參考書目

中文書目

方志華（2001）。女性主義關懷倫理學與儒家學說之對比。第六屆當代新儒學國際學術會議─當代新儒學與人文精神重建。台北，鵝湖雜誌社、東方人文學術研究基金會、中國哲學研究中心、國立中央大學哲學研究所主辦，民國90年11月10-13日。
王志弘（2000）。性別化流動的政治與詩學。台北：田園城市。
王淑英、孫嫚薇（2003）。托育照顧政策中的國家角色。國家政策季刊，vol.2，4：147-174。
江宜樺（1998）。自由主義、民族主義與國家認同。台北：揚智。
江宜樺（2001）。自由民主的理路。台北：聯經。
羊憶容（2004），公民社會的窘境--何以法治不能生根？歷史月刊，196：105-111。
李震山（2005）。個人資料保護與監視錄影器設置之法律問題研究－以警察職權行使法第十條為中心。警察法學，4：21-76。
李丁讚（2004）。公共領域中的親密關係，見李丁讚、吳乃德、吳介民、陳弱水、夏春祥、錢永祥、顧忠華著 公共領域在台灣：困境與契機。台北：桂冠。
何春蕤（1998）。好色女人。台北：元尊文化。
林火旺（1998）。公民身分：認同與差異，見蕭高彥、蘇文流編 多元主義。台北：中研院中山文社會科學研究所。
林芳玫（1998）。當代台灣婦運的認同政治：以公娼存廢爭議為例。中外文學，Vol.27，1：56-87。
林淑娥（1999）。誰的最佳利益-母親或兒童?初探台北市婚姻暴力合併兒少虐待家庭的社工處遇。國立台灣大學社會學所碩士論文。
林毓生（1996）。中國傳統的創造性轉化。歷史月刊，4：72-82。
吳嘉苓（2000）。醫療專業、性別與國家：台灣助產士興衰的社會學分析。臺灣社會學研究，4：191-268。
周月清（1995）。婚姻暴力：理論分析與社會工作處置。台北：巨流。
胡幼慧（1995）。三代同堂：迷失與陷阱。台北：巨流。
倪炎元（2003）。再現的政治：台灣報紙媒體對「他者」建構的論述分析。台北：韋伯。
徐明（2004）。從女志工服務經驗探究「關懷倫理」之公民道德價值。公民訓育學報，15：113-147。
黃俊傑（2005）。東亞近世儒者對「公」「私」領域分際的思考：從孟子與桃應的對話出發。見江宜樺、黃俊傑編 公私領域新探：東亞與西方觀點之比較。台北：台大出版中心。
黃惠琴（2004）。女教師與女學生的空間識覺：以高雄市的高中為例。女學學誌，19：47-103。
廖炳惠（1993）。中西女性與公共領域：導讀。北縣文化，38：13-18，（本文為清華大學兩性與社會研究室為亞洲協會編輯之性別研究讀本系列之導讀）。
陳美華，鄧佳蕙（2000）。1999台灣女權報告。台北：財團法人婦女新知基金會。
陳弱水（1997）。公德觀念的初步探討－歷史源流與理論建構。國科會人文及社會科學集刊，2：39-71。
陳惠馨（2005）。女性主義法學與性別主流化。律師雜誌。313：15-37。
劉毓秀（1997）。女性、國家、照顧工作。台北：女書文化。
顧忠華（2005）。解讀社會力：台灣的學習社會與公民社會。台北：左岸。
瞿海源（1998）。跨世紀公民教育的問題。見殷海光基金會編 市民社會與民主的省思。台北：桂冠。
蔡英文（2001）。政治實踐與公共空間：漢娜.鄂蘭的政治思想。台北：聯經。
蕭高彥（1998）。多元文化與承認政治論，見蕭高彥、蘇文流編 多元主義。台北：中研院中山文社會科學研究所。
焦興鎧（2001a）。大專校園性騷擾所引起之法律爭議及其防治之道？美國經驗所提供之啟示，國立中正大學法學集刊，4：3-36。
焦興鎧（2001b）。美國最高法院與工作場所性騷擾之爭議。歐美研究，Vol.31，2：325-420。
焦興鎧（2003）。美國女性主義法學者對工作場所性騷擾爭議之批判。歐美研究，Vol.33，1：57-123。
簡成熙（2000）。正義倫理與關懷倫理的論辨：女性倫理學的積極意義。教育資料集刊，25：185-211。
高鳳仙（2005）。性騷擾防治法立法期間爭議問題研究。全國律師，Vol.9，9：63-75。
高鳳仙（2006）。性騷擾防治法之規範精神與施行願景（上）。臺灣本土法學雜誌，79：32-44。
高鳳仙（2006）。性騷擾防治法之規範精神與施行願景（上）。臺灣本土法學雜誌，80：41-50。
顧燕翎（1997）：臺灣婦運組織中性慾政治之轉變--受害客體抑或情慾主體。思與言， Vol.35，1：87-118。
龔卓軍，1998身體與想像的辯證：從尼采到梅落龐蒂。中外文學，Vol.26，11：10-50。
傅大為（1991）。片斷、游牧與邊緣戰鬥──一個社運新論述的提出。中國論壇，374：53-57。
校園性侵害或性騷擾防治準則草案訂定計畫成果報告，2005
教育部法規委員會第1116-1124次會議記錄，2005


翻譯書目

Aristotle. (1982)。尼各馬科倫理學。苗力田 譯。北京：中國社會科學出版社。
Gilligan. C. (2002)。不同的語音。王雅各譯。台北：心理。
Grey, J. (2002)。自由主義的兩種面貌。蔡英文譯。台北：巨流。
Kant, I. (1988)。答何謂啟蒙。李明輝譯。思想。台北：聯經。
Fukuyama, (1998)。誠信：社會德行與繁榮的創造。台北：立緒。
MacIntyre, A. (1995)。德性之后。龔群、戴揚毅 譯。北京：中國社會科學出版社。
Schwartz, P. & V. Rutter (2004)。性之性別。陳素秋譯。台北：韋伯文化。
Tong, R. (1996)。女性主義思潮。刁筱華譯。台北：時報。
Yalom, M. (2000)。乳房的歷史。何穎怡譯。台北：先覺。
MacKinnon, C. （1993）。性騷擾與性別歧視 : 職業女性困境剖析。賴慈芸, 雷文玫, 李金梅譯。台北：時報文化。
Weisman, L. K.（1997）。設計的歧視：「男造」環境的女性主義批判。王志弘，張淑玫，魏慶嘉 譯。台北：巨流。


英文書目

Ackelsberg, M.A. (2005). Women's community activism and the rejection of "politics": some dilemmas of popular democratic movements. In M. Friedman (Ed.), Women and citizenship (pp. 67-90). New York: Oxford University Press.
Ackelsberg, M. A., & Shanley, M. L. (1996). Privacy, publicity and power: a feminist rethinking of the public-private distinction. In N. J. Hirschmann & C. Di Stefano (Eds.), Revisioning the political: feminist reconstructions of traditional concepts in western political theory (pp. 213-234). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Alderman, E., & Kennedy, C. (1995). The right to privacy. New York: Knopf.
Allen, A. L. (1996). Privacy at home: the twofold problem. In N. J. Hirschmann & C. Di Stefano (Eds.), Revisioning the political: feminist reconstructions of traditional concepts in western political theory (pp. 193-212). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Allen, A. L. (1997). The jurispolitics of privacy. In M. L. Shanley & U. Narayan (Eds.), Reconstructing political theory: feminist perspectives (pp. 68-83). University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Armstrong, C., & Squires, J. (2002). Beyond the public/private dichotomy: relational space and sexual inequalities. Contemporary Political Theory, 1(3), 261-283.
Benhabib, S. (1992). Situating the self: gender, community, and postmodernism in contemporary ethics. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Benhabib, S. (1995). Feminism and postmodernism. In Feminist contentions: a philosophical exchange (pp. 17-34). New York: Routledge.
Bevacqua, M., & Baker, C. (2005). ‘Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!’: power, privacy, and the legal regulation of violence against women. Women in Politics, 25(3/4), 57-83.
Bird, S. R., & Sokolofski, L. (2005). Gendered socio-spatial practices in public eating and drinking establishments in the United States. Gender, Place and Culture, 12(2), 213-230.
Boling, P. (1996). Privacy and the politics of intimate life. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Bondi, L., & Domosh, M. (1998). On the contours of public space: a tale of three women. Antipode, 30(3), 270-289.
Butler, J. (1997). Excitable speech: a politics of the performative. New York: Routledge.
Carroll, J., & Zerilli, L. M. G. (1993). Feminist challenges to political science. In A. W. Finifter (Ed.), Political science: the state of the discipline II (pp. 55-76). Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Cohen, J. L. (2002). Regulating intimacy: a new legal paradigm. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Cohen, J. L., & Arato, A. (1992). Civil society and political theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cooke, M. (2003). The weaknesses of strong intersubjectivism. European Journal of Political Theory, 2(3), 281-305.
Cooke, M. (2005). Book review: making the case for privacy rights. Philosophy Social Criticism, 31, 131-143.
Coole, D. (2000). Cartographic convulsions: public and private reconsidered. Political Theory, 28, 337-354.
Cornell, D. (1995). The imaginary domain: abortion, pornography and sexual harassment. New York: Routledge.
Crossley, N. (1996). Body-subject/body-power: agency, inscription and control in Foucault and Merleau-Ponty. Body & Society, 2(2), 99-116.
Crossley, N. (2001). The phenomenological habitus and its construction. Theory and Society, 30(1), 81-120.
Danielson, C. (1999). The gender of privacy and the embodied self: examining the origins of the right to privacy in U.S. law. Feminist Studies, 25(2), 311-344.
Davidoff, L. (2003). Gender and the great divide: public and private in British gender history. Journal of Women's History, 15(1), 11-27.
d'Entrèves, M. P. (2000). Public and private in Hannah Arendt's conception of citizenship. In M. P. d'Entrèves & U. Vogel (Eds.), Public and private: legal, political, and philosophical perspectives (pp. 68-90). New York: Routledge.
Dietz, M. (1985). Citizenship with a feminist face: the problem with maternal thinking. Political Theory, 13(1), 19–37.
Dietz, M. (1998). Context is all: feminism and theories of citizenship. In A. Phillips (Ed.), Feminism and politics (pp. 378-400). New York: Oxford University Press.
Eisenstein, Z. (1996). Equalizing privacy and specifying equality. In N. J. Hirschmann & C. Di Stefano (Eds.), Revisioning the political: feminist reconstructions of traditional concepts in western political theory (pp. 181-192). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Elias, N. (1978). The civilizing process: the history of manners. New York: Urizen Books.
Elshtain, J. B. (1981). Public man, private woman: women in social and political thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Fabian, K. (2002). Cacophony of voices: interpretations of feminism and its consequences for political action among Hungarian women's groups. European Journal of Women's Studies, 9(3), 269-290.
Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T.A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction (p.258-284). London: Sage.
Foucault, M. (1970). The order of things: an archaeology of the human sciences. London: Tavistock Publications.
Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. New York: Harper & Row.
Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. New York: Vintage Books.
Fraser, N. (1989). Unruly practices: power, discourse, and gender in contemporary social theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: a contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, 25/26, 56-80.
Fraser, N. (1998). Sex, lies, and the public sphere: some reflections on the confirmation of Clarence Thomas. In J. B. Landes (Ed.), Feminism, the public and the private (pp. 314-337). New York: Oxford University Press.
Gadamer, H. G. (1994). Truth and method (2nd rev. ed.). New York: Continuum.
Gal, S. (2002). A semiotics of the public/private distinction. differences, 13(1), 77-95.
Garber, M. B. (1992). Vested interests: cross-dressing & cultural anxiety. New York: Routledge.
Gobetti, D. (1997). Humankind as a system: private and public agency at the origins of modern liberalism. In J. A. Weintraub & K. Kumar (Eds.), Public and private in thought and practice: perspectives on a grand dichotomy (pp. 103-132). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action. Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (1987). The philosophical discourse of modernity: twelve lectures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: an inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (1990). Moral consciousness and communicative action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hartmann, B. (1987). Reproductive rights and wrongs: the global politics of population control and contraceptive choice (1st ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
Harvey, D. (1973). Social justice and the city. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Hasian, M., Jr. (1995). Remembering and forgetting: a postmodern interpretation of the origins of the "right of privacy.” Journal of Communication Inquiry, 19(2), 33-49.
Hershatter, G. (2004). Making the visible invisible: the fate of "the private" in revolutionary China. In J. W. Scott & D. Keates (Eds.), Going public: feminism and the shifting boundaries of the private sphere (pp.309-329). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Honig, B. (1998). Toward an agonistic feminism: Hannah Arendt and the politics of identity. In J. B. Landes (Ed.), Feminism, the public and the private (pp. 100-134). New York: Oxford University Press.
Honkasalo, M. (1998). Space and embodied experience: rethinking the body in pain. Body & Society, 4(2), 35-57.
Jaggar, A. M. (2005). Arenas of citizenship: civil society, the state and the global order. In M. Friedman (Ed.), Women and citizenship (pp. 91-110). New York: Oxford University Press.
James, S. (1992). The good-enough citizen: female citizenship and independence. In G. Bock & S. James (Eds.), Beyond equality and difference: citizenship, feminist politics, and female subjectivity (pp. 48-68). New York: Routledge.
Jones, K. B. (1990). Citizenship in a woman-friendly polity. Signs, 15(4), 781-812.
Jung, H. Y. (1996). Phenomenology and body politics. Body & Society, 2(2), 1-22.
Jorgenson, M., & Phillips, L. (2002). Discourse analysis as theory and method. London: Sage Publications.
Keane, J. (1984). Public life and late capitalism: toward a socialist theory of democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kittay, E. F. (1999). Love's labor: essays on women, equality and dependency. New York: Routledge.
Kross, J. (1999). Mansion, men, women, and the creation of multiple publics in eighteenth-century British North America. Journal of Social History, 33(2), 385-408.
Kumar, K. (1997). Home: the promise and predicament of private life at the end of the twentieth Century. In J. A. Weintraub & K. Kumar (Eds.), Public and private in thought and practice: perspectives on a grand dichotomy (pp. 204-236). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kymlicka, W. (1990). Contemporary political philosophy: an introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kymlicka, W. (1995). Multicultural citizenship: a liberal theory of minority rights. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kymlicka, W., & Norman, W. (1994). Return of the citizen: a survey of recent work on citizenship theory. Ethics, 104, 352-377.
Landes, J. B. (1998). The public and the private sphere: a feminist reconsideration. In J. B. Landes (Ed.), Feminism, the public and the private (pp. 100-134). New York: Oxford University Press.
Lever, A. (2000). Must privacy and sexual equality conflict? A philosophical examination of some legal evidence. Social Research, 67(4), 1137-1171.
Li, C. (1994). The Confucian concept of Jen and the feminist ethics of care: a comparative study. Hypatia, 9(1), 70-89.
Lister, R. (1997). Citizenship: feminist perspectives. Washington Square, NY: New York University Press.
Lowndes, V. (2004). Getting on or getting by? Women, social capital and political participation. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 6(1), 47-66.
MacIntyre, A. C. (1984). After virtue: a study in moral theory (2nd ed.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Mackinnon, C. (1983). Feminism, Marxism, method and the state: toward feminist jurisprudence. Signs, 8, 635-658.
MacKinnon, C. (1991). Reflections on sex equality under law. The Yale Law Journal, 100(5), 1281-1328.
Mackinnon, C. (1998). Difference and dominance: on sex discrimination. In A. Phillips (Ed.), Feminism and politics (pp. 295-313). New York: Oxford University Press.
MacKinnon, C. (2000). Privacy and equality: notes on their tension. The Tocqueville Review, 21(2), 77-85.
Martin, E. (1987). The woman in the body: a cultural analysis of reproduction. Boston: Beacon Press.
McLaughlin, J. (2003). Feminist social and political theory: contemporary debates and dialogues. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
McNay, L. (1992). Foucault and feminism: power, gender and the self. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge.
Moi, T. (1999). What is a woman? and other essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Morgan, J. (1995). Sexual harassment and the public/ private dichotomy: equality, morality and manners. In M. Thornton (Ed.), Public and private: feminist legal debates (pp. 89-100). New York: Oxford University Press.
Morris, D. (2000). Privacy, privation, perversity: toward new representations of the personal. Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 25(2), 323-351.
Mort, F. (1996). Cultures of consumption: masculinities and social space in late twentieth-century Britain. New York: Routledge.
Najmabadi, A. (2004). Gender and the sexual politics of public visibility in Iranian modernity. In J. W. Scott & D. Keates (Eds.), Going public: feminism and the shifting boundaries of the private sphere (pp. 43-68). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Narayan, U. (1997). Towards a feminist vision of citizenship: rethinking the implications of dignity, political participation and nationality. In M. L. Shanley & U. Narayan (Eds.), Reconstructing political theory: feminist perspectives (pp. 48-67). University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Offen, K. (1988). Defining feminism: a comparative historical approach. Signs, 14(119-57).
Okin, S. M. (1998). Gender, the public, and the private. In A. Phillips (Ed.), Feminism and politics (pp. 116-141). New York: Oxford University Press.
Pateman, C. (1989). The disorder of women: democracy, feminism, and political theory. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Phillips, A. (1993). Democracy and difference. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Phillips, A. (1999). Who needs civil society?: A feminist perspective. Dissent, 46(1), 56-61.
Putnam, R. (1995). Bowling alone: American's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6, 65-78.
Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice (Rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ricoeur, P. (1991). Life in quest of narrative. In D. Wood (Ed.), On Paul Ricoeur: narrative and interpretation (pp. 20-33). New York: Routledge.
Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sapiro, V. (1983). The political integration of women: roles, socialization, and politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Saxonhouse, A. (1983). Classical Greek conceptions of public and private. In S. I. Benn & G. F. Gaus (Eds.), Public and private in social life (pp. 363-385). London: St. Martin's Press.
Seligman, A. (1992). The idea of civil society. New York: Free Press. International.
