:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:公民素養融入大學通識課程之實踐經驗研究:以「探究多元文化中的自我」課程為例
書刊名:教育研究與發展期刊
作者:徐敏雄 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsu, Min-hsiung
出版日期:2013
卷期:9:3
頁次:頁59-85
主題關鍵詞:公民素養通識教育課程與教學融入式課程Civic literacyGeneral educationCurriculum and instruction
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:175
  • 點閱點閱:107
為瞭解公民素養如何融入通識教育,本文以研究者開授之「探究多元文化中的自我」課程為例,將公民素養融入其中,並以質性研究方法記錄實踐過程。研究發現,教師若能善用電影廣告媒體、與學生切身相關議題,或足以引發生命反思與情緒感動的媒材,便可讓學生在經驗與價值碰撞過程中擴展知識與經驗,覺察自己、他人與外在社會文化框架的權力關係。若欲將課程成效發揮更佳,教師還必需在適當課程主題與團體氛圍下,適切地融合多元教學設計,才能讓學生因曖昧與衝突的價值與經驗碰撞,學習理性表達、尊重、包容等民主素養,反思各種社會與生命倫理、生活與身體美學,以及媒體意識型態之合理性。
In order to understand the possible strategies and their effects of nurturing civic literacy from the curriculum of general education, I took an example from the class of “Self-exploring within a multicultural context” taught by myself in the general education center, with qualitative research method, to record whole practice processes. The findings were that if making use of movies and commercial films, troubling issues that are pertinent to the students, or materials that are sufficient to trigger reflection on life, there were chances for students to make their own interpretations and constructions with one another, with possibility to expand knowledge and experiences, as well as the values presetting and power structures among oneself, other people and society. Besides this, if to extend better effects on the implementation of curriculum, there were requirements to make auxiliary of teaching designs, such as lecture, Socratic teaching, guided and groups discussions, role play and cooperative learning et al. During the process due to differences, as well as the collision of vague and conflicting values and experiences, students might learn the literacy of democracy such as rational expression, respect and tolerance, and reflect on the various kinds of social and human ethics, life and body aesthetics, and the rationality of ideology implied in the media.
期刊論文
1.徐敏雄(20090600)。培養現代公民的社區大學課程連結原則之研究。當代教育研究,17(2),71-101。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Cordero, E. D.、White, S.、Park, Y. S.、Israel, T.(2010)。Impact of instructor and course characteristics on the effectiveness of curriculum infusion。Journal of American College Health,59(2),75-81。  new window
3.黃俊傑(19990600)。論通識教育與公民養成之關係。通識教育,6(2),1-16。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃俊傑(200412)。論大學通識教育中的主體覺醒與群體意識:教學理念與實踐。通識教育,11(4),11-22。  延伸查詢new window
5.林思伶(20110400)。我國大專校院通識教育實施現況調查。教育資料與研究,99,1-36。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.陳介英(20080600)。通識教育與臺灣的大學教育。思與言,46(2),1-33。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.謝青龍、鄒川雄、葉裕民、林明炤(2006)。以經典為核心的通識教育--南華大學通識教育改進方案。南華通識教育研究,3(1),1-16。  延伸查詢new window
8.江宜樺(2005)。公民理念與公民的教育。通識教育,12(1),27-44。  延伸查詢new window
9.朱建民(20020600)。大學通識教育的回顧與前瞻。通識教育,9(2),143-151。  延伸查詢new window
10.劉阿榮(19990600)。臺灣地區通識教育之變遷:批判與反思。通識教育,6(2),17-37。  延伸查詢new window
11.Gutmann, Amy(1995)。Civic Education and Social Diversity。Ethics,105,557-579。  new window
12.張秀雄(19990600)。建構適合臺灣社會的公民資格觀。通識教育,6(2),39-63。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.林火旺(2000)。公民議題的回顧與反省。二十一世紀公民與道德教育學術研討會。臺北:國立台灣師範大學公民訓育學系。129-144。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Jeff Lewis、邱志勇、許夢芸(2008)。細說文化研究基礎。臺北:韋伯文化國際出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.Conant, James Bryant、謝明珊(201008)。自由社會的通識教育。臺北:韋伯。  延伸查詢new window
3.Brookfield, S. D.(2006)。The skillful teacher: On technique, trust, and responsiveness in the classroom。San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass。  new window
4.Corr, C. A.、Nabe, C. M.、Corr, D. M.(2003)。Death and dying, life and living。Belmont, CA:Brooks/Cole。  new window
5.Lash, S.、Urry, J.(1993)。Economies of signs and space。London:Sage。  new window
6.Nussbaum, M. C.、孫善豪(2010)。培育人文:人文教育改革的古典辯護。臺北市:政大出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.樊明德(2004)。以電影開啟生命智慧:e化電影是生命教育之理論與實踐。臺北市:學富。  延伸查詢new window
8.Hargreaves, A.(2003)。Teaching in the knowledge society: education in the age of insecurity。Teacher College Press。  new window
9.Schön, D. A.(1991)。The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action。Hampshire:Ashgate。  new window
10.黃俊傑(200607)。轉型期中的大學通識教育:理念、現況與展望。高雄市:中華民國通識教育學會。  延伸查詢new window
11.Giroux, H. A.(1988)。Teachers as intellectual: Toward a critical pedagogy of learning。Westport, CT:Bergin & Garvery。  new window
12.黃武雄(2003)。學校在窗外。左岸文化出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.Potter, W. J.(2008)。Media literacy。Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Publications。  new window
14.Silverblatt, A.(2008)。Media literacy: keys to interpreting media messages。Westprot, CT:Praeger。  new window
15.Habermas, Jürgen、Burger, Thomas、Lawrence, Frederick(1989)。The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society。Cambridge, MA:MIT Press。  new window
16.Giddens, Anthony(1984)。The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration。Cambridge:Polity Press。  new window
17.Bauman, Zygmunt、張君玫(2001)。全球化:對人類的深遠影響。群學。  延伸查詢new window
18.Giddens, Anthony(1992)。The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love, and Eroticism in Modern Societies。Stanford University Press。  new window
19.Palmer, P. J.(1998)。The courage to teach: exploring the inner landscape of a teacher's life。San Francisco, California:Jossey-Bass Inc.。  new window
20.Giddens, Anthony(1990)。The Consequences of Modernity。Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press。  new window
21.Galston, William A.(1991)。Liberal purposes: Goods, virtues, and diversity in the liberal state。Cambridge University Press。  new window
22.畢恆達(20010000)。空間就是權力。臺北:心靈工坊文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.Corey, Gerald、Corey, Marianne Schneider、李茂興(1998)。追求未來與過去。臺北:弘智文化。  延伸查詢new window
24.吳璧純、詹志禹、Ratcliff, James L.、Johnson, D. Kent、Gaff, Jerry G.(2010)。通識教育課程改革。國立政治大學政大出版社。  延伸查詢new window
25.Bauman, Zygmunt、朱道凱(2002)。社會學動動腦。群學出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.教育部(2010)。第八次全國教育會議之10大中心議題全民論壇之結論與建議,http://www.edu.tw/files/site_content/B0010/10大中心議題全民論壇之結論與建議(彙.pdf, 2012/07/04。  延伸查詢new window
2.European Commission(2004)。Working Group B "Key Competence", Implementation of "Education and Training 2010" Work Programme,Brussels:European Commission。,http://ec.europa.eu/ education/policies/2010/doc/basicframe.pdf。  new window
圖書論文
1.陳舜芬(2000)。臺灣地區大學通識教育的檢討與展望。新世紀教育的理論與實踐。高雄市:復文。  延伸查詢new window
2.Cranton, P.(2002)。Teaching for transformation。Contemporary viewpoints on teaching adults effectively。San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass。  new window
3.Giroux, H. A.、Simon, R. I.。Schooling, popular culture and a pedagogy of possibility。Sociology of education: major themes。New York, NY:Routledge。  new window
4.Kymlicka, W.、Norman, W.(1995)。Return of the citizenship: a survey of recent work on citizenship theory。Theorizing citizenship。New York, NY:State University of New York Press。  new window
5.Van der Kamp, M.、Veendrick, L.(2000)。Different views on literacy。Adult education and social responsibility。Frankfurt am Main, Germany:Peter Lang。  new window
6.Young, Iris M.(1996)。Communication and the Other: Beyond Deliberative Democracy。Democracy and Difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political。Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press。  new window
7.李奉儒(2000)。西方大學理念的轉變:從傳統、現代到後現代。新世紀教育的理論與實踐。高雄市:復文。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE