:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:政府預算補救措施之研究
書刊名:國立虎尾科技大學學報
作者:莊振輝 引用關係
作者(外文):Juang, Jenn-huei
出版日期:2010
卷期:29:2
頁次:頁49-63
主題關鍵詞:政府預算預算法預算補救措施立法怠惰Government budgetBudget actRemedial measuresLegislative inaction
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:175
  • 點閱點閱:36
立法機關若因故未能於會計年度開始前審竣預算,須有補救辦法以爲因應。預算補救措施可定於憲法、法律、法規命令、行政規則或依照慣例,其中以定於法律爲優先。政府收入係依據法律或行政命令而非預算數徵收,支出則應按預算嚴格執行,因此僅規定得先支出之項目即可。在各種不同之預算補救措施中,以法律明定得支出項目爲最優先。我國之預算補救措施係於預算法規定,其範圍包括收入與支出,除新興資本支出及新增計畫以外均可依上年度預算述先行支出,過於寬鬆,易造成立法怠惰之情況。綜合本研究之發現,建議刪除收入部分之規定,支出部分修正爲各機關僅可支用法定經費、繼續經費、維持基本運作經費,有關收支差短調度部分覈實辦理。
There must be remedies to cope with if the legislature fails to finish budget auditing for some reason before the beginning of the fiscal year. Budget remedial measures may be regulated in the Constitution, laws, legal orders, administrative rules or in accordance with established practice, in which the law that established the better. Government revenue is based on laws or administrative orders rather than the budgeted levy and expenditure should be strictly enforced on budget. It is available that only the items of expenditure may be enforced in advance should be projected. Expenditure items regulated in law is the best way among the different remedial measures. The budget remedial measures of Taiwan are regulated in Budget Act and both income and expenditure are included. Expenditures can be enforced in advance according to the budget of the previous year except the new capital expenditure and new plan expenditure. The loose requirement leads to legislative inaction easily. The suggestions in this study are listed as following: 1. Delete provisions of the part of revenue. 2. Provisions of the part of expenditure should be amended as only Legal Expenses, Continuous Expenses can be enforced and basic operating funds can be maintained. 3. Rising of debt in response to the needs of revenues and expenditures may be conducted.
期刊論文
1.徐仁輝(19990300)。制度變遷與美國預算改革。東吳經濟商學學報,24,89-113。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.蘇彩足(199909)。民主化對於政府預算決策的衝擊與因應之道。理論與政策,13(3)=51,47-64。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.方清風(200609)。初探世界銀行所作的各國政府預算實務調查。今日會計,140,59-78。  延伸查詢new window
4.李介民(200406)。經由立法機關逕行修改法規命令問題之研究。東海大學法學研究,20,1-39。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.呂世昌(200610)。法國第五共和憲政體制之研究。中正學報,7(3),87-110。  延伸查詢new window
6.馬駿(2003)。公共預算原則:挑戰與重構。經濟學家,73-81。  延伸查詢new window
7.Kettl, D. F.(1989)。Expansion and Protection in the Budgetary Process。Public Administration Review,49(3),231-239。  new window
8.蔡茂寅(19971200)。預算法之基礎理論。全國律師,1(12),58-75。  延伸查詢new window
9.Rubin, S. I.(1989)。Aaron Wildavsky and the Demise of Incrementalism。Public Administration Review,49(1),78-81。  new window
10.顧建亞(200611)。法律位階劃分標準探新。浙江大學學報(人文社會科學版),36(6),42-50。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.張四明(2002)。財政壓力下地方政府的預算決策與調適行為之研究。預算平衡與中程計畫預算制度研討會,(會議日期: 20020315)。臺北:行政院主計處等。1-29。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.石素梅(1998)。美國聯邦政府預算作業之研究。臺北:石素梅。  延伸查詢new window
2.林紀東(1977)。中華民國憲法釋論。臺北:朝陽大學法律評論社。  延伸查詢new window
3.范黛明、陳靜怡(2006)。考察英國預算制度之改革及其運作。臺北:行政院主計處。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳清雲(2004)。立法審查行政命令之檢討與建議。立法原理與制度。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.曹峰、慕玲、張玉坤(2002)。公共預算系統。北京:清華大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.管歐(1977)。中華民國憲法論。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.謝瑞智(2000)。活用憲法大辭典。臺北:文笙書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.審計部(2008)。歲入來源別決算審訂表。中央政府總決算審核報告。臺北:審計部。  延伸查詢new window
9.蘇彩足(1998)。漸增預算之迷思。行政管理論文選輯。臺北:銓敘部。  延伸查詢new window
10.GAO(2005)。A Glossary of Terms Used in the Federal Budget Process。D.C.:GAO。  new window
11.Gleich, Holger(2003)。Budget Institutions and Fiscal Performance I Central and Eastern European Countries。Frankfurt, German:European Central Bank。  new window
12.Gore, A.l.(1993)。From Red Tape to Results: Creating a Government That Works Better and cost Less。National Performance Review。D.C.:Government Printing Office。  new window
13.Houerou Le Philippe(1996)。Fiscal Management in Russia。D.C:World Bank Publications。  new window
14.Lang, Bob、Swain, Sandy(2007)。State Budget Process。Wisconsin:Legislative Fiscal Bureau。  new window
15.Lienert, Ian、Jung, Moo-kyung(2004)。The Legal Framework for Budget Systems: An International Comparison。Paris:OECD Publishing。  new window
16.OECD。Budget in Turkey。Paris:OECD Publishing。  new window
17.Pylee, M.V.(2004)。Select Constitution of the World。Delhi, India:Universal Law Publishing Co.。  new window
18.Wade E. C. S.、Bradley, A. W.(1987)。Constitutional and Administrative Law。London:Longman Group Ltd.。  new window
19.小嶋和司(1996)。日本財政制度の比較法史的研究。東京:信山社。  延伸查詢new window
20.羅傳賢(2000)。行政程序法論。臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
21.許宗力(19990000)。憲法與法治國行政。臺北:元照出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.行政院經濟建設委員會(1998)。政府再造與預算制度改革。臺北:行政院經濟建設委員會。  延伸查詢new window
23.陳工(2004)。政府預算與管理。北京市:清華大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.丁孝文(20041013)。走進國會山,http://book.sina.com.cn/longbook/1097649339_zoujinguohuishan/27.shtml。  new window
2.立法院預算中心(2009)。99年度中央政府總預算案整體評估報告,臺北:立法院。  延伸查詢new window
3.行政院(2010)。99年度中央政府總預算案。  延伸查詢new window
4.審計部(2008)。國輸出入銀行損益計算審訂表 、盈虧撥補審訂表,臺北:審計部。  延伸查詢new window
5.HM Treasury,http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/budget/budget_08/bud_bud08_index.cf, 2008/3/12。  new window
6.OECD(2008)。Budget Practices and Procedures Survey,http://webnet4.oecd.org/budgeting/Budgeting.aspx。  new window
7.日本〈財政法〉,http://www.ron.gr.jp/law/law/zaisei.htm。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE