臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：國民中學後現代學校行政倫理兩難困境解決之路徑分析
書刊名：教育資料與研究
作者：黃乃熒 引用關係／陳麗霞
作者(外文)：Whang, Nai Ying／Chen, Li Shya
出版日期：2012
卷期：105
頁次：頁123-160
主題關鍵詞：國民中學；後現代學校行政倫理；兩難困境；路徑分析；線性結構模式；Junior high schools；Postmodern ethics in school administration；Dilemma；Path analysis；Linear structural models
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:28
  • 點閱點閱:51
本文旨在討論國民中學後現代學校行政兩難困境解決的路徑。後現代學校行政倫理，強調對於普遍規定、普遍規範、統一結構、主流文化、獨大權威的反駁或挑戰，以利避免人性的壓抑及壓迫，它會促進學校的功能，但是它也會衍生個體膨脹的行為，而造成學校的反功能，因而造成諸多批評。有鑑於此，探索抑制兩難困境行為的行動途徑，以確立後現代學校行政倫理價值性，益形重要。為了達到此目的，本研究採用問卷調查法蒐集資料，並透過兩段式抽樣方法進行調查，共抽取105 所學校，寄出2,200 份問卷，有效收回1,196 份，有效回收率達54％。隨後，對於國民中學後現代學校行政倫理的特質、功能、兩難困境及解決途徑，利用線性結構模式進行實證分析，據以提出結論。其中，結論包括，後現代學校行政具有功能性，但是其衍生推卸責任，致使其出現兩難的困境，必須透過領導人與被領導人理解與效力的行動，來解決兩難困境。
Abstract The study is to explore the paths of the resolving strategies of the dilemma of postmodern ethics in school administration in junior high schools. Postmodern ethics in school administration is defined as the challenge of universal rules, unified rules, universal norms, mainstream culture, and totalitarian authority. It will facilitate positive school functions because of the enlightenment of the human repression. On the other hand, it also produces some individuals＇self-aggrandized behaviors which facilitate schools＇negative functions. That is why postmodern ethics usually are viewed as evil＇s thought. According to the reasons, it is crucial for people that they realize the dilemma of postmodern ethics in school administration and its resolution in order to avoid people＇s misunderstanding. In order to reach these purposes, the study uses questionnaire survey to collect data. A two-stage sampling scheme is designed and the sample data is analyzed by fitting the Linear Structural Models. This study selects 105 junior high schools to inquire the purposes Then, the study sends 2,200 questionnaires for school members and the 1,196 questionnaires are effective. Consequently, the effective ratio is 54%. According to the discussions, the study provides people with the conclusions, including: (1) positive function values of postmodern ethics in school administration; (2) the dilemma of postmodern ethics in school administration derived from the behavior ofirresponsibility; (3)the resolution of the dilemma of postmodern ethics in school administration through action of understanding and efficacy.
期刊論文
1.Chabot, C. Barry(1988)。The Problem of the Postmodern。New Literary History: A Journal of Theory and Interpretation，20(1)，1-20。  new window
2.Hoelter, J. W.(1983)。The analysis of covariance structures: Goodness-of-fit indices。Sociological Methods and Research，11(3)，325-344。  new window
3.黃宗顯(20030600)。共識論述與差異政略思想在學校行政革新上的和合與適用性：Habermas、Lyotard與中國「道」思想的詮釋性應用。教育研究集刊，49(2)，97-115。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.黃乃熒(20050400)。學校組織變革之意識型態研究--以一所國民中學為例。師大學報. 教育類，50(1)，101-121。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Anderson, James C.、Gerbing, David W.(1988)。Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach。Psychological Bulletin，103(3)，411-423。  new window
6.黃乃熒、陳麗霞(20080600)。國民中學組織變革意識型態影響變革品質路徑之研究。教育研究集刊，54(2)，93-136。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Mulaik, Stanley A.、James, Larry R.、van Alstine, Judith、Bennett, Nathan、Lind, Sherri、Stilwell, C. Dean(1989)。Evaluation of Goodness-of-Fit Indices for Structural Equation Models。Psychological Bulletin，105(3)，430-445。  new window
8.Abbinett, R.(1998)。Post-modernity and the ethics of care: Situating Bauman's social theory。Cultural Values，2(1)，87-116。  new window
9.Ambrosio, J.(2008)。Writing the self: Ethical self formation and the undefined work of freedom。Educational Theory，58(3)，251-267。  new window
10.Antonio, R. J.(2000)。After postmodernism: Reactionary tribalism。American Journal of Sociology，106(2)，40-87。  new window
11.Babcock, W.、Whitehouse, Y.(2005)。Celebrity as a postmodern phenomenon, ethical crisis for democracy, and media nightmare。Journal of Mass Media Ethics，20(2/3)，176-191。  new window
12.Begley, P. T.(2006)。Self-knowledge, capacity and sensitivity: Prerequisites to authentic leadership by school leadership。Journal of Educational Administration，44(6)，570-589。  new window
13.Bourgeois, P. I.(2001)。The search for a postmodern ethics。Research in Phenomenology，32，249-257。  new window
14.Braidotti, R.(2005)。A critical cartography of feminist post- postmodernism。Australian Feminist Studies，20(47)，1-15。  new window
15.Braidotti, R.(2007)。Feminist epistemology after postmodernism; Critiquing science, technology and globalization。Interdisciplinary Science Reviews，32(1)，65-74。  new window
16.Calclei, G.(2005)。Postmodernism, pragmatism, and the possibility of an ethical relation to the past。Theories，52(3)，82-101。  new window
17.Cullin, J.(2005)。The ethics of paradox: Cybernetic and postmodern perspectives on non-direct intervention in therapy。ANZJIFT，26(3)，138-146。  new window
18.Fardella, J. A.(2008)。The recovery model: Discourse ethics and the retrieval of the self。Journal of Medical Humanit，29(2)，111-126。  new window
19.Hallstein, L. O.(1999)。A postmodern caring: Feminist standpoint theories, revisioned caring, and communication ethics。Western Journal of Communication，63(1)，32-56。  new window
20.Jaafar, S. B.、Anderson, S.(2007)。Policy trends and tensions in accountability for educational management and services in Canada。Alberta Journal of Educational Research，53(2)，207-227。  new window
21.Lindlom, C.(1997)。Logical dilemmas of postmodernism。The Journal of Royal Anthropological Institute，3(4)，747-760。  new window
22.Mason, M.(2001)。The ethics of integrity: Educational values beyond postmodern ethics。Journal of Philosophy of Education，35(1)，47-69。  new window
23.McCance, D.(1996)。L'ecriture limite: Kristeva's postmodern feminist ethics。Hypatia，11(2)，141-160。  new window
24.Muthen, L. K.、Muthen, B. O.(2002)。How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power。Structural Equation Modeling，4，599-620。  new window
25.Nuyen, A. T.(2004)。Lyotard's postmodern ethics and information technology。Ethics and Information Technology，6，185-191。  new window
26.O'Neil, M.(2006)。Ethics and epistemology: Ecclesial existence in a postmodern era。Journal of Religious Ethics，34(1)，21-40。  new window
27.Rundell, J.(2000)。The postmodern ethical condition: A conversation with Angnes Heller。Critical Horizons，7(1)，135-145。  new window
28.Ryu, H.(2001)。Ethics of ambiguity and irony: Jacques Derrida and Richard Rorty。Human Studies，24，5-28。  new window
29.Schultz, D.(2004)。Professional ethics in a postmodern society。Public Integrity，6(4)，279-297。  new window
30.Schutz, A.(2000)。Teaching freedom? Postmodern perspectives。Review of Educational Research，70(2)，215-251。  new window
31.Slattery, P.、Morris, M.(1999)。Simone de beauvoir's ethics and Postmodern ambiguity: The assertion of freedom in the face of the absurd。Educational Theory，49(1)，21-36。  new window
32.Snyman, S.、Fasser, R.(2004)。Thoughts on ethics, psychotherapy and postmodernism。South African of Psychology，34(1)，72-83。  new window
33.Spicer, M. W.(2005)。Public administration enquiry and social science in the postmodern condition: Some implications of value pluralism。Administrative Theory & Praxis，27(4)，669-688。  new window
34.Spivak, G. C.(1994)。Responsibility。Boundary 2，21(3)，19-64。  new window
35.Strassberg, B. A.(2005)。Fortieth anniversary symposium: Science, religion, and secularity in a technological society。Zygon，40(2)，307-322。  new window
36.Tifonas, P. P.(2004)。Postmodernism, post-structuralism, and difference。Journal of Curriculum Theorizing，20(1)，151-163。  new window
37.Ventriss, C.(2004)。The postmodern condition and the challenge of rethinking the foundations of public policy and administration: A critical inquiry。Administrative Theory and Praxis，27(3)，552-560。  new window
38.Walker, J.(2008)。Social/corporate accountability: A university's 'trek' towards excellence。The Canadian Journal of Higher Education，38(2)，45-71。  new window
39.Wang, C. X.(2008)。Adult education philosophies in post modern China。International Forum of Teaching and Studies，4(1)，21-119。  new window
40.Woodbury, S.、Gess-Newsome, J.(2002)。Overcoming the paradox of change without difference: A model of change in the arena of fundamental school reform。Educational Policy，16(5)，763-785。  new window
41.Ziarek, E.(2003)。Evil and testimony: Ethics 'after' postmodernism。Hypatia，18(2)，197-204。  new window
圖書
1.Slattery, P.、Rapp, D.(2003)。Ethics and the foundations of education: Teaching convictions in postmodern world。Boston：Allyn and Bacon。  new window
2.Fullan, M.(2003)。The moral imperative of school leadership。Thousand Oaks, CA：Corwin Press。  new window
3.Kearney, R.(1984)。Dialogues with contemporary continental thinkers。Manchester：Manchester University Press。  new window
4.Lindblom, C. E.、Cohen, D. K.(1979)。Usable Knowledge: Social Science and Social Problem Solving。New Haven, CT：Yale University Press。  new window
5.Blanke, V.(1991)。Understanding organization。Columbus, OH：The Ohio State University。  new window
6.Greene, M.(1978)。Landscapes of learning。New York, NY：Teachers College, Columbia University。  new window
7.O'Neill, J.(1995)。The poverty of postmodernism。London。  new window
8.Hatcher, L.(1994)。A step-by-step approach to use the SAS system for factor analysis and structural equation modeling。SAS Institute。  new window
9.Byrne, B. M.(1998)。Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PREL1S, and SIMPLIS: Basis concepts, applications and programming。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
10.James, Lawrence R.、Mulaik, Stanley A.、Brett, Jeanne M.(1982)。Causal Analysis: Assumptions, Models, and Data。Beverly Hills, California：Sage Publications。  new window
11.Lindblom, C. E.(1990)。Inquiry and Change。Yale University Press。  new window
12.Bauman, Zygmunt(1993)。Postmodern Ethics。Blackwell。  new window
13.Bollen, K. A.(1989)。Structural Equations with Latent Variables。New York：John Wiley & Sons。  new window
14.Morgan, Gareth(1997)。Images of Organization。Sage Publications。  new window
15.Spivak, Gayatri C.(1993)。Outside in the Teaching Machine。Routledge。  new window
16.Burke, A.(2007)。Beyond security, ethics and violence。London。  new window
其他
1.Joreskog, K. G.，Sorbom, D.(1999)。How large can a standardized coefficient be?，http://www.ssicentral.com/lisrel/column2.htm。  new window
2.Shinko, R. E.(2009)。Liberal affinities, ethical problematization, performative postmodern subjectivities，New York。  new window
圖書論文
1.Boomsma, A.、Hoogland, J. J.(2001)。The robustness of lisrel modeling revisited。Structural equation models: Present and future. A Festschrift in honor of Karl Joreskog。Chicago, IL：Scientific Software International。  new window
2.Chou, C. P.、Bentler, P. M.(1995)。Estimation and tests in structural equation modeling。Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications。Thousand Oaks, CA：Sage。  new window
3.West, S. G.、Finch, J. F.、Curran, P. J.(1995)。Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies。Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications。Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1483（臺灣：1473，外國：10） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1855660 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67677119
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上