and Disagreement。Belknap Press of Harvard University Press。  new window
4.Forester, John(1999)。The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes。Cambridge, MA:MIT Press。  new window
5.Forester, John(1989)。Planning in the Face of Power。University of California Press。  new window
6.Barber, Benjamin R.(1984)。Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age。University of California Press。  new window
7.Elster, Jon(1998)。Deliberative Democracy。Cambridge University Press。  new window
8.Gutmann, Amy、Thompson, Dennis F.(2004)。Why Deliberative Democracy?。Princeton University Press。  new window
9.Young, Iris Marion(2000)。Inclusion and Democracy。Oxford University Press。  new window
10.Langton, Stuart(1978)。Citizen Participation in America。Lexington Books。  new window
11.陳毓麟、Ian Shapiro(2005)。民主理論現況。台北。  延伸查詢new window
12.黃瑞茂(1999)。環境正義與民眾參與。台北市地區環境改造計畫社區動力營:第一階段觀摩工作坊活動手冊。台北。  延伸查詢new window
13.Albrechts, L.,、W. Denayer(2001)。Communicative planning, emancipatory politics and postmodernism。Handbook of urban studies。London。  new window
14.Elster, J.(1997)。The market and the forum: Three varieties of political theory。Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics。Cambridge, MA.。  new window
15.Mansbridge, J. M.(1999)。On the idea that participation make better citizen。Citizen competence and democratic institutions。University Park, PA.。  new window
其他
1.林國明(20070900)。審議民主實踐的多元模式--評John Gastill and Peter Levine eds., 審議民主手冊:二十一世紀有效的公民參與策略。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Cohen, Joshua(1989)。Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy。The Good Polity: Normative Analysis of the State。Oxford:Basil Blackwell。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE