參考書目
一、中文參考文獻
王仲春、李元中、顧莉蕾、孫名符（1995）。數學思維與數學方法論。台北市：建宏出版社。
王淑敏（2000）。班級團體輔導技巧。班級輔導活動設計指引，15~25。台北市：張老師出版社。
王琇慧（2001）。肢體障礙國中生之數學認知─一個建構教學的行動研究。未出版碩士論文，國立彰化師範大學，彰化市。
方吉雄（2001）。原住民國中學生的文字符號概念與代數文字題的解題研究。國立高雄師範大學數學研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。
毛柄楠(2005)。國民小學數學教師教學鷹架策略分析之個案研究。未出版碩士論文，國立台中師範學院，台中市。
田万海（1992）。數學教育學。浙江：教育出版社。
古明峰（2000）。教學評量的現況與發展。國教世紀，189，35-42。
田秀蘭(2000)。紮根理論在諮商心理學研究中的應用。輔導季刊，36(4)，35-40。
朱則剛（1994）。建構主義知識論與情境認知的迷思---兼談其對認知心理學的意義。教學科技與媒體，13，13-14。任樟輝（1999）。數學思維論。廣西省：教育出版社。
沈中偉(1994)。魏考斯基理論在認知策略上的應用。教學科技與媒體，2，23-31。李其維（1995）。皮亞傑心理邏輯學。台北市：揚智出版社。
李永吟、單文經(1995)。教學原理。台北市:遠流出版社。
巫正成（2000）。數學對話促進國一學生數學理解之個案研究。未出版碩士論文，國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
李長燦（2003）。發展對話與反省社群的國小數學教學模式之研究— Vygotsky「可能發展區」概念的探討與實踐。未出版博士論文，國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
李美蓮（2004）。一位國二學生在等差數列解題表現之研究。未出版碩士論文，國立嘉義大學，嘉義市。
李佩玟(2006)。國小六年級學童發現數列樣式的推理歷程之分析研究。未出版碩士論文，國立臺北教育大學，台北市。
林尹、高明主編（1985）。中文大辭典。台北市：私立中國文化大學。
邱上真(1989)。後設認知研究在輕度障礙者教學上的應用。特殊教育季刊，（30），12-16。邱上真(1991)。學習策略教學的理論與實際。特殊教育復健學報，（1），1-49。林清山、張景媛(1993)。國中生後設認知、動機信念與數學解題策略之關係研究。教育心理學報，26，53-74。張景媛(1994)。國中生代數應用題教學策略效果之評估。國立台灣師範大學心理與輔導學系教育心理學報，27，35-62。林福來(1997)。教學思維的發展：整合數學教學知識的教材教法（1/3）。國科會專題研究計畫報告（頁45-82），台北市：台灣師範大學數學系.
周立勳、劉祥通(1998)。寫作活動對國小學生數學解題能力的影響。教育研究資訊，6(3)，46-62。林文生、鄔瑞香（1999）。另類教與學：數學教育的藝術與實務。台北市：心理出版社。邱美虹、劉嘉茹、周金城、梁家祺（1999）。認知師徒制對學生化學概念改變的影響。中華民國第十五屆科學教育學術研討會（頁64-76），國立彰化師範大學。
周筱亭（2000）。從課程標準到課程綱要—以數學學習領域為例，九年一貫課程的教與學（頁33-46）。台北市：台灣省國民學校教師研習會。
林福來（2001）。數學師資教育研究。台北市：國立台北師範學院演講。
吳玫瑤（2001）。教學對高中生學習函數概念的影響。未出版碩士論文，國立台灣師範大學，台北市。
林達森（2002）。合作學習在九年一貫課程的應用。教育研究資訊，10（2），87-103。林福來、吳家怡、李源順、鄭英豪、連秀巒、林佳蓉、朱綺鴻、陳姿妍、林春慧(2002)。數學證明的暸解(Ⅱ)，國科會專題研究計畫成果報告。NSC 84-2511-S003-072。
胡炳生（1994）。數學解題思維方法。台北市：九章出版社。
柯華葳、幸曼玲(1996)。討論過程中的互動-年齡與推理能力的影響。皮亞傑與維高斯基的對話學術研討會會議手冊（頁34-76）。台北市：台北市立師範學院。
姚如芬(1998)。從教學研究實作中學習教學－以數學科職前教師為例。未出版博士論文，國立彰化師範大學，彰化市。
孫志麟（1991）。自我效能的基本概念及其在教育上的應用。教育研究，22，47-54。孫志麟（1992）。生手如何才能成為專家呢?:教師專業表現之探討。師友，297，21-25。
涂金堂(1995)。分析哲學對教育的啟示。教育研究，4，193-207。
席振偉（1995）。數學的思維方式。江蘇省：江蘇教育出版社。
徐椿樑(2001)。鷹架學習理論在專業技術教學的成效分析之研究。未出版博士論文，國立臺灣師範大學，台北市。
翁嘉聲（2001）。國小數學教學形成全體討論文化之個案研究。未出版碩士論文，國立台北師範學院，台北市。
曹才翰、蔡金法（1989）。數學教育叢書。上海市：上海教育出版社。
郭汾派、林光賢和林福來（1989）。國中生文字符號概念的發展。國科會專題研究計劃報告。
陳李綢（1991）。個案研究。台北市：五南出版社。
陳密桃（1992）。從認知心裡學的觀點談閱讀理解。台灣高雄師範大學「教育文粹」，21，10-19。
教育部（1993）。國民小學課程標準。台北市：教育部。
許良榮（1993）。談建構主義之理論觀點與教學的爭論。國教輔導，33（5）， 7-12。
陳淑敏（1995）。Vygotsky 的心理發展理論和教育。屏東師院學報，7，121-143。
教育部（1995）。國民中學課程標準。台北市：教育部。
郭重吉（1996）。建構論：科學哲學的省思。教育研究， 49，16-24。陳正乾（1996）。從維高斯基（Vygotsky）的理論來討論其對幼兒教育的應用。現代教育論壇，1，160-165。
陳淑敏（1996）。社會性互動對認知發展的影響。八十四學年度師範學院教育學術論文發表會論文集（頁153-189），台北市：台北市立師範學院。
陳儀君（1998）。國中學生在現實情境中解決測量問題的解題思維與互動歷程之研究。未出版碩士論文，國立台灣師範大學，台北市。
教育部（2001）。國民小學九年一貫課程暫行綱要。台北市：教育部。陳育琳（2002）。數學對話影響國三學生數學理解之探究。九十一學年度師範院校教育學術論發表會論文集（頁261-294），嘉義市：嘉義師範學院。
陳育琳(2003)。國中數學實施統整課程之行動研究---以幾何課程為例。系統思維模式提昇九年一貫課程實施成效研討會論論文集（頁64-86）。台中市：台中師範學院。
教育部（2003）。九年一貫數學學習領域課程綱要（第五版草案）。台北市：教育部。
許瑛玿，洪榮昭（2003）。皮亞傑認知發展階段的新詮釋。科學教育月刊，260，2-9。
曹亮吉（2003）。阿草的數學聖盃。台北市：天下遠見出版社。
陳定邦（2004）。鷹架教學概念在成人學習歷程上應用之研究。未出版博士論文，國立台灣師範大學，台北市。黃敏晃（1986）。數學世界萬花筒。台北市：牛頓出版社。
黃敏晃（1987）。如何解數學題？ 數學解題策略簡介。科學月刊，18，515-522。
張春興 (1989)。張氏心理學辭典。台北市：東華書局。
黃敏晃 (1990)。幼兒數學概念的學習。台北市：信誼基金出版社。
張景媛（1990）。不同後設認知能力的大學生在學業成績與認知適應上之差異。測驗年刊，15，451-534。黃政傑（1992）。台灣省高級職業學校合作學習實驗研究。台北市：師大教研中心。
甯自強（1993）。國小數學科新課程的精神及改革動向—由建構主義的觀點來看。科學教育學刊，1（1），101－108頁。張春興（1994）。教育心理學－三化取向的理論與實踐。台北市：東華書局。
張景媛 (1994)。國中生數學學習歷程統整模式之研究。教育心理學報，27，141-174。張靜嚳(1995)。何謂建構主義？建構與教學，3。
張惠博（1995）。初任科學教師的專業成長。中華民國第十屆科學教育學術研討會論文彙編（頁801-826），彰化市：彰化師範大學。
張世忠（1996）。從社會建構論的觀點看學生的分享對概念學習上的重要性。興大人文社會學報，5，181-192。
黃政傑、林佩璇（1996）。合作學習。台北市：五南出版社。
張春興（1996）。教育心理學—三化取向的理論與實踐。台北市：東華書局。
張靜嚳（1996a）。傳統教學有何不妥？建構與教學，4。
張靜嚳（1996b）。建構教學：採用建構主義，如何教學？建構與教學，7。
張世忠(1997)。討論教學的技巧與發現。科學教育月刊，205，2-8。
張菀珍（1997）。鷹架理論在成人教學實務之應用。成人教育，40，43-52。
黃幸美（1997）。數學新課程學習評量之探討。國民小學數學新課程學習評量方法初探論文集（頁15-20），台北縣：台灣省國民學校教師研習會。
單文經（1998）。評鑑二種多元評量：真實評量與實作評量。北縣教育，25，46-52。
黃建瑜（1999）。國中理化教師試行合作學習之行動研究。未出版碩士論文，國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
游自達（1999）。國小數學科建構取向教學之作法與省思。各國初等教育改革國際學術研討會論文集（頁112-145），新竹市：國立新竹師院初等教育系暨國民教育研究所。
游麗卿（1999）。除法概念形成歷程中的錯誤分析對教學的啟示。臺北市：復文書局。張世忠（2000）。建構教學：理論與應用。臺北市：五南出版社。黃敏晃（2000）。規律的尋求。台北市：心理出版社。
黃俊儒（2000）。從社會互動與認知投入的觀點探討理化實驗課中學習機會之分佈。未出版博士論文，國立臺灣師範大學，台北市。彭聃齡、張必隱（2000）。認知心理學。台北市：東華書局。
張春興（2001）。教育心理學。台北市：東華書局。
單文經（2001）。由若干亞太國家的教育發展談起。教育資料與研究，43，39-44。黃瑞琴（2002）。質的教育研究法。 台北市：心理出版社。
游麗卿（2002）。從分析學生爭論解題記錄的合理性探討社會數學規範的內涵。第六屆課程與教學論壇學術研討會論文集（頁1-21），台北市：台北師範學院。
黃善美、黃萬居（2003）。以問題為中心的合作學習策略對國小學童科學學習之研究。科學教育研究與發展季刊，32，1-31。
.張家豪(2005)。教材、起點行為與學習成就的關係。未出版碩士論文，國立台灣師範大學，台北市。
甯自強（1993）。國小數學科新課程的精神及改革動向－由建構主義的觀點來看。科學教育學刊，1（1），101-108。
楊代誠（2002）。國中數學課室教師進行師生對談歷程及影響因素之研究。未出版碩士論文，國立彰化師範大學，彰化市。
廖琬秀（2000）。Norbert Wiener:數學天才的學習成長與學術發展的條件。未出版碩士論文，國立彰化師範大學，彰化市。
劉德明（1992）。教學習理論和建構主義之研究。花師數理教育學報，1，109-138。
鄭晉昌（1993）。從「情境學習」的認知觀點探討電腦輔助教學中教材內容的設計-由幾個學科教學系統談起。教學科技與媒體，12，3-4。劉錫麒（1994）。數學思考教學研究。台北市：師大書苑。
蔡聰明（1995）。代數是什麼？科學月刊，26（1），67-73。
潘宏明（1996）。建構主義與數學教育論文集。花蓮：真義出版社。
潘世尊（1997）。Rogers人本教育理論與建構主義的整合教學模式在國小一年級數學科教學應用之個案研究。未出版碩士論文，國立台中師院，台中市。
劉祥通（1997）。數學寫作教學策略初探。國民小學數學科新課程概說（頁224-263），台北市：台灣省國民學校教師研習會。
蔡敏玲（1998）。「內」、「外」之間與之外的模糊地帶：再思建構論之爭議。課程與教學季刊，1（3），81-96。蔡敏玲（2002）。教育質性研究歷程的展現－尋找教室團體互動的節奏與變奏。台北市：心理出版社。
潘世尊（2002）。教學上的鷹架要怎麼搭。屏東師院學報，16，263-294。蔡金法(2001)。常規數學問題解決能力等於非常規數學問題解決能力嗎？。「數學課程全面檢討：之後又如何？」研討會論文集（頁221-247）。香港：香港中文大學教育學院課程與教學學系及香港數學教育學會。
蔡文煥（2004）。協同教師發展有利數學意義產出之課室討論文化之研究。發表於海峽兩岸行動研究論文研討會。北京：北京師範大學。
鄭晉昌（1993）。自「情境學習」的認知觀點探討電腦輔助教學中教材內容的設計－從幾個學科教學系統談起。教育科技與媒體，12，3-14。蕭文強（1995）。為甚麼要學習數學。台北市：九章出版社。
鄭毓信(1998)。數學教育哲學。台北市：九章出版社。鄭毓信、李國偉（1999）。數學哲學中的革命。台北市：九章出版社。戴文賓(1999)。國一學生由算術領域轉入代數領域呈現的學習現象與特徵。未出版碩士論文，國立彰化師範大學，彰化市。
藍偉瑩（2001）。小組互動與概念改變機制之探討---以物質狀態與氣體性質概念為例。未出版碩士論文，國立台灣師範大學，台北市。
謝佳叡（2001）。國中生配方法學習歷程中之數學思維研究。未出版碩士論文，國立台灣師範大學，台北市。
鍾漢峰（2001）。高一學生科學問題組隊討論中的同儕關係與論證方式的影響分析。未出版碩士論文，國立台灣師範大學，台北市。
謝宜玲（2003）。在課堂討論情境下國一學生文字符號概念及運算相關法則的認知。未出版碩士論文，國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
魏麗敏 (1995)。後設認知學習理論與策略。學生輔導通訊，38，66-75。
蘇育任（1993）。「兒童的科學」研究之沿革與其對國小自然科教學之啟示。台中師範學院初等教育研究集刊，1，91-104。數學學習心理學（林義雄、陳澤民譯）（1985）。台北市：九章出版社。（原著出版年：1972）。
學習理論與教學應用（吳幸宜譯）（1994）。台北市：心理出版社。（原著出版年：1987）。
教室言談－教與學的語言（蔡敏玲、彭海燕譯）（1998）。臺北市：心理出版社。（原著出版年：1988）。
鷹架兒童的學習―維高斯基與幼兒教育（谷瑞勉譯）（1999）。臺北市：心理出版社。（原著出版年：1995）。
心理學（上）（洪蘭譯）(1997)。台北市：遠流出版社。（原著出版年：1991）。
質性研究概論 （徐宗國譯） (1997)。台北市：巨流出版社。(原著出版年：1985)。
幹嘛學數學？（葉偉文譯）（1999）。台北市：天下出版社。（原著出版年：1996）。
鷹架兒童的學習：維高思基與幼兒教育（谷瑞勉譯） (1999)。台北市：心理出版社。（原著出版年：1982）。
教育的文化：文化心理學的觀點（宋文里譯）（2001）。台北市：遠流文化。（原著出版年：1996）。
數學學習心理學（陳澤民譯） (2002)。台北市：九章出版社。(原著出版年：1987)。
教育心理學：理論與實務（王明傑，陳玉玲譯）（2002）。台北市：學富出版社。（原著出版年：1995）。
幼兒數學教材教法（何雪芳、陳彥文譯）(2003)。台北市：華騰出版社。（原著出版年：1998）。
二、西文文獻
Bentley, D., & Watts, M.. (1992). Communi- cating in school science. London: The Falmer Press.
Berk, L. E., & Winsler, A.. (1995). Scaffolding children’s learning: Vygotsky and early childhood education. Washington, D. C.: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
Bishop, J. W. (1997). Middle school students’understanding of mathematical patterns and their representations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Illinois State University .
Bishop, J. (2000). Linear geometric number patterns: Middle School Student's Strategies. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 12(2), 107-126.
Booth, L. R. (1988). Children’s difficulties in beginning algebra. In A. F. Coxford & A. P. Shulte (Eds.), The ideals of algebra (pp.20-32). Reston, VA: National Council of Teacher of Mathematics.
Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, and experience & school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Brown, A. L. (1980). Metacognitive development and reading. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issue in reading comprehension. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
Brown, J. S., & Burton, R.B. (1978) Diagnostic models for procedural bugs in basic mathematical skills. Cognitive Science, 2, 155-192.
Brown, J.S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
Cannella, G. S. (1993). Learning through social interaction: Shared cognitive experience, negotiation strategies, and joint concept construction for young children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 8, 427-444.
Cardelle-Elawar, M.. (1992). The meta-cognitive teacher as a multicultural educator. SCOPE, 91 (3), 6-12.
Carey, D. A . (1992). Research into practice: Student’s use of symbols. Arithmetic Teacher, 40, 86-184.
Carr, M., & Biddlecomb, B. (1998). Meta-cognition in mathematics: From a constructivist perspective. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. graesser(Eds.), Meta-cognition in educational theory and practice ,69-91. Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Clarkson S. P. (1970). A study of the relationships among translation skills and problem-solving abilities. New York: Academic Press.
Clements, D., & Battista, M. (1990). The effects of LOGO on children conceptualizations of angles and polygons. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(5), 356-371.
Clermont, P., A. N(1980). Social Interaction and Cognitive Development in Children. New York: Academic Press.
Cobb, P., Wood, T., & Yackel, E. (1990). Classrooms as learning environments for teachers and researchers. In R. B. Davis, C. A. Maher, & N. Noddings (Eds.), Constructivist views on teaching and learning mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Monograph,4, (pp. 125-146). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Cobb, P., Jaworski, B. & Presmeg, N. (1996). Emergent and socio-cultural view of mathematical activity. In L. P. Steffe & P. Nesher (Eds.), Theories of mathematical learning (pp. 3-19). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Conwell, C.R., Piel, J.A., & Cobb, K.R. (1988). Students’ perceptions when working in cooperative problem solving groups. Paper presented at the North Carolina Science Teachers Association Convention, Asheville, NC. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED313455)
Cook, J. (1995). Integrating math and writing. Teaching PreK-8, 25(4), 22-23.
Cooper, T. J.,Boulton-Lewis, G., Atweh, B., Pillay, H., & Wilss, L. (2000). Readiness for algebra. In T. Nakahra and M. Koyama (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th International Conference for Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2, 89-96. Japan Hiroshima University.
Costa, A. L. (1984). Mediating the meta-cognitive. Educational Leadership, 42(3), 57-62.
Day, J. D., & Cordon, L.A. (1993). Static and dynamic measures of ability: An experimental comparison.. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 75-82.
Driver, R., Guesne, E., Tiberghien, A., Richmond, G., & Striley, J. (1985). Children’s ideas and the learning of science. In Driver, R., Guesne, E., Tiberghien, A., Richmond, G., & Striley, J. (Eds.), Children’s ideas in science (pp.1-9). Milton Keynes, Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., Scott, P. (1994). Construction scientific know- ledge in the classroom. Journal of Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5-12.
Doolittle, P. E. (1998). Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development as a theory foundation for cooperative learning. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
Dougherty, B. J. (1996). The write way: A look at journal writing in the first-year algebra. The Mathematics Teacher, 89(7), 556-560.
Dover, A., & Shore, B. M.. (1991). Giftedness and flexibility on a mathematical setbreaking task.. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35(2), 99-105.
Doyle, W. (1986). Classroom organization and management. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3nd ed., pp.392-431). New York: Macmillan.
Dyson, A. (1990). Special educational needs and the concept of change. Oxford Review of Education, 16(1), 55-66.
Edelman, G. M. & Tononi, G. (2000).Consciousness : How Matter Becomes Imagination. New York : Basic Books.
Ernest, P. (1991). The Philosophy of Mathematics Education. UK: The Falmer Press.
Fawcett H. P. & Cummins K. B. (1970). The Teaching of Mathematics from Counting to
Calculus. Columbus, Ohio: Charles, Merrill.
Fennema, F., Carpenter, T. P., & Peterson, P. (1989). Teachers’ decision making and cognitively guided instruction: A new paradigm for curriculum development. InN. F. Ellerton & M. A. Clement (Eds.), School mathematics: The challenge to change (pp.87-174). Victoria: Australian University press.
Fernandez, M. & Anhalt, C. (2001). Transition toward algebra.. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 7(4), 236-241.
Flavell, J. H. (1976). Meta-cognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence(pp.231-235). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Flavell, J. H. (1987). The effects of question clarification and memory aids on young children’s performance on appearance reality tasks. Cognitive Development, 2, 127-144.
Forman, Ellice A., & Cazden, Courtney B. (1985). Exploring Vygotskian perspectives in education: The cognitive value of peer interaction. In James V. Wertsch (Eds.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Forman, E. A. (1989). The role of peer interaction in the social construction of mathematical knowledge. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 55-70.
Freudenthal, H. (1972). The Empirical Law of Large Numbers, or the Stability of Frequencies. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 4, 484-490.
Gallas, K. (1995). Talking their way into science. New York: Teachers College Press.
Gallimore, R., & Tharp, R. (1993). Teaching mind in society: Teaching , schooling, and literate discourse. In L.C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of socio-historical psychology，175-205. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gagne, R. M. and Briggs, L. J. (1988). Principles of Instructional Design. Walter W. Wagner. New York, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 3rd（ed.）.
Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York: Basic Books.
Garofalo, J., & Lester, F. K. (1985). Meta-cognition, cognitive monitoring and mathematical performance. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 16（3）, 163-176.
Garofalo, J. (1987). Meta-cognition and school mathematics. Arithmetic Teacher, 34（9）, 22-23.
Gawned, S. (1990). An emerging model of the language of mathematics. In J. Bickmore- Brand （Ed.）, Language in mathematics, 27-42. Carlton, Vic.：Australian Reading Association.
Gergen, K. J. (1995). Social construction and the educational process. In L. P. Steffe & J. Gale （Eds. ）, Constructivism in education,（pp.17-39）. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Press.
Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical Sensitivity. Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. Mill Valley, California: Sociology Press.
Gray, E. M., Tall, D. O. (1994). Duality, ambiguity, and flexibility: a "proceptual" view of simple arithmetic. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(2), 116-140.
Greenes, C. & Findell, C. (1999). Developing students’ algebraic reasoning abilities. In L. V. Stiff & F. R. Curcio (Eds.), Developing mathematical reasoning in grades K-12 (pp. 127-137). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Hart, L. C. (1993). Some factors that impede of enhance performance in mathematical problem solving. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24, 167-171.
Hayes, J. R.. (1985). Three problems in teaching general skills. In S. F. Chipman, J. W. Segal & R. Glaser（Ed.）, Thinking and learning skills: Volume 2, Research and open questions. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hayes, J.R.(1989). The Complete Problem Solver. Hillsdale, New Jersey : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Herbert, K. & Brown, R. H. (1997). Patterns as tools for algebraic reasoning. Teaching Children Mathematics, 3 (6), 340-344.
Hobbes, T. (1962). Discourse, learning, and teaching. Review of Research in Education, 21, 49-95.
Hogan, K., & Pressley, M. (1997). Scaffolding scientific competencies within classroom communities of inquiry. In K. Hogan & M. Pressl（Eds.）, Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches & Issues, 74-107. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
Huggins, B., & Maiste, T. （1999）. Communication in Mathematics. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 439016).
Hogan, K., & Pressley, M.. (1997). Scaffolding scientific competencies within classroom communities of inquiry. In K. Hogan & M. Pressley （Eds.）, Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches & Issues（pp. 74-107）. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
Johnson, D. W., ＆ Johnson, R. T.（1994）.Learning together and alone.（4rd.）. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Judithann, W. W. (1993). Weekend report: A qualitative study of the scaffolding strategies used by a teacher of children with handicaps during a "sharing time" discourse event. Dissertation: University of Cincinnati.
Kawanaka, T. & J. W. Stigler. (1999). Teachers’ use of questions in eighth-grade mathematics classrooms in Germany, Japan, and the United States. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1（4）, 255-278.
Kieran, C. （1990）. Cognitive Processes Involved in Learning School Algebra. In P. Nesher, & J. Kilpatrick（Ed.）, Mathematics and learning skills: Volume 2, Research and open questions. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kieran., C. (1992). The learning and teaching of school algebra. In Grouws, D.A.(Eds), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning: A Project of the NCTM.. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Kilpatrick, J. (1986). Editorial. Journal for Research in Science Teaching, 21(3), 235-254.
Laborde, C. (1990). Language and Mathematics. In P. Nesher, & J. Klipatrick（Ed.）, Mathematics and cognition : A Research Synthesis In by the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. NY: Cambridge University Press.
Langer, J. A. (1984). Instructional scaffolding: Reading and writing as natural language activities. Language Arts, 60, 168-175.
Lannin, J. K. (2003). Developing algebraic reasoning through generalization. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 8(7), 342-348.
Lerman, S. (1996). A case of interpretations of social: A response to Steffe and Thompson. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(2), 210-227.
Lewis, A. B. ＆ Mayer, R. E. (1987). Students’ miscomprehension of relational statements in arithmetic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79（4）, 363-371.
Lee, B. (1985). Intellectual Origins of Vygotsky’s Semiotic Analysis. In J. V. Wertsch(Ed.), Culture, Communication, and Cognition: Vygotskian Perspectives（pp. 66-92）. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, L (1987). The status and understanding of generalized algebraic statements by high school students. In J. C. Bergeron, N. Herscovics, & C. Kieran(Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th International.
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. New York: Alex Press.
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Science, semantics, and social change. Paper presented at annual meeting of the American Educational Research..（ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 334 828）.
Lepper, M. R., Aspinwall, L. G., Mummer, D. L., & Chabay, R. W. (1990). Self-perception and social-perception processes in tutoring: Subtle social control strategies of expert tutors. In J. M. Olson & M. P. Zann(Eds.). Self-inference process: The Ontario Symposium, 217-237. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum & Associate.
Lerman, S. (1996) Inter subjectivity in Mathematics Learning: A Challenge to the Radical Constructivist Paradigm. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(2), 133-150.
Leskow S. & Smock C. D. (1970). Developmental changes in problem-solving strategies: Permutation. Developmental Psychology, 412-422.
Lester, F. K. and Kerr, D. (1979). Some ideas about research methodologies in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 10, 228-232.
Lester, F. K. et al. (1989). The role of meta-cognition in mathematical problem solving：A study of two grade seven classes. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED314255)
Lester, F. K. (1995).Musing about mathematical problem-solving research: 1970-1994. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25（6）, 660-675, NCTM.
Lesh, R.A. (1982). Meta-cognition in mathematical problem solving. Unpublished manuscript.
Macgregor, M. & Stacey, K. (1993). Seeing a pattern and writing a rule. In I. Hirayabashi, N. Nohda, K. Shigematsu, & F. I. Lin(Eds.), In proceedings of the seventeenth international conference for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 88-181). Japan: Tsukuba.
Mason, J. (1996). Expressing generality and roots of algebra. In Bednarz, N.、Kieran, C. ＆ Lee, L.（Ed.）, Approaches to Algebra, Chap. 5, p65-86
Matlin, M. W.(1998). Cognition, Fort Worth, (4thEd.). TX: Harcourt Brace.
Mayer R. E. (1983). Thinking, problem solving, cognition. New York: W.H. Freeman.
Mayer R. E. (1985). Education Psychology: A Cognition Approach. New York: Freeeman
Mayer, A. M. (1987). Polyphenol oxidases in plants – recent progress. Phytochemistry 26,
11–20.
McClain, K., ＆ Cobb, P.（2001）.An analysis of development of socio mathematical norms in one first-grade classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 236-266.
Mead, G. H. (1964a). Gerorge Herbert mead on social psychology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Melanie, H., Diane, S. T., & John, T. (1998). Children's strategies with number patterns. Educational Studies, 24(3), 315-331.
Mead, G. H. (1964b). Selected writing. Edited by A. J. Reck. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Meyer, D. K. & Turner, J. C. (2002). Using instructional discourse analysis to study the scaffolding of student self-regulation. Educational Psychologist, 37(1), 17-25.
Miller, L. D. (1992). Begin mathematics class with writing. Mathematics Teacher, 85, 354-355.
Miller, S. P., & Mercer, C. D. (1997). Educational aspects of mathematics disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(1), 47-56.
Moje, E. B. (1995). Talking about science: An interpretation of the effects of teacher talk in a high school science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teacher, 32(4), 349-371.
Moll, L.C. (1990). Vygotsky and education. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Moll, L.C. & Whitmore, K.F.(1993).Vygotsky in classroom practice: Moving from individual transmissions to social transaction. In E.A. Forman, N. Minick & C.A. Stone（Eds.）, Contexts for learning: Socio-cultural dynamics in children’s development(pp.19-42). New York: Oxford University Press.
Montague, M. & Bos, C. S.（1990）. Cognitive and meta-cognitive characteristics of eight grade students’ mathematical problem solving. Learning and Individual Differences, 2（3）, 971-388.
Montague, M., Bos, C. S. & Doucette, M.（1991）. Affective, cognitive, metacognitive attributes of eighth – grade mathematical problem solvers. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 6（3）, 145-151.
Moss, J., & Case, R. (1999). Developing children’s understanding of the rational numbers: A new model and experimental curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, (30), 122-147.
Niaz M. (1989). Translation of algebraic equations and its relation to formal operational reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(9), 785-793.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.（NCTM）（1989）. Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.（NCTM）（1991）. Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM)（2000）. Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, Va.: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Naylor, M. (2002). Who Am I? Teaching PreK-8, 32 (4), 40-41.
Neimark E. D. & Lewis N. (1967). The development of logical problem-solving strategies. Child Development , 38, 107-177.
Newell, A . J . & Simon , H .(1972). Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall.
Nickerson, R. S. (1991). Modes and models of informal reasoning: A commentary. InJ. F. Voss, D. N. Perkins, & J. W. Segal(Eds.), Informal reasoning and education (pp. 291-309). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learning. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
National Research Council (1989) Recommended Dietary Allowances, 10th ed. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
Orton, A., & Orton, J. (1994). Student's perception and use of pattern and generalization. In Proceeding of the 18th annual conference of international group for the psychology of mathematics education, 3, 407-414.
Owen, A. (1995). In search of the unknown: A review of primary algebra.. In J. Anghileri (Ed. ), Children’s mathematical thinking in the primary years: Perspectives on children’s learning. London: Cassell.
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. （1986）. Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-115.
Phillips, P., & Scltics, B. (1991). Optimal Inference in co integrated systems. Econometrics, 59, 283-306.
Pokay, P., & Blumenfeld, P. C. （1990）. Predicting achievement early and late in the semester: The role of motivation and use of learning strategies. Special Section: Motivation and efficacy in education: Research and new directions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82（1）, 41-50.
Pugalee, D. K. (2001). Connecting writing to the mathematics curriculum. The Mathematics Teacher. 90(4), 308-310.
Rasmussen, J. (2001). The importance of communication in teaching: A systems-theory approach to the scaffolding metaphor. Journal Curriculum Studies, 33, 569 –582.
Resnick, L.B.(1999). The Development of Mathematical Intuition. Graduated Institution of Science Education（pp. 63-81）, National Taiwan Normal University:Taipri,Taiwan.
Robertson, S. I..（2001）.Types of Thinking. New York：Routledge.
Rodgers A. & Rodgers E. M. (2004). Scaffolding literacy instruction: Strategies for
K-4 classrooms. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
Romberg , T. A.（1992）. Problematic features of the school mathematics curriculum. In P. W. Jackson（Ed.）, Handbook of research on curriculum. NY：Macmillan.
Rose, B. (1989). Writing and mathematics: Theory and practice. In P. Connolly, & T. Vilard,（Eds.）, Writing to learn mathematics and science（pp. 15-30）. New York: Teachers College.
Schiftery, D. (1999). Reasoning about operations early algebraic thinking in K-6. Developing mathematical reasoning in grades K-12 (pp. 63-81). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1979a). Can heuristics be taught？ In cognitive process instruction. Philadelphia, PA：The Franklin Institute Press.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1979b). Explicit heuristic training as a variable in problem solving performance. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 10(3), 173-187.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orland, FL：Academic Press.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1987). What’s all the fuss about meta-cognition？ In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.). Cognitive science and mathematics education (pp.189-215). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1988). When good teaching leads to bad results：The disasters of
“well-taught” mathematics course. Educational Psychology, 23(2), 145-166.
Scribner, S. (1985). Vygotsky’s Use of History. In J. V. Wertsch（Ed.）, Culture, Communication, and Cognition: Vygotskian Perspectives（pp. 119-143）. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Scruggs, T. E. & Mastropieri, M. A. (1998). What happens during instruction: Is any metaphor necessary? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 404-409.
Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same Coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22,1-36.
Silver E. A. (1982). Thinking about problem solving：Toward an understanding of meta-cognitive aspects of mathematical problem solving. Unpublished manuscript, San Diego StateUniversity. Department of Mathematical Sciences, San Diego, CA.
Simon, H. A.（1980）. Problem solving and education. In D. T. Tuma & F. Reif（Eds.）, Problem solving and education: Issues in teaching and research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Skemp, R. R.（1982）. Communicating mathematical：surface structures and deep structures. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Solomon B. P. (1987). The role of male flowers in Solanum carolinense: pollen donor or pollinator attractors? Trends Plants, 1，89-93.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Stacey, K. (1989). Finding and using pattern in linear generalizing problem. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 20, 64-147.
Steffe, L., Glasersfeld, E. V., Richards, J., & Cobb, P.（1983）. Children’s counting types: Philosophy, theory and application. New York, NY: Praeger.
Steen, L. A. (1988). Calculus for a new century. A pump, not a filter [MAA Notes No. 8]. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America..
Steffe, L. P., & Wood, P.（1990）. Stages in the construction of the counting scheme. In S. Wagner（Ed.）, Psychology of Mathematical Education. Athens, GA: University of Georgia
Sternberg, R. J. , & Garder, M. K. (1983). Unities in inductive reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112(1), 80-116.
Stone, C. A. (1993). What is missing in the metaphor of scaffolding? In E. A. Forman, N. Minck, & C. A., Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning: Socio-cultural dynamics in children’s development（pp. 169-183）. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Tall, D. (1992). The transition from arithmetic to algebraic: number patterns, or proceptual programming? New Directions in Algebra Education, 213-231. Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane.
Threlfall, J. (1999). Repeating patterns in the early primary years. In A. Orton (Ed. ), Pattern in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 18-30). Landon: Cassell.
Thurston, W. (1990). Mathematical education. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 37, 844-850.
Treffers, A. (1987). Framework for Instruction Theory. In A. Treffers, (Ed.), Three Dimensions, （pp. 239-296）. Netherlands: D. Reidel.
Treffers, A. (1991). Didactical background of a mathematics program for primary education. In L. Streefland et al. (Ed.), Realistic Mathematics Education in Primary School（pp. 21-56）. Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht.
Tudge , J. R. & Rogoff, B. (1989). Peer influence on cognitive development: Piagetian and Vygotskyian perspectives. In M. Bornstein & J. Bruner (Eds.), Interaction in human development (pp.17-40). Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.
Tudge,J.(1990). Vygotsky,the zone of proximal development, and peer collaboration : implications for classroom practice.In L.C.Moll(ED.), Vygotsky and education: instructional implications and applications of sociaohistorical psychology. Cambridge:Cambridge University.
Usnick, V. E. （1992）. Multidigit addition: A study of an alternate sequence. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 14, 53-62.
Von Glasersfeld, E.（1989）. Constructivism in education. In T. Husen & N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education,（pp. 11-12）. Oxford, England: Pergamon.
Von Glasersfeld, E.(1990). An exposition of constructivism: Why some like it radical. In Davis, R. B., Maher, C. A., & Noddings, N. (eds.) Constructivist Views on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics. NCTM..
Von Glasersfeld, E. (1993). Questions and answers about radical constructivism. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The Practice of Constructivism in Science Education (pp. 23-38). Washington, DC: AAAS Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Vygotsky, L. S. （1978）. Mind in society. Edited by M. Cole, V. John-Stiener, Scribner, S. and E. Souberman. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wertsch, J.（1985）. Culture, communication, and cognition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Wheatley, G. （1991）. Constuctivist perspectives on mathematics and science learning. Science Education, 75(1), 9-12.
Wittgenstein, L.（1953）. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wood, C., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89-100.
Yackel, E., Cobb, P., & Wood, T. (1989). Small-Group Interactions as a Source of Learning Opportunities in Second-Grade Mathematics.
Yackel, E.,& Cobb, P.,& Wood, T.(1991). Small-group interactions as a source of learning opportunities in second-grade mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(5), 390-408.
Yackel, E. ＆Cobb,P.(1996). Socio-mathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics . Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 458-477.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Yudin L. W. & Kates S. (1963). Concept attainment and adolescent development. Journal of Education Psychology, 54, 177-182.