:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從學習者到教學者角色轉換歷程之權力分析:三位社區大學肢體運動課程講師的敘事研究
書刊名:臺灣教育社會學研究
作者:徐敏雄 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsu, Min-hsiung
出版日期:2012
卷期:12:2
頁次:頁123-161
主題關鍵詞:社區大學肢體運動敘事研究教學者Community collegeBody movementNarrative researchInstructors
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:38
  • 點閱點閱:16
本研究主要目的在於探究社區大學肢體運動類課程講師從「學習者」轉變成「教學者」的過程中,所依循、複製或重構的身體意象與配套自我技術論述,及其延伸出來各類社會關係和外在社會機制間存在的「知識—身體—權力」關係,以釐清肢體運動對人們身體和價值可能帶來的生產性和壓抑性。研究發現,存在社區大學、肢體運動社群、師生與同儕間的「知識—身體—權力」關係並非零合,所有課程內容、教學策略與人際模式都處在高度不確定狀態下,透過對抗與順服並存的方式體現著自由與壓抑。倘若寄望社區大學肢體運類課程的實施能尊重師生身體與價值自主性,勢必得培養其容忍、欣賞人際關係與社會文化之不確定性,才能讓每個人的聲音都被充分聆聽與尊重。
The study aims to investigate the discourse of body images and supporting self-techniques, which is followed, copied, or restructured by those in the process of changing roles from learners to instructors in body movement classes in community colleges. It also explores the relations among derived knowledge, body and power existing in various social relationships and social mechanisms, in order to clarify the kinds of impact body movements human body and human values. The study showed that the power relations existing in community colleges and the professional community, and between faculty and students, do not constitute a zero-sum situation. There is a high degree of uncertainty underlying all curriculum content, teaching strategies and interpersonal relationships. If we wish the implementation of body movement curricula to respect the autonomy of the bodies and values of faculty and students, it is necessary to cultivate appreciation and tolerance of diversity and uncertainty among faculty and students. Only in this way can all voices be fully listened to and respected appropriately.
期刊論文
1.徐敏雄(20090600)。培養現代公民的社區大學課程連結原則之研究。當代教育研究,17(2),71-101。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.徐敏雄(2007)。臺北市社區大學融入式課程設計策略之研究 (計畫編號:NSC96-2413-H-260-013)。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.王維銘(2004)。一個身體的旅程(碩士論文)。國立臺北藝術大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Foucault, Michel、Hurley, R.(1986)。The care of the self: The history of sexuality。New York:Pantheon。  new window
2.Foucault, Michel、Rabinow, Paul、Hurley, Robert(1997)。Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth。London:The Penguin Press。  new window
3.Danaher, Geoff、Schirato, Tony、Webb, Jen(2000)。Understanding Foucault。London:Sage Publications。  new window
4.Foucault, Michel、Sheridan, Alan(1977)。Discipline & Punish: The Birth of the Prison。New York:Pantheon Books。  new window
5.Fraser, Nancy(1989)。Unruly practices: Power, discourse and gender in contemporary social theory。Minneapolis, MN:University of Minnesota Press。  new window
6.黃武雄(2003)。學校在窗外。左岸文化出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.Habermas, Jürgen、Burger, Thomas、Lawrence, Frederick(1989)。The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society。Cambridge, MA:MIT Press。  new window
8.Foucault, Michel(1985)。The Use of Pleasure: the History of Sexuality。New York:Pantheon。  new window
9.顧忠華(2005)。解讀社會力:臺灣的學習社會與公民社會。臺北:左岸文化出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.Turner, Bryan S.(2008)。The Body & Society: Explorations in Social Theory。SAGE。  new window
11.Foucault, Michel、Gros, Frédéic、Ewald, François、Fontana, Alessandro、Burchell, Graham(2005)。The Hermeneutics of the Subject: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1981-1982。New York:Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
其他
1.王佩珊(2009)。美感再現--燒傷與顏損者在肚皮舞表演歷程的意義與改變。  延伸查詢new window
2.Edwards, T.(2011)。文化理論:古典與當代。  延伸查詢new window
3.沈宜璇(2006)。肚皮舞專題研究室:肚皮舞的歷史。  延伸查詢new window
4.邱俊傑。PNates的運動哲學與其演進。  延伸查詢new window
5.胡幼慧(1996)。質性硏究的分析與寫成。  延伸查詢new window
6.蔡適任(2009)。偏不叫她肚皮舞:構思一堂符合社區大學理念的肢體課程。  延伸查詢new window
7.Foucault, M.(1972)。The archaeology of knowledge。  new window
8.Foucault, M.(1978)。The will to knowledge: The History of Sexuality, 1。  new window
9.Foucault, M.(1983)。The subject and power。  new window
10.Foucault, M.(1984)。The ethic of care for the self as a practice of freedom: An interview。  new window
11.Foucault, M.(1988)。Technologies of the self。  new window
12.Gros, F.(2005)。Course context。  new window
13.Markula, P.; Pringle, R.(2006)。Foucault, sport and exercise: Power, knowledge and transforming the self。  new window
14.Shilling, C.(2005)。The body in culture, technology and society。  new window
15.Shogan, D.(1999)。The making of high-performance athletes: Discipline, diversity, and ethics。  new window
圖書論文
1.李丁讚(20040000)。公共領域中的親密關係--對新港和大溪兩個造街個案的探討。公共領域在台灣:困境與契機。臺北:桂冠。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top