:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國內跆拳道教練領導行為與選手訓練滿意度之研究
書刊名:屏東教大運動科學學刊
作者:曾崑煇陳科嘉 引用關係李志凌莊紋娟 引用關係
作者(外文):Teng, Kun-huiChen, Ko-chiaLi, Chih-lingChuang, Wen-chuan
出版日期:2009
卷期:5
頁次:頁197-213
主題關鍵詞:跆拳道背景結構教練領導行為訓練滿意度TaekwondoBackground compositionCoaches' leading behaviorsPlayers' training satisfaction
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:166
  • 點閱點閱:78
本研究旨在探討國內跆拳道選手背景結構、教練領導行為、訓練滿意度現況分析、以及選手在不同背景結構下對教練領導行為與訓練滿意度之差異情形。採自編問卷調查,針對參與96年度全國運動會跆拳道項目之各縣、市代表隊男、女參賽選手為研究範園,共計發出311份問卷,扣除填答不完整之問卷,有效問卷為300份,無效問卷為11份,將所收集的資料以SPSS 14.0進行統計分析,利用t考驗、單因子變異數分析、皮爾遜積差相關分析,藉以了解變項差異性。實證結果顯示,假設1:不同性別對教練領導行為構面有顯著差異成立;假設2:不同量級對領導行為構面有顯著差異成立;假設3:不同訓練年數對領導行為構面有顯著差異成立;假設4:每週練習天數對領導行為構面有顯著差異成立;假設5:性別對訓練滿意度構面有顯著差異是成立的;假設6:量級對訓練滿意度構面有顯著差異是成立的;假設7:訓練年數對訓練滿意度構面有顯著差異是成立的;假設8:每週練習天數對訓練滿意度構面有顯著差異是成立的;假設9:教練領導行為與訓練滿意度呈現正相關。
The aim of this study is to analyze the variables of Taekwondo players' background ccmposition, the coaches' leading behaviors, training satisfaction, thus further to perceive whether the players with different background composition will reflect different views about the coaches' leading behaviors and the training satisfaction. By utilizing a self-designed questionnaire and taking male and female players from all cities and counties who participated in National Sport Competition from October 21th to 24th, 2007 as the subjects, 311 questionnaires were used with 300 ones returned valid and 11 ones invalid. SPSS 14.0 software was chosen to analyze the data, and t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson Correlation were used to realize the diversities among these variables. Results showed: Hypothesis 1-1: Different gender is statistically significant to the coaches' leading behaviors. Hypothesis 1-2: Different levels of players are statistically significant to the coaches' leading behaviors. Hypothesis 1-3: Players with different training years revealed significant difference to the coaches' leading behaviors. Hypothesis 1-4: Players' weekly training days are significantly different to the coaches' leading behaviors. Hypothesis 2-1: Gender showed significant difference to the players' training satisfaction. Hypothesis 2-2: Different levels of players are statistically significant to the players' training satisfaction. Hypothesis 2-3: Players with varied training years reflected statistically significance to their training satisfaction. Hypothesis 2-4: Players' weekly training days are significantly different to their training satisfaction. Hypothesis 3-1: The coaches' leading behaviors are positively correlated to the players' training satisfaction.
期刊論文
1.劉雅燕、鄭俊傑、洪郭賓(20061100)。大學院校橄欖球隊教練領導行為與選手滿意度之研究。淡江體育,9,114-127。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.簡瑞宇(20060800)。大專網球選手知覺教練領導行為對運動參與動機及訓練滿意度之影響。臺灣運動心理學報,8,65-86。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.歐正明(20061200)。羽球教練領導行為與選手滿意度之研究--以大專院校甲組球員為例。運動休閒管理學報,3(2),167-189。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.許如雅(20040600)。我國跆拳道優秀選手教練領導行為之研究。文化體育學刊,2,103-116。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.王元聖(20061100)。大專院校跆拳道教練領導行為與甲組跆拳道選手滿意度關係。淡江體育,9,51-59。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.吳慧卿(1998)。運動教練領導行為、團隊衝突與選手滿意度之影響初探。臺灣師大體育研究,6,1-18。  延伸查詢new window
7.李建平、施致平(20030300)。大專優秀網球選手訓練滿意度之研究。體育學報,34,149-160。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.鄭志富、蕭嘉惠、牟鍾福(19970400)。運動領導量表(中文版)編製研究。體育研究,3,101-120。  延伸查詢new window
9.Chelladurai, P.(1984)。Discrepancy Between Preferences and Perceptions of Leadership Behavior and Satisfaction of Athletes in Varying Sports。Journal of Sport Psychology,6(1),27-41。  new window
10.賴世堤(19991200)。大專院校田徑教練領導行為之研究。大專體育學刊,1(2),111-128。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.House, R. J.、Aditya, R. N.(1997)。The social scientific study of leadership: Quo vadis?。Journal of Management,23,409-474。  new window
12.黃金柱(19900600)。國家級運動教練領導行為之調查研究。國立體育學院論叢,1(2),33-62。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.吳國銑(20000300)。我國大專院校運動教練領導行為比較研究。體育學報,28,59-68。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Chelladurai, P.、Riemer, H. A.(1997)。A classification of facets of athlete satisfaction。Journal of Sport Management,11(2),133-159。  new window
15.Riemer, H. A.、Chelladurai, P.(1998)。Development of the Athlete Satisfaction Questionnaire。Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,20(2),127-156。  new window
學位論文
1.Lee, B. C.(2002)。The Influence of Taekwondo Instructor's Leadership Type on the Satisfaction of the Trainee(碩士論文)。Youn-In University,Gyeonggi-Do。  new window
2.鄭志富、方明營(1994)。大專院校足球教練領導行為與運動員滿意度關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.王文科(1999)。教育研究法--民族誌研究。臺北:五南圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.Chelladurai, P.、Carron, A. V.(1978)。Leadership。Ottawa, Ontario, Canadian:Association of Health, Physical Education and Recreation。  new window
3.Robbins, S. P.(2002)。Organizational Behavior。Prentice Hall。  new window
4.Robbins, S. P.(1998)。Organizational behavior: Concepts, controversies, applications。NJ:Prentice Hall。  new window
其他
1.中華民國跆拳道協會(2008)。跆拳道歷史,http://www.taekwondo.org.tw/instpage.php?r=&w=100%25&h=800&url=www.taekwondo.org.tw/tkd/top6.htm, 2008/03/02。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE