:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國小學童樂樂足球遊戲型式之探討
書刊名:中華體育季刊
作者:許睿元掌慶維 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsu, Ruei-yuanChang, Ching-wei
出版日期:2012
卷期:26:3=102
頁次:頁361-369
主題關鍵詞:理解式球類教學法樂樂足球學生學習中心Teaching games for understandingTGfUHappy soccer gamesStudent leaming-center
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:33
  • 點閱點閱:79
教育部為了使足球向下扎根,辦理「國民小學樂樂足球計劃」。近年體育教學由教師教學中心轉變為學生學習中心取向,孕育出理解式球類教學法。樂樂足球是以足球遊戲進行學習,與理解式教學理念相同。若能了解學生在足球遊戲中如何「玩」,則可設計適合的樂樂足球遊戲教材。結果顯示,學童在學習初期足球遊戲成功得分之情形,以簡單的型式為主。其中前場取得球得分的頻率較高;其次有中、後場取得球得分;前場接獲傳球得分;中、後場接獲傳球得分的方式,對此階段學童是組織進攻策略的起步階段。影響學童足球遊戲型式的因素會與性別與能力的職務分工、攻防組織和技能有關。因此,這些遊戲型式與影響因素可作為體育教師進行樂樂足球教材設計之參考,提供學生更優質的學習。
In order to promote the youth soccer for pupils, the Ministry of Education advocates "Happy Soccer" program for elementary school. Recently, physical education teaching has been teachers centered changed into student learning-center. Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU) is one of the suitable learners centered models. The happy soccer is a reduced version soccer game to learn and the concept of TGFU as well. If one understands pupils how to "play" in soccer games, then it can help teachers to design suitable didactical soccer games. The results showed that, according to the way of scoring, students' configurations of play in the early learning period were simple. It was the most easily to observe that players interruption the ball and shoot at the goal in the front court; followed in the backcourt to interruption the ball score; field received a passing score; received a passing score. After this stage, pupils were in the initial stage of the organizational attack strategy. Factors affecting the organization of school football game were related to gender, ability, the duties of offensive, defensive organization, and skills. Therefore, these forms of organization and influencing factors can be considered as the designing factors of teaching materials for physical education teachers, in order to increase the quality of learning.
期刊論文
1.Bunker, D.、Thorpe, R.(1982)。A model for the teaching of games m secondary school。Bulletin of Physical Education,18(1),5-8。  new window
2.潘義祥(20050900)。臺灣地區國民小學教師健康與體育學習領域教學實踐之研究。體育學報,38(3),63-73。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.曹弘源、潘義祥(20111200)。概念構圖在理解式球類教學法之應用。中華體育季刊,25(4)=99,774-782。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.周建智(20111200)。動作學習歷程前決策與後決策階段中批判思考的中介角色。體育學報,44(4),495-510。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.林章榜、林靜萍(2008)。編製學生知覺體育課同學行為影響學習因素量表。體育學報,41(3),55-68。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.掌慶維(2007)。理解式球類遊戯之設計原則─以侵人式遊戯為例。學校體育,17(6),81-88。  延伸查詢new window
7.掌慶維(2008)。理解式球類遊戯之創怠教材變化要素。學校體育,18(6),54-63。  延伸查詢new window
8.鄭漢吾、闕月清(2006)。理解式球類教學法對中學生學習效果之探討。臺灣運動教育學報,1(2),25-41。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Gréhaigne, J. F.、Boulhier, D.、David, B.(1997)。Dynamic-system analysis of opponent relationships in collective actions in soccer。Journal of Sports Sciences,15,137-149。  new window
10.Rink, J. E.(2001)。Investigating the assumptions of pedagogy。Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,20,112-128。  new window
11.Wallian, N.、Chang, C. W.(2007)。Language, thinking and action: Towards a semio-constructivist approach in physical education。Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy,12(3),289-311。  new window
學位論文
1.范綱榮(2007)。理解式球類教學法對國小五年級學生巧固球學習效果之研究(碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.邱奕銓(2005)。傳統與理解式教學法對高職學生籃球學習效果比較之研究(碩士論文)。國立體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
3.潘義祥(1998)。國小教師體育教學目標與教學成效之研究(碩士論文)。國立體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃志成(2004)。理解式球類教學對國小六年級學生羽球學習效果之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.郭世德(2000)。理解式教學在國小五年級學生足球學習效果的研究(碩士論文)。國立體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
6.掌慶維(2006)。國小五年級建構取向籃球遊戲學習之研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.蔡宗達(2004)。理解式球類教學法與技能取向球類教學法比較研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.黃志成、闕月清(2008)。理解式球類教學法。臺北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
2.Grehaigne, J. F.、Richard, J. F.、Griffin, L.(2005)。Teaching and learning team sports and games。New York:Routledge Falmer。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE