:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:社群、典則與當局:大學生政治支持穩定與變遷的邏輯
書刊名:中國行政評論
作者:劉嘉薇 引用關係
作者(外文):Liu, Jia-wei
出版日期:2013
卷期:19:2
頁次:頁121-155
主題關鍵詞:政治支持政治社會化定群追蹤Political supportPolitical socializationPanel study
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:346
  • 點閱點閱:122
政治支持為政治系統不可或缺的輸入項,其對象可分為政治社群、典則以及權威當局。此一1960年代便提出的理論,在二十一世紀的今天仍未過時,且其重要性反而遞增。大學生作為社會未來的中堅份子,且部分學生已成為選民,其他學生為潛在選民,故研究大學生的政治支持有其價值。有別於一般研究政治態度的設計,本研究採用定群追蹤研究法,以貫時性的資料型態更能瞭解政治支持如何持續與變遷。本研究發現,以政治支持穩定度而言,在大學生的政治支持中,對典則的支持相對穩定,但對於政治社群、權威當局的支持較不穩定,甚至政治社群的穩定度低於典則支持。再者,以政治支持高低程度而言,大學生對權威當局的支持是這三種層次中最低者,對典則的支持也高於社群。學理上認為人民對社群的支持應高於典則,在台灣卻得到相反的結果,這與人民國家認同長期分歧應無法脫勾,長期國家認同的分歧可能使大學生對政治社群的支持產生懷疑。整體而言,政治支持雖有高低起伏甚至變遷,然其變遷邏輯皆與政治環境變遷相扣連。
Political support is an indispensible input in political system and its objects are political community, regime, and authorities. The theory provided in 1960s is still not out of date and increases progressively its importance so far in this twenty-first century. College students are the future core people in society and part of them has become electors and the others are potential electors. Thus, it is meaningful to study college students' political support.Distinguished from the design of general researches in political attitude, this study uses panel study in which longitudinal data would reveal and know more about how political support continues and changes. It discovers that in the stability of political support, college students in supporting regime are relatively stable but are unstable in supporting political community and authorities; even the stability of community support is lower than that of regime support.Moreover, as to the degree of political support, students' support to authorities is the lowest among these three objects and to regime is still higher than to community. Theoretically, people's support to community should be higher than that to regime, but it comes to the opposite result in Taiwan which is supposed to relate to a long-term divergence of people's national identity. It cannot exclude the possibility that the long-term divergence of people's national identity would create doubts about support for political community. In general, political support has its high or low degree and changes, but the logic of changes is closely connected with changes in the political environment.
期刊論文
1.Muller, Edward N.(1970)。The Representation of Citizens by Political Authorities: Consequences for Regime Support。American Political Science Review,64(4),1149-1166。  new window
2.Halaby, Charles(2004)。Panel Models in Sociological Research: Theory into Practice。Annual Review of Sociology,30(1),507-544。  new window
3.Langeheine, R.、Van De Pol, F.(1990)。A Unifying Framework for Markov Modeling in Discrete Space and Discrete Time。Sociological Methods and Research,18(4),416-441。  new window
4.黃紀、王鼎銘、郭銘峰(20051200)。日本眾議院1993及1996年選舉--自民黨之選票流動分析。人文及社會科學集刊,17(4),853-883。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Easton, David(1957)。An Approach to the Analysis of Political Systems。World Politics,9(3),383-400。  new window
6.王鼎銘、蘇俊斌、黃紀、郭銘峰(20041100)。日本自民黨之選票穩定度研究:1993、1996及2000年眾議院選舉之定群追蹤分析。選舉研究,11(2),81-109。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.陳陸輝(20031200)。政治信任、施政表現與民眾對臺灣民主的展望。臺灣政治學刊,7(2),149-188。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.林聰吉(20071200)。政治支持與民主鞏固。政治科學論叢,34,71-103。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.盛治仁(20030500)。臺灣民眾民主價值及政治信任感研究--政黨輪替前後的比較。選舉研究,10(1),115-169。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.黃紀(20050500)。投票穩定與變遷之分析方法:定群類別資料之馬可夫鍊模型。選舉研究,12(1),1-37。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.陳陸輝(20021100)。政治信任感與臺灣地區選民投票行為。選舉研究,9(2),65-84。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.陳陸輝(20060600)。政治信任的政治後果--以2004年立法委員選舉為例。臺灣民主季刊,3(2),39-61。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.陳義彥(19791200)。臺灣地區大學生對政治系統支持態度之研究--從中美斷交事件探析。政治學報,8,101-172。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Sears, D. O.、Funk, C.(1999)。Evidence of the Long-Term Persistence of Adults’ Political Predispositions。Journal of Politics,61(1),1-28。  new window
會議論文
1.陳陸輝(2007)。台灣民眾政治支持的初探。「台灣民主的實踐 : 責任、制度與行為」學術研討會,2007年 。臺北:臺灣政治學會。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.陳義彥、陳陸輝(2004)。我國大學生政治價値與態度的持續與變遷--大學四年社會化過程之硏究I (計畫編號:NSC93-2414-H-004-032-SSS)。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳義彥、陳陸輝(2005)。我國大學生政治價値與態度的持續與變遷--大學四年社會化過程之硏究Ⅱ (計畫編號:NSC-94-2414-H-004-030)。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳義彥、陳陸輝(2006)。我國大學生政治價値與態度的持續與變遷--大學四年社會化過程之硏究Ⅲ (計畫編號:NSC95-2414-H-004-050-SSS)。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.彭懷恩(1978)。中華民國大學生的政治支持(碩士論文)。國立台灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Beetham, David(1994)。Defining and Measuring Democracy。London:Sage。  new window
2.Rabe-Hesketh, Sophia、Skrondal, Anders(2005)。Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata。College Station:Stata Press。  new window
3.Norris, Pippa(1999)。Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance。Oxford University Press。  new window
4.易君博(1975)。政治理論與研究方法。台北:三民書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Singer, Judith D.、Willett, John B.(2003)。Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Modeling Change and Event Occurrence。Oxford University Press。  new window
6.Jennings, M. Kent、Niemi, Richard G.(1981)。Generations and Politics: A Panel Study of Youth Adults and Their Parents。Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press。  new window
7.Easton, David、Hess, R.(1965)。A System Analysis of Political Life。New York, NY:John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
8.Levine, Herbert M.(1982)。Political Issues Debated : An Introduction to Politics。Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall。  new window
9.Easton, David、Dennis, Jack(1969)。Children in the Political System: Origins of Political Legitimacy。New York, NY:McGraw-Hill。  new window
10.Jennings, M. Kent、Niemi, Richard G.(1974)。The political character of adolescence: The influence of families and schools。Princeton University Press。  new window
11.Agresti, Alan(2002)。Categorical Data Analysis。John Wiley & Sons。  new window
12.Dalton, Russell J.(2004)。Democratic challenges, democratic choices: the erosion of political support in advanced industrial democracies。Oxford University Press。  new window
13.Connover, Pamela J.(1991)。Political Socialization: Where’s the Politics。Political Science: Looking to the Future。Evanston. Illinois:Northwestern University Press。  new window
其他
1.中國時報社論(20051118)。豈能讓無休止的爆料決定選舉結果!。  延伸查詢new window
2.何博文,羅如蘭(20051116)。邱毅再爆『弊案的火燒到閣揆腳下』高捷董事會、五人小組謝系通吃。  延伸查詢new window
3.林修全(20061230)。倒扁紅潮最紅的時尚。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳嘉宏(20051123)。爆料大賽負面選舉如野火燎人又燎己。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃國樑(20061230)。國務費特別費最昂貴的歷史共業。  延伸查詢new window
6.溫貴香(20051122)。張顯耀質疑高捷案籲謝揆公布基金會帳戶。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Langeheine, Rolf、van de Pol, Frank(1994)。Discrete-Time Mixed Markov Latent Class Models。Analyzing Social and Political Change: A Casebook of Methods。London:Sage Publications。  new window
2.Langeheine, Rolf、van de Pol, Frank(2002)。Latent Markov Chains。Applied Latent Class Analysis。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Dalton, Russell J.(1999)。Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies。Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government。New York, NY:Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE