臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：規則依循與科學知識的社會學
書刊名：科技、醫療與社會
作者：鄭凱元 引用關係
作者(外文)：Cheng, Kai-yuan
出版日期：2014
卷期：18
頁次：頁197-239
主題關鍵詞：規則依循；科學知識的社會學；孔恩；布洛爾；類詞學；Rule-following；Sociology of scientific knowledge；Thomas Kuhn；David Bloor；Generics
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:19
  • 點閱點閱:22
後期維根斯坦的哲學論述對主張科學知識具有社會性面向的理論進路提供重要的資源與依據，從孔恩援引家族相似性的論理來支撐其典範概念，到布洛爾與林區訴諸對規則依循的不同理解來發展其各自的科學知識社會學與俗民方法論，均是其中具代表性的嘗試。有鑑於規則依循在維氏的論述裡比家族相似性概念更具基礎性與系統性，本文將聚焦於布洛爾與林區的著名爭論，透過庫許的相關討論及引進類詞學語意進路，來重估維氏哲學對科學知識本質的探討所帶來的影響。
Philosophical considerations of the later Wittgenstein have provided important conceptual resources those who claim that scientific knowledge has a social dimension in nature. Kuhn’s appeal to the notion of family resemblance in the support of his idea of paradigm, Bloor’s and Lynch’s divergent interpretations of what rule-following involves are among some of the representatives taking this approach. In view of the fact that Wittgenstein’s discussions of rule-following are more basic and systematic than those of family resemblance, this paper will focus on the noted “Bloor-Lynch debate”. Aided by Kusch’s related discussions on this issue and by the considerations of a generic semantic analysis offered by Leslie and Cheng, this paper aims to re-evaluate the impacts brought about by the later Wittgenstein’s philosophy to the inquiry concerning the nature of scientific knowledge.
期刊論文
1.Hacking, Ian(20081000)。Comments and Replies。科技、醫療與社會，7，265-294。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Wynn, K.(1990)。Children's understanding of counting。Cognition，36(2)，155-193。  new window
3.Boghossian, P.(1989)。The Rule-Following Considerations。Mind，98，507-549。  new window
4.Bloor, David(1973)。Wittgenstein and Mannheim on the Sociology of Mathematics。Studies in History and Philosophy of Science，4(2)，173-191。  new window
5.Cheng, Kai-Yuan(2011)。A New Look at the Problem of Rule-Following。Philosophical Studies，155，1-21。  new window
6.Dehaene, S.、Spelke, E.、Stanescu, R.、Pinel, P.、Tsivkin, S.(1999)。Sources of Mathematical Thinking: Behavioral and Brain-Imaging Evidence。Science，284(5416)，970-974。  new window
7.Hattiangadi, Anandi(2003)。Making it Implicit: Brandom on Rule-Following。Philosophy and Phenomenological Research，66(2)。  new window
8.Hindriks, Frank A.(2004)。A Modest Solution to the Problem of Rule-Following。Philosophical Studies，121，65-98。  new window
9.Hoffman, Paul(1985)。Kripke on Private Language。Philosophical Studies，47(1)，23-28。  new window
10.Kusch, Martin(2004)。Rule-Scepticism and the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge: The Bloor-Lynch Debate Revisited。Social Studies of Science，34(4)，571-591。  new window
11.Kusch, Martin(2004)。Reply to My Critics。Social Studies of Science，34(4)，615-620。  new window
12.Leslie, Sarah(2007)。Generics and the Structure of the mind。Philosophical Perspectives，21(1)，375-403。  new window
13.Leslie, Sarah-Jane(2008)。Generics: Cognition and Acquisition。The Philosophical Review，117(1)，1-47。  new window
14.Li, Zheng-Feng、Hwang, Ruey-Chyi、Huang, Chih-Tung(2010)。Going Strong or Go Home: An Interview with David Bloor。East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal，4，419-432。new window  new window
15.Malcolm, Norman(1989)。Wittgenstein on Language and Rules。Philosophy，64，5-28。  new window
16.McDowell, John(1992)。Meaning and Intention in Wittgenstein's later Philosophy。Midwest Studies in Philosophy，17，40-52。  new window
17.Pettit, P.(1990)。The Reality of Rule-Following。Mind，99，1-21。  new window
18.Summerfleld, Donna M.(1990)。On Taking the Rabbit of Rule- Following out of the Hat of Representation。Mind，99，424-432。  new window
19.傅大為(20081000)。Hacking on Kuhn and Foucault。科技、醫療與社會，7，203-214。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.陳瑞麟(20110900)。英美哲學、STS、科技與社會。人文與社會科學簡訊，12(4)，13-24。  延伸查詢new window
21.Rosch, Eleanor H.(1973)。Natural categories。Cognitive Psychology，4(3)，328-350。  new window
22.傅大為(20130400)。定位與多重越界：回首重看STS與科哲。科技、醫療與社會，16，49-102。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.Rouse, Joseph(20110000)。Philosophy of Science and Science Studies in the West: An Unrecognized Convergence。East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal，5(1)，11-26。new window  new window
24.Blackbum, S.(1984)。The Individual Strikes Back。Syntheses，58，281-301。  new window
25.Rosch, Eleanor(1975)。Cognitive representation of semantic categories。Journal of Experimental Psychology: General，104(3)，192-233。  new window
26.McDowell, J.(1984)。Wittgenstein on Following a Rule。Synthese，58，325-363。  new window
學位論文
1.Cheng, Kai(2002)。Solving Kripke/Wittgenstein’s Rule-Following Paradox(博士論文)。City University of New York, Graduate Center。  new window
圖書
1.Lynch, Michael(1993)。Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action: Ethnomethodology and Social Studies of Science。Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Churchland, P. M.(1984)。Matter and Consciousness。Cambridge, Massachusetts：The MIT Press。  new window
3.Bloor, David(1997)。Wittgenstein, Rules and Institutions。London：Routledge。  new window
4.Kuhn, Thomas S.、程樹德、傅大為、王道還、錢永祥(2000)。科學革命的結構。臺北：遠流出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Sismondo, Sergio、林宗德(2007)。科學與技術硏究導論。台北：群學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.Baker, Gordon P.、Hacker, Peter Michael Stephan(2009)。Wittgenstein, Rules, Grammar and Necessity。Oxford：Blackwell。  new window
7.Bloor, David(1976)。Knowledge and Social Image。London：Routledge and Kegan Paul。  new window
8.Bloor, David(1983)。Wittgenstein: A Social Theory of Knowledge。New York：Columbia University Press。  new window
9.Dehaene, Stanislas(1997)。The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics。Oxford University Press。  new window
10.Kripke, Saul A.(1982)。Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language: An Elementary Exposition。Oxford：Blackwell。  new window
11.Kusch, Martin(2006)。A Sceptical Guide to Meaning and Rules: Defending Kripke's Wittgenstein。McGill-Queen's University Press。  new window
12.McGinn, C.(1984)。Wittgenstein on meaning。Oxford：Basil Blackwell。  new window
13.Pettit, P.(1993)。The Common Mind: An essay on Politics, Psychology, and Society。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
14.Sismondo, Sergio(2009)。An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies。Cambridge：University Press。  new window
15.Shanker, Stuart G.(1987)。Wittgenstein and the Turning-Point in the Philosophy of Mathematics。Albany：SUNY Press。  new window
16.Wittgenstein, Ludwig(1967)。Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics。Oxford：Blackwell。  new window
17.Kuhn, Thomas S.(2000)。The road since structure。Chicago：University of Chicago Press。  new window
18.Barnes, Barry(1982)。T. S. Kuhn and social science。London：MacMillan Press。  new window
19.Schatzki, T. R.、Cetina, K. K.、von Savigny, E.(2001)。The practice turn in contemporary theory。London：New York, NY：Routledge。  new window
20.Pickering, Andrew(1992)。Science as Practice and Culture。Chicago：University of Chicago Press。  new window
21.Garfinkel, Harold(1967)。Studies in Ethnomethodology。Englewood Cliffs, NJ：Cambridge：Prentice-Hall：Polity Press。  new window
22.Wittgenstein, L.、Anscombe, G. E. M.(1953)。Philosophical Investigations。Oxford, England：New York：Blackwell Publishers：Macmillan。  new window
23.Brandom, Robert B.(1994)。Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment。Harvard University Press。  new window
24.Kuhn, Thomas Samuel(1970)。The Structure of Scientific Revolutions。University of Chicago Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.陳瑞麟(2012)。維根斯坦與科學知識的社會學。科技與社會。台北：群學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Garfinkel, Harold、Sacks, Harvey(1970)。On Formal Structures of Practical Actions。Theoretical Sociology。New York, NY：Appleton-Century-Crofts Press。  new window
3.Lynch, Michael(1992)。Extending Wittgenstein: The Pivotal Move from Epistemology to the Sociology of Science。Science as Practice and Culture。The University of Chicago Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：755（臺灣：700，外國：55） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1931025 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67729977
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上