:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:數學教室內之班級互動類型研究:一個國小四年級的班級個案
書刊名:教育與心理研究
作者:張淑怡 引用關係
作者(外文):Chang, Shu-i
出版日期:2008
卷期:31:4
頁次:頁23-52
主題關鍵詞:數學教室數學教學師生互動班級互動類型Mathematics classroomMathematics teachingTeacher-student interactionClass interactive pattern
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:33
  • 點閱點閱:47
本研究針對一個國小四年級的數學教室個案進行班級互動類型探究。由於將社會互動類型視為社群內之個體一再輪番地在彼此之間實踐的「暗示選擇」行為序列類型,且考慮到同一信號可能基於不同理念而產生相似的選擇行為,故以「教室錄影」及「課後晤談錄影」方式進行資料蒐集;資料分析來源則是32卷錄影帶轉譯和編輯而成的16份原案。研究結果發現:此數學教室個案的班級互動類型主要有兩大類:(一)「猜謎遊戲」教師為「出題者」,學生為「猜謎者」;由於逼近謎底的過程不同,可區分出三子類。(二)「學生寫,老師說」學生為「解題者」及「記錄者」,教師為「代為發表者」;由於學生的寫與老師的說有不同的連接方式,亦可進一步區分出三子類。
This study explores the class interactive patterns at a primary four mathematics class. This research uses“Video recording at classroom”and“Video interview after class”methods to collect data. The methods are chosen because of the“hint-choice”pattern, which is required for the integrated operation of community by individuals, is repeatedly practiced among people and the choice behavior from individuals, which is triggered by a signal, is similar though may be generated by different ideas. The source of research analysis is based on the sixteen working transcripts, which were transcribed and edited from thirty-two videotapes. This research analysis concludes two types of class interactive pattern at the mathematics classroom: (1)“Guessing game”. The teacher plays as “question giver”,and students play as“shooters”,who continue guessing the right answer. It can be classified into three sub types based on the process how students get the correct answer. (2)“Problem solving by pupils and elaboration by teacher”. Students play as “problem solver”and “recorder”, and the teacher plays as ”representative”. It can also be categorized into 3 sub types based on the process how teacher elaborates after pupils solve problems.
期刊論文
1.Sfard, A.、Nesher, P.、Streefland, L.、Cobb, P.、Mason, J.(1998)。Learning Mathematics through Conversation: Is It as Good as They Say?。For the Learning of Mathematics,18(1),41-51。  new window
2.張淑怡(20040600)。從Maturana的認知生物學看數學學習與數學教學之本質。朝陽人文社會學刊,2(1),109-148。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Voigt, J.(1985)。Patterns and routines in classroom interaction。Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques,6(1),69-118。  new window
4.Cobb, P.、Yackel, E.(1996)。Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,27(4),458-477。  new window
5.Ricoeur, Paul(1971)。The Model of the Text: Meaningful Action Considered as a Text。Social Research,38(3),529-562。  new window
6.甯自強(19930300)。國小數學科新課程的精神及改革動向--由建構主義的觀點來看。科學教育學刊,1(1),101-108。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Voigt, J.(1994)。Negotiation of mathematical meaning and learning mathematics。Educational Studies in Mathematics,26,275-298。  new window
會議論文
1.陳英娥(2003)。開發數學教室的論證情境之研究。臺北市。134-145。  延伸查詢new window
2.鍾靜(2005)。討論式數學教學的理論與實務。0。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.甯自強(1993)。國小低年級兒童數概念發展研究,I-「數概念」類型研究,I。0。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.蓋允萍(2003)。跨領域個案班級中師生互動的話語類型與過程技能教學的分析研究,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Maturana, Humberto R.、Varela, Francisco J.(1992)。The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding。Boston, MA:Shambhala。  new window
2.Mehan, Hugh(1979)。Learning Lessons: Social Organization in the Classroom。Harvard University Press。  new window
3.Cooley, C. H.(1902)。Human nature and the social order。New York:Schocken Books。  new window
4.Von Glasersfeld, E.(1995)。Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning。London:The Falmer Press。  new window
5.Maturana, Humberto R.、Varela, Francisco J.(1980)。Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living。Dordrecht:Reidel。  new window
6.Seeger, F.、Voigt, J.、Waschescio, U.(1998)。The Culture of the Mathematics Classroom。New York, NY:Cambridge University Press。  new window
7.Bateson, G.(1991)。Sacred Unity: Further Steps to an Ecology of Mind。Sacred Unity: Further Steps to an Ecology of Mind。New York, NY。  new window
8.Mehan, H.、Wood, H.(1975)。The Reality of Ethnomethodology。The Reality of Ethnomethodology。New York, NY。  new window
9.Voigt, J.(1985)。Thematic Patterns of Interaction and Sociomathematical Norms。The Emergence of Mathematical Meaning: Interactions in Classroom Culture。Hillsdale, NJ。  new window
10.Cobb, P.、Yackel, E.、McClain, K.(2000)。Symbolizing and Communicating in Mathematics Classrooms: Perspectives on Discourse, Tools, and Instructional Design。Mahwah, New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.。  new window
圖書論文
1.Maturana, H. R.(1978)。Biology of language: The epistemology of reality。Psychology and biology of language and thought。New York, NY:Academic Press。  new window
2.Bauersfeld, H.(1988)。Interaction, construction, and knowledge: Alternative perspectives for mathematics education。Effective mathematics teaching。Reston, Virginia:NCTM and LEA。  new window
3.Cobb, P.、Yackel, E.(1998)。A constructivist perspective on the culture of the mathematics classroom。The culture of the mathematics classroom。New York, NY:Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Richards, J.(1991)。Mathematical discussions。Radical constructivism in mathematics education。Dordrecht:Kluwer。  new window
5.Doyle, W.(1986)。Classroom organization and management。Handbook of research on teaching。New York:Macmillan。  new window
6.Bauersfeld, H.(1998)。About the Notion of Culture in Mathematics Education。The Culture of the Mathematics Classroom。New York, NY:Cambridge University Press。  new window
7.Wood, T.(1994)。Patterns of Interaction and the Culture of the Mathematics Classroom。Cultural Perspectives on the Mathematics Classroom。Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
8.Bauersfeld, H.(1995)。"Language Games" in the Mathematics Classroom: Their Function and Their Effects。The Emergence of Mathematical Meaning: Interaction in Classroom Cultures。Hillsdale, New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE