:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:落實審美意識主體性於通識藝術課程之探究
書刊名:高雄師大學報. 人文與藝術類
作者:王玫 引用關係
作者(外文):Wang, Mei
出版日期:2013
卷期:34
頁次:頁39-54
主題關鍵詞:主體意識審美意識課程實踐Aesthetic consciousnessCurriculum praxisSubjective consciousness
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:14
  • 點閱點閱:58
審美研究的目的,在於獲得審美的經驗,而形成美感的主體及其主體性,成就文化的審美意識之主體性。由此而能對所處之社會、教學工作,繼續反思、互動,提供一種源源不絕的新的動力。就本文所探討的審美意識主體性而言,審美行為的發生,主要涵構三個審美樣態 (mode) : 審美意識主體、審美對象及審美主體。審美意識主體透由自身於審美意向性的表達,創作出課程之藝術品,並將自我之審美意識灌注於通識教育的課程實踐中,藉由審美客體的表現性傳達意義,讓審美主體(學生)在課程實踐歷程裡,也能具有審美意識的主體性。研究者並提出三個意識覺醒途徑: 一為處境意識;二為想像意識;三為解放意識。透過這三種意識覺醒,才可能使主體自由,使課程的內在精神得以真正開啟學習意識的彰顯,影響課程學習後的效能。
The purpose of aesthetic study is to gain an aesthetic experience in order to form a cultural aesthetic subject consciousness. There will be the continual motivation to support the teaching job, reflect oneself and have positive interaction with students. In terms of the aesthetic subject consciousness, aesthetic behaviors mainly include three aesthetic modes: aesthetic conscious subjects, aesthetic objects and aesthetic subjects. The aesthetic conscious subjects create art works of curricula by means of aesthetic intentionality. We can say that teachers who once become aesthetic conscious subjects could put their aesthetic consciousness into education praxis. Besides students could transform aesthetic subjects into aesthetic conscious subjects in the learning process while the expression of aesthetic objects conveyed their aesthetical values. This researcher submitted three ways to make subjects have perceptions: 1. situation consciousness 2. imagination consciousness 3. liberation consciousness. Individuals, through these ways, could be really liberated as well as become conscious subjects. The inside spirit of the curricula may be displayed and at the same time conscious perceptions can influence learning effects.
期刊論文
1.Greene, M.(1990)。The Passion of The Passible: Choice, Multiple and Commitment。Journal of Moral Education,19(2),67-76。  new window
2.Wang, H.(2001)。Aesthetic experience, the unexpected, and curriculum。Journal of Curriculum and Supervision,17(1)。  new window
學位論文
1.甯增湖(2005)。MaxineGreene意識論及其對教師課程實踐之蘊義(碩士論文)。國立台北師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.洪詠善(2008)。美感經驗觀點的教學再概念化(博士論文)。國立臺北教育大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Schubert, W.、Ayers, W.(1992)。Teacher lore: Learning from our own experience。New York:Longman。  new window
2.Franck, F.(1993)。Zen seeing, zen drawing。New York:Bantam Books。  new window
3.Pinar, W. F.(1998)。Introduction。The passionate mind of Maxine Greene:I am…not yet。London:Falmer Press。  new window
4.王文科(1996)。課程與教學論。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
5.Greene, M.(1978)。Landscapes of learning。New York, NY:Teachers College, Columbia University。  new window
6.Schubert, W. H.(1986)。Curriculum: Perspective, paradigm, possibility。New York, NY:Macmillan。  new window
7.Freire, P.(2000)。Education for Critical Consciousness。New York:Continuum。  new window
8.Huebner, D. E.、Hillis, Vikki(1999)。The lure of the transcendent: Collected essays by Dwayne E. Huebner。New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
9.Merleau-Ponty, Maurice、Cobb, William、Edie, James M.、Wild, John(1964)。The Primacy of Perception: And Other Essays on Phenomenological Psychology, the Philosophy of Art, History and Politics。Evanston:Northwestern University Press。  new window
10.Greene, Maxine(1995)。Releasing the imagination: essays on education, the arts, and social change。Jossey-Bass Publishers。  new window
11.Dewey, John(1980)。Art as experience。Perigee Books。  new window
12.Greene, Maxine(1973)。Teacher as Stranger: Educational Philosophy for the Modern Age。Wadsworth Publishing Company, Inc.。  new window
其他
1.Greene, Maxine,Hancock, Markie(2001)。Exclusions and awakenings: The life of Maxine Greene,CA:Hancock Productions。  new window
圖書論文
1.Pinar, W. F.、Reynolds, W. M.、Slattery, P.、Taubman, P. M.(1995)。Understanding curriclum as poststructurlist, deconstructed, postmodern text。Understanding Curriculum。NY:Peter Lang Publishing, Inc。  new window
2.Vallance, E.(1991)。Aesthetic inquiry: Art criticism。Forms of Curriculum Inquiry。Albany, New York:State University of New York Press。  new window
3.Kliebard, H. M.(1975)。Bureaucracy and curriculum theory。Curriculum Theorizing: The Reconceptualists。McCutchan。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top