臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：畫出美麗新境界--視覺藝術教學融合語文賞析的美感經驗之探究
書刊名：新竹教育大學教育學報
作者：胡郁珮
作者(外文)：Hu, Yu-pei
出版日期：2016
卷期：33:2
頁次：頁95-144
主題關鍵詞：美感教育；美感經驗；視覺藝術教學；Aesthetic education；Aesthetic experience；Visual arts instruction
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:98
  • 點閱點閱:16
美好人生需透過美感教育薰陶得以豐富、完滿。國內在「課程美學探究」（aesthetic inquiry to curriculum）之研究上，是以美學概念探究課程情境中美感特質以及美感經驗；多數的研究只強調美感特質對於課程重要性的論述層面，鮮少深入討論學習者的美感經驗。因此，本研究以視覺藝術融合語文的學習活動，透過質性研究法，探究10位6歲至12歲的學習者在此學習歷程中的美感經驗，為視覺藝術教學的研究範疇提供另一種視點與觀照。本研究發現學習者的美感經驗如下：一、學童能在賞析詩文與視覺藝術作品的過程中釋放想像、產生移情，與詩畫共鳴；二、詩文結合視覺藝術作品的審美與創作活動，能引領學童以不同的角度觀看世界，以情意知覺涵養理性思維、詩情畫意妝點生活；三、在本研究設計的學習活動中，學童能專心致志，以昂然的興致、深層投入創作，不畏艱難、信心滿懷地克服難題，而擁懷心滿意足的美感經驗；四、本研究設計的學習活動能引發學童與環境對談的自我言說能力，重寫生命經驗、再創造自身的美感境地。
Through aesthetic education, one can better his life to be nurtured rich and more fulfilling. Studies conducted domestically on aesthetic inquiry on the curriculum are based on the aesthetic concept to explore aesthetic qualities and experiences of the courses' contexts. Most research studies have only emphasized on the importance of aesthetic characteristics but rarely discussed in-depth the aesthetic experiences of learners. Therefore, this study integrates visual arts and literature appreciation in learning activities to explore the aesthetic experiences of 10 six- to twelve-year-old learners through a qualitative research method. We provide an alternative viewpoint for the study on the field of visual arts instructions. In this study, we found the aesthetic experiences of learners are as follows. First, children can reason with the texts and paintings, and then release their imaginations. Second, poetry combined with visual artwork can induce children to appreciate the world from different views, in order to conserve rational affective and perceptual thinking, thus contributing to a ＂poetic life.＂ Third, in the learning activities of the study design, the students can concentrate to proudly spirits, deep into creative, brave, full of confidence to overcome difficulties, to enjoy the satisfying emotional quality of the aesthetic experience. Fourth, the learning activities of the study design can lead the sensitivity and ability to interactive with the environment and create new aesthetic experiences.
期刊論文
1.Johnson, H. L.(2007)。Aesthetic experience and early language and literacy development。Early Child Development and Care，177(3)，311-320。  new window
2.Smith, R. A.(2005)。Aesthetic education: Questions and issues。Arts Education Policy Review，106(3)，19-34。  new window
3.Dickson, R.、Costigan, A.(2011)。Emerging Practice for New Teachers: Creating Possibilities for "Aesthetic" Readings。English Education，43(2)，145-170。  new window
4.林曼麗(20010200)。臺灣視覺藝術教育理念之展開--藝術、人文、新契機。國民教育，41(3)，26-34。  延伸查詢new window
5.Jakobson, B.、Wickman, P. O.(2008)。The roles of aesthetic experience in elementary school science。Research in Science Education，38(1)，45-65。  new window
6.Eisner, E.(2006)。Does arts-based research have a future?。Studies in Art Education: A Journal of Issues and Research in Art Education，48(1)，9-18。  new window
7.Barone, T.(1983)。Education as aesthetic experience: Art in germ。Educational Leadership，40(4)，21-26。  new window
8.Berns, Gregory S.、Blaine, Kristina、Prietula, Michael J.、Pye, Brandon E.(2013)。Short- and long-term effects of a novel on connectivity in the brain。Brain Connectivity，3(6)，590-600。  new window
9.Changeux, J. P.(1994)。Art and neuroscience。Art and Science Similarities, Differences and Interactions，Special Issue，189-201。  new window
10.Eaton, M. M.、Moore, R.(2002)。Aesthetic experience: Its revival and its relevance to aesthetic education。Journal of Aesthetic Education，36(2)，9-23。  new window
11.Greene, M.(1977)。Imagination and aesthetic literacy。Art Education，30(6)，14-20。  new window
12.Gulla, A.、Pinhasi-Vittorio, L.、Zakin. A.(2009)。Exploring relationships between aesthetic education and writing across the curriculum using poetry。Across the Disciplines，6。  new window
13.Jakobson, B.、Wickman, P. O.(2015)。What difference does art make in science? A comparative study of meaning-making at elementary school。Interchange，46(4)，323-343。  new window
14.Kidd, David Comer、Castano, Emanuele(2013)。Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind。Science，342(6156)，377-380。  new window
15.Lacey, S.、Hagtvedt, H.、Patrick, V. M.、Anderson, A.、Stilla, R.、Deshpande, G.、Sathian, K.(2011)。Art for reward's sake: Visual art recruits the ventral striatum。Neuroimage，55(1)，420-433。  new window
16.Maivorsdotter, N.、Lundvall, S.(2009)。Aesthetic experience as an aspect of embodied learning: stories from physical education student teachers。Sport, Education and Society，14(3)，265-279。  new window
17.Pugh, Kevin J.、Girod, Mark(2007)。Science, art, and experience: Constructing a science pedagogy from Dewey's aesthetics。Journal of Science Teacher Education，18(1)，9-27。  new window
18.Sinclair, N.(2009)。Aesthetics as a liberating force in mathematics education?。ZDM，41(1/2)，45-60。  new window
19.Vezzali, L.、Stathi, S.、Giovannini, D.、Capozza, D.、Trifiletti, E.(2015)。The greatest magic of Harry Potter: Reducing prejudice。Journal of Applied Social Psychology，45(2)，105-121。  new window
20.Zaidel, D. W.(2010)。Art and brain: insights from neuropsychology, biology and evolution。Journal of Anatomy，216(2)，177-183。  new window
21.Zeman, A.、Milton, F.、Smith, A.、Rylance, R.(2013)。By heart: an fMRI study of brain activation by poetry and prose。Journal of Consciousness Studies，20(9/10)，132-158。  new window
22.吳承澤(20111200)。現象學觀點下的藝術批評--論海德格〈藝術作品的本源〉。經國學報，29，119-135。  延伸查詢new window
23.李雅婷(20101200)。美感教育之實踐策略探究：以敘事課程為例。教育學刊，35，65-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.周淑卿(20110100)。學習歷程中美感經驗的性質--藝術與科學課堂的探究。課程與教學，14(1)，19-40。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.林逢祺(19980700)。美感經驗與教育。教育研究集刊，41，155-170。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.郭禎祥(19940600)。多元文化觀與藝術教育。師大學報，39，545-582。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.郭禎祥(1999)。二十一世紀藝術教育的展望。美育，106，1-9。  延伸查詢new window
28.陳玉婷(20070600)。美感教育在藝術與人文學習領域上之運用：一位音樂老師之個案研究。教育研究與發展期刊，3(2)，113-136。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.陳伯璋(20030900)。新世紀的課程研究與發展。國家政策季刊，2(3)，149-167。  延伸查詢new window
30.陳錦惠(20050400)。教學經驗中的美感特質探討--杜威美學的觀點。課程與教學，8(2)，15-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.Eisner, E. W.(2004)。What can education learn from the arts about the practice of education?。International journal of education & the arts，5(4)，1-13。  new window
32.Girod, Mark、Twyman, Todd、Wojcikiewicz, Steve(2010)。Teaching and learning science for transformative, aesthetic experience。Journal of Science Teacher Education，21(7)，801-824。  new window
33.Ramachandran, V. S.、Hirstein, W.(1999)。The science of art: A neurological theory of aesthetic experience。Journal of Consciousness Studies，6(6/7)，15-51。  new window
34.Ballengee-Morris, C.、Stuhr, P. L.(2001)。Multicultural art and visual cultural education in a changing world。Art Education，54(4)，6-13。  new window
會議論文
1.黃彥文(2010)。邁向一種共鳴的課程美學取向。「美學取向課程與教學之理論建構與應用」學術論壇。臺北市：國立編譯館。103-120。  延伸查詢new window
2.廖仁義(2010)。美的覺醒：公民社會美學教育的理論與實踐。「美學取向課程與教學之理論建構與應用」學術論壇。臺北市：國立編譯館。1-5。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉梅琴(2007)。論《莊子．人間世》快感．美感．審美境界的現代詮釋。第三屆中國文哲之當代詮釋學術研討會。臺北市：國立臺北大學中國語文學系。215-226。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.教育部(2013)。教育部美感教育中長程計畫：第一期五年計畫（103年至107年）--臺灣．好美--美感從幼起、美力終身學。臺北：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
2.李雅婷(2009)。美感為本課程經驗之理論與實踐途徑建構研究（I）研究成果報告 (計畫編號：NSC96-2413-H-153-011)。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳伯璋(2006)。課程研究典範建構的新取向：論課程美學探究的必要性及其限制 (計畫編號：NSC94-2413-H032-011)。台北市：台灣師範大學教育系。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳麗文(2008)。閱讀、對話與遊戲：國小綜合活動課程美學之探究(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.陳錦惠(2013)。閱讀歷程之美感經驗探究(博士論文)。國立臺北教育大學，台北市。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.花英德(2013)。美感經驗的理論與實踐--國小六年級國語科的行動研究(博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.幸佳慧(1998)。兒童圖畫故事書的藝術探討(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.李雅婷(2002)。課程美學探究取向的理論與實踐之研究--以國小藝術統整課程之教育批評為例(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.吳惠娟(2002)。以圖畫書引導兒童審美與表現的教學研究(碩士論文)。屏東師範學院，屏東市。  延伸查詢new window
7.呂玉環(2006)。國小國語科美育教學之研究--從MaxineGreene美育觀點來分析(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.洪詠善(2008)。美感經驗觀點的教學再概念化(博士論文)。國立臺北教育大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Pinar, W. F.(2012)。What is curriculum theory?。New York, NY：Routledge。  new window
2.Greene, M.(1978)。Landscapes of learning。New York, NY：Teachers College, Columbia University。  new window
3.艾蜜莉•狄金生、董恆秀、賴傑威(2006)。艾蜜莉．狄金生詩選。新北市：木馬文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.歐用生(2003)。課程典範的再建構。高雄市：麗文文化。  延伸查詢new window
5.Berger, John、吳莉君(2010)。觀看的方式。臺北：麥田城邦文化。  延伸查詢new window
6.朱光潛(2014)。談美。臺中市：晨星。  延伸查詢new window
7.甄曉蘭(2015)。課程理論與實務--解構與重建。臺北市：高等教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.劉思源、何雲姿(2009)。小紅傘。高雄市：愛智圖書。  延伸查詢new window
9.Tagore, R.、鄭振鐸(2011)。再見經典：泰戈爾全集。新北市：漢宇國際文化。  延伸查詢new window
10.Dewey, J.(1938)。The philosophy of the arts。Washington, DC：Washington Dance Association。  new window
11.Eisner, E. W.(1996)。Cognition and curriculum reconsidered。London：SAGE。  new window
12.Dewey, John(1929)。Experience and nature。New York, NY：Dover。  new window
13.Dewey, John(1944)。Democracy and education。The Free Press。  new window
14.Eisner, E. W.(1972)。Educating Artistic Vision。New York, NY：The Macmillan Publishing Company, Inc.。  new window
15.Greene, M.(2001)。Variation on a blue guitar: The Lincoln Center Institute lectures on aesthetics education。New York, NY：Teachers College Press。  new window
16.梁川(2010)。漏。臺北市：上誼文化。  延伸查詢new window
17.Pinar, William F.、Reynolds, William M.、Slattery, Patrick、Taubman, Peter M.(1995)。Understanding curriculum: An introduction to the study of historical and contemporary curriculum discourses。Peter Lang。  new window
18.李澤厚(2001)。美學四講。台北：三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
19.Eisner, E. W.(2002)。The arts and the creation of mind。Yale University Press。  new window
20.Dewey, John(1934)。Art as Experience。New York, NY：Perigee Books。  new window
21.Greene, Maxine(1995)。Releasing the imagination: essays on education, the arts, and social change。Jossey-Bass Publishers。  new window
單篇論文
1.Butterfield, C. L.(2002)。Education by imagination: Using nonfiction children's literature to promote aesthetic connections(ED467522)。  new window
其他
1.Holzer, M. F.(2007)。Aesthetic education, inquiry, and the imagination，http://www.lcinstitute.org/wps/PA_1_0_P1/Docs/495-AEII.pdf。  new window
2.教育部(2012)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要藝術與人文學習領域，http://teach.eje.edu.tw/9CC2/9cc_97.php。  延伸查詢new window
3.曾昭旭(20131212)。庖丁解牛的技術層次和藝術層次--莊子與你16，https://m.facebook.com/notes/%E6%9B%BE%E6%98%AD%E6%97%AD/%E5%BA%96%E4%B8%81%E8%A7%A3%E7%89%9B%E7%9A%84%E6%8A%80%E8%A1%93%E5%B1%A4%E6%AC%A1%E5%92%8C%E8%97%9D%E8%A1%93%E5%B1%A4%E6%AC%A1%E8%8E%8A%E5%AD%90%E8%88%87%E4%BD%A016/636782999701888/， 。  new window
圖書論文
1.Kesson, K. R.(1999)。Toward a curriculum of mythopoetic meaning。Understanding democratic curriculum leadership。New York, NY：Teachers Coolege, Columbia University。  new window
2.Broudy, H. S.(1988)。Aesthetics and the Curriculum。Contemporary curriculum discourses。Gorsuch Scarisbrick。  new window
3.Vallance, E.(1991)。Aesthetic inquiry: Art criticism。Forms of curriculum inquiry。New York, NY：Albany, NY：State University of New York Press。  new window
4.Holzer, M. F.(2005)。From philosophy to practice: Asking important questions, reating enabling structures。Community in the making: Lincoln center Institute, the arts and teacher education。New York, NY：Teachers College, Columbia University。  new window
5.王淑芬(2010)。為什麼我會打翻牛奶。樹先生跑哪去了？--童詩精選集。臺北市：天下雜誌。  延伸查詢new window
6.夏婉雲(2010)。坐在雲端的鵝。樹先生跑哪去了？--童詩精選集。臺北市：天下雜誌。  延伸查詢new window
7.Eisner, E.(1985)。Aesthetic modes of knowing。Learning and teaching the ways of knowing。Chicago, Ill：National Society of Study of Education。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：543（臺灣：488，外國：55） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1311662 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67110526
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上