主要參考書目
一、中文部份
王如哲(2003)。知識管理的理論與應用。台北:五南圖書。
王淑言(1996,7月4日)。斷線的項鍊、失根的教育。中國時報,16版。
王紅宇譯(1999)。W. E. Doll著。後現代課程觀(A post modern perspective on curriculum)。台北:桂冠。
文潔禮、鄧廣成、劉煒堅合編(1994)。課程理論與設計。香港:朗文。
仇忠海、霍益萍(2000)。開放性主題活動課程---上海市七寶中學新探索。上海:上海社會科學院。
西村 俊一(2002)。日本教育中的「生活科」與「綜合學習」:所謂「平成新教育」的意義與課題。載於歐用生、莊梅枝(主編),讓生活活起來(8-33頁),台北縣:中華民國教材研究發展學會。
羊憶蓉(1996)。一九九0年代的澳洲教育改革:「核心能力」取向的教育計劃。教育改革,20,(14)12-18。朱云川(2001)。論馬克思主義的辯證史觀。2004年3月26日,取自
http://ufca61.chinaw3.com/zyc2.htm 。
李文輝(1994,5月22日)。北縣廿所國小將試辦開放教育。載於台北縣政府(主編)北縣教育改革經驗耕讀剪報文集(107頁)。台北縣政府編印。
李其龍譯(1991)。普通教育學。台北:五南圖書。
李秀林、王于 & 李淮春(1982)。辯證唯物主義和力史唯物主義原理。北京:中國人民大學出版社。
李幼蒸譯(1990)。R. Rorty著.哲學和自然之鏡(Philosophy and the mirror of nature)。台北:桂冠圖書。
李奉儒(2001)。英國教育:政策與制度。台北:師大書苑。李坤崇(2000)。九年一貫課程學校經營研發與撰寫原則(初稿)。載於教教育部(主編)國中小學九年一貫課程試辦與推動工作(294-296頁).台北:教育部。
李坤崇(2000)。推動九年一貫課程的省思。載於教育部(主編)國中小學九年一貫課程試辦與推動工作(258-270頁)。台北市:教育部。
李坤崇(2000)。試辦輔導小組國中組試辦成果評估報告書。文章刊載於教育部(主編)國中小學九年一貫課程試辦與推動工作(271-285頁)。 台北市:教育部。
李秀林、王于 & 李淮春(1982)。辯證唯物主義和力史唯物主義原理。北京:中國人民大學。
李子建(2003年10月)。 課程領導與教師專業發展:知識管理的觀點。載於西北師範大學主辦之課程領導與課程評價的理論與實施,研討會論文集,蘭州。
吳璧純(2001)。科學-科技-社會(STS)教育思潮及教學取向。教育研究月刊,92,69-76.吳麗花(1997)。日本開放教育學校的生活指導:記緒川。載於鄧運林(主編)開放教育日本經驗(172-178頁)。高雄:復文圖書。
吳淑環(1997)。日本小學實施開放教育教學的具體策略。文章刊載於鄧運林(主編)開放教育日本經驗(115-117頁)。高雄:復文圖書。
吳根明譯(1988)。R. Gibson著。批判理論與教育(Critical theory and education)。台北:師大書苑。
余安邦(1998)。開放教育原本就是神話。師友,370,51-53。
沈劍平譯(1999)。J. I Goodlad著。學校的職能(What school are for)。.。台北:桂冠。
江合建(2001)。杜威藝術經驗理念之實踐。教育研究集刊。47,17-34.金淑伊(1996)。韓國教育改革概況。教育改革,20,11-48。
林玉體譯(1990)。J. S. Brubacher著。西洋教育史(A history of the problems of education)。台北:教育文物。
林寶山譯(1989)。J. Dewey著。民主主義與教育(Democracy and education )。台北:五南圖書。
林寶山&康春枝譯(1998)。J. Dewey著。 學校與社會&兒童與課程(The School and the Society and the Child and the Curriculum)。台北:五南圖書出版公司。
林秀珍(2001)。「教育即生活」抑「生活即教育」:杜威觀點的詮釋。教育研究集刊。47,1-15.林佩璇(2000)。教師行動與研究:課程及教學實踐。台北縣:教育部台灣省國民學校教師研習會印行。
林文生(1998)。臺北縣開放教育專案研究報告:開放教育自勵學習。未出版。
林文生(2002,11月)。轉化與發展。論文發表於國立教育資料館主辦之現代教育論壇研討會,研討會論文集。台北市:國立台北師範學院。
林樹聲(2004)。重視自然與生活科技學習領域中科技爭議議題的融入與探討。載於教育部(編印)國民中小學九年一貫課程:理論基礎(二)(2004)(453-465頁)。台北市:教育部。
佘曉清(1994)。各國STS課程教材評介(四):美國的科學-技術-社會(STS)教育。科學教育月刊。171,12-66。
有寶華(2002)。綜合課程論。上海:上海教育出版社。
吳壁純(1990)。科學-科技-社會(STS)教育思潮及教學取向。教育研究月刊。92, 69-76。
吳韻儀(1998)。教改大浪襲捲全球。天下雜誌,海闊天空:跨世紀希望工程師:教育特刊。20-25。
周淑卿(2002)。誰在乎課程理論?課程改革中的理論與實踐問題。國立台北師範學院學報:教育類,3-15。周淑卿(2002)。課程政策與教育革新。台北:師大書苑。施德福、靳輝明(1991)。馬克斯主義哲學史(1)。北京市:北京出版社。
施良方(1997)。課程理論。台北:麗文。
周振華(2004)。略論易經與辯證法。2004年2月27日取自http://www.ichingstudy.net/webpage/wen/wen25.htm。
邵瑞珍譯(1997)。教學論。台北:五南。
知原(2004)。兩種辯證法。2004年2月28。日取自http://www.1840cn.com/ctk/index.htm。
柯啟瑤(2001)。橫向統整的意義和重要性。翰林文教雜誌網路版第十九期。
2004年5月4日。取自http://www.worldone.com.tw/magazine/19/19_12.htm
姚定一(2004).亞里士多德與黑格爾關於對立統一學說的比較研究。
2004年2月28日。取自http://www.siwen.org/zhexueshi/ahgydltyxsdbjyj.htm ,
姜文閔譯(1992)。J. Dewey著。經驗與教育(Experience and education) 。台北:五南。
重建教育連線(2003)。終結教改亂象˙追求優質教育。2003年12月12日。
取自http://www.highqualityeducation.com/ 。
段德智、尹大貽 、金常政譯(2000)P. A. Angles著。哲學辭典(Harper Collins
Dictionary)。台北:貓頭鷹出版社。
