資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(18.190.156.212)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
Thematic Hierarchy and Derivational Economy
書刊名:
語言暨語言學
作者:
李豔惠
作者(外文):
Li, Audrey Yen-hui
出版日期:
2014
卷期:
15:3
頁次:
頁295-339
主題關鍵詞:
論旨階層
;
賓語省略
;
自由詞序
;
論旨結構
;
詞彙標示
;
非賓格
;
Argument structure
;
Flexible word order
;
Lexical specification
;
Object deletion
;
Thematic hierarchy
;
Unaccusative
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
3
) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
3
共同引用:
32
點閱:25
論旨階層在語法理論中的地位眾說紛紜,甚至連最基本的是否應該存在都有爭議。 本文主張以結構層次來反映論旨階層可以有助於解釋有關漢語賓語省略的相關現象。 漢語基本上對動詞選擇何種論元、多少論元似乎彈性很大,主賓語好像也常能互換。然 而,在這些看似極大的彈性之下,事實上仍有一些限制。譬如,只有在句子的論元結構 遵守論旨階層的情況下,賓語才能省略;如果論元是在句法運作中加入的,那麼賓語就 不能省略。相對地,主語省略就不受此限。本文指出,這些限制可以從論旨結構層次及 衍生經濟性得到合理的解釋。
以文找文
What thematic hierarchy is has been controversial, and whether it should exist as a theoretical construct has been questioned. This work shows that if thematic hierarchy is represented structurally as layers of projections, it helps to account for some newly observed constraints on object deletion in Chinese. Chinese exhibits much flexibility in the number and type of arguments that can occur with verbs, and subjects and objects seem to be interchangeable in many cases. However, it is shown that constraints can be found amid the great flexibility in argument structure—object deletion is not possible in the cases not following thematic hierarchy, although subject deletion is still possible. Moreover, object deletion is unacceptable in the cases where arguments are added syntactically. Again, subjects can be deleted in such constructions. These generalizations will be captured by the aforementioned layers of projections reflecting thematic hierarchy and a notion of derivational economy— simpler structures are favored when choices are available.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Bowers, John(1993)。The syntax of predication。Linguistic Inquiry,24(4),591-656。
2.
Her, One-soon(2009)。Apparent subject-object inversion in Chinese。Linguistics,47(5),1143-1181。
3.
朱德熙(1961)。說「的」。中國語文,1961(12),1-16。
延伸查詢
4.
Li, Yafei(1993)。Structural head and aspectuality。Language,69(3),480-504。
5.
Yuan, Yulin(2003)。一套漢語動詞論元角色的語法指標。世界漢語教學,2003(3),24-36。
延伸查詢
6.
Zha, Weidong(2004)。論元結構與句式變換。中國語文,2004(3),209-221。
延伸查詢
7.
Zho, Guoguang(1997)。工具格在漢語句法結構中的地位。中國語文,1997(3),215-218。
延伸查詢
8.
Aelbrecht, Lobke、Haegeman, Liliane(2012)。VP-ellipsis is not licensed by VP-topicalization。Linguistic Inquiry,43(4),591-614。
9.
Bresnan, Joan、Kanerva, Jonni M.(1989)。Locative inversion in Chicheŵa: a case study of factorization in grammar。Linguistic Inquiry,20(1),1-50。
10.
Chen, Jie(2009)。虛介詞假設與增元結構--論不及物動詞後非核心論元的句法屬性。現代外語,2009(1),23-32。
延伸查詢
11.
Gu, Jimao(1999)。試談「飛上海」等不及物動詞帶賓語現象。中國語文,1999(5),337-346。
延伸查詢
12.
Hu, Jianhua(2007)。題元、論元和語法功能項--格標效應與語言差異。外語教學與研究,2007(3),163-168。
延伸查詢
13.
Hu, Jianhua(2008)。現代漢語不及物動詞的論元和賓語--從抽象動詞「有」到句法--信息結構接口。中國語文,2008(5),396-409。
延伸查詢
14.
Hu, Jianhua(2010)。論元的分佈與選擇--語法中的顯著性和局部性。中國語文,2010(1),3-20。
延伸查詢
15.
Kluender, Robert、Kutas, Marta(1993)。Subjacency as a processing phenomenon。Language and Cognitive Processes,8(4),573-633。
16.
Li, Yen-Hui Audrey(2011)。Non-canonical objects and case。Korea Journal of Chinese Language and Literature,1(1),21-51。
17.
Li, Yen-Hui Audrey。Born empty。Lingua。
18.
Lu, Jianming(2004)。「句式語法」理論與漢語研究。中國語文,2004(5),412-416。
延伸查詢
19.
Newmeyer, Frederick J.(1991)。Functional explanation in linguistics and the origin of language。Language and Communication,11(1/2),3-28。
20.
Shima, Etsuro(2000)。A preference for move over merge。Linguistic Inquiry,31(2),375-385。
21.
Sun, Tianqi、Li, Yafei(2010)。漢語非核心論元允准結構初探。中國語文,2010(1),21-33。
延伸查詢
22.
Xion, Zhongru(2009)。外圍格的論元地位。安徽師範大學學報(人文社會科學版),2009(5),560-566。
延伸查詢
23.
Xu, Liejiong、Shen, Yang(1998)。題元理論與漢語配價問題。當代語言學,1998(3),1-21。
延伸查詢
24.
Aoun, Joseph、Choueiri, Lina、Hornstein, Norbert(2001)。Resumption, movement, and derivational economy。Linguistic Inquiry,32(3),371-403。
25.
黃正德(2007)。漢語動詞的題元結構與其句法表現。語言科學,6(4),3-21。
延伸查詢
26.
陸儉明(2002)。再談「吃了他三個蘋果」一類結構的性質。中國語文,2002(4),317-325。
延伸查詢
27.
沈家煊(2006)。「王冕死了父親」的生成方式--兼說漢語「糅合」造句。中國語文,2006(4),291-300。
延伸查詢
28.
Thompson, Sandra A.(1973)。Transitivity and some problems with the BA construction in Mandarin Chinese。Journal of Chinese Linguistics,1(2),208-221。
29.
黃正德(2006)。Resultatives and unaccusatives: a parametric view。Bulletin of the Chinese Linguistic Society of Japan,253,1-43。
30.
Li, Yafei(1990)。On V-V compounds in Chinese。Natural Language and Linguistic Theory,8(2),177-207。
31.
Li, Yen-hui Audrey(1998)。Argument determiner phrases and number phrases。Linguistic Inquiry,29(4),693-702。
32.
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan(2001)。On Subject Specificity and Theory of Syntax-Semantics Interface。Journal of East Asian Linguistics,10(2),129-168。
33.
呂叔湘(1987)。說「勝」和「敗」。中國語文,1997(1),1-5。
延伸查詢
34.
Li, Yafei(1995)。The thematic hierarchy and causativity。Natural Language and Linguistic Theory,13(2),255-282。
會議論文
1.
Li, Yen-Hui Audrey(2010)。Case and objects。The 8th GLOW in Asia conference,(會議日期: 2010/08/12-08/16)。Beijing:Beijing Language and Culture University。
2.
Barrie, Michael、Li, Yen-Hui Audrey(2012)。Noun incorporation and non-canonical objects。30th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics。Somerville:Cascadilla Proceedings Project。65-75。
學位論文
1.
Pesetsky, David(1982)。Paths and Categories(博士論文)。Massachusetts Institute of Technology。
2.
Lin, Tzong-Hong Jonah(2001)。Light Verb Syntax and the Theory of Phrase Structure(博士論文)。University of California。
3.
吳曉虹(2002)。On Ellipsis and Gapping in Mandarin Chinese(碩士論文)。國立清華大學。
延伸查詢
圖書
1.
袁毓林(1998)。漢語動詞的配價研究。南昌:江西教育出版社。
延伸查詢
2.
Zhang, Ren(2005)。Enriched Composition and Inference in the Argument Structure of Chinese。New York:Routledge。
3.
Borer, Hagit(2005)。The Normal Course of Events。Oxford University Press。
4.
Bowers, John(2010)。Arguments as Relations。Cambridge:MIT Press。
5.
Hale, Kenneth Locke、Keyser, Samuel Jay(2002)。Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure。Cambridge:MIT Press。
6.
Lebeaux, David(2009)。Where does Binding Theory Apply?。Cambridge:MIT Press。
7.
Ramchand, Gillian(2008)。Verb Meaning and the Lexicon。Cambridge:New York:Cambridge University Press。
8.
Sprouse, Jon、Hornstein, Norbert(2014)。Experimental Syntax and Island Effects。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。
9.
Rosenbaum, Peter S.(1967)。The grammar of English predicate complement constructions。Cambridge:MIT Press。
10.
司馬翎(1999)。The Mandarin VP。Dordrecht:Boston:The Netherlands:Kluwer Academic Publishers:Kluwer Academic Publishers:Kluwer Academic Publishers。
11.
Rizzi, Luigi(1990)。Relativized Minimality。MIT Press。
12.
Aoun, Joseph E.、Li, Yen-hui Audrey(2003)。Essays on the representational and derivational nature of grammar: the diversity of Wh-constructions。MIT Press。
13.
Li, Audrey Yen-hui(1990)。Order and Constituency in Mandarin Chinese。Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic Publishers。
14.
Chomsky, Noam(1982)。Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding。Cambridge, Mass:MIT Press。
15.
Chomsky, Noam(1981)。Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures。Foris Publications。
16.
Chomsky, Noam(1995)。The minimalist program。MIT Press。
17.
Levin, Beth、Hovav, Malka Rappaport(2005)。Argument Realization。Cambridge University Press。
18.
Aoun, Joseph、Li, Yen-Hui Audrey(1993)。Syntax of Scope。MIT Press。
19.
Huang, Cheng-Teh James、Li, Audrey Yen-Hui、Li, Yafei(2009)。The Syntax of Chinese。Cambridge University Press。
圖書論文
1.
Barrie, Michael、Li, Yen-Hui Audrey。Analysis vs. synthesis: objects。Chinese Syntax in a Cross-linguistic Perspective。Oxford:Oxford University Press。
2.
Chomsky, Noam(1998)。Some observations on economy in generative grammar。Is the Best Good Enough? Optimality and Competition in Syntax。Cambridge:MIT Press。
3.
Collins, Chris(2003)。Economy conditions in syntax。The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory。Malden:Blackwell。
4.
Hale, Kenneth、Keyser, Samuel J.(1997)。On the complex nature of simple predicators。Complex Predicates。Stanford:CSLI。
5.
Hovav, Malka Rappaport、Levin, Beth(2012)。Lexicon uniformity and the causative alternation。The Theta System: Argument Structure at the Interface。Oxford:Oxford University Press。
6.
Tai, James H. Y.(1984)。Verbs and time in Chinese: Vendler's four categories。Papers from the Parasession on Lexical Semantics。Chicago:Chicago Linguistic Society。
7.
Kratzer, Angelika(1996)。Severing the external argument from its verb。Phrase Structure and the Lexicon。Kluwer。
8.
Johnson, Kyle(2001)。What VP ellipsis can do, what it can't, but not why。The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory。Malden:Blackwell Publishers。
9.
Hale, Kenneth、Keyser, Samuel Jay(1993)。On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations。The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger。Cambridge, Massachusetts:MIT Press。
10.
Fillmore, Charles J.(1968)。The Case for Case。Universals in Linguistic Theory。Holt, Rinehart and Winston。
11.
Chomsky, Noam(2000)。Minimalist inquires: The framework。Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik。Cambridge:MIT Press。
12.
Chomsky, Noam(2008)。On phases。Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud。MIT Press。
13.
Halle, Morris、Marantz, Alec(1993)。Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection。The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger。MIT Press。
14.
Chomsky, Noam(2001)。Derivation by phase。Ken Hale: A life in language。MIT Press。
15.
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen、Huang, C.-T. James(1994)。On the argument structure of resultative compounds。In honor of William S.-Y. Wang: Interdisciplinary Studies on Language and Language Change。Pyramid Press。
16.
黃正德(19970000)。On Lexical Structure and Syntactic Projection。中國境內語言暨語言學。臺北:中央研究院歷史語言研究所出版品編輯委員會。
延伸查詢
17.
Huang, C.-T. James(2015)。On syntactic analyticity and parametric theory。Chinese Syntax in a Cross-linguistic Perspective。Oxford University Press。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
華語代詞性謂語之事件結構分析
2.
A Morphosyntactic Analysis of Patient-subject Constructions in Chinese
3.
Appearance and Existence in Mandarin Chinese
4.
Sluicing, Sprouting and Missing Objects
5.
談論元結構和引介策略:從客語非典處置「將」字句談起
6.
Investigating the Argument Structure of Hakka Disposal Constructions: A Case Study of Disposal-Affective Jiong in Sixian Hakka
7.
Fake Attributives in Chinese--A Prosodic Grammar Perspective
8.
On Han Language V-Q-V Form
9.
The Syntax and the Semantics of Collective Marker yibing in Mandarin Event Structure
10.
談「的」字(準)定語結構--以四縣客家話名物化為例
11.
Transitivity and Two-way V-O Compound Verbs in Mandarin Chinese
12.
The Syntax and the Semantics of Ba-Construction in Mandarin Chinese
13.
Process-Related Durative Phrases as Numeral-Classifier Phrases in Chinese
14.
從被動句看「這本書的出版」
15.
漢英事件強迫之比較研究
1.
古漢語名詞轉動詞研究
2.
客語輕動詞邊緣地貌圖
3.
比較句刪略:國台語對比研究
4.
析取、並列、與疑問:一個比較性的研究
5.
漢語次要謂語研究
6.
鄒語語法結構與主語問題探究
1.
Causative Compounds across Chinese Dialects : A Study of Cantonese, Mandarin and Taiwanese
2.
On Lexical Structure and Syntactic Projection
無相關著作
1.
Numeral Classifiers in Ersu
2.
In Defense of the Numeral-based Model of Austronesian Phylogeny, and of Tsouic
3.
The Modal System in Hainan Min
4.
Phonological Patterning of Prevocalic Glides in Squliq Atayal
5.
Color Isn't Silent, Shallow Isn't Deep: Two Case Studies of Evaluating Silent Elements
6.
Constituent Structure in a Tagalog Text
7.
共性與差異:粵方言名詞短語研究
8.
漢語「聞/嗅」義詞的現狀與歷史
9.
南寧地區語言「去」義語素的語法化與接觸引發的「複製」
10.
在族群與語言接觸下形成的臺灣華語--從聲學分析的結果看起
11.
析論越南漢字音魚虞分韻的歷史層次
12.
臺灣閩南語情態詞「通」的語義句法屬性:存在、否定、情態、語氣的互動
13.
Request Strategies: A Comparative Study in Mandarin Chinese and Korean. By Yong-Ju Rue and Grace Qiao Zhang. (Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 2008)
14.
The Prosodic History of Chinese Resultatives
15.
Typology of Word Order in Chinese Dialects: Revisiting the Classification of Min
QR Code