Sevenhuijsen, S. (1998). Citizenship and the ethics of care: feminist considerations on justice, morality, and politics. London: Routledge.
Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2003). Mobile transformations of ‘public' and ‘private' life. Theory, Culture & Society, 20(3), 107-125.
Shilling, C. (2003). The body and social theory. London: Sage.
Skjeie, H., & Siim, B. (2000). Scandinavian feminist debates on citizenship.
International Political Science Review, 21(4), 345-360.
Skocpol, T. (2004). Voice and inequality: the transformation of American civic cemocracy. APSA Presidential Address, 2(1), 3-20.
Sloat, A. (2005). The rebirth of civil society. European Journal of Women's Studies, 12(4), 437-452.
Star, D. (2002). Do Confucians really care? A defense of the distinctiveness of care ethics: a reply to Chenyang Li. Hypatia, 17(1), 77-106.
Sypnowich, C. (2000). The civility of law: between public and private. In M. P. d'Entrèves & U. Vogel (Eds.), Public and private: legal, political, and philosophical perspectives (pp. 93-116). New York: Routledge.
Tay, A. E.-S., & Kamenka, E. (1983). Public law-private law in public and private in social life. In S. I. Benn & G. F. Gaus (Eds.), Public and private in social life (pp. 67-92). New York: St. Martin's Press.
Taylor, C. (1985). The nature and scope of distributive justice. In Philosophy and the human sciences (pp. 289-317). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: the making of the modern identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Taylor, C. (1991). Modes of civil society. Public Culture, 3(1), 95-118.
Taylor, C. (1994). Multiculturalism: examining the politics of recognition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Tronto, J. C. (1993). Moral boundaries: a political argument for an ethic of care. New York: Routledge.
Turner, B. S. (1991). Recent developments in the theory of the body. In M.
Featherstone, M. Hepworth & B. S. Turner (Eds.), The body: social process and cultural theory (pp. 1-35). London: Sage.
Turner, B. S. (1996). The body and society: explorations in social theory (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Turner, B. S. (2001). Outline of a general theory of cultural citizenship. In N. Stevenson (Ed.), Culture and citizenship (pp. 11-32). London: Sage Publications.
Uhlmann, A. J., & Uhlmann, J. R. (2005). Embodiment below discourse: The internalized domination of the masculine perspective. Women’s Studies International Forum, 28, 93– 103.
Voet, M. C. B. (1998). Feminism and citizenship. London: Sage Publications.
Voet, M. C. B. (1998). Citizenship and female participation. In J. Bussemaker & M. C. B. Voet (Eds.), Gender, participation, and citizenship in the Netherlands (pp. 11-24). Brookfield, VT: Ashgate.
Walby, S. (1994). Is citizenship gendered? Sociology, 28(2), 379-395.
Wall, E. (2001). Sexual harassment and wrongful communication. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 31, 525-537.
Warren, S.D., & Brandeis, L.D. (1890). The Right to Privacy. Harvard Law Review, 4(5), 193-220.
Weintraub, J. (1997). The theory and politics of the public/private distinction. In J. A. Weintraub & K. Kumar (Eds.), Public and private in thought and practice: perspectives on a grand dichotomy (pp. 1-42). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wolfe, A. (1997). Public and private in theory and practice: some implications of an uncertain boundary. In J. A. Weintraub & K. Kumar (Eds.), Public and private in thought and practice: perspectives on a grand dichotomy (pp. 182-203). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wright, M. W. (2004). The private parts of public value: the regulation of women workers in China's export-processing zones. In J. W. Scott & D. Keates (Eds.), Going public: feminism and the shifting boundaries of the private sphere (pp. 92-122). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Yeatman, A. (1994). Postmodern revisionings of the political. New York: Routledge.
Yeatman, A. (1997). Feminism and power. In M. L. Shanley & U. Narayan (Eds.), Reconstructing political theory: feminist perspectives (pp. 144-157). Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Yeatman, A. (2001). Feminism and citizenship. In N. Stevenson (Ed.), Culture and citizenship (pp. 138-152). London: Sage Publications.
Young, I. M. (1989). Polity and group difference: a critique of the ideal of universal citizenship. Ethics, 99(2), 250–274.
Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Young, I. M. (1997). Intersecting voices: dilemmas of gender, political philosophy, and policy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Young, I. M. (1998). Impartiality and the civic public: some implications of feminist critiques of moral and political theory. In J. B. Landes (Ed.), Feminism, the public and the private (pp. 421-447). New York: Oxford University Press.
Young, I. M. (2005). On female body experience: "Throwing like a girl" and other essays. New York: Oxford University Press.