徐世瑜(2001)。為孩子開啟通往世界的窗----小班教學訪視報告。台北市:台北市政府教育局。徐世瑜(2001)。統整課程發展:協同合作取向。台北:心理出版社。徐俊祥(2003,10月)。突破課程改革的止步點:一個多方參與共同匯聚領導模式的實例。載於西北師範大學主辦課程領導與課程評價的理論與實施研討會。蘭州:西北師範大學。
莊明貞(2002)。學校本位課程的理念與實踐。高雄市:財團法人翰林文教基金會編印。
孫可平(2001)。STS教育論。上海:上海教育出版社。
夏林清譯(2000)。 C. Argyris, R. Putnam, & D. M. Smith著。行動科學(Action Science)。 台北:遠流。
夏林清等譯(2001)。Herbert Altrichter, Peter Posch & Bridget Somekh 原著。行動研究方法導論(Teachers investigate their work)。台北:遠流出版事業股份有限公司。
梁福鎮(1999)。普通教育學研究的現況與趨勢。載於中正大學教育學研究所(主編)教育學研究方法(315-353頁)。高雄:麗文文化。
梁雲霞(2002)。絕非軟土,但需深耕:課程改革與教師專業成長這條路。文章刊載於深美教學團隊、梁雲霞(主編)看見想像的學校。(67-73頁)。台北:遠流。
郭秀段(2000)。中日教育改革動向之比較。教育研究,9,167-176。
郭昡海譯(2004)。 麻省理工學院開放式課程:科學、科技與社會(Science, Technology, and Society). 2004年3月26日。取自http://www.twocw.net/Science--Technology--and-Society/
連進福(1995)。讓孩子主動學習:談主題探索。載於鄧運林(主編)開放教育新策略(11-26)。高雄:復文圖書。
陳文玉(1998)。政策制訂過程之研究:台北縣開放教育政策個案分析。新竹師院國民教育研究所論文集,3,101-116。
陳伯璋(1987)。潛在課程研究。台北:五南。
陳伯璋(1987)。課程研究與教育革新。台北:師大書苑。
陳伯璋(2002,01月)。課程統整的迷失與省思。載於香港中文大學教育學院主辦第四屆兩岸三地課程理論研討會:課程統整研討會論文集(1-13頁)。香港:中文大學。
陳伯璋(2003a)。新世紀的課程研究與發展。國家政策季刊,2(3),149-166。
陳伯璋(2003)。實踐智慧與校長課程領導。載於歐用生、莊梅枝(主編)活化課程領導(3-17頁)。台北縣:中華民國教材研究發展學會。
陳幼慧(2001)。「無」在黑格爾辯證法之詮釋。哲學文化。28(6),514-530。陳烘玉(2002)。金包里風情再現:互動俗民誌取向之社區行動課程發展。載於
余安邦(主編)社區有教室:學術研討會論文集II(1-43頁)。臺北縣政府教育局。
陳順和(1998)。摸著石頭過河。載於台北市政府教育局編印。開放教育第二輯:海闊天空的開放教育(71-77頁)。台北市:台北市政府教育局。
馮朝霖(2002)。根本建構論理論發展之哲學反思。載於詹志禹(主編)建構論(28-48頁)。台北:正中書局。教育部(2000a)。國民教育階段課程總綱綱要。台北市:作者。
教育部(2000b)。國民小學九年一貫課程試辦工作輔導小組研討會實錄。台北市:作者。
教育部(2000c)。國民中小學九年一貫課程試辦與推動工作:學校經營研發輔導手冊。台北市:作者。
教育部(2002)。教育部九十一年全國九年一貫課程實務研討會「新世紀的挑戰:九年一貫課程政策與執行手冊。台北市:作者。
教育部(2004a)。人文社會科學教育改進計劃:STS計劃辦公室。2004年3月20日。取自
http://www.sinica.edu.tw/~htliedu/data/STS/Templates/news.htm
教育部(2004b)。國民中小學九年一貫課程理論基礎(一)。台北市:作者。
單文經、高新建、游家政、蔡清田、張明輝、王麗雲等譯(2000)。J. G. Henderson& R. D. Hawthome著。革新的課程領導(Transformative curriculum leadership, 2nd ed.)。台北:學富。單文經(2001)。解析Beane對課程統整理論與實際的主張。教育研究集刊。47,57-90.單文經等譯(2003)。 R.Fogarty著。課程統整的十種方法(The Mindful School: How to integrate the Curricula)。台北:學富文化事業有限公司。
程樹德、傅大為、王道還、錢永祥譯(1994)。T. S. Kuhn著。科學革命的結構(The structure of scientific revolution)。台北:遠流。
黃嘉雄(2000)。轉化社會結構的課程理論:課程社會學的觀點。台北:師大書苑。黃炳煌(1964)。赫爾巴特教育思想之研究。台北:嘉新水泥公司文化基金會。
黃政傑(1997)。課程改革的理念與實踐。台北:漢文。黃光雄等譯(2001)。統整課程的設計:證實能增進學生學習的方法。高雄市:麗文。
黃政傑(1991)。課程設計。台北:東華。
黃世孟(1996)。開放教育學習環境之國民小學建築計畫課程。建築學報,19,85-100。黃顯華、朱嘉潁(2002)。一個都不能少:個別差異的處理。台北:師大書苑。
黃志順(1998)。教師參與台北縣國小實施「開放教育」之經驗:兩位教師的詮釋性研究。新竹師院國民教育研究所論文集,3,161-178。
黃譯瑩(2003)。統整課程系統。台北:巨流圖書。
黃楠森、商英傳(1994)。馬克斯主義哲學史(4)。北京市:北京。
葉玲君(1994,8月15日)。國小試辦開放式教育縣府有回應。中國時報,載於台北縣教育改革經驗耕讀剪報文集(136頁)。台北縣:台北縣政府編印。
甯自強(1993)。國小數學科新課程的精神及改革動向:由建構主義的觀點來看。科學教育學刊,1(1),101-108。賈澤林、周國平、蘇國勳譯(1984)。論辯證法的敘述方法。香港:中國社會科學。
詹棟樑(1979)。赫爾巴特教育思想之研究。台北:水牛。
許瑞雯譯(1999)。課程與目的。台北:桂冠。
張華、石傳平&馬慶發(2000)。課程流派研究。濟南市:山東教育。
張文斌(2001)。神蛙傳奇。載於歐用生、莊梅枝(主編)統整課程作作看(52-81頁)。 台北縣:中華民國教材研究發展學會。
張世忠(2003)。建構取向教學:數學與科學。台北:五南。張經昆(2003)。「社區有教室」課程典範轉移---以淡水鎮清水祖師廟課程設計為例。文章刊載於歐用生&莊梅枝(主編)活化課程領導(147-171頁)。台北縣:中華民國教材研究發展學會。
曾漢塘、林季薇譯(2000)。N. Noddings 著。教育哲學。(Philosophy of Education)。 台北:弘智。
楊友成(2004)。辯證歷史觀哲學批判。香港人文哲學網頁。2004年2月28日。取自http://www.arts.cuhk.edu.hk/~hkshp 。
楊深坑(1978)。理論˙詮釋與實踐。台北:師大書苑。
楊麗英(譯)(2001)。 D. P. Schultz & S. E. Schultz著。現代心理學史(A history of modern psychology)。台北:五南。
緒川學校(1998)。個性化教育:培養生存力的橫斷的、總合的學習。日本名古屋:黎明。
廖鏡林(1997)。日本緒川小學個性化教育之淺見。載於鄧運林(主編)開放教育日本經驗(60-82頁),高雄:復文。
趙李婉儀(2002)。專題研習:學會學習的實踐。載於香港中文大學教育學院大學與學校伙伴中心優質學校計劃資料冊(34-53頁)。未出版。香港:香港中文大學。
賈馥茗(1995)。人人可讀的教育經典譯叢(序)。收錄於李其龍(譯)普通教育學.(1-24頁)。台北:五南圖書出版公司。
賈澤林、周國平&蘇國勳(譯)。B. M. 凱德洛夫(前蘇聯)著。論辯證法的敘述方法。北京:中國社會科學出版社。
歐用生(1990)。課程發展的基本原理。高雄:復文。
歐用生(1996)。教師專業成長。台北:師大書苑。
歐用生(1999)。統整課程爭論平議。論文發表於國立台北師範學院編印自主與卓越:九年一貫課程的變革與展望(1-26頁)。歐用生(2002,1月)。從綜合活動課程談台灣課程統整趨勢。載於香港中文大學教育學院主辦第四屆兩岸三地課程理論研討會:課程統整。香港:中文大學。
歐用生等(2002)。 生活課程研究。 台北縣:中華民國教材研究發展學會。
歐用生(2003)。課程典範再建構。高雄:麗文。歐用生(2003)。教科書之旅。台北:教材學會。
歐用生(2003)。誰能不在乎課程理論?教師課程理論的覺醒。教育資料集刊,28,373-385。
詹志禹(2002)。認識與知識:建構論VS.接受觀。載於詹志禹(主編)建構論(12-27)。台北:正中。劉奕權(2001)。從小班教學計畫到九年一貫課程
載於台北市教師研習中心編印,教育部九十學年度小班教學成果發表會,7-8. 台北市:教育局。
劉慶仁(2003)。美國中小學教育改革的趨勢:從學童的卓越教育法談起。2003年11月7日。取自http://www.tw.org/newwaves/44/1-b.html2003/11/7 。
甄曉蘭(2001)。中小學課程改革與教學革新。台北:元照出版。蕭昭君譯(1997)。K. G. Wilson著全是贏家的學校(Redesigning education)。台北:天下文化。
鄧運林(1995)。開放教育新探索(上)。高雄:復文圖書。
鄧運林(1994)。台北縣實施開放教育之背景、緣起與構想。北縣教育,2,28-33頁。
鄧運林(1995)。開放教育新策略。高雄:復文圖書。
鄧運林(1997)。開放教育與教育改革。高雄:復文圖書。盧美貴、廖雪珍(1988)。緒川學校。台北市:師大書苑。
鍾啟泉(1989)。現代課程論。上海:上海教育。
鐘敏綺、張世忠(2002)。奠基於建構主義的STS於自然與生活科技領域之應用。科學教育月刊,254, 2-15。
戴雲卿(2003)。校園Croak! Croak! Croak!。文章發表於歐用生˙莊梅枝(主編)讓英語與其他領域交心(頁52-81)。台北縣:中華民國教材研究發展學會。
關永中(2000)。知識論(上下冊)。台北:五南。
魏明通(1994)。各國STS課程教材評介(三):日本的科學/技術/社會(STS)教育。科學教育月刊,170,11-22。
魏明通(1997)。科學教育。台北:五南。
蘇育任、陳素琴(1998)。將STS理念融入國小自然科課程的嘗試。載於台北市立師範學院主辦八十七學年度教育學術研討會:數理類論文1-30頁。1998/11/26-27日。
羅厚輝(2002)。課程發展的理論基礎。台北:學富文化。
二、西文部份
AAAS(2004).Project 2061:A long term AAAS initiative to advance literacy in science, mathematics and technology. Retrieved March,3, 2004 from
http://www.project2061.org/default_flash.htm
Aoki, T. T.(1988). Toward a dialectic between the conceptual world and the lived world: transcending instrumentalism in curriculum orientation. In W. F. Pinar(Ed.)(1999). Contemporary curriculum discourses.(pp.402-416).Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
Apple, M. W.(1971). The hidden curriculum and the nature of conflict. Interchange, 2(4), 27-40.
Apple, M. W.(1979). Ideology and curriculum. Routledge :Chapman and Hall.
Apple, M. W.(2000).Standards, markets, and curriculum. In B. M. Franklin(Ed.)Curriculum and consequence(pp. 55-74). New York: Teachers College Press.
Applebee, A. N., Burroughs, R. & Cruz G.(2000). In S. Wineburg & P. Grossman(Eds.). Interdisciplinary curriculum : Challenges to implementation(pp.93-111). New York & London: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Arends, R. I.(1997). Classroom instruction and management . Boston:McGraw-Hill.
ASCD(1998).Planning integrated units:A concept-based approach. Facilitator’s Guide. Alexandria: ASCD.
ASCD(1999).Curriculum mapping:Charting the course for content.(videocassette).ASCD.
Ascher, C.(1984). The 1983 educational reform reports. Eric clearinghouse on urban education. New York: ED252636.
Ausubel, D. P.(1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Beane James A.(1997). Curriculum integration:Designing the core of democratic education. New York: Teachers College.
Bernstein ,B.(1971).On the classification and framing of educational knowledge. In MFD Young(Ed.)(pp. 47-49.).Knowledge and control:New directions for the sociology of education. Collier-Macmillan, London,
Blanck, Guillermo(1990)Vygotsky:The man and his cause. In Luis C. Moll(Ed.)Vygotsky and education:Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology.(pp.31-58). New York:Cambridge University Press
Blase, J. & Blase J. R.(1994). Empowering Teachers. Thousand Oaks, Clifornia: Corwin Press, Inc.
Blase, J.;Blase J.; Anderson G. L. & Dungan Sherry(1995).Democratic Principals in Action. Thousand Oaks, Clifornia: Corwin Press, Inc.
Blase J. & Anderson G.(1995). The micropolitics of educational leadership: From control to empowerment. London:Cassell Wellington House.
Blase J. & Blase J.(1998).Handbook of instructional leadership: How really good principals promote teaching and learning. Thousand Oaks, Califormia: Corwin Press, Inc.
Blase J. & Blase J.(2004).Handbook of instructional leadership(Second edition): How successful principals promote teaching and learning. Thousand Oaks, Califormia: Corwin Press.
Blum,A.(1991).Integrated science studies. In A. Lewy (Ed.)The international encyclopedia of curriculum.(pp.163-167) New York: Pergamon Press.
Blunden, Andy(1997).Vygotsky and the dialectical method.
Retrieved April,5, 2004 from
http://www.marxists.org/archive/vygotsky/works/comment/vygotsk1.htm
Bobbit, F.(1918). Scientific method in curriculum-making. In D.J.S. J.(Eds.) The curriculum studies reader(pp. 9-16). N.Y.: Routledge.
Brandt, R.(1991). On interdisciplinary curriculum: A conversation with Heidi Hayes Jacobs. Educational Leadership Magazine, 49(2),24-26.
Bridges, D.(1999,11月). Curriculum integration:reflections on the English experience. 國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所專題演講講義。
Bowers, C.(1980). Curriculum as cultural reproduction: An examination of the metaphor as carrier of ideology. Teachers College Record, 82(2), 267-290.
Broundy, H. S.(1988). Aesthetics and the curriculum. In W. F. Pinar(Ed.) Contemporary curriculum discourses.(pp.332-342). Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
Bruner, J. S.(1960,1994). The importance of structure and the spiral curriculum. In G. Willis, W. H. Schubert, R. V. Bullough,Jr.,C. Kridel,& J. T. Holton(Eds.).The American curriculum:a documentary history(pp.355-361).Westport, Connecticut:Praeger.
Carson, R.(1962,1987).Silent spring. Boston: Houghton Mifflin company.
Clay, M. M., Cazden, C. B.(1990). A Vygotsky interpretation of reading
recovery. In Luis C. Moll(Ed.)Vygotsky and education:Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology. (pp.206-222). New York:Cambridge University Press.
Cummins, J.(1976).The Influence of Bilingualism on Cognitive Growth:A Synthesis of Research Findings and Explanatory Hypothesis. Working Papers on Bilingualism ,9,1-43.
Connelly, F. M. & Clandinin, D. J(1988)Teachers as curriculum planners: Narratives of experience. N. Y.: Teachers College Press.
Conran, P. C.(1989).Foreword. In H. H. Jacobs (Ed.) .Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation. Alexandria: ASCD.
Daresh, J. C.(1985).Platform building:A tool for managerial
effectiveness. School business affair, 51(4),52-68.
Dewey, J.(1902).The child and the curriculum. In G. Willis, W. H. Schubert, R. V. Bullough, jr., C. Kridel, & J. T. Holton(1994). The American curriculum: A documentary history.(pp.123-130). London: Westport. Connecticut.
Dewey, J.(1959). Democracy and education. New York:Macmillan.
Dewey, J.(1933,1986). How we think. New York: D. C. Heath.
Dewey, J.(1938). Experience and education. N.Y.:Collier Books.
DePencier, I.(2004).The history of the university of Chicago laboratory school. Retrieved March,26, 2004 from
http://www.ucls.uchicago.edu/About/history/book.html.
Doll, J. W.(1989). Foundations of a postmodern curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies ,21, 243-253.
Doyle, Walter(1992). Curriculum and pedagogy. In P. W. Jackson(Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum(pp.363-401). NY:Macmillan.
Drake, S. M.(1998). Creating integrated curriculum: Proven ways increase student learning. Ca. Corain Press.
Edward T. & Clark, Jr.( 1997 ). Designing and implementing an integrated curriculum .Brandon, Holstic Education Press.
Eisner, E.(1984). No easy answers: Joseph Schwab’s contribution to curriculum. Curriculum inquiry. 14(2). 201-210.
Ellsworth, J. B. A survey of educational change models. Eric clearinghouse on information and technology Syracuse N Y. ED444597.
English, F. W.(1980). Curriculum mapping. Educational Leadership,37(7),558-559.
Erickson, H. L.(1995). Stirring the head, heart, and soul. California : Corwin Press.
Fairbairn, B. & Fulton, M.(2000).Interdisciplinarity and the transformation of the university. Saskatoon, SK. Canada:Centre for the Study of Co-operatives, University of Saskatchewan.
Foley, R.(2002).Conceptual diversity in epistemology. In P. K. Moser(Ed.)The Oxford handbook of epistemology.(pp.177-203).New York:Oxford University Press Inc.
Foshay A. W.(2000)The curriculum:Purpose, Substance , Practice.
New York:Teachers College Press.
Francis W. Parker school(2004). Home Page.
Retrieved March,25, 2004 from
http://www.fwparker.org/。
Freire, P.(1983).Pedagogy of the oppresses. New York:The continuum Publishing Corporation.
Freeland Kent & Hammons Karen( 1998). Curriculum for integrated learning. Boston, Delmar Publishers.
Fullan , M., & Stiegelbauer, S.(1991).The new meaning of educational change. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Fullan , M., S.(2001). Leading in a culture of change . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Gardner, H.(1983).Frames of mine. New York: Basic Book.
Gardner, H.(1985).The mind’s new science. New York: Basic Book.
Gardner, H.(1991). The unschooled mind. New York: Basic Book.
Gardner, H.(1993). Multiple intelligence. New York: Basic Book.
Gardner, H.(1994).Teaching for understanding-Within and aross the disciplines . Educational Leadership. 51,5.14-18.
Garrison, J. & Leach, M.(2001).Dewey after Derrida. In Virginia Richardson(ed.).Handbook of research on teaching(4th Ed.) .
Giroux, H. A. (1980). Dialectics and the development of curriculum theory. In W. F. Pinar(ED.).(1999). Contemporary curriculum discourses: Theory years of JCT.(pp.7-23).New York: Peter Lang.
Goodlad, J. I.(1979).Curriculum inquiry: The study curriculum practice. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Goodlad, J.I. (1984). A place called school. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Goodlad, J. I. & Su, Zhixin(1992). Organization of the curriculum. In P. W. Jackson(Ed.). Handbook of research on curriculum.(pp. 327-344). NY: Macmillan.
Goodlad, John I(2000).Foreword, In S. Wineburg & P. Grossman(Eds.). Interdisciplinary curriculum : Challenges to implementation .(pp.vii-xii). New York & London: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Goodson, Ivor(1991). On understanding curriculum: The alienation of curriculum theory. In I. F. Goodson & R. Walker(Eds.). Biography, Identity & schooling : Episodes in educational research.(pp.17-36) London: The Falmer Press.
Gough, A.(1998). Beyond Eurocentrism in science education: Promises and problematics from a Feminist poststructuralist perspective. In W. F. Pinar(Ed.). Curriculum: Toward new identities(pp.185-210). New York: Garland.
Gough, N.(1999). Understanding curriculum systems. In James G. Henderson and K. R. Kesson(Eds.)Understanding democratic curriculum leadership. (pp.47-69). New York : Teachers College Press.
Greene, M.(1991). Texts and margins. Harvard Educational Review, 61(1),27-39.
Grossman, P., Wineburg, S. & Beers, S.(2000). Introduction: When theory meets practice in the world of school. In Sam Wineburg & Pam Grossman(Eds.). Interdisciplinary curriculum. New York & London: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Grumet, M. R.(1992). Existential and phenomenological foundation of autobiographical method. In W. Pinar &W. Reynolds(Eds.). Understanding curriculum as phenomenological and deconstructed text(pp.28-42). NY: Teachers College Press.
Grundy, S.(1987). Curriculum:Product or praxis. Philadelphia, PA:The Falmer
Hamel, F. L.(2000). Disciplinary landscapes, interdisciplinary collaboration: A case study. In Sam Wineburg & Pam Grossman(Eds.). Interdisciplinary curriculum : Challenges to implementation .(pp.74-92). New York & London: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Hammerness, K., & Moffett, K.(2000). The subjects of debate: Techers’ clashing and overlapping. In S. Wineburg & P. Grossman(Eds.). Interdisciplinary curriculum : Challenges to implementation .(pp.134-152). New York & London: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Harms, W., & DePencier, I.(2004).Experiencing education 100 years of learning at The University of Chicago Laboratory School. Retrieved March,26, 2004 from
http://www.ucls.uchicago.edu/Administration/alumni/EE/
Haynes, C. J.(1987). Education and economic development.
Retrieved March,23, 2004 from
http://www.ericdigests.org/pre-928/economic.htm
Hayles, N. K.(1990). Chaos bound: Orderly disorder in contemporary literature and science.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Hedegaard, M.(1990). The zone of proximal development as basis for instruction. In L. C. Moll(Ed.) Vygotsky and education:Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology. (pp.349-371). New York:Cambridge University Press.
Henderson, J. G., & Hawthorne R. D.(1995). Transformative curriculum leadership. New Jersey:Merrill.
Henderson, James G.(1992). Curriculum discourse and the question of empowerment. Theory into Practice. 31(3), 204-209.
Hoggan, D. L.,(1986). Plato’s dialectic vs. Hegel and Marx: An evaluation of five revolutions. The Journal for Historical Review. 6(1),67-83.
Hueberner, D.(1976). Toward a political economy of curriculum and human development. In A. Molnar & J. A. Zahorik(Eds.)Curriculum theory(pp. 92-107). Washington, D.C.: ASCD.
Hutchins, R. M.(1936). The higher learning in America. Michigan: Yale University Press.
Hutchins, R. M.(1943).Education for freedom. Louisiana state: University Press.
Hutchins, R. M.(1952).The great conversation. New York: Encyclopedia Britannica.
Hutchins, R. M.(1968).The learning society . New York :The new American Libraryyt.
Hwang, J. J., & Chang C. Y.(2003).Curriculum study in Taiwan: Retropect and prospect. In W. F. Pinar(Ed.) International handbook of curriculum research .(pp.595-606). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Jacobs, H.H.(1989).Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation. Washington, D.C.:ASCD.
Jacobs, H. H.(1997). Designing with rigor:Crafting interdisciplinary high school curricula. The High School Magazine, 4(3),32-37.
Jacobs, H.H.(1999a). Curriculum mapping: Charting the course for content. Washington, D.C.:ASCD.
Jacobs, H.H.(1999b)Mapping big the picture. Alexandria, Va.: ASCD.
jagodzinski, j.(1992). Curriculum as felt through six layers of an aesthetically embodied skin: The arch-Writing on the body. In W. Reynolds(Eds.).Understanding curriculum as phenomenological and deconstructed text(pp.159-183).NY: Teachers College Press.
Jeannot, T.(2001). Hegel’s dialectic: logic of capital — or of freedom ? Retrieved March,26, 2004 from
http://www.newsandletters.org/Issues/2001/July/1.07_essay.htm
Jorgensen, C. M.(1995). Essential question:inclusive answer. Educational Leadership. 52(4),52-55.
Johnson, Jr. M.(1967). Definitions and models in curriculum theory. Educational Theory. 17(2), 127-140.
Kelly, A. V.(1999). The curriculum and the study of the curriculum. In The curriculum: Theory and practice.(4th Ed.).(pp.1-22). London: Paul Chapman.
Kerr, Stephen T.(1999). Visions of Sugarplums: The future of technology, education, and the schools. In M. Early & K. Rehage(Eds.).Issues in Curriculum: Selected essays from NSSE yearbooks. Chicago, ILL: NSSE.
Kesson K. R.(1999). Toward a Curriculum of Mythopoetic Meaning. In J. G. Henderson & K. R. Kesson(Eds.)Understanding democratic curriculum leadership .(pp.84-105). New York: Teachers Coolege, Columbia University.
Kliebard, H. M.(1981). Dewey and the Herbartians: The genesis of a theory of curriculum. In W. F. Pinar(Ed.)(1988). Contemporary curriculum discourses.(pp.66-79).Arizona:Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
Klotz, J. & Whiting, M.(1998). Integrating curriculum and instruction: Administrative practice to create new educational leaders.
Retrieved March,11, 2004 from
http://www.ncrel.org/tech/elearn/techsys.htm
Koss, A. (1999).What is the curriculum. In W. Pinar(ed.)Curriculum construction and critique(pp.8-17). London: Falmer Press.
Kuhn, T.S.(1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
Lauritzen, C. & Jaeger, M.(1997).Integrating learning through story : The narrative curriculum. New York:Delmar Publishers.
Lewy, A.(Ed.).1991. The international encyclopedia of curriculum. New York:Pergamon.
Lochhead, J., Yager, R. E.(1996).Is science sinking in a sea of knowledge? A theory of conceptual drift. In R. E. Yager(ed.). Science/technology/society as reform in science education.(pp.25-38).New York: State University of New York Press.
Lowry, C. M.(1989). Supporting and facilitating self-directed learing.
Retrieved March,13, 2004 from
http://www.ntlf.com/html/lib/bib/89dig.htm
Lutz, M.(1996).The congruency of the STS approach and contructivism.
In Robert E. Yager(ed.). Science/technology/society as reform in science education.pp.39-52.New York: State University of New York Press.
Macdonald, J. B.(1974). A transcendental developmental ideology of education: In W. Pinar(Ed.). Hightened consciousness, cultural revolution, and curriculum theory. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
Macdonald, J. B.(1988). Theory- practice and the hermeneutic circle. In W. F. Pinar(Ed.)Contemporary curriculum discourses. Scottsdale, Arizona: Gorsuch Scarisbrick, Publishers.
Macdonald, J.(1988). Curriculum, consciousness, and social change. In W. Pinar(Ed.) Contemporary curriculum discourses.(pp.156-174)Scottsdale, AR: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
Macdonald, J. B.(1988). Theory- practice and the hermeneutic circle. In W. F. Pinar(Ed.)Contemporary curriculum discourses. (pp.101-113)Scottsdale, Arizona: Gorsuch Scarisbrick, Publishers.
van Manen, Max(1982). Phenomenological pedagogy. Curriculum Inquiry, 12(3), 283-299.
McCarthy, C.(1998)The uses of culture: Canon Formation, Postcolonial Literature, and the multicultural project. In W. F. Pinar(Ed.). Curriculum: Toward new identities(pp.253-262). New York: Garland.
McNeil, J. D.(1977). Curriculum administration principles and techniques of curriculum development. New York: Collier-Macmillon.
Mansilla, V. B., Miller, W. C., & Gardner, H.(2000).On disciplinary lenses and interdisciplinary work. In Sam Wineburg & Pam Grossman(Eds.). Interdisciplinary curriculum : Challenges to implementation .(pp.17-38). New York & London: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Martinello M. L., & Cook, G. E.(1994).Interdisciplinary inquiry in teaching and learning. New York:Macmillan College Publishing Company.
Marsh, C.J. (1997). Planning, Management and ideology : Key concepts for understanding curriculum 2. London: The falmer press.
Martinello, M. L(2000).Interdisciplinary inquiry in teaching and learning. New Jersey : Merrill, an imprint of prentice Hall.
Massell, D.(1994).Achieving consensus: Setting the agenda for state curriculum reform. In R. F. Elmore & S. H. Fuhrman(eds.)(1994)The governance of curriculum. (pp.84-108).Virginia: ASCD.
Munro, P.(1998). Engendering curriculum history. In W. F. Pinar(Ed.).Curriculum: Toward new identities(pp.263-294). New York:
Garland.
Myers, L.(1996).Mastery of basic concepts. In Robert E. Yager(ed.). Science/technology/society as reform in science education. (pp.3-15).New York: State University of New York Press.
NCTM(1980).An agenda for action: Recommendations for school mathematics of the 1980s. Virginia : The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Neadley, R. L., & Evans, N. D.(1967). Handbook for effective curriculum development. London:Prentice-Hall International.
Noddings, N.(1992). Gender and the curriculum. In P. W.Jackson(Ed.)Handbook of research on curriculum. (pp.659-684). NY: Macmillan.
Noffke, Susan E.(1998). Multicultural curricula: “Whose knowledge?”and beyond. In L. E. Beyer & M. W. Apple(Eds.)The curriculum: problem, politics, and possibilities(2nd ed.).(pp.101-116). NY: SUNY Press.
Ollman, B.(2003).Dance of the dialectic: Steps in Marx’s method. Champaign:University of Illinois Press.
Perkins, D. N.(1991)Educating for insight, Educational Leadership. 49,2,4-8
Phenix, P. H.(1964). Realms of meaning. In G. Willis et al.(eds.)The American curriculum:A documentary history. London: Westport, Connecticut.
Phenix, P. H.(1971,1975). Transcendence and the curriculum. Teachers College Record, 73. 2,(pp.271-283).Reprinted in W. Pinar(Ed.), Curriculum theorizing: The reconceptualists(pp.321-337). Berkeley, CA:McCUtchan.
Piaget, J.(1972). The principles of genetic epistemology. London:Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Pinar, W.(1975). Currere: Toward reconceptualization. In William
Pinar(Ed.). Curriculum theorizing(pp.396-414). Berkeley: McCuuutchan.
Pinar, W. F., Reynolds, W. M., Slattery, P. & Taubman, P. M.(1995). Understanding curriculum: An instruction . In W. F. Pinar et al.(Eds.), Understanding curriculum(pp.3-65).NY: Peter Lang.
Posner, G. J.(1995). Analyzing the curriculum (2nd ed.). New York:
McGraw-Hill.
Pinar, W. F.(1978). The reconceptualization of curriculum studies. Journal of Curriculum Studies. 10(3), 205-214.
Popper, K. R.(1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London, Harper
Torchbooks.
Post, T. R., Ellis, A. K., Humphreys, A. H. & Buggey, L. J.(1997).Interdisciplinary approaches to curriculum: Themes for taching. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Ravitch, D.(1995). National standards in American education:A citizen’s guide. Washington, D.C. : The Brooking Institution.
Radnor, H. A.( 1994). Across the curriculum. London: Cassell.
Resnick, L.B.&Hall, M.W.(1999). Learning organizations for sustainable education reform. 論文發表於台灣師範大學科學教育研究所主辦課程與教學國際研討會。 1999年12月10-12日。
Renyi,J.(2000).Hunting the quark : Interdisciplinary curricula in public schools. In S. Wineburg & P. Grossman(Eds.). Interdisciplinary curriculum : Challenges to implementation(pp.39-56). New York & London: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Schrag, F.(1992). Conceptions of knowledge. In P. W. Jackson(ed.)Handbook of research on curriculum.(pp.268-301).New York: Macaillan Publishing company.
Schwab, J. J.(1962). The concept of the structure of a discipline. In Giroux, H. A. Penna, A. N. & Pinar, W. F.(Eds.). Curriculum & instruction: alternatives in education.(pp.51-68). McCutchan Corporation.
Schwab, J. J.(1964). Structure of the disciplines:Meanings and significances. In G. Ford & L. Pugno (Eds.),The structure of knowledge and the curriculum. (pp.1-30).Chicago,IL: Rand Mcnally..
Schwab, Joseph J.(1970). The practical: A language for curriculum. School Review. 78(1). 1-23.
Schubert, W. H.(1986). Curriculum: perspective, paradigm, and possibility. New York : Macmillan publishing company.
Schubert, W. H.(1992). Practitioners influence curriculum theory: Autobiographical reflections. Theory into Practice . 31,(3). 236-244.
Sears, J. T.(1992). The second wave of curriculum theorizing : Labyrinths, Orthodoxies, and other legacies of the glass bead game. Theory into Practice. 31 (3),210-218.
Sinclair, R.L., & Ghory, W. J.(1979). Curriculum as environments for learning. Social studies/social science education. ED170221.
Smith, David G.(1996). Identity, self, and other in the conduct of pedagogical action: An east/west inquiry. In W. F. Pinar(Ed.)(1999). Contemporary curriculum discourses: Theory years of JCT. (pp.458-473).New York: Peter Lang.
Smith, E.(1994). Mathematics, computers and people:Individual and social perspectives. In Paul Ernest(Ed.)Constructing mathematical knowledge: Epistemology and mathematics education.(pp.73-91). Washington, D. C.:The Falmer Press.
Sowell, E. J.(2000).Curriculum:An integrative introduction(2nd ed.).New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Stephen T., & Lafer Stephen(1996).The interdisciplinary teacher’s handbook.: integrated teaching across the curriculum .Portsmouth, NH : Boynton / Cook Publishers.
Stevenson, C. & Carr, J, F.(1993). Integrated studies in the middle grades: Dancing through walls. New York & London: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Taba, H.(1962). Curriculum development:Theory and practice. San Francisco:Harcourt, Brace & World.
Tanner, D., & Tanner, L.(1975). Curriculum development:Theory into practice. New York, NY:Macmillan.
Tanner, D. & Tanner, L.(1990). History of the school curriculum. New York: Macmillan.
Tanner, D., & Tanner, L.(1995). Curriculum development:Theory into practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill.
Tchudi, S., & Lafer, S.(1996). The interdisciplinary teacher’s handbook: Interated teaching across the curriculum. Portsmouyh:Boyton/Cook Publishers.
Til, W. V.(1974).Curriculum:quest for relevance. Boston:Houghton Mifflin Company.
Tyack, D., & Tobin, W.(1994). The“ grammar” of schooling:Why has it been so hard to change? American Educational Research Journal , 31,453-479.
Tyler, Ralph W.(1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
Tyler, Ralph W.(1975).Specific approaches to curriculum development. In J. Schaffarzick & D.H. Hampson(Eds.). Strategies for curriculum development.(pp.17-33). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
U.C.L.S.(1994). Mission statement. Retrieved March,12, 2004 from
http://www.ucls.uchicago.edu/About/missionstatement.html
Unruh, G. G.(1975).Responsive curriculum development:Theory and action. Berkeley, California:McCutchan Publishing Corporation.
von Glasserfeld, E.(1989). Constructivism in education. In T. Husen &N. Postlethwaie(Eds.). International encyclopedia of education,(pp.162-163).Oxford, England:Pergamon.
Vygotsky(1962). Thought and language, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Vygotsky(1981).The genesis of higher mental functions. In J. V. Wertsch(Ed.). The concept of activity in Soviet psychology. Armonk, NY:
Sharpe.
Wells, A. S.(1990)School choice: Issues and concerns for urban education. Eric clearinghouse on urban education .New York: NY. ED322275.
Wertsch, James V.(1990). The voice of rationality in a sociocultural approach to mind. In Luis C. Moll(Ed.)Vygotsky and education:Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology. (pp.111-126). New York:Cambridge University Press.
Wheeler, B.(2003).The interdisciplinary music therapist. 2004年6月15日,取自http://www.voices.no/columnist/colwheeler020603.html.
Willis, G. et al.(eds.).(1994).The American curriculum:A documentary. London: Westport. Connecticut..
Wood, K. E. ( 2001) Interdisciplinary instruction. New Jersey, Merrill Prentice Hall.
Yager, R. E.(1996).History of science/technology/society as reform in the United States. In R. E. Yager(ed.). Science/technology/society as reform in science education. (pp.3-15).New York: State University of New York Press.
Yamasaki, E.(1998)Effective polices for remedial education.
Retrieved March,26, 2004 from
http://www.ericdigests.org/1998-3/remedial.html
Young, Micharel F. D.(1971). Knowledge and control: New directions for the sociology of education. London, Collier-Macmillan.
Zahorik, J. A.(1997). “Encouraging----and Challenging ---- Students’ Understandings”. Educational Leadership, 54(6)30-32.
Zmuda, A., Kuklis R. & Kline, E.(2004). Transforming schools: Creating a culture of continuous improvement. Alexandria: ASCD.