:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:美國行動電話定位追蹤法規範研究
書刊名:中央警察大學法學論集
作者:黃政龍
作者(外文):Huang, Cheng-lung
出版日期:2010
卷期:18
頁次:頁163-215
主題關鍵詞:細胞基地臺定位資訊混合理論追蹤器理論合理根據合理懷疑Cell site location informationCSLIHybrid theoryTracking device theoryProbable causeReasonable suspicion
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:80
  • 點閱點閱:22
期刊論文
1.Kerr, Orin S.(2004)。A User's Guide to the Stored Communications Act, and a Legislator's Guide to Amending It。George Washington Law Review,72(6),1208-1243。  new window
2.黃政龍(20091100)。美國有關行動電話定位追蹤合憲與否之研究。警學叢刊,40(3),185-208。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.李震山(20070900)。挪動通訊保障與通訊監察天平上的法碼--釋字第六三一號解釋評析。臺灣本土法學雜誌,98,283-291。  延伸查詢new window
4.林鈺雄(20080400)。論通訊之監察--評析歐洲人權法院相關裁判之發展與影響。東吳法律學報,19(4),109-152。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.林鈺雄(20070400)。干預保留與門檻理論--司法警察(官)一般調查權限之理論檢討。政大法學評論,96,189-231。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.陳瑞仁(2001)。捜索門檻「相當理由」之內涵。司法週刊,1038。  延伸查詢new window
7.吳巡龍(2001)。核發搜索票心證門檻之再檢討。司法週刊,1061。  延伸查詢new window
8.吳巡龍(2003)。新法下緊急捜索之心證門檻、要件及違法捜索之證據排除。法學叢刊,189,39-56。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Kerr, Orin S.(2003)。Internet Surveillance Law After the USA Patriot Act: The Big Brother That Isn't。NW. U. L. REV.,97,607-673。  new window
10.McLaughlin, Ke(2007)。THE FOURTH AMENDMENT AND CELL PHONE LOCATION TRACKING: WHERE ARE WE。29 HASTINGS COMM. & ENT L.J. 421,421-445。  new window
11.Rahter, Sarah(2009)。PRIVACY IMPLICATIONS OF GPS TRACKING TECHNOLOGY。4 I/S: J. L. & POL'Y FOR INFO. SOC'Y 755。  new window
12.Samuel, Ian James(2008)。WARRANTLESS LOCATION TRACKING。83 N.Y.U. L. REV.,1324,1324-1352。  new window
13.Solove, Daniel J.(2004)。RECONSTRUCTING ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE LAW。72 GEO. WASH. L. REV.,1264,1264- 1305。  new window
14.Stapleton, Timothy(2007)。The Electronic Communications Privacy Act and Cell Location Data。BROOK. L. REV.,73,383-419。  new window
15.Note(2004)。WHO KNOWS WHERE YOU'VE BEEN? PRIVACY CONCERNS REGARDING THE USE OF CELLULAR PHONES AS PERSONAL LOCATORS。18 HARV. J.L. & TECH. 307,307- 317。  new window
16.Otterberg, April A.(2005)。GPS TRACKING TECHNOLOGY: THE CASE FOR REVISITING KNOTTS AND SHIFTINGTHE SUPREME COURT'S THEORY OF THE PUBLIC SPACE UNDER THE FOURTH AMENDMENT。46 B.C. L. REV.,661,661-704。  new window
學位論文
1.黃政龍(2009)。科技偵查之研究--以公共空間行動資訊隱私權為範疇(碩士論文)。中原大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Slobogin, Christopher(2007)。Privacy at Risk: The New Government Surveillance and the Fourth Amendment。University of Chicago Press。  new window
2.林鈺雄(200210)。搜索扣押註釋書。元照。  延伸查詢new window
3.林輝煌(2003)。論證據排除--美國法之理論與實務。元照。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃東熊、吳景芳(2004)。刑事訴訟法論。台北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.王兆鵬(20000000)。搜索扣押與刑事被告的憲法權利。臺北:王兆鵬。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.SOLOVE, DANIEL J.、ROTENBERG, MARC、SCHWARTZ, PAUL M(2006)。PRIVACY, INFORMATION, AND TECHNOLOGY。Aspen Publishers, Inc.。  new window
7.WHITEBREAD, CHARLES H.、SLOBOGIN, CHRISTOPHER(2008)。CRIMINAL PROCEDURE。  new window
圖書論文
1.李震山(2009)。公權力運用定位科技措施與基本權利保障。人性尊嚴與人權保障。元照。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE