| 期刊論文| 1. | Beyer, L.(1985)。Aesthetic, experience for teacher preparation arid social change。Educational Theory，35(4)，385-397。   | | 2. | Chen, Shudorig(2005)。Thinking "the unthinkable" and teaching "the impossible":Eastwest formation。East-West Connections: Review of Asian Studies，5(1)。 | | 3. | Freedman, K.、Popkewitz, T.(1988)。Art education and social interests in the develop-ment of American schooling: Ideological origins of curriculum theory。Journal of Curriculum Studies，2(5)，287-405。 | | 4. | Pinar, W. F.(1972)。Working from within。Educational Leadership，29(4)，329-331。 | | 5. | 李雅婷(20070400)。H. Rugg創造性自我表現之課程美學觀點探究。課程與教學，10(2)，145-159。 延伸查詢 | 圖書| 1. | Eisner, E.(1985)。The ari of educational evaluation: A personal view。New York：Macmillan。 | | 2. | 天下雜誌(2002)。美的學習：捕捉看不見的競爭力。臺北：天下雜誌。 延伸查詢 | | 3. | Pinar, William F.(1975)。Curriculum Theorizing: The Reconceptualists。Berkeley, California：McCutchan Publishing Corporation。 | | 4. | Greene, M.(1978)。Landscapes of learning。New York, NY：Teachers College, Columbia University。 | | 5. | Pinar, W. F.、Grumet, M. R.(1976)。Toward a poor curriculum。Dubuque, IA：Kendall/Hunt。 | | 6. | Pinar, W. F.、Reynolds, W. M.、Slattery, P.、Taubman, P. M.(1995)。Understandingcurriculum: An introduction to the study of historical and contemporary curriculum discourse。York, NY：Peter Lang。 | | 7. | Eisner, Elliot W.(1985)。The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs。Macmillan。 | | 8. | Giroux, H.、Penna, A.、Pinar, W.(1981)。Curriculum and instruction: Alternatives in education。Berkeley, California：McCutchan。 | | 9. | 歐用生(20030000)。課程典範再建構。高雄：麗文文化。 延伸查詢 | | 10. | 歐用生(1984)。課程研究方法論：課程研究的社會學分析。高雄市：復文。 延伸查詢 | | 11. | 王文科(1988)。課程論。臺北市：五南圖書公司。 延伸查詢 | | 12. | 陳伯璋(2001)。新世紀課程改革的省思與挑戰。台北：師大書苑。 延伸查詢 | | 13. | 歐用生(2004)。課程領導：議題與展望。臺北市：高等教育。 延伸查詢 | | 14. | Greene, Maxine(1973)。Teacher as Stranger: Educational Philosophy for the Modern Age。Wadsworth Publishing Company, Inc.。 | | 15. | 黃政傑(1991)。課程設計。臺北：東華。 延伸查詢 | 圖書論文| 1. | Grumet, M. R.(1976)。Toward a poor curriculum。Toward a poor curriculum。Iowa：Kendall and Hunt。 | | 2. | Padgham, R.(1988)。Correspondences: Contemporary curricuium theory and twentieth century art。Contemporary curriculum discourses。Scottsdale, Arizona：Gorsuch Scarisbrick。 | | 3. | Phenix, P. H.(1975)。Transcendence and the curriculum。Curriculum theorizing: The reconceptualists。Barkeley, California：McCutchan。 | | 4. | Kliebard, H.(1975)。Persistent issues in historical perspective。Curriculum theorizing: The reconceptualists。Barkeley, California：McCutchan。 | | 5. | Popkewitz, T. S.(2000)。Curriculum as a problem of knowledge, governing, and the social administration of the soul。Curriculum & consequence: Herbert M. Kliebard and the promise of schooling。Teachers College Press。 | | 6. | Rosario, J.(1988)。Harold Rugg on how we came to know: A view of his aesthetics。Contemporary curriculum discourses。Scottsdale, Arizona：Gorsuch Scarisbrick。 | | 7. | Greene, M.(1975)。Curriculum and consciousness。Curriculum theorizing: The reconceptualists。Berkeley, CA：McCutchan。 | | 8. | 吳靖國(2005)。詩性智慧對後現代課程實踐的啟示。後現代課程：實踐與評鑑。臺北：中華民國教材研究發展學會。 延伸查詢 | | 9. | Broudy, H. S.(1988)。Aesthetics and the Curriculum。Contemporary curriculum discourses。Gorsuch Scarisbrick。 | | 10. | Vallance, E.(1991)。Aesthetic inquiry: Art criticism。Forms of Curriculum Inquiry。Albany, New York：State University of New York Press。 | | 11. | Popkewitz, T. S.、Brennan, M.(1998)。Restructuring of Social and Political Theory in Education: Foucault and a Social Epistemology of School Practices。Foucault's Challenge: Discourse, Knowledge, and Power in Education。New York：Teachers College Press。 | | 12. | Huebner, D.(1975)。Curriculum language and classroom meanings。Curriculum theorizing: The reconceptualists。Barkeley, California：McCutchan。 